Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Sony unveils PS3-exclusive MAG News

PlayStation 3 News by Robert Purchese

15 July, 2008

Sony has unveiled MAG, an enormous action game exclusive to PS3 that boasts 256-player online battles.

The name means Massive Action Game, in case you were in any doubt, and SOCOM outfit Zipper Interactive is the studio behind it.

Lead designer Andy Beaudoin took to the E3 conference stage to fill us in, and revealed that each side will be broken down into eight-player squads led by those who had previously proven themselves.

There will be a character advancement trees to climb and you can fine-tune your soldier to fit your style. Eventually you will rank up and assume more responsibility in your throng.

The idea is to combine large-scale battles with the intimacy of squad combat.

All of this was illustrated in what appeared to be a CG trailer, which showed huge armies and multiple views of the action: commander view, top-down view - presumably depending on what role you take.

We'll hopefully have that for you soon.

MAG is due out sometime in 2009, or "beyond holiday season", as Sony boss Jack Tretton put it.

Advertisement

Are you excited about MAG (Massive Action Game) on PlayStation 3?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-31 of 31 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
hammerstein07
15/07/08 @ 20:36
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Looked like CG, that doesn't show us anything.

The proof of the pudding ... as the saying goes
Edited 1 times, most recently on 15/07/08 @ 21:36
Abscido
15/07/08 @ 20:38
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Truly, truly uninspiring.

Games conventions ain't what they used to be!
Edited 1 times, most recently on 15/07/08 @ 21:38
bad09
15/07/08 @ 20:41
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I want to see it playing there's a catch somewhere 256 players???!!!!
the_dudefather
15/07/08 @ 20:41
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
concept seemed pretty cool, looks like its a good way off though
malmer
15/07/08 @ 20:47
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
CG-trailer.

Release probably in 2010. Might make late 2009, but probably not.

And I bet if there is an coordinated effort to move all those 256 players into the same area of the map it will not work. The game will probably put up some invisible walls or have some other mechanic that prevents it from being massive in one small locale.
liverpoolfc
15/07/08 @ 20:48
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
NOW THATS WHAT IM TALKING ABOUT
stevencole7
15/07/08 @ 20:51
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Beats Gears 5 v 5 action......
ruttyboy
15/07/08 @ 20:51
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I didn't see any 'huge armies' in the trailer 0_o

Oh and for those who are wondering how this will work, it will be 8v8 battles a la COD4 (sounds like they've copied the class thing from there too) with either a meta game over the top or pitching the survivors against each other in successive rounds.
tonynibbles
15/07/08 @ 20:52
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sorry, but this sounds fucking AMAZING!

Not since Planetside has a large scale battlefield game been announced. 256 players in a war zone. And from
the people who made SOCOM no less (the biggest online console game for years, before XBL too).

Very pleased that someone has announced a game like this and looking forwrd to seeing how this turns out.
hammerstein07
15/07/08 @ 20:52
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Microsoft have unveiled some research technology lately that copes with introducing massive numbers of players in an online world. They demoed it with Quake 3, so I don't think it's impossible to have 256 players on screen at once, assuming the actual packets flying around are of a manageable size for the hardware.
Widge
15/07/08 @ 20:52
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@rutty

is that assumption not fact by any chance?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 15/07/08 @ 21:52
ruttyboy
15/07/08 @ 20:54
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think it's a fair assumption, otherwise the 8 player squad thing is pretty pointless.
Muddtallica
15/07/08 @ 21:00
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
They must have spent months devising that title.
Dreddnaught
15/07/08 @ 21:15
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Was hoping for 257 players ......

Oh well
Edited 1 times, most recently on 15/07/08 @ 22:16
Xerx3s
15/07/08 @ 21:20
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"I want to see it playing there's a catch somewhere 256 players???!!!! "

It's not that hard to do, it's just a matter of the right tech and coding. Making it fun and balanced, now that is the hard thing and where many fail.
JediMasterMalik
15/07/08 @ 21:28
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Looks like it'll be really good, the team have a good record with online games. Shame they only showed CGI though.
malmer
15/07/08 @ 21:33
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Only possible on the PS3" = BS.
You don't need PSUs for that. You need clever partiioning of your gamespace and good ways to send data over a network.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 15/07/08 @ 22:34
bad09
15/07/08 @ 21:34
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ Xerx3s

Hopefully! I dunno CGI no gameplay, I'll believe it when I see it. I do hope it delivers on it's promise (and it's good!) sounds like great fun!
SeesThroughAll
15/07/08 @ 21:36
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Game conventions have changed.

ID-tagged companies bring ID-tagged games, made by ID-tagged developers. Game conventions have changed. Content control, press control, exclusivity control... He who controls the press controls the content, controls History.

Game conventions have changed.
bad09
15/07/08 @ 21:38
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Very good SeesThroughAll I like! :)
FenderMaster
15/07/08 @ 22:59
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
awesome SeesThroughAll!!
Teamallstar
15/07/08 @ 23:49
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This makes me laugh so much. Sony announce game that is guaranteed to cure cancer, solve worldwide hunger and poverty and will eradite all wars... Due for release in 2009 or at some point in the not too distant future... well unless it is delayed by 6 months and then another, and then strangely cancelled at the last minute...

How desperate are they getting...
mkreku
16/07/08 @ 00:00
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Does anyone remember the Joint Operations games? How many players did they manage online? 150? I remember seeing a shitload of people rushing me over a hill once at least.. It was awesome :)
Execta
16/07/08 @ 08:00
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sounds amazing. A great new exclusive game for PS3 system. And PS3 always needs more shooters. It only haves upcoming Resistance 2 and Killzone 2. Resistance: Fall of Man was pretty good too but not enough. Hopefully MAG will be great. Looking up to this.
FixedInfinity
16/07/08 @ 08:16
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@mkreku
Yep, Joint Operations was an amazing game!
Been searching for the last few years to find a game that gets close to just how excellent that was to play!
Widge
16/07/08 @ 08:23
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Teamallstar.... 17 posts of gash and counting...
zuljin
16/07/08 @ 10:02
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ruttyboy
"I think it's a fair assumption, otherwise the 8 player squad thing is pretty pointless."

I take it you haven't played Bad Company then. 24 players online in squads of 4 and works a treat. How bout we wait until we see some gameplay until we make assumptions.
themorganator
16/07/08 @ 12:26
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@stevencole7

"Beats Gears 5 v 5 action......"

err, when I see this in action, that may be true. Until that time, this is just typical Sony PR as far as I'm concerned - no substance, just concept.
themorganator
16/07/08 @ 12:28
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Widge

Come on mate, why don't you pop your 1000-post cherry with more blinded fanboy twaddle.

Come on,.. you can do it.

idiot.
Chufty
16/07/08 @ 13:55
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It was, in fact, Sony who made Planetside, where 1000 players in a battle at once was about the norm. So don't all be so skeptical.

It's just consoles catching up with PCs a decade late again.
rhinoxious
16/07/08 @ 15:27
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sounds good, but until my real-world friends/family buy PS3s, I'm not going to play this over something on 360.

Games important.
Friends more so.

Comments: 1-31 of 31 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery