Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Shadowrun Review

Xbox 360 PC Review by Kieron Gillen

1 June, 2007

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

My bank manager's frowning. Were I smart, I could have spun this out for two reviews and doubled my profits. Instead, I'm doing it for one for the simple fact that this dual PC/Xbox 360 release is the same. In fact, I could probably sum up the major differences in one paragraph. Let's give it a shot.

Basically none.

Winner!

Shadowrun is based on the old-skool FASA pen-and-paper role-playing game. It's already come to ["the wonderful world of videogames" - Increasingly-Despairing-For-His-Writers-Ed] in the form of the 16-bit RPG which remains a much-loved period classic. True fans of either are going to be disappointed. This is a traditional-sized team-based Counter-Strike-derived shooter with an extremely heavy online bent and a mass of interesting twists, with the mechanics justified by the Shadowrun setting of Fantasy meets Cyberpunk. In other words, as well as shooting people with guns like you would in Counter-strike, you get to spend your ill-gotten gains on cybernetics ("tech") and magic ("magic").

(To be honest, I'm fine with the abandonment of its more straight-RPG possibilities - the magic and tech stuff is absolutely great for a more purely mechanic-based shooter, giving the designers and us lots of room to have fun. While SNES Shadowrun was a great game, personally I've never been particularly convinced by Shadowrun's worth as a setting per se, purely for 'orrible Neuromancer purist reasons. Cyberpunk and Elves is just a bloody geeky idea for a real fiction setting. And, yeah, take it to the comments thread, 'Runners. As entertaining as it often is, Shadowrun has bigger problems than not being an RPG.)

The single-player is vestigial, limited to tutorials and botmatches. The real game will take place online - there's no split-screen for either format - across the nine included maps (with three smaller versions also available). Each map has an artfact-capturing mode attached to it (either both teams going for the artifact, or one defending it), or can be turned into Attrition (basically, team deathmatch). Between rounds, players are given money depending on their and their team's performance, which they get to spend on the aforementioned special powers and weapons. Much like Counter-strike. It also shares with the Half-life Mod That Did Really Well, Y'know in having character death leading to sitting out the rest of the round, which adds tension to what you're up to.

Well... it mostly means sitting out the round. In practice, someone with the resurrect ability may get you back on your feet. And it's in this - that is, the special abilities - where Shadowrun absolutely distinguishes itself. It's essentially a brutal marriage of Counter-strike and Guild Wars (i.e. you only get to use a limited number of your powers at any time, so choosing which to apply in combos is the cornerstone of your tactical choices).

'Shadowrun' Screenshot 1

Elves. Molly From Neuromancer would not approve.

The way these abilities can link together is genuinely something, with enough quirks in each ability - and in how they interact - to get really interestingly defined roles. And all the better, as you've thought them up yourself. For example, if you purchase a Katana, as well as being a melee weapon par excellence, if you manage to strike someone unawares from the rear, you can perform a back-stab that'll cause your opponent to swiftly spurt all their insides outside. However, if you marry that to Wired reflexes, as well as a general speed boost, as long as you're not swinging it, you get to deflect a large number of bullets directly shot at you like a cinematic ninja.

While you're able to purchase any number of abilities - and they remain for the rest of the round, unlike weapons which drop to the floor when you're killed - you only have three quick-slots available. This hard-limit is where the Guild Wars-esque tactics come into play. It's not even just what you can afford in terms of cash, and have room for - you also have to worry about the magical energy it takes to power them ("Essence"). Some abilities just require you have enough in the bank, like the teleport which allows you to zip through walls, ceilings, across gaps and generally confuse the living hell out of your opponents. Others require an upkeep. So, for example, summoning a Tree of Life will grey out part of your supply which will be inaccessible until the tree disappears. Throw down enough Strangles - crystalline walls which block passageways, and are ideal for defence or just plain annoying the oppositions - and you'll find you don't have enough to do anything but keep them in existence. That equipping technology like the glider-wings or enhanced vision will also diminish your bar as long as you have them plugged in means that you have to ask serious questions of whether you can afford a certain combination in terms of energy.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Shadowrun on Xbox 360/PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 119 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
myiagros
01/06/07 @ 13:36
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ouch!!

was hopping for more, but expecting about this.
pauleyc
01/06/07 @ 13:43
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's some kind of Troll-playing game.

Nice one.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 01/06/07 @ 14:43
urban
01/06/07 @ 13:44
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
awww maaaannn
Huntcjna
01/06/07 @ 13:45
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I quite like it I would rate it more in 8 country to be honest.
JediMasterMalik
01/06/07 @ 13:46
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Haven't you only had it for a few hours? :p

Shadowrun is TEH DOOMED!!1!

Sadly, this time it's actually true.
Steroyd
01/06/07 @ 13:48
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
At the price the game is on Xbox 360 and the specification as a Vista only game on PC and if you want to play against Xbox 360 people on the PC you have to subscribe to XBL gold, it's got a hell lot going against it.
Huntcjna
01/06/07 @ 13:50
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Admittedly its only had about 6 hours of my time but thats more than Final Fantasy XII has had and I liked that aswell. :P

I think with a nice little EG squad it can be great. Probably a £17.99 purchase for people unsure of the genre though.
superdelphinus
01/06/07 @ 13:51
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"My bank manager's frowning"

PLEASE AMEND
souljacker2000
01/06/07 @ 13:52
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought as much... o well

saves money for forza2
BremXJones
01/06/07 @ 13:54
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Manic: Honestly, as more reasonable price, this could be a dark-horse sleeper hit.

KG
JediMasterMalik
01/06/07 @ 13:54
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@MMUK - What's wrong with what souljacker said exactly?
souljacker2000
01/06/07 @ 13:55
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@mmuk

Sorry u posted urs just before i did..

I did Alevel English im afraid
Dizzy
01/06/07 @ 13:56
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
BTW if you have a gold account on 360 you can use that on PC as well. PC gamers with no Live gold can of course play against PC gamers for free.
Huntcjna
01/06/07 @ 13:56
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think if they had priced it aggresively at under £20/$40 the would have a lot more sales. Rather worryingly had they constructed a decent single player campaign around the world with a storyline about the Lineage war it could even have been a system seller.
rhinoxious
01/06/07 @ 13:59
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Good review but I'm not surprised you're finding it hard to find opponents . . .

Microsoft are idiots for releasing an online shooter during the limited beta period for Halo 3 multiplayer.

I've got a copy of Shadowrun, but I doubt I'll be touching it much till the Beta ends, sometime in the middle of next week?
captainrentboy
01/06/07 @ 13:59
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I had a brief go on the single player side of it in work and I didn't think it was anything special, yes yes I'm aware online is where it's at with this game I just mean the gameplay in general did nothing for me, and the graphics were fooking diabolical, I haven't seen such an ugly 360 game for quite some time.
And the recommended PC specs don't really make sense, they recommend a pretty darned hefty set up yet it still looks like Pig shit.
The Bodybuilder
01/06/07 @ 13:59
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Was anyone expecting more?
souljacker2000
01/06/07 @ 14:00
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Just seems lame without at least a mediocre single player...
DiscoStu
01/06/07 @ 14:00
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
shadowruin huahuahua
Pike
01/06/07 @ 14:01
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't get the Neuromancer reference in the screencap. It's about fifteen years since I read it, but still.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 01/06/07 @ 15:03
SuperBas
01/06/07 @ 14:02
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Vista only? Insta-failure!
JediMasterMalik
01/06/07 @ 14:02
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This would be the perfect candidate for MS to release online like Warhawk, at a reduced price like Warhawk.
BremXJones
01/06/07 @ 14:04
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
MMUK: As I always say, marks only exist as a buyers guide. Which is a shame.

KG
1Dgaf
01/06/07 @ 14:05
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The game is about £30 online. Perhaps this should be taken into account in the review.
Trendyninja
01/06/07 @ 14:06
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I watched the Eurogamer preview of this last night after downloading it from the Live Marketplace.

Eurogamer were practically creaming themselves over this.

So let's say it was £19.99, what WOULD you have scored it then?
Steroyd
01/06/07 @ 14:06
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think if they had priced it aggresively at under £20/$40 the would have a lot more sales.

You know what's sad had this been on the PS3 it'd be a PSN/Blu-ray title for cheaper than you retail price alongside Warhawk, Little Big Planet and Socom: Confrontation.

Oh well MS is hoping that after the Halo 3 beta people will be starving for a multiplayer game any multiplayer game... oh what a coincidence Shadowrun is that type of game.
Lebowski
01/06/07 @ 14:09
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Thanks for the review but I'm still unsure what the USP of this game is.

Do you build / level up your character game-by-game RPG-style?

Or just spend the points you gain during one game session?

JediMasterMalik
01/06/07 @ 14:10
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
One game session I wager. Would be unbalanced otherwise.
andromeda
01/06/07 @ 14:14
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
that troll thing in the last screenie looks ridiculous.
Huntcjna
01/06/07 @ 14:14
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yeah your probably right Steroyd its a good job Sony didn't fuck over the consumer with an extra £200 of hardware premium. I mean had they done that they would have been in no position to judge first party titles pricing stratergy would they?

Seriously if you haven't played it or read the review properly whats the point in talking shite for the sake of it?
menage
01/06/07 @ 14:15
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This probably will find a market on 360, since people are already used to paying loads for games. But I doubt any PC players will be playing this in a month. I hope for PC gamers taht they're not, cause if this Live Gold thing pulls through they will bite themselves in the ass.

Oh, and on the subject. Make Live free. MS can't ever keep this up. It's just a load of crap to enforce a pay policy for online games if the contents already in the bought game. If they have to charge they should deliver more original content. Not crap that the competition does for free.
BremXJones
01/06/07 @ 14:15
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Lebowski: Like Counter-strike, inside each game session you buy stuff which you keep until the end of the level (or lose it, in the case of guns). There's no persistence between levels.

Re: Scores. Probably a 7.

KG
Whizzo
01/06/07 @ 14:17
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Someone should make a Cyberpunk 2020 game Battlefield game set during the Fourth Corporate War; Millitech versus Araska with AV4s flying around in urban environments. Would be awesome. Unfortunately that's never going to happen.
1Dgaf
01/06/07 @ 14:19
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Gillen,

When you reviewed the game were you taking its merits into account at the RRP or at the online price? At the moment it's floating around £33.

Admittedly prices change, but reviewing in a financial vacuum does seem a little odd. (Esp. since Eurogamer have just posted an article linking to an item on play.com.)

Also, I fear that people are going to ignore most of what you've written and look at the score alone. For a game you seemed to like, this is a shame.
BremXJones
01/06/07 @ 14:22
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yeah, but for more reasonably priced games, you get them cheaper than their RRP too.

Hypothetically, two games. One released for forty, which you can get for 32 quid. Another which is thirty which you can get for 22. In real terms of cost, the other is still much cheaper.

KG
JediMasterMalik
01/06/07 @ 14:24
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You simply cannot go by anything other than RRP, people will obviously find fluctuations of the price online and in stores, even second hand, but the RRP also has an effect on how much the title is sold for in these places, a lower RRP means an even lower sale price. Rating it on the RRP as standard only makes sense.

Edit for spelling.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 01/06/07 @ 15:26
1Dgaf
01/06/07 @ 14:26
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've never seen a 360 game go for £30 on release.

At £30 this game is worth it. I've been playing it since 10am, almost solidly.
1Dgaf
01/06/07 @ 14:28
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Fair points, fair points.

But I fear that this game will have been damned by this review, because it took [X] hundred words to get to the concept that: 'It's good fun if you can find it at a good price'.


Steroyd
01/06/07 @ 14:30
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Seriously if you haven't played it or read the review properly whats the point in talking shite for the sake of it?

I'm not talking shite of the game just where it's positioned, Shadowrun is akin to what MS did with the Crackdown Halo 3 Beta, I've been looking at this game a little bit like i do of most other games.

The gameplay could be the best thing since sliced bread, but you aren't paying for a "complete" enough game to justify the price, no?

It's like selling a single XBLA title for a full price retail game it...just...feels...wrong....
BremXJones
01/06/07 @ 14:32
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
To be fair, if anyone actually reads it, most of those X hundred words are positive.

You can only write reviews for people who want to read reviews. People who only want a mark only want to know if they should buy it or not.

And 6/10 really isn't THAT bad a mark, y'know.

KG
Gurgeh
01/06/07 @ 14:32
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"But I fear that this game will have been damned by this review"

Maybe not:

"This review made me make the >< face right off the bat. "It's already come to the PC, in the form of the SNES RPG which remains a much-loved period classic." There are at least 2 things wrong there"

from the Shack (and thats the polite one)
Edited 1 times, most recently on 01/06/07 @ 15:33
Foundry
01/06/07 @ 14:32
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Needs a demo before I even think about buying this, and its about time MS started selling "full" games over Live, and this would appear to be a good candidate.

Being able to buy "full" games over PSN is one thing that is attracting me towards PS3 - and I have very little love for Sony.
1Dgaf
01/06/07 @ 14:35
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh come on. Games reviews are just porno films -- everyone fast forwards to the penetration.

And 6 is above average, yes. But only in a world where an average game isn't normally rated 7. (Not that that's your fault of course.)
Bloodkult
01/06/07 @ 14:35
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Regardless of the game being any good or not, that art style make me want to puke.

Steroyd
01/06/07 @ 14:37
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
technically it's not a "full" game and i think that's what the reviewer is trying to convey.

But yeah I agree MS should buy up steam or copy them or something, XBLA opened the door for the one price doesn't fit all games approach and Sony's taking it one step further.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 01/06/07 @ 15:38
LarryLoxley
01/06/07 @ 14:38
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Fair review. Game is fantastic but just focusing on multiplayer with a full price is counterproductive. Absolutely love the game though. Best FPS I have played for a long long time.
Xerx3s
01/06/07 @ 14:39
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Se lemme get this straight, it's actually a half decent game but the biggest con against it is the price (haven't had time to read the review)? So if I would buy this at 20 €, would it be a good purchase?

I'm a die hard fasa/shadowrun fan if that counts for something.
BremXJones
01/06/07 @ 14:42
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/me FACEPALMS!

KG
disc
01/06/07 @ 14:43
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A 6 is as good as Resistance people and that's the best multiplayer game the PS3 has (not counting Calling All Cars and Warhawk).

;)
Dizzy
01/06/07 @ 14:44
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So as good as Resistance but no Halo? :)

A pity.. a lot of my friends seem to be playing this online so I will probably get it once the Halo 3 beta ends or if I can find it for a good price. I have seen this for 45 euro.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 01/06/07 @ 15:44

Comments: 1-50 of 119 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery