Silent Hunter 5 Review

Das booted off the server.

Version tested: PC

As usual for this World War II u-boat sim series, your first task in Silent Hunter 5 is going into the options and filling out a long checkbox questionnaire while the game holds a protractor and set square up to your masculinity.

"Realistic repair times?" Check. "Limited compressed air?" Check. "Manual targeting?" Uh, maybe not. "No external view?" Check. Meanwhile the game updates a judgemental "realism" percentage at the bottom of the screen. Once again a "Sexual tension as men rub past one another in corridors" checkbox is conspicuous by its absence, and once again I ended up with a history-tastic 70 per cent.

I also began to get excited. Again. I really do like this series. For anyone who hasn't played them, Silent Hunter games are capable of great things. Riffing off the fact that subs in World War II often acted as independent vessels, Silent Hunter gives you your own ship with your own crew and your own mission, and in simply allowing you to prowl the oceans like some phallic sea monster it ends up providing both incredible freedom and an overwhelmingly atmospheric vision of what life was like for all those sailors in WWII.

Which is to say life was basically the worst thing. The only thing more horrible than successfully torpedoing four ships and watching them catch fire and sink out in the freezing, inky wetness a thousand miles from anywhere is being on the other side of that coin, in a hunted sub.

'Silent Hunter 5' Screenshot 1

I want to mark this game up for giving you a First Officer with an eye-patch. My heart's saying no, but my body's telling me yes.

The Silent Hunter games have always excelled at this. You get to wield this awesome power and send 20,000 tons of cargo to the bottom of the ocean with each successful torpedo salvo, but there's also the terror of being sighted, of the emergency dive, of your crew whispering to one another so the enemy hydrophones don't pick you up. And then that haunting conclusion: the depth charges, the flickering lighting, the spraying valves, the God-groan of your penile vessel being warped by unknowable pressure.

This has always been an unforgiving series. But what I didn't know, clicking through those realism checkboxes in Silent Hunter 5, is that this game comes with way more little difficulties than the ones you can chose. Silent Hunter 3 was a buggy game at release, Silent Hunter 4 more so. But this is something else. I cannot believe they shouldered this game out the door.

Let's start with it being a chubby system hog. This is the first game I've seen my 2.4GHz quad-core with 6GB RAM and a Radeon X1900 struggle with, even on reasonable settings. Running the game at the high speeds required to travel large distances, the frame-rate often falls into unbearable choppiness. So, a taxing simulation of the North Sea in more ways than one.

Another early problem is the game's tutorial, or lack of one. The way the game starts you off as a First Officer doing a Captain's bidding is the smartest introduction this series has ever had, so it's a bit surprising when your schoolin' ends after the game's done nothing but make you fire some torpedoes at stationary merchant vessels and dock in a port. Nothing on emergency manoeuvres, your deck guns, hunting tactics, logistics or your crew, and don't think you'll learn any of this stuff in the manual, which is a flimsy bare cupboard of a thing.

That the crew receive zero attention here is especially odd since they've gotten some new features. As well as having to manage their morale as usual, your crew now have stats and even special powers you upgrade with "promotion points".

You can even upgrade your ship's mess officer to unlock his ability to make morale-boosting Special Food, or chat to your men about their about their wives, children, the boat, the war, even their novel. Throughout the campaign your men receive new (if brief) lines of dialogue, and their continued growth as characters is a nice reward for your continued survival.

Yes, that's right, there's a campaign now. Rather than picking a submarine and a year and floating off to create your own story, the game now features a single sub and has you commanding it through a branching path of missions, each made up of many patrols.

Sadly though it's very limited. You command a team of fixed personalities, which means that nobody on your ship can get injured or die, and this is hardly ideal for a simulation, or any game which sells itself on being dramatic. Console fans and Silent Hunter fans probably don't overlap too much, but the example set by Valkyria Chronicles on PS3 was better, proving that when characters with names, histories, traits and voice actors die due to your actions, you feel it.

'Silent Hunter 5' Screenshot 2

Pop! This shot's from when I encountered eight unarmed merchant vessels and sunk them all with hundreds of deck gun rounds over the course of 25 minutes. Guilt and boredom, together at last.

A bigger issue is that Silent Hunter 5 players can look forward to a spectacular first mission set in 1939, which takes some five tired hours to complete and sees you sinking dozens of merchant vessels around a poorly defended England before you can proceed to the more hostile waters of 1940 onwards.

The final serious new feature is what Ubisoft describe as your u-boat becoming a "Living Space", wherein more of your ship than ever is available to wander around (not the entire thing, still), and lots of your orders are issued directly to crew members by clicking on them and then selecting various options.

It's pretty and atmospheric, but between this new need for you to go pottering around your boat, that grubby frame-rate and the revised UI being hugely clunky, running your ship can become very trying indeed. Imagine controlling a Captain with two peglegs who's trying to maintain his dignity while an important part of his job is still climbing ladders. Imagine him squinting at his cramped ship through tear-glossed eyes. That's Silent Hunter 5.

But all of these missteps pale in comparison to how unfinished this game is. Any notes I take while reviewing a game tend to be of the angry variety; when I'm having fun I don't often stop to jot things down. Thanks to Silent Hunter 5 the room I'm writing in now looks like Russell Crowe's shed from A Beautiful Mind. I'm just going to go ahead and read some of what I've written on the wall, floor and ceiling:

Rudder control is broken. Hull integrity dropped to 81 per cent while I was circumnavigating Denmark. WHY IS MY CREW'S MORALE ZERO. Why will no-one man the deck gun? Why do I have to man the deck gun? Why can I man and fire the deck gun in waves so fierce that I'm underwater most of the time? Realism options revert to defaults each time you start the game?! Changing resolution causes game to run in window on monitor. What are the blue health bars? What does this button do? Why is nobody chasing me?

As was the case with Silent Hunter 3 and 4, it's likely that between Ubisoft and the boys at Subsim.com (who've already released a glut of mods which, among other things, disable Silent Hunter 5's currently broken morale system) Silent Hunter 5 will be patched from the leaking, barnacle-coated wreck that it is now to comparative perfection by autumn, but right here and now it's simply not good enough.

On my first day with Silent Hunter 5 I spent 40 minutes trying to figure out how to get my crew to man a deck gun and never got further than making an officer scream "MAN THE DECK GUN" with no result.

Today I sank a tanker that a Destroyer was escorting and was denied the breathtaking chase I've come to expect from the series when the warship slunk off dejectedly. It couldn't have given up the fight quicker if my sub had sprouted legs and wriggled onshore like a caterpillar.

'Silent Hunter 5' Screenshot 3

Man the deck gun! MAN THE DECK GUN! ...man the deck gun? MAN THE DECK GUN!

Why on earth was this game rushed? Were they trying to hit the shelves before all those high-profile submarine simulators under development at BioWare and Infinity Ward came out or something? And I'm playing version 1.1.5! What was SH5 like before they patched it several times?

As a game, Silent Hunter 5 fails because the bugs and UI render it a chore. As a simulation, it fails because the bugs and UI render it ridiculous and incomplete. As a product, it's just overwhelming disrespectful to this long running series' fans. And finally, as one of the first games to receive Ubisoft's new copy protection, it's an embarrassment.

In case you're not aware (or at least not actively part of the PC gaming community that's been frothing with rage about this), Silent Hunter 5 requires you to be connected to the internet at all times so that Ubisoft's launcher program can stay connected to the game's authentication servers. Without internet access the game won't begin, and if your internet connection drops while you're playing then it saves your game and quits itself.

Now, this works the other way- if Ubisoft's authentication servers are down, you can't play your game. Staggeringly for a company introducing something like this, this Sunday and Monday Ubisoft's servers were in fact brought down, and myself and many others were left with a game we couldn't play. There's no way of knowing whether this was just the growing pains of a new service, but it's worth remembering all the same, especially so when a patched Silent Hunter 4 can be found cheaper and is, for now, the better game.

5 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (55) Latest comment 1 year ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • ZuluHero #1 2 years ago

    It’s nice to see reviews taking the horrendous DRM into account. I hope it sends a clear message to Ubisoft. If you're going to instil such draconian DRM, be prepared for it to suffer at review.
  • M4RV #2 2 years ago

    ^ ^ ^ ^

    You mean sales shirley.
  • Fitzmogwai #3 2 years ago

    Ouch. I wasn't going to buy this because of the DRM anyway, but I don't think I'll buy it even if that gets patched out. Back to SH3 and the Grey Wolves mod then.
  • TriggerHippie #4 2 years ago

    Ubi soft brings a whole new meaning to Silent Service.
  • spliffhead #5 2 years ago

    Of all the games that people pirate I'm sure a specialised Submarine Sim is near the bottom of the list?

    Oh well if it's fixed by Autumn I'll pick up a "classics" version for £9.99 that has no DRM ;) (crosses fingers)
  • sirtacos #6 2 years ago

    Article's as buggy as the game it reviews. May want to look over a few sentences again. Aside from that, well-written review.
    Shame about the game though. I liked Silent Hunter 3 and was thinking of picking this one up. Maybe I will when it's fixed and they've dropped DRM.
    Edited by 2 at 10/03/10 @ 15:18
  • schnide #7 2 years ago

    Ouch - torpedoed.

    I've never played a Silent Hunter game before and was actually interested enough to read the review and consider it.. but I *think* I might pass now.
  • Raz76 #8 2 years ago

    I know it's mostly pointless to discuss scoring but surely a game this broken deserves a lower score than "average". Well written review though.
    Edited by 1 at 10/03/10 @ 14:20
  • JohnnyWashnGo #9 2 years ago

    'chubby system hog'

    Sounds tasty. Serve it with some rocket and wasabi mayo and we are good to go.
  • bauhaus #10 2 years ago

    I was looking forward to this.

    I've hyped myself up into a right submarine frenzy as well, what can I do now??
  • UncleLou #11 2 years ago

    @schnide - well, get Silent Hunter IV, as the article recommends. It's incredibly pretty, cheap as chips, hasn't the "always online" DRM, and is patched. :)

    As for SHV: no thanks. Once it's cheap, patched, and the DRM has been removed or replaced by a less annoying one, I'll reconsider.
  • WrongShui #12 2 years ago

    Play SH3 schnide, cheap and awesome.

    Think I'll wait till this is a tenner.
  • ignatiusjreilly #13 2 years ago

    I think it must be a mistake in the text - it seems unlikely as a PC games reviewer he'd pair a quad core/6GB RAM system with a four year old graphics card...
  • bad09 #14 2 years ago

  • matrim83 #15 2 years ago

    Nice of you guys to mention the horrible, horrible DRM. I still would have bought it despite all of its flaws but there is no way in hell I am touching that DRM.

    Also, are times tough at EG? Did you guys spend all the spare cash on coke and hookers again? We could chip in to get you guys a used 4850 or something. :p
  • Quinns #16 2 years ago

    @Bloodkult, retrend:

    Yeah, my video card blows. You're right. My point with that paragraph is that this is still the first game I've played which my system struggles with. Not Crysis, not Arma2, this.
  • Quinns #17 2 years ago

    @matrim83

    If you posted me a 4850 I'd only eBay it to buy more hookers and coke :(
  • ignatiusjreilly #18 2 years ago

    OK, the Quinns donation drive starts here.

    edit: hmm, maybe not such a great idea after reading the above...
    Edited by 1 at 10/03/10 @ 14:47
  • jellyhead #19 2 years ago

    It's a shame as i enjoyed SH3 & 4 buggy though they were but when Ubisoft essentially abandoned SH4 and with it written in such a way as to limit modding quite severely i began to have doubts about their real commitment to the series.
    I'll wait for patches before buying it even though the modding community say they'll be able to make a lot of changes and tweaks it's up to Ubisoft to patch the game so it works properly.

    I really want to play this game as the videos and stills i've seen look spectacular and there's nothing quite so atmospheric as hunting freighters in the middle of a pack of destroyers. Heart in mouth stuff.

    Epic game series being ruined by bugs and spectacularly badly thought out DRM. I despair.
  • dbranchevans #20 2 years ago

    To be fair to Quinns as well these never used to be all that resource hungry, would be the kind of thing that I'd buy for my Dad so hearing that it chugs on that kind of system is actually pretty useful to know. It also saves me from the horror of seeing all realism set to 100% and the inevitable plume of smoke as he prangs it coming out of the harbour...
  • Grom #21 2 years ago

    "Why on earth was this game rushed?"

    Check the date - it's March 10th and the financial year ends in a couple of weeks. Releasing this now means Ubi can write off the development costs this year rather than next, which is great for them especially if next year looks tough and this was expected to do poorly...
  • Darren #22 2 years ago

    The game sounds sub-par to me so it's fitting that it's sullied further by UbiSoft's awful new DRM system. Let's hope it sinks without a trace...

    Shame about Assassin's Creed II though, that game deserved so much better. If I was one of the developers then I'd be quietly crying into my cup of tea about now, knowing that my publisher had effectively crippled the game for the people they made it for and to enjoy.
  • ignatiusjreilly #23 2 years ago

    @Bloodkult

    I think Quinns is a freelancer (like I would be if I had the balls), so EG don't supply his equipment.
  • sneetch #24 2 years ago

    Silent Hunter 4, eh? Not a bad idea review guy!
  • space_ace #25 2 years ago

    maybe during the war, subs required internet connection at all times? then this could be a misunderstood masterpiece of simulation :)
  • Hydrogene #26 2 years ago

    Good and honest review. I think I'll stick to SHIV, then...
  • Normski #27 2 years ago

    @Hydrogene

    You'll stick to stabbing people in prison with a makeshift knife? To each his own
  • darleysam #28 2 years ago

    From the review, this sounds like a complete shambles of a game from start to finish. So now I'm puzzled at how it earned a score that translates as 'average'? I know I sound like That Guy, but it just seems rather inconsistent.

    This is from the perspective of someone who's never played a SH game, nor had any real interest in the series.
  • thisisatempaccount #29 2 years ago

    "the God-groan of your penile vessel being warped by unknowable pressure"

    Um. Did anyone else have to adjust their sitting position after reading this?

    Just me then?
  • UncleLou #30 2 years ago

    So now I'm puzzled at how it earned a score that translates as 'average'?

    If you only take into account EG's scores, I'd say 5 is most likely below average. If you take into account the bigger picture, with all dross that gets released but not reviewed, it probably really is at least an average game. Either way makes sense. ;)
  • mingster #31 2 years ago

    Tagline is a classic.
  • dingo75 #32 2 years ago

    @spliffhead:

    Of all the games that people pirate I'm sure a specialised Submarine Sim is near the bottom of the list?

    In fact there is a crack out already.
    People are debating whether it works 100% or not though.

    Point is: Every game will be cracked regardless how small or big it is.

    The question is whether the people interested in the genre would pirate it or buy it without this DRM.
    I tend to say they would buy since they want to support this niche genre.

    But then again I'm not a professional Ubi money hat that probably knows way better than me.
  • Blackthorned #33 2 years ago

    I enjoyed that pun.
  • oceanclub #34 2 years ago

    For those of us who never touched a sub sim before, which of the previous SH is the best?

    P.
  • QotSAfan #35 2 years ago

    "Man the deck gun! MAN THE DECK GUN! ...man the deck gun? MAN THE DECK GUN!"

    GLOL!
  • Diogo_Ribeiro #36 2 years ago

    People complaining about Quinns' system are forgetting that even modern games like Mass Effect 2 and Stalker: Call of Prierpanevercanspellit scale very nicely to a "four year old" card. This hog of a game is poorly optimized, plain and simple, specially since its intended user base is one who plays simulators for the game, not its graphics.
    Edited by 1 at 10/03/10 @ 17:28
  • Raz76 #37 2 years ago

    "If you only take into account EG's scores, I'd say 5 is most likely below average. "

    According to their scoring system: "5 = average".
  • Videogamer. #38 2 years ago

    Man, I feel for that peg-legged Captain - tough haul. :)

    Eurogamer, you make the Internet a better place.

    Cheers. :)
  • harhol #39 2 years ago

    From the review, this sounds like a complete shambles of a game from start to finish. So now I'm puzzled at how it earned a score that translates as 'average'? I know I sound like That Guy, but it just seems rather inconsistent.

    I think someone needs to update that scoring policy. The average score on the first page of PC reviews (dating back to March 2009) is almost 7.5.
  • Red-Moose #40 2 years ago

    @darleysam: yes it would make sense to get a score of around 3/10 for SH5. But, EG does follow the 7/10 = average rule. Amiga Power used to be strict on 5/10 = average, which causes a lot of problems, notably by Team 17. Publishers can quote average games as being 70% + games if totally uninteresting.

    I would like a return to the ACE system out of 1000 and commenting on graphics, sound, gameplay, etc., .like the old days.

    Well done for commenting on the DRM in the review.
    Edited by 1 at 10/03/10 @ 18:21
  • BurningR #41 2 years ago

    Thanks for taking the insane DRM into account. When I buy a game, it's *mine* - I am not borrowing it from Ubisoft. Who do they think they are?
  • Vixremento #42 2 years ago

    Agreed BurningR.

    Tis a shame they took this route - Ubi won't see a game purchase from me agian if they keep this up (my last Prince of persia game really sucked and I'll be damned if I'm gonna pay for one that's infested with this DRM junk).

    To be honest the console versions are looking more viable now - I was hoping that I could at least buy the PC versions (because they are cheaper and I spend more time in front of my PC) but now it looks like it'll have to be PS3 all the way. Anyway - let's all cheer for Red Dead Redemption...coming soon!! Til then Ubi can kiss my big fat azz.
  • DoKtoR #43 2 years ago

    Ooo, next film idea for Mr Moore; "Ubisoft's Awesome Copy Protection Measures & The Gaming Public: A Love Story".
  • Bitkari #44 2 years ago

    Play SH3 schnide, cheap and awesome.

    Agreed. Great game, good value, no arsing around.
  • Tehren #45 2 years ago

    Cock puns ahoy in that there review. Arrr!
  • mkreku #46 2 years ago

    Let me just add that the DRM is the only reason why I've decided I won't be buying Assassin's Creed 2 for the PC. First time ever for me that I've decided not to get a game I want because of DRM. I just feel like they've finally crossed the border to the unacceptable.

    I hope AC2 is not cracked AND that it sells poorly. Maybe then Ubisoft will realize that what's killing PC gaming isn't piracy.
  • loopholezero #47 2 years ago

    @mkreku: nah, they'll never admit that the cause of less sales on pc might be that their games aren't very good (coupled with pc gamers being less easily satisfied with mediocre games) or that their drm policies aren't too good either.
    they'll deem the majority of pc gamers as cheapskates who'd rather wait a year for a crack than buy a game and they'll stop porting their console games over to the pc

    the only downside to this would be that you'd need a console for beyond good and evil 2.
  • UBOATMAN #48 2 years ago

    [link url=http://www.silenthuntermods.com/forum/index.php?topic =403.0
    ]http://ww w.silenthuntermods.com/forum/in...[/link]

    HA HA HA HA HA

    WHAT A CLASS!!! Working solution without any cracks , how to progress game without net connection HA HA HA

    THIS GUY NEED A LOT OF BEER from us all!
    It works like a charm!

    DRM TEAM SHOULD BE FIRED
    Edited by 2 at 10/03/10 @ 21:59
  • harhol #49 2 years ago

    @mkreku: You aren't missing out on much by not playing Assassin's Creed 2. It's the same story all over again: awesome for the first few hours but gets incredibly tedious incredibly fast. Jim Sterling's review on Destructoid, while unnecessarily picky at times, is mostly spot on.
  • thedaveeyres #50 2 years ago

  • mkreku #51 2 years ago

    @harhol: Yes, but.. unfortunately, I'm one of the few that never thought the repetitiveness of the first game was grating. I enjoyed it from beginning to end. I would probably enjoy the sequel too, if Ubisoft would let me.
  • AlexIsNotHome #52 2 years ago

    You guys realize how the DRM works, right? In that it actually runs code on the Ubi servers. It is not just pulling data. So it is actually, completely impossible to break without removing the elements of the game which the code is trying to run on the server - there are no working pirated versions of Assassin's Creed 2 or this game out there right now, no matter what people may tell you...
  • bszom #53 2 years ago

    LOL. First of all - this is one of the funniest reviews I've read in a long time. Well done.

    I wanted to drop a few lines about my experience with SH5. I'm not really a sim fan but occasionally I will play one for as long as it keeps me entertained. I installed the 1.02 patch thinking it would rid me of most of the mentioned bugs. After playing the intro mission I cruised back to Kiel at 1024x normal game speed, safe under the knowledge that the "Journey Mode" had been activated. Journey mode promises not to slow down the game unless an important event happens (sighting an enemy etc.). As I watched my sub enter the Kiel harbour I heard about 15s of a crunching noise, which I can only assume was meant to imitate the noise a ship hitting something hard would make. "Crap, I ran aground", I thought. I was taken from map-mode through a series of random underwater in-game cutscenes, none of which showed anything besides seabed and water, followed by a bird's eye view of the surroundings, but not showing my sub. Then came the mission complete screen. I was happy to have completed the first mission despite the clunky interface. Then came, and this is no joke, the mission failed screen. It clearly showed that I had rammed my sub straight into the side of a German destroyer. Apparently "Journey Mode" does not deem being on a collision course with a destroyer to be an important event. FML.

    I will still try it again though, even if only for the lulz.
  • steve_2010 #54 1 year ago

    Can any one help me past first stage all I get is dock at Kiel I go there and then nothing else happens I go right inside park under to achor, click the buttons refit etc and thats as far as I can get ether im thick or missing somthing HELP
  • AdityaMookerjee #55 1 year ago

    The best simulation of world war 2, along with IL-2 Sturmovic. is Silent Hunters 4, Wolves of the Pacific. What one does is one challenges oneself, with the game. One finds out whether the crew is able to keep a certain radius, with the enemy ship, when one draws a circle around the enemy ship, with a compass, on the map. Having read the manual, the game seems like a breeze, with all the difficulties on. I want the U-Boat war expansion, but do not want to use any credit card. I am certainly not disappointed with SH5, knowing that Ubisoft will do better in the future, with the next SH. How Ubisoft comes out with these gems, is beyond my imagination. I give Ubisoft the title of the game developer who makes the best WW2 genre simulations. I want a simulation of the Tiger Tank, or any German tank of WW2 from Ubisoft. If anyone can do it, then they can.