Red Dead: Redemption

Go West.

It's starts, appropriately enough, with a Mexican standoff. Six sun-baked outlaws, standing motionlessly in a circle, hands frozen above holsters, while six white-washed gamers perch on the edges of their seats, fingers poised on the triggers of Xbox controllers.

The camera flicks from its vulture's eye vantage point to the weathered face of my cowboy, whose narrow eyes dart between rivals, then pans behind before fixing to the standard third-person view. A final pause, then the screen explodes in gunfire as any semblance of strategy goes up in smoke and a wild spray of bullets.

Some slump to the ground almost immediately; others frantically back away, peppering shots at each other praying for the decisive strike. Meanwhile someone's tactic seems to consist entirely of running away as fast as possible without looking back, a successful wheeze until the inevitable bullet in the back of the skull, fired at a distance by the only other remaining combatant. A dramatic sweep, an orgy of violence and a slapstick finale, done and dusted in under 30 seconds. Yes, folks, we're in Rockstar country.

All multiplayer matches in Red Dead Redemption begin with a shootout, a frantically fun snapshot of self-contained action perfectly in-keeping with the Western theme of the game. During several hours of six-player multiplayer gaming at Rockstar's London HQ, I'm able to explore various permutations of this: sometimes it's a free-for-all, other times it's a three-on-three face-off; and occasionally in every-man-for-himself stand-offs the game gives you a specific target, delivering an XP bonus if taken down.

99

Right bumper hits cover. Beware protruding moustaches.

Grand Theft Auto IV represented Rockstar's most considered attempt to bring multiplayer to its open-worlds. For Red Dead, the goal is once again to complement the vast single-player experience, while creating modes which cater to the game's giant map, emergent potential and distinctive feel.

First up, the concept of lobbies has been dumped in favour of a flexible free-roaming environment within which players can explore the full map, hop in and out of matches, form groups, take on individual challenges or just mess around. With all negative and positive actions tied to XP (maxing out at level 50), there's reward to be found everywhere, encouraging a spirit of playfulness with the toys in Rockstar's sandiest of sandboxes.

104

A horse may give an edge in speed and power, but bear in mind it's also a massive moving target.

16 players can enter Free Roam together, which also features a comprehensive cast of lawmakers, breakers and wildlife to interact with (read: kill). Within that, posses of up to eight players can be formed, either by creating your own posse or joining an existing one. Posse leaders then select a location and game type (either one-offs or playlists), to which other members are able to warp.

A variety of challenges are featured in Free Roam. Hunting involves seeking out deadly predators, then surviving their attacks; in Survivalist players search out rare herbs protected by savage animals; Lawbringer requires you to take down gang hideouts, teaming up with other players to tip the odds in your favour; Outlaw challenges are triggered when you have a Wanted rating, with XP on offer for kill streaks, taking down other Wanted outlaws, and so on.

Sharpshooter challenges, meanwhile, run in matches or Free Roam, rewarding players who can, say, shoot hats off heads and guns from hands. Levelling up unlocks more challenges and playlists, while furnishing you with cooler weaponry and a variety of mounts - including bulls and, brilliantly, a donkey.

That's all the stuff I'm told about by Rockstar reps. The bulk of my hands-on time is spent within a playlist featuring four match-ups we loop through, howling, cursing and face-shooting every boot stomp of the way.

We begin with a Free For All Shootout in the cluttered crucible of Chuparosa, a Mexican village with an open central area littered with emergency cover options, bordered by two-level buildings riddled with interior hideaways and rooftop vantage points.

Other players are hidden on the map, revealing themselves only when sprinting or, to the more eagle-eyed gunslinger, when icons for collectible items disappear. A basic set of weapons, including hand gun, shot gun, rifle and knife, is accessed via the left bumper, which brings up the weapon wheel from which any selection can be made. But additional weapons are also scattered around the environment, found in cases or dropped by the fallen.

113

There's a shootout before every multiplayer match. Prepare for bullet bukake.

Players quickly revert to type, some camping on the nearest rooftop with sniper rifle, others mazing around the houses, unleashing bursts of handgun fire at close range. A useful tactic which quickly emerges is the roll-and-shoot: when holding the left trigger to target, pressing X rolls your character in any direction, a more effective means of dodging point-blank fire than the more sluggish leap. This produces absurdly entertaining moments of death-defying gymnastics - often the difference between life and death if you run out of ammo at an inopportune moment.

Dead Eye, which returns from Red Dead Revolver, is a limited resource that gives a killer edge in a tight spot. Activated by hitting R3, while it doesn't slow down time in multiplayer, it still allows the 'painting' of multiple targets on an enemy in range, making it considerably more likely you'll take them down first. Once exhausted, only a green pick-up can restore Dead Eye; white ones, meanwhile, boost ammo supplies.

Gang Shootout is the team-based version of this mode, and for our three-on-three encounter we're whisked to Armadillo, the Platonic ideal of a Wild West frontier town, the wide-open main street flanked by wooden buildings redolent of any number of classic Spaghetti Western sequences, freshly transposed into a hide-and-shoot adventure playground.

116

A posse, posturing. Posses are formed in Free Roam so players can tackle maps together.

At the end of each round, a standard stats screen lists achievement by score, number of kills, deaths, assists, max kill combo and so on. Then it's into a new 'track' in the playlist via the capering carnage of a shootout.

Goldrush is Red Dead's capture the flag - in this case, literally, capture the bag. Back to the oppressively narrow confines of Chuparosa, respawning bags of gold are strewn around: grab one and dump it into a chest to score a point; 10 points wins. You can carry two bags at a time, but this severely reduces mobility and renders you a slow-moving target for everyone else.

As is often the case with this multiplayer style, more skilful players can snake across the map, while those of an irredeemably spawny nature will cower in a corner by a chest waiting to shoot someone in the head and claim the prize. Of all the matches I play, it's the most riotously fun as there's nothing to be gained from camping on rooftops, and even the deadest of eyes has to turn and run when there's a chest to reach.

The team-based version is an altogether different affair: two bases, a mile apart, just discernible from one to the other, with skyscraping rock formations towering above the desert, offering a ridge at midway point with a canon. This is classic capture the flag territory, with one bag in each base that must be swiped and returned with you, but which exploits the breathtaking scale of Rockstar's world.

During one round I spend a good 10 minutes on approach, first on horseback (up on the d-pad calls your steed), then creeping silently through the wilderness, circling back on the enemy base, clambering inch-by-inch up a rocky outcrop, drawing my sniper rifle to take aim. Then get shot in the face before I manage a single trigger-pull. Bastards.

Clearly, effective teamwork will help here, but there's not a great deal in evidence during this playtest. Nowhere better is this highlighted than towards the end of one round where, with no clear victor, the game reverts to death match. Which I mistake as 'free for all' rather than the team variety, and promptly shoot one of the Rockstar PR team in the back, his reward for a valiant and exhausting defence of our base. Never trust a journalist.

91

Capture the flag becomes capture the bag while capturing a bullet in the back.

As a third-person multiplayer experience in the GTA mould, I feel a lot more comfortable shooting at distance than at close-quarters, which can get a little wonky and imprecise when targeting and shifting the camera around simultaneously. That said, it can work to the game's advantage on occasion, for example during the intensity of a shootout; more amusing experiences include chasing down another Rockstar PR rep with a knife, wildly slashing as they desperately remain just out of reach, and circling another with a horse and cart, desperately trying to run them down. Really, the only thing missing is Benny Hill music.

It's also still a little buggy in places, with occasional crashes, flying steeds and other random freak occurrences, though the game is now at the stage where these small creases will hopefully be smoothed out.

124

It's raining Mexicans, hallelujah!

I doubt people will queue up in droves to buy Red Dead Redemption as a multiplayer experience in the same way they would for Call of Duty, say, but that's not the point. An enormous, evocative, provocative single-player adventure is the big draw here, as ever.

And that doesn't mean multiplayer is simply tacked on. Far from it, the scale and variety of Red Dead's environments and the sheer amount of cool stuff to do means Free Roam alone is likely to immerse groups of friends for long stretches. The core modes, while pretty standard fare, play well to Redemption's structural and thematic strengths and, over the course of half a day's play, are certainly never less than fun.

For a game tipped to be one of the single-player highlights of 2010, it can only add to the overall package. Worth taking a bullet for? We'll find out in just over a month.

Red Dead Redemption is coming to PS3 and Xbox 360 on 21 May.

Comments (65) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Syrette #1 2 years ago

    Does it have motorbikes?
  • INSOMANiAC #2 2 years ago

    Does it have any tacked on 'ten dollar' bullshit to con you into thinking you are getting something for nothing ?
    Edited by INSOMANiAC at 08/04/10 @ 18:07
  • YoshiMcTaggis #3 2 years ago

    Were you asked to reflect the "amazing achievement" this game is nicely by a R* representative?
  • Vyggo #4 2 years ago

    I want this game, I want it bad. (And I don't care about GTA one bit)
  • angerisagift #5 2 years ago

    As CliffyB might say: "SICK, game is SICK"
  • zisssou #6 2 years ago

    Can you say FUCK at the press of a button? I want it to be as much like Deadwood as possible.
  • matrim83 #7 2 years ago

    Is this write up positive enough? I hope Mr Minkley gets to keep his job.
  • Aeon #8 2 years ago

    Multiplayer trailer here:

    [link url=http://www.rockstargames.com/reddeadredemption/videos
    ]http://www.rockstargames.com/reddeadrede...[/link]

    Looks absolutely incredible, could be one of my favourite games of all time.

    Looks like they fixed the low framerate issue of past trailers as well.
  • creepylizard #9 2 years ago

    "Can you say FUCK at the press of a button? I want it to be as much like Deadwood as possible."
    It'd be more like Deadwood if you can say COCKSUCKER at the press of a button..
  • mcmothercruncher #10 2 years ago

    How is the framerate EG?
  • asphaltcowboy #11 2 years ago

    Sounds fantastic!
  • tossetaz #12 2 years ago

    Would like to hear about the framerate aswell, but I'm going to buy it anyways though :)
  • sirtacos #13 2 years ago

    Looks good, although the stuff he said about close-range aiming is worrying. But maybe that only applies to multiplayer. Somehow.
    As long as the shooting's better than GTAIV's I'll be happy.
  • ph101 #14 2 years ago

    Hmm much as this tried to stay positive the last para says that the multiplayer essentially it isnt that great. It seems there are no new ideas here... Open world games need more in to make mp work imo but hey I could be wrong.
  • tobsen #15 2 years ago

    What an "AMAZING ACHIEVEMENT"! There is literally nothing else to be said about this game.
  • matrim83 #16 2 years ago

    @ph101 Dude what are you doing? Do you want him to get fired?

    Its all very nice Rockstar. Preordered the game based on previews and wont cancel. I promise.
    Edited by matrim83 at 08/04/10 @ 19:07
  • Spliffy_Shootz #17 2 years ago

    gimme gimme gimme
  • The_Inquisitor #18 2 years ago

    If this game was just 'GTA with Horsies', I'd still be excited, but this looks like so much more.
    Definitely my most anticipated game so far this year.
  • Rodchenko #19 2 years ago

    EG, you could have just mentioned on the frontpage feature that this articles is all about the multiplayer and thereby saved me from wasting 4 minutes of my life trying to find some worthwhile info on the campaign mode?
  • Spekingur #20 2 years ago

    I just want a multiplayer shootout on a train. That's all I ask for from a Western.
  • BBIAJ #21 2 years ago

    @fightman9t:

    Way to go to support Rockstar San Diego and the long hard hours, and many years of effort spent in bringing you this potentially epic and genre redefining game, you complete and utter moronic tit.
  • UncleLou #22 2 years ago

    This is the game i've been waiting for all my very very long life

    I know exactly what you mean! :)

    Now hurry up and announce a PC version!
    Edited by UncleLou at 08/04/10 @ 20:48
  • matrim83 #23 2 years ago

    @UL. I thought a PC version was confirmed by Gameinformer last month. Thats what I am waiting on anyway.
  • Zappa #24 2 years ago

    wtf is wrong with rockstar??

    give us a san andreas fun game not old western with a horse.
  • WinterSnowblind #25 2 years ago

    @Zappa
    Personally, I'm very pleased to see them breathing new life into a now unfashionable genre. There have been some pretty decent Western games, but nothing that's really done it justice. Everything about the game looks amazing, and it certainly seems more interesting than another sandbox game set in modern times.

    If you want a game to appeal to the lowest common dominator, go buy Just Cause 2.
  • TRUTH #26 2 years ago

    The thing I'm starting to hate about these open world sandbox games: GTA IV, Just Cause 2, Mercenaries 2, Oblivion etc...They all become very repetitive after a few missions which involve: Killing, stealing, protection, escort; which all involve killing someone!

  • Xabarin #27 2 years ago

    I wish this gets ported eventually to pc... just as long as it is a nice port. Which considering we are dealing with Rockstar, I shouldn't keep my hopes up :(
  • Ignatius_Cheese #28 2 years ago

  • metalangel #29 2 years ago

    As the article says, multiplayer is not where this is at.

    Anyone else play Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood? It had a surprisingly inventive multiplayer, running around a town as outlaws trying to commit crimes while a posse of lawmen tried to stop you. I think I played it maybe twice and (having finished the singleplayer story) that was it.

    Tacked on? Maybe not. Superfluous? Yes.

    GTAIV added multiplayer, yes, and I had some hilarious times in it... Hangman's NOOSE, Cops n' Robbers, and a few just out and out deathmatches. But without any structure to the mayhem, the thrill quickly wanes and you're left with a shallow clusterfuck of explosions, headshots and stabbings.

    So I dare say that anyone playing multiplayer will likely be doing so for the achievements.
  • seanthejackal #30 2 years ago

    @TRUTH i know what u mean but there is also alot of new things this brings to the genre as well. i for one cant bloody wait for Red Dead Redemption..............what two bit backstabbing son of a mangy old whore dog marked me down?
    Edited by seanthejackal at 09/04/10 @ 03:10
  • AnsemsApprentice #31 2 years ago

    Why aren't they bringing it out in April? There is literally no competition other than Super Street Fighter IV, which poses no threat to a R* game, but instead they bring it out around the same time as Remedys clearly brilliant to be Alan Wake. There must be a good reason I guess, it still looks amazing. A week after Alan Wake though, that's £75 from me in 7 days, help me Superman!
    Edited by AnsemsApprentice at 08/04/10 @ 22:59
  • Moribundman #32 2 years ago

    @ansemsapprentice MS have brought Alan Wake forward a week in Europe presumably to give it at least a week at the top of the charts before RDR steamrollers in to the top spot regardless of the eventual reviews.

    I'm not fussed. I have BOTH special editions on pre-order :-)
  • AnsemsApprentice #33 2 years ago

    @Moribundman. Yeah I know but they would sell more copies if it was April again. Do you think the Red Dead Special Edition is worth it? It only includes the soundtrack and a couple worthless bonuses, not £49.99 worth in my opinion. I have the Alan Wake special edition Pre-Ordered though, seems worth it. I'm off to have a refreshing can of Sprunt. Ahhhh Sprunt.
    Edited by AnsemsApprentice at 08/04/10 @ 23:16
  • RedPanda #34 2 years ago

    Post deleted at 14:31:59 28-01-2012
  • naffers #35 2 years ago

    @redpanda thats wat it does have, i suggest you take a look at the newly release multiplayer trailer. seems to explain the games modes quite well. the free roam is definately where i'll be hanging out. drinking in a saloon with some mates then going off on horseback to catch me some Beasts!
  • RedPanda #36 2 years ago

    Post deleted at 14:31:59 28-01-2012
  • telboy007 #37 2 years ago

    What? Flying horses? WTF is Pegasus doing in the game, trying to tap into Clash of the Titan... tut! ;)
  • miseryguts #38 2 years ago

    Multiplayer is quickly becoming the British package holiday tourist of gaming - PALE, BLOATED & NO IDEA WHY IT IS THERE!
    If a developer of the calibre of Rockstar now feels obliged (although i suspect this decision is out of there hands) to 'bolt on' multiplayer, it is indeed a sad state of affairs.
    Please Devs HAVE THE COURAGE OF YOUR SINGLE PLAYER CONVICTIONS, before i am engulfed in flame - I DO participate in "socal gaming" sessions, i just dont believe it is the final frontier of gaming, and just wish that we would see more developers devote some of their valuable creative juices towards extending the lifespan/replayability of singleplayer games in interesting ways instead of ever more convoluted means to present the same tedious online experiences (Ubisoft im' looking at you)
  • Eraserhead #39 2 years ago

    Miseryguts: hell yeah! Sadly singleplayer gaming seems to be dying, as more and more devs pander to people who like to run about wildly shooting at other people/dying/respawning/repeating, being shot within two seconds by a 14 year old who literally has nothing else to do, and possibly paying an extra £10 or more for the privilege. But hey, you get XP these days! And ranks! And stuff! It's all sooo much more sophisticated than, er, running around and shooting and dying... again and again and again...
  • Harmonica #40 2 years ago

    If you don't like multiplayer games, why did you bother commenting on this article?

    The single player is expansive, the multiplayer is a fun social experience. Often these are managed by entirely separate units at developers so they don't even 'sacrifice' the content to work on the other.

    @ Spekingur "I just want a multiplayer shootout on a train. That's all I ask for from a Western."

    Even better: king of the hill (train) - when you die, you respawn on a horse galloping alongside.

    I am very excited by this game. As much as Alan Wake.
    Edited by Harmonica at 09/04/10 @ 06:45
  • Harmonica #41 2 years ago

    @metalangel "So I dare say that anyone playing multiplayer will likely be doing so for the achievements."

    They could be playing it to have fun, I don't know. Did you even play GTA IV multiplayer? Do you know how much fun it can be?

    You might want to check out the achievements list, since the vast majority of them can be completed in singleplayer, there are only a handful of multiplayer-specific achievements.

    Finally, if people were playing the multiplayer just to get achievements, is that any of your concern? Not really.
    Edited by Harmonica at 09/04/10 @ 06:52
  • earobus #42 2 years ago

    Sounds good to me will be buying day one, i wonder if you may be able to find an old mine with a false wall with a certain car behind it.
  • muscleblade #43 2 years ago

    @TRUTH

    I agree. Im not a fan of sandbox games. AC2 was good though. I liked how you could ignore all the side missions.

    This will probably get very high scores all over, but i think i go with Alan Wake and Lost Planet 2 in May.
  • Zebula77 #44 2 years ago

    Will there be a single player hands on any time soon? That's what I'm really interesting in, tho the MP sounds good.
  • metalangel #45 2 years ago

    @Harmonica: You must have read my whole comment as you quoted the last line, so why the hell are you asking if I even played GTA4 multiplayer?
  • TruWari3r #46 2 years ago

    I just skipped reading this whole article, I'm pumped about this game and don't want to read anything anymore in fear of spoilers.
  • zuljin #47 2 years ago

    I don't really understand why people are downvoting INSOMANiAC, because thats what Rockstar are doing here.

    Well apart from the paranoid 'con' part of the comment. But if you check Amazon, the game sells for £35. £50 if you buy the special edition, which includes the "extras" if you were to preorder it from elsewhere (ie the warhorse, and the deadly assasin outfit). They do however give you the soundtrack in addition, so there is something physical extra in the Limited Edition over the regular.

    I do however hope people don't buy the limited edition. This "get an advantage over your mates by paying more" is starting to get out of hand.
  • BOBBYLUPO #48 2 years ago

    @zuljin

    It's only £43 on ShopTo. Not exactly a rip-off.
  • Retro_ #49 2 years ago

    I've had this pre-ordered from ARGOS for about 6 months ago when they had their first 20% off promotion. Paid £27 for this which is a steal IMO.
  • Retro_ #50 2 years ago

    @TRUTH

    I quite like sandbox games myself but for some reason I can't explain, The Saboteur is the one I'm determined to play till It's 100% complete. The game has a few glitches but it's a hellova lot of fun!
  • kinky_mong #51 2 years ago

    I imagine some staff at EG will be able to do a simple IP track of fightman9t's account right? Could actually make the Digital Rights Bill claim one valid victim if you were to forward said IP address on around the time RDR gets released.

    Anyway this write up makes the multiplayer sound pretty good. Hope it's implimentation is much better than the awkward phone method from GTA, as nothing put me off that more than sitting through lengthy loading screens everytime the game booted me back to the single player.
  • TonyHarrison #52 2 years ago

    @miseryguts I'm with you there, the multiplayer on games can be fun in quick blasts but I'm still all about the single player experience. That's why it makes me a sad panda to see games with a 3 hour SP campaign released and praised because it has a deathmatch multiplayer mode...

    EDIT. I guess I should point out that I have complete faith in Rockstar's ability to deliver yet another compelling single player experience regardless of their advances in multiplayer.
    Edited by TonyHarrison at 09/04/10 @ 11:46
  • geeza2020 #53 2 years ago

    the game looks great and fightman9t is an absolute twat.

    That is all.
  • Roland_on_the_Ropes #54 2 years ago

    fightman9t is just bored at work/college on a friday afternoon and is trolling forums to ruffle a few feathers me thinks. Ignore...

    Genuinely excited about this game. Will you be able to knock people off horses and back over them GTA style? A quick hoof to the temple...
    Edited by Roland_on_the_Ropes at 09/04/10 @ 14:46
  • kangarootoo #55 2 years ago

    This just looks brilliant, simple as that.


    @metalangel

    I'm not that interested in competetive multiplayer, but I love cooperative games. And the freeroaming aspect of this looks like it would suit both.

    The single player will be the main draw for me as well no doubt, but being able to ride over the hills to cap a few AI bad guys with a couple of friends from time to time has its appeal too. Its kinf of a pity they are seperate really, some drop-in drop-out options as part of the main game would be fun imo.
  • kangarootoo #56 2 years ago

    I don't think fightman9t has a job. Classic "grown man living with parents" behaviour. Ignore is indeed the best solution.
  • carlitoswagon #57 2 years ago

    Not sure if I like the idea of killing defenceless wildlife.


    /Darling, fetch my Otters nose ash tray.
  • th3duckst3r #58 2 years ago

    BEEN WAIITNG ON THIS FOR AWHILE I LIKE A GOOD OLS GUNSLINGER BEEN SOME TIME SINCE YHERE WAS ONE.BUT WAT REALYY PISSES ME OFF IS THAT THERE WILL BE 4 VARIATIONS: AMAZON.ZAVVI,HMV ,GAME..I WONT THE GAME IN ONE PACKAGE NOT 4..............
  • sonmi451 #59 2 years ago

    have they released a latest horse list?

    I want to be the meanest gunslinger riding a shetland pony.
  • metalangel #60 2 years ago

    Forget horses, it's set in 1911! Cars and motorcycles please! (1911 was the first Indy 500, while the Isle of Man TT was four years old, to give some perspective.)
  • TRUTH #61 2 years ago

    The last sandbox game I enjoyed was Fallout 3 - due to less repetitive missions (though sometimes to similar) & AC 2...The problem with a large majority of sandbox games, they do, simply follow the same formula of tasks which are just renamed but you end up doing the same thing: GTA IV, Just Cause 2, Mercenaries 2..etc; all guilty of this!

    The now multiplayer is also really pissing me off!...I find that multiplayer games are the same as sandbox games- kill things and then repeat!...The problem now is that game developers think that everyone wants multiplayer games, when a majority actually still prefer the single player experience (esp the gamers I know). The single player is now becoming a second thought as all the effort with production costs seems to be leaning more and more towards multiplayer!...Multiplayer can work as in sports games ( I love online Fight Night 4 & Left 4 Dead, Endwar) fps, Rts etc - but when single player is being sacrificed, this is a concern for gaming... I find in multiplayer online games - no one really plays fairly!...Also personally had a better gaming experience with Boarderlands in single player rather then co-op/online!
    Edited by TRUTH at 10/04/10 @ 14:02
  • Harmonica #62 2 years ago

    It's also set in 1908 and cars were absolutely crap in those days. I wouldn't mind a few cars in very luxurient locations, as long as they only ran for a few miles and always broke down.
  • atheistium #63 2 years ago

    It's starts
    It's starts
    It's starts
    It's starts
  • metalangel #64 2 years ago

    Well yeah, any motor vehicles would be a bit slow and handle badly... certainly not a match for the horses. Saying that, a steam car of the time would easily reach 80 mph which would make for a fun easter egg/toy to play with (been saying this in the various articles on this hoping to encourage Rockstar)
  • kangarootoo #65 2 years ago

    @metalangel

    There weren't many decent roads back then. Any car of the time that could do 80mph would shake itself to bits in no time :)