Jump to navigation
Sponsored by Alienwaretracer
Advertisement

Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War Review

Review by Kieron Gillen

24 September, 2004

'Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War' Screenshot 1

Both for newcomers and the initiated, I think it's worth taking a few moments to reiterate what the Warhammer 40,000 universe is all about. Bear with me. If we're exceedingly lucky, we'll chance upon a point.

It's the 40th millennia. This Dark Age, after the fall of Man. Humanity's domain is a million worlds, governed by a fascistic theocracy with a God-Emperor worshipped as a bona-fide deity. This man would be dead - in fact, it's entirely possible that he is dead - were not for the fact that an enormous baroque machine siphons the souls of thousands of psychics every day. A vast Inquisition gathers these frightening minds, between performing purges across human space, persecuting and executing untold billions, with rebel planets following rival creeds regularly suffering sterilisation bombardments from space. There is no hope, no truth, no peace, no love: only War.

And these are the good guys.

The 40K universe was invented in the eighties as Games Workshop took their pre-existing fantasy - also determinedly grim - franchise into a far gothic future. The reason why the Imperium, as man's domain is known, are the good guys is the alternatives are even worse (i.e. even more apocalyptic). A jackboot stomping on a human face forever is preferable to being rendered immortal by one of the Chaos powers then having your organs re-arranged as a fashionable hat. In short, 40K has everything required to power a brilliant videogame.

And it really does have everything - it's very much a maximalist creation, baroquely taking from every science-fiction convention and forming it into a glistening fleshy sticky whole. Brilliant character design - in fact, so brilliant that their influence is seen in more than half the science-fiction videogames in existence. A scenario where improbably violent conflict naturally emerges from its licence rather than feeling crammed in. And ludicrously sized guns.

'Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War' Screenshot 2

Dawn of War just nails it.

Now, 40K hasn't been as badly treated in games as legend would have it - the pair of EA Space Hulk games can justify the lineage by themselves - but nothing has been even a fraction as successful as exploiting the possibilities of the licence as this has. It's a perfect gaming world, being exploited perfectly, for the first time. That alone deserves some kind of applause, and that alone is going to gather some serious sales for Games Workshop's army of fans - and those who would be fans if they could spare the time and money to create a huge army. And, since the universe really is ideal fodder for a videogame, the point of this extended rambling intro, pretty much anyone else who likes their RTS to be lively and bloody too.

In terms of the pure RTS, it's the most attractive yet seen. It's all in the details and the illusion of life, and the animation. The characters bubble with personality and - in many cases - barely restrained violence. Seeing the Avatar of Khaine tear its way through a rank of hapless yelping-goblinoid Gretchin is a thrilling sight.

This season there are, essentially, three contenders for your strategy money. Kohan 2, Rome: Total War and this. Out of the three, it's Dawn of War which is closest to the entral mainstream - for that read "Whatever Blizzard are doing". Kohan 2 interests in how it elegantly and intelligently deviates from the formula. Total War, in the best tradition of British developers, doesn't give a damn what the colonials are up to, and carries on building its Roman Road to the future in a manner unlike anyone else. While there are moments Dawn of War does something unexpected, it's instantly familiar and recognisable to anyone who's dabbled in Starcraft. The population of Korea will feel very much at home.

'Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War' Screenshot 3

But that undersells Dawn of War. Its animation, while glorious, isn't just for vicious kicks. For example, touches like a squad being sent flying by a grenade or lobbed over the horizon by a Dreadnought, the Marine's hulking mechanical walkers, create a direct impact in what weapons are used where, as well as looking spectacular.

Since so much is familiar, you may... well, think it a little shallow. While we'll only be able to tell for certain the truth of the matter a year of multi-playing down the line, there's actually considerable subtlety available to a player. Take, for example, the standard Space Marine (the Imperium's super-human armoured warriors) squad. Once created, you're given options of either keeping with the basic squad size, or pushing it up to a cap. Equally, as the research tree opens up, you get the option of paying for up to four heavy weapons (from four separate sorts) for the squad. Each of the four heavy weapons have their own uses and disadvantages, and there's even an argument not to take them, since you have to stay stationary for a period prior to firing. Expanding out to the entire army, there's certainly a lot to think about and options to process, and while its classical nature means it's going to descend into a giant scrum upon occasion, it's underestimating its potential to think that's all it is.

The multiplayer is very much the centre of the game. The eleven-mission campaign , while put together competently, will be marched through swiftly by vaguely competent players. In terms of narrative, it's tied together by a story which leans on the major themes of the 40K universe: corruption of the Imperium by Chaos. It aspires to competency and almost reaches the mark, mainly stumbling by failing to introduce the principle sides in any real way. If, for example, you don't know who the Eldar are or what they're doing on the planet, you'll be none the wiser for playing. And if you want to actually play the Eldar single-player... Well, it's off to the fairly standard skirmish mode for you. Only one campaign, with you stuck as the Marines, is available, which seems more than a little on the mean side.

'Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War' Screenshot 4

Which is a backhanded compliment towards the quality of the four sides: due to the unique flavour, you do want to play them all. The Orks (Space Orks!) favour mobs - in fact, have their build options limited until they reach a certain critical mass of bodies. The Eldar (Space Elves!) are delicate and evasive, with each unit type having a clear role in which it excels. The Marines (Er... Space Marines?) are a resilient all-round army, which can be customised considerably on the fly. And the Chaos side mixes their elite Chaos Marines with cannon-fodder mobs and frankly terrifying summoned Daemons. And for a non-backhanded compliment to their quality, I honestly don't have a favourite. They all charm.

And it's charm which cements Dawn of War in the affections. In fact, it charms so casually that the contrary parts of the gaming world will just lazily dismiss it as a bimbo. It really isn't. Charm lures us in, but there's enough happening upstairs to keep it firmly in our affections.

Though whether "charm" really is the right word where by "charm" you mean "the visceral thrill when you see an Ork advance rent asunder by giant pincers" is a matter I leave to you.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

No Yes

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-40 of 40 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Mugwum [staff]
24/09/04 @ 10:06
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ooh, apparently we've broken Kieron's face. [Runs off to find out how.]
Tiger_Walts
24/09/04 @ 10:07
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
An EG review? On release?

...

Ah, it's KG, will I be seeing this in PC Gamer as well?
Mugwum [staff]
24/09/04 @ 10:11
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No.
krudster [mod]
24/09/04 @ 10:11
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nope, you're going to be seeing a bit more of Mr G...
Tiger_Walts
24/09/04 @ 10:12
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
...really?
Mugwum [staff]
24/09/04 @ 10:13
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well, not you personally, because after the cheeky jab about reviews on release dates we've sent the boys round to dash your brains out with a copy of DRIV3R.
templar wizard
24/09/04 @ 10:14
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
(y)

great game. single poor, multi great.
thou shalt kill
Lutz [mod]
24/09/04 @ 10:18
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
exceeeding? Exceedingly

?

Anyway, great review though! May get this. :)
Tiger_Walts
24/09/04 @ 10:29
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I heard that Driv3r would break before my head would.
Mugwum [staff]
24/09/04 @ 10:42
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
:-)
SnoppleMonster
24/09/04 @ 10:44
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I shall most definately purchasing this. Loved the demo, and have been looking for something new after exhausting Warcraft 3!!!
disc
24/09/04 @ 10:48
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
when I tried the demo I got the sense that its more a matter of holding points than building...

should probably be mentioned, changes the way you play quite a bit... having to move quickly instead of hoarding...
squaylor
24/09/04 @ 10:48
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If I only had a PC, I might pick this up. Nice review.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 24/09/04 @ 10:49
Groovicron
24/09/04 @ 11:04
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
They finally release the 40K game I've always wanted when my PC is a doddering piece of crap too old to run it.

Still it will be nice to see some more reviews from Mr Gillen. I've missed PCGamer since I had to stop buying, it became too much of a depressing read when I knew my PC couldn't play a single game reviewed. Half-life 2 previews still make me cry :'-(
jiroczech
24/09/04 @ 11:06
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"it's Dawn of War which is closest to the entral mainstream" central?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 24/09/04 @ 11:07
ralphwolfenstein
24/09/04 @ 11:08
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Disc - you do build in the game, but only need a few core buildings - ie you start with a base, then you add a research unit, a barracks, a vehicle plant and a couple of power generators - but it's unlikely you'll have more than 7 or 8 major structures in a typical game. The strategic points, once captured, allow you to build fortifications and even buildings in a radius around them - so you can construct another barracks right on the front line, which is useful in larger maps, and surround it with gun turrets. However, you can only build around captured points - so you can't leave forests of gun emplacements all over the place. It means all the action takes place on the front line, and the old tank rush is unlikely to work as you wont have the time to build up a killer army back at base as all your resources will be ploughed into the immediate threat on the line of battle. Also means games aren't necessarily decided in the first five minutes.

Unless it's me playing, in which case they usually are, in favour of some half cyborg american teen who has interfaced with his shortcuts...

Nice review!
TardKommando
24/09/04 @ 11:43
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Just or me or did that whole review read like a preview to the actual review?
praetorian
24/09/04 @ 11:46
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm tempted, but the fact you only get the human campaign in SP is a bit blah. Why couldn't they have tied three or four races into a single storyline campaign a la Starcraft?
Maybe there's potential for an expansion pack...
Teeth
24/09/04 @ 11:53
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
'Millennia' is plural.

That aside, this is a tasty review and makes me want to buy this game ASAP.
Whizzo
24/09/04 @ 11:57
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hopefully my copy from Play will turn up soon, really looking forward to this one and for the price they're selling at it's a steal.
groovychainsaw
24/09/04 @ 12:12
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Demo bored me, unfortunately - its EXACTLY the same structure as starcraft, which is, what, 7 years old? Nice graphics and a reasonable game, but there is a massive lack of any sort of innovation here - fine if you wqant more of the same, but im bored of the tank rush - looks like R:TW for me then (now if only they would make a turn based wwarhammer game, and keep it true to the depth of strategy....)
StixxUK
24/09/04 @ 12:38
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I only want to know one thing. Is it better than Warcraft 3 in multiplayer?

WC3 is the only RTS I've ever really got into online and I wonder if this is as fun or as deep.
SnoppleMonster
24/09/04 @ 13:33
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I too have never played an online game as much as Warcraft 3.

I hope this one's good fun, but I doubt that relic will support it with the endless patches that Blizzard seem to do for Warcraft 3. They are adding new heroes 2 years on which is fantastic!

Battles in Warhammer 40k's demo are very good, and surprisingly violent too.


StixxUK
24/09/04 @ 13:48
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
New heroes?!?!!111

Haven't played for about a year in all honesty, but will deffo be giving it a go now :D:D:D:D:D
Dabs
24/09/04 @ 14:51
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nope, you're going to be seeing a bit more of Mr G...

Excellent.
Dabs
24/09/04 @ 14:55
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
... as was the review, by the way.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 24/09/04 @ 14:55
Dynamize
24/09/04 @ 15:06
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm so very tempted by the pretties and the style...but I'm wary of the gameplay being too simple for my tastes. Might just dust off Chaos Gate.
Dizzy
24/09/04 @ 16:45
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So only marines in 11 missions? WTF is up with that?

So if I want to play Eldar I can only play online or vs AI? Why? Why? Why? I love single player RTS games! Online there usually is way to much cheating in these kind of games.

/removes W40K from wish list
Razz
25/09/04 @ 01:54
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Anyone else notice that the guy in the pic that links to this review on the front page looks like Jack Bower from the TV series 24
Aaarrrgh
25/09/04 @ 02:58
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Demo bored me, unfortunately - its EXACTLY the same structure as starcraft, which is, what, 7 years old? Nice graphics and a reasonable game, but there is a massive lack of any sort of innovation here - fine if you wqant more of the same, but im bored of the tank rush - looks like R:TW for me then (now if only they would make a turn based wwarhammer game, and keep it true to the depth of strategy....)"

You couldn't be MORE wrong on all accounts.

a) There is NO 'tank rushing'. Naturally, there is an element of rushing, a quickly produced squad of seer council WILL wreck havoc. But, that's it. A tank-tech-rush is simply impossible, because it implies that you get at least 50% of the tactical points on the map. Problem is, unless the opponent isn't interesting in taking yours (which he will be), the majority of the early- and midgame money will be spent on reinforcing your squads with new men and weaponry. However, if he doesn't, you should be able to have ONE (yes, one) dreadnought after six minutes (this is based directly off the beta, where such tests were conducted). alternatively, your opponent will probably have 2 squads, a force commander, several scout squads. In short, you'll be a goner.

b) massive lack of innovation? Tactical points? Morale (which is far from a gimmick. Any experienced player will tell you this)? the fact that both closecombat and ranged combat plays a role, not seen in any other game before? Sorry, but I completely disagree with this.

c) same structure as starcraft? What, because it's based around getting ressources? Or because it's a fast RTS? Or that you build buildings? Sure, there are similarities, but this is more a troll than anything else.

As for your final R:TW comnent. Well, QUAKE II IS THE BESTEST GAME EVER SINCE NFS:UNDERGROUND. Apples and oranges doesn't compare well.
AtomicBanana
25/09/04 @ 15:27
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was hoping you'd mention the intro movie... I almost shed a tear! That is the most 'realistc' looking interpretation of the 40k universe I have ever, ever seen. Violent, bloody and.. well just amazing! Please god someone pay the team responsible to make a mini series or something . . .
Phattso
25/09/04 @ 15:36
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought the exact same thing when I saw the intro: "this needs to be made into a feature length film of some kind."

I didn't shed a tear though. ;-)
Dynamize
25/09/04 @ 15:55
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Agreed, the intro movie is very, very nice.
They used to do some pretty funky live-action WH40k short films at the annual convention thingy in Birmingham when I were a lad, very nice props and that, seemed quite professional.
Played the demo, not sure if it's for me, don't think the game would fit my style of play.
mingster
26/09/04 @ 23:45
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i've read and re-read the review and it seems a bit out of keeping with a normal EG review.
It's a nice review but doesn't go into enough technical depth about the game and it's pro's and con's of gameplay.
I've learnt more about whether i'd like the game from the comments section tbh.
Like someone else said its more of a preview type sum-up of the game than an indepth review. Please don't skip on the gameplay details ie: holding points, upgrade paths, computer ai etc...
Edited 1 times, most recently on 26/09/04 @ 23:49
SnoppleMonster
27/09/04 @ 13:29
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hmmm.

Played game for a couple of days now. It's ok, but I think it stops short of being brilliant.

Also it can still get occasionally choppy on my 3.6gz, 1gb ram, P4 with a Radeon 9800 ( Reading the dawn of war forums leads me to believe theres an issue with the AI, as it's not choppy without computer opponents ).

masterson
29/09/04 @ 18:31
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"I can't understand what the reviewer is saying half the time."

Try the reader reviews on Amazon then, they may be more suitable for one of your reading age.
Scimarad
30/09/04 @ 15:02
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I wasn't impressed with this at all when I first played it but somehow I've gone from 'meh' to 'this is GREAT!'. Don't ask me how...

Discovering the fully 3D camera option helped.
Nillsens
30/09/04 @ 15:32
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's class :D

I played the demo to death, played a friend's copy after that then went and bought my own.

Too bad the online game is being swamped by those who believe to be 'leet'.
PSPFANBOY
28/01/05 @ 12:59
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This Rocks i love all of relics games the icing on the cake is the army painter and the units killing moves seeing a bloodthirster throw a space marine scout halfway across the map trailing blood all the way is brilliant!
Roamer
28/02/05 @ 19:06
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Scimarad, I had the exact same response :)

I left it on the shelf for a few months, picked it up again now, and I can hardly stop playing it.

Comments: 1-40 of 40 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Get involved with Eurogamer's community portal, including reader reviews, personal game collections, private discussion groups, Xbox Live gamertag integration and tons more.

Community Game Stats
Metaboli

X View gallery