Scene It? Box Office Smash Review

Fingers on Buzz.

Version tested: Xbox 360

Without the benefit of copious downloadable content, quiz games have a finite shelf life. It's just a matter of how long you can play before you run out of questions you've not seen before. The most pressing issue, therefore, is how many times you can expect to play any new quiz game before you start seeing repeated questions.

In the case of Box Office Smash, the answer is less than five. Play more than ten, and you'll be getting serious déjà vu every round.

In many respects, this sequel to last year's buzzer bonanza is a marked improvement. The game moves faster, there are more open rounds where everyone gets a chance to score and there's a greater variety of round types - twenty-one in all. The long-winded banter between rounds has been trimmed, and while the new voiceover is every bit as unfunny as before, it's brief. There's even online play, an extremely welcome addition for film nerds desperate to escape the monotony of thrashing family and friends every time, and a much-needed option following the robust network options in rival quiz goliath, Buzz!, in its PS3 debut.

Although it lacks the option to create your own quiz, Box Office Smash does contain some decent options tucked away in the Custom Game menu. You can set the game to subtract points for incorrect answers, for example. There's also a Continuous Mode designed for party amusement, where the game fires a constant stream of trivia questions at the screen with no interruptions. If you're all on your own, there's a dedicated Solo Mode that uses an escalating multiplier system to create a reasonably compelling high-score game.

'Scene It? Box Office Smash' Screenshot 1

The game is still extremely generous with the gamerpoints. A few hours' play should net you well over 700 of the buggers.

Unlike Buzz, online play is exactly the same as offline, with short and long modes available. As the game shuffles the rounds randomly it also keeps things more interesting during a long session than Buzz's fixed round order. You can't use your Avatar offline, though, which seems very strange. If your console isn't connected to Xbox Live, you can only pick from a pre-rendered Avatar - or ask the game to randomise one for you.

The questions are generally well-chosen, and skew the game in favour of reasonably well-informed film fans. Many of the incorrect multiple-choice answers have been specifically chosen to trip up those taking an educated guess and, as with the previous edition, it draws from a commendably eclectic selection of films across all genres and decades.

There's just no getting away from the repetition, though, and it seems especially obvious alternating between offline and online play, as if the mechanism that tracks the questions you've seen isn't used for Live games. Within four games you get the same clips and questions, and after ten it's almost guaranteed that at least a quarter of the content will be familiar. On one occasion I got the same anagram question twice in the same round during an online game.

It's not just that the questions themselves are repeated, since licensing issues mean that the game's repertoire of clips, images and soundbites is limited by necessity. If you're a fan of films such as Overboard, Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story, Hot Fuzz or Little Miss Sunshine then you'll see plenty from these. I had the same clip from Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid three times, albeit with occasionally different questions, while the same scene from Paper Moon turned up in two successive Xbox Live games. Bearing in mind that this was after ten games, and assuming you're likely to at least play a couple of short games per session, even the most casual player is going to start getting repeated material sooner rather than later.

There are also some very sloppy mistakes, which are just frequent enough to make you wonder whether the game was proofread and fact-checked. Maybe only a tedious movie nerd like me would take umbrage at a question that says Casey Affleck played a cop in Gone Baby Gone (he was a private detective) but most people will be able to spot howling gaffes like "Micheal Douglas" and "Will Farell".

Then there's the question of balance. Bonus points are dished out to the players between rounds, but the game has a weird - and very annoying - habit of rewarding bad players more than good. Numerous times I saw my hard-earned lead chipped away as the game boosted my opponent's score by over 3500 points for achievements like "Slowest Buzzer" and "Most Incorrect Answers". Presumably this is to keep average players in with a fighting chance, but it feels like the wrong way to do it.

'Scene It? Box Office Smash' Screenshot 2

Conspiracy theorists may like to note that a suspicious number of questions relate to movies from Universal, the studio that so doggedly supported HD-DVD.

The same is true of the climactic Final Cut round, which offers four questions and a score multiplier to increase the odds of a last-minute upset. Get lucky with the choice of clip, or get every question right quickly enough, and you can win an extra 20,000 points, more than enough to completely reverse the game in the last minute. For the player who has led in every single round, and only dropped their multiplier after one simple mistake, losing under these circumstances is more than a little unfair. (Yes, that was me and, yes, it still stings).

Still, when it gets things right, this second slice of Scene It is a compelling quiz game, with questions that show a genuine understanding and appreciation of the subject matter and not just a desire to shovel trivia onto a disc. When it gets things wrong, however, the flaws immediately and irrevocably chip away at the game's longevity. Obviously the problems are amplified binging on the game for a review, but even played at a more casual pace there are enough problems to reduce Box Office Smash to an entertaining short-term prospect at best.

6 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (32) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • bad09 #1 3 years ago

    My girlfriend got the first one, we played it all of twice, terrible game and it looks like this one is to from the review (but then I never played the DVD/board games either). I should love these as I'm a serious movie buff but I just can't get into these "quiz show" games.

    / curses Buzz! and all it's casual kind!
  • Zomoniac #2 3 years ago

    I really enjoyed the first one, played it loads. Played this a couple of times last night, got the Hot Fuzz clip in both my first two games, and had a repeat question in another round. Plus the avatars are just fucking irritating. It's just far less enjoyable than the first. And I lost a game by about 50 points because my other half was given a 5,000 or so point bonus for being shit. They just seem to have taken a decent format and fucked it up.
  • stuarty_2003 #3 3 years ago

    I prefer this one to the last one, purely because the annoying tw@ from the last one has been taken out the pasture and shot.

    In saying that, getting points for being cock is unfair.
  • 3william56 #4 3 years ago

    A quiz game with hardly any questions, that makes the person who answers the least questions right the winner. 6/10.

    Er... ok. O_o
  • rashes #5 3 years ago

    Is it really so difficult to get a quiz game right??
  • siro #6 3 years ago

    How can this have been rated a six if it's repetitive in no time, which - as Dan noted rightly - is the most pressing issue regarding Quiz games. And also with what 3william56 said.
  • andywilkie35 #7 3 years ago

    I've played this a fair bit, its true that the same clips do come up a lot - I got a clip from Child's Play in 4 playthroughs in a row! There seems to be a lot less content that there was in the first one...

    I do like it tho
  • DanWhitehead #8 3 years ago

    we can thank the wii for shite like this

    All those quiz games I played on the Spectrum must have been made by fortune tellers then.
  • Weezer #9 3 years ago

    This is weird as the question tracking system on the first version works fine - or at least it does for me. How hard is it to place a check against a question and just not read it again until the last unseen question appears?

    I wonder if they've purposefully done this so you're forced to buy question packs online?

    The missus got this for me but not played it yet - I hope it's not as bad as it sounds...

    (This from the product page on Xbox.com: "With downloadable content available via Xbox LIVE Marketplace and a content tracking system that minimizes question repeats, you always have a fresh play experience." Hmmmmm. Somebody's got it wrong then.)
  • jebus #10 3 years ago

    @Weezer
    24-Nov-08 09:13:30 This is weird as the question tracking system on the first version works fine - or at least it does for me. How hard is it to place a check against a question and just not read it again until the last unseen question appears?


    I imagine that maybe the reviewer didn't set it up correctly. There was that option in the first one and it did work - however you had to make sure it was set on a per profile basis. Been playing the first one for ages with a couple of friends and still not really had that many repeat questions - apart from the one time we forgot to sign in my mates profile that is doing the question tracking.

    If that is the case here then 6 based on lack of questions is a really unfair score.
  • YobRenoops #11 3 years ago

    So not as good as Buzz. Just like Lips is not as good as Singstar. What Microsoft rip-off (sorry re-imagining) is going to be not as good next?
  • Moribundman #12 3 years ago

    A bit worried now - I bought the first (with buzzers) for £15 second hand at GAME after hearing this one would be coming out. I'd played the demo for the first, and wholeheartedly agree with Stuarty_2003 that the "tw@" from that game should have been dispatched much more painfully than simply being shot...

    Have only played the new game a couple of times, and thought it was a massive improvement (mainly through not doing the exact same swoopy camera moves and f***ing shadow puppet in front of screen idiocy EVERY SINGLE TIME...

    The Tommy Vance and Adam/Joe soundalikes are much better "hosts" and sit just the right side of annoying. At least they are succinct. Or certainly more so than the idiot from the first game.

    I agree with Jebus that the tracking worked fine for me in the first one. I'd suggest maybe the review copy was not being played on a regular Xbox, or using a normal (and consistent) gamer profile... The first game saved the questions asked and I have yet to get repetitionafter a number of parties. While I've hardly played the new one to death, no repetition there yet either... Twice in one round? SERIOUSLY?
  • DanWhitehead #13 3 years ago

    I played a retail copy of the game on a retail Xbox, and have used the same Gamertag for every game, online and offline. There are no options to turn on a "question checker" in the settings.
  • systems #14 3 years ago

    ^That shadow puppet thing annoyed me and my mates so much we just can't bear to play the game any more because of it. How the hell that got through a focus group test amazes me. It was annoying the second time, especially as it's a shadow from a flat 2D hand.
  • Weezer #15 3 years ago

    @Dan: Well I'm bemused how they can break it so badly then, when it worked fine first time around. Let's hope they notice and get it patched!

    I'm gonna try this out tonight...
  • Eighthours #16 3 years ago

    f***ing shadow puppet in front of screen

    I had to avert my eyes during every camera swoop up to the movie screen. Couldn't take it in the end.
  • jebus #17 3 years ago

    @ Dan DanWhitehead
    24-Nov-08 10:02:49 I played a retail copy of the game on a retail Xbox, and have used the same Gamertag for every game, online and offline. There are no options to turn on a "question checker" in the settings.

    Odd then - I do know that it doesn't save questions scene when playing a Live Game but should for other modes.
  • Britesparc Verified Creative, ITV #18 3 years ago

    I think this review is a little harsh. I played the game through five times (one two separate Xboxes, too) and so far I've had about two questions repeat. I've watched the Child's Play clip three times, true, but all three times had separate questions, and most of the other films Dan's listed I've not seen any clips for yet.

    It's a good, fun, casual game, and I guess if you properly caned it achievement-whore style, you'd see some repetition but so far I've found it to be enjoyable. I like the fact it gives scores to losers, too, as I'm the out-and-out film geek among my friends, so it basically handicaps me and makes it a fairer match!

    Caveat: yet to play it online.
  • chris_ace #19 3 years ago

    Post deleted at 11:55:13 13-12-2011
  • XdarXideX #20 3 years ago

    "Fingers on Buzz" Yeah... no. I have an Xbox360 thanks.
  • fatchris Verified Senior Developer, Eurogamer Network #21 3 years ago

    The rounds where you take control before answering can be very annoying. For instance, there's a round similar to Catchphrase where you have to form an actor's name or a film name from some pictures... however you can just buzz in straight away (before you've even looked at the clues) to take control, causing the choices to be shown and you can easily work it out before the time runs out, not giving the other players a chance! If this catches on, the round just becomes a race to press the buzzer as quickly as possible when the question starts.

    It's good fun though - but we've only played a few rounds, so haven't run out of questions yet.
  • Dr.Mott #22 3 years ago

    "So not as good as Buzz. Just like Lips is not as good as Singstar. What Microsoft rip-off (sorry re-imagining) is going to be not as good next? "

    You're In The Movies.
  • floppylobster #23 3 years ago

    This is not really the place to comment on this, but all the female avatars look very manly. And I really hate the 'attitude' they've been given overall. They're like little people who are desperate for attention and are trying to look cool. They're constantly trying wave at me everytime I switch the console on. I just hate it.
    Edited by 1 at 24/11/08 @ 12:14
  • Moribundman #24 3 years ago

    @floppy: Funny you should say that - I found many facial features make male avatars look feminine! Very hard to find the right eyes for mine without making it look a) freakish or b) like it's wearing make-up!

    The whole point of these avatars is supposed to be that you can represent "yourself", but unless "you" are a very stylised Rare character it is tricky to get it right... More choice of colours on various outfits would have been nice. Maybe when they start getting "real" clothes in there things will get better. This is the sort of thing places like H&M spooge over (the Sims, anyone?) and I'm damn sure Microsoft want such people on board...

    Fashion students designed these clothes? Ummm... I can see why they're designing clothes for Rare's little people instead of real people...

    I'm being harsh. I like the avatars generally.
  • Skooch #25 3 years ago

    People should realise the avatars are not supposed to be identical representations of themselves (or MS would have used an EA face-morphing type application) and are neither meant to be weird doll things (Mii's) - they are meant to be quirky and fun to appeal to the mass-market (mums and dads and kids). If you are posting on this website you are a hardcore gamer and they weren't really aimed with you in mind.
  • IronGiant #26 3 years ago

    Along with Lips another disappointment.
  • chris_ace #27 3 years ago

    Post deleted at 11:55:13 13-12-2011
  • sanctusmortis #28 3 years ago

    Yeah, love it but the end of round rewards are ridiculous; many a time the wife's taken the lead from being rerwarded for not doing good.

    Still, MUCH better than the original. Rounds work better, less annoying VO, Avatar support works well; I'd agree it's a 6.
  • Moribundman #29 3 years ago

    Skootch, you have a point, but selling the avatars with good likenesses of MS bigwigs and even Mr bloody Pointyhead and his cronies gives a different impression... Back to Scene It, it's a decent casual game. They would do well to support it with downloads though to keep it fresh.

    I think with all these games tho - Lips, BOS (nice acronym given this review ;-) and YITM, they are make or break (particularly as the latter two are second attempts to get the franchise/game type off the ground. If they work, we'll be swamped by content. If not they'll wither and die.

    What would make Scene it better is making it more like You Don't Know Jack - which was fantastic and genuinely funny series of games on CD in the later 90s. They spawned a whole series of Movie/Sport/TV versions and were genuinely funny American games with smart-assed humo(u)r. The innovatively simple but slick flash interface allowed them to make "net shows" and they even released a UK version with Paul Kaye (Dennis Pennis) doing the presenter's voice (rather well I felt).
  • rougie #30 3 years ago

    I like it, UK actors doing the VO and Uk specific content! And DLC to follow....can't be bad.
  • onyx_elite #31 3 years ago

    "There's just no getting away from the repetition, though, and it seems especially obvious alternating between offline and online play, as if the mechanism that tracks the questions you've seen isn't used for Live games."

    Thinking about it, it would be impossible or at least very difficult to have the question checker active during Live games. If 4 seperate players are presented with the same question, the system would have to reference the 'question log' of four seperate accounts/consoles before deciding which question to display.

    I can live with repeated questions anyway, makes me look clever.
  • stigmatt #32 2 years ago

    Complete Scene It? BOS + DLC solution

    You can easily download it here:
    [link url=http://cid-5e83f 5c3d99be8f0.skydrive.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/Complete%20S cene%20It.%20Box%20Office%20Smash%20solution/scene%20it%20BO S%20-%20solution.xls
    ]http://cid-5e83f5c3d99be8f0.skydrive.liv...[/link]


    Brief description:

    Genre X (genre x sheet) Genres are organized alphabetically. Look for the beginning of the question. Within each genre questions are organized alphabetically, too.

    Movie clip (movie) Names of the movies are organized alphabetically. Use search for quick find. In brackets there is description of the clip for easier identifying. Slash divides descriptions of several clips for one movie. Lower you get link to wikipedia web page with movie info. It will help you to get correct answers for missing questions. And at last, there are alphabetically organized questions for each movie.

    Sequentials (sequentials sheet) Names of the movies are cut to the beginning word. Sequences are organized alphabetically by the first movie name in the sequence. Use search of the first word in the movie name for quick find of the desired sequence.

    Songs and slogans (songs sheet) Look for the beginning of the question. Questions are organized alphabetically.

    Credit roll (credit sheet) Look for the beginning of the question. Questions are organized alphabetically.

    Quotables (quotes sheet) Look for the beginning of the question. Questions are organized alphabetically.

    Celebrity ties (ties sheet) Ties are grouped in blocks as they appear during gameplay. Only surnames are left for celebrities. Groups are organized alphabetically by the surnames. Use search of the surname for quick find of celebrity sequence.

    Who am I (who sheet) Look for the beginning of the question or movie name, if it is mentioned in italics in the first line of the question. Questions and names of the movies are organized alphabetically.

    Sound clip (sound sheet) Try to identify record with record description. Voice column will help to narrow your choices to records performed by a man or a woman. The first question corresponds to the movie name. Names of the movies are organized alphabetically. Answer for the second question is in the second column.

    Pixel flix (pixel sheet) Try to identify clip with clip description. The first question corresponds to the movie name. Names of the movies are organized alphabetically. Answer for the second question is in the second column.

    Pop Quiz (pop sheet) Names of the movies grouped in blocks that are true to the corresponding best picture Oscar winner, director or actor. Directors and actors are organized alphabetically. Names of the movies within groups are organized alphabetically. Use search of the director or actor for quick find of the desired group. If you are asked for the name of the movie that is not in the corresponding block – that assumes false answer.

    Anagram (anagram sheet) Use provided web link. Type letters shown to you. Entering spaces is not essential.

    Note: Any cells marked with yellow are missing values or possibly inaccurate. Please remember, this solution doesn’t contain 100% of the answers. You won’t find here answers for visual questions as they are very limited amount, repeat often, easy to memorize and difficult to navigate in search of a correct one. In Now Playing you can simply wait till the end of the timer and get desired name of the movie. In Crosswords you can do the same trick with only some letters missing. In Pictogram wait till the end of the timer and name exactly what you see. Also, you may like to use full screen mode in excel when using this file.

    Feel free to correct or provide new information concerning this guide here:

    [link url=http://www.xbox360achievements.org/forum/showthr ead.php?t=177626
    ]http://ww w.xbox360achievements.org/forum...[/link]

    This will help you and many other players to get easy 1250! Good luck!!!
    Edited by 6 at 11/10/09 @ 13:43