Small Arms Review

Smashing.

Version tested: Xbox 360

Small Arms has been billed as Smash Bros. with guns, and that's a reasonable summary (unlike the weather outside these days, which is unreasonably wintery), but where you might imagine some sort of collusion between platforming combat and shoot-where-you-go gunnery, the controls are actually dual-stick, closer to something like Robotron.

And so players leap around manically, double-jumping and grabbing the edge of ledges, and as they go they're using the right analogue stick to aim and the triggers to fire off bullets, rockets, plasma, icicles, and even high-calibre sniper rounds. You can still go up to someone and punch them in the head, but it's actually a bit of an afterthought; the bulk of the combat is ranged, and sees you jumping to evade enemies rather than to meet them.

There are 12 combatants (four of which are unlockable) and eight stages (one unlockable), and as well as a health gauge you've also got an ammo meter to marshal, either replenishing it with pick-ups or picking up a new weapon, of which there are quite a few to replace your character's standard offering. You'd be wrong to expect the depth and diversity of a proper beat-'em-up though. Instead of special moves, the protagonists have default guns, but, with several life-bars to exhaust before death, you can expect a game in Small Arms to adopt a different timbre as often as new weapons present themselves. Characters effectively swap characteristics when they do.

Really it's the character of the levels that has the most impact on the scale and tactics of a match, and the eight provided are neatly varied. Most are static, having you hop around a particular single-screen environment trying to aim your projectiles between platforms, up and over the nose of a rocket in a silo, through holes in rotting logs and under canopies. Others scroll as you play, like a train-top level with multiple carriages, crane wagons and so on, and a weird tornado level where you're hopping from giant tyre to uprooted mansion to floating scaffold and so on. Some walk the line between the two, with moving elements or platforms that shatter under the weight of rockets.

'Small Arms' Screenshot 1

Some up, getting beat 'em. Yesterday.

Graphically the 360 does a lovely job of all of this, even if it's a bit dark in places (brighten up, Xbox developers!), and the little yelps and explosive effects mean it's obvious when you've hit someone, while an array of relatively simple achievements mean there's good cause for pillaging the single-player game several times over. Like Street Fighter's old-days barrel and car smash-up levels, there's also a shooting gallery that pops up between rounds, and there's a standalone version available in the main menu (although, once you've managed 10,000 points there for the achievement, you're unlikely to return often).

Offline there's also a Challenge mode, where your aim is to survive against a long sequence of AI adversaries. Like the main single-player game, you're often pitted against several at once, and this is likely where you'll focus most of your attention if your aim is to play Small Arms alone - the leaderboards are already alive with some worryingly impressive feats, and it's a good place to go to hone your targeting skills and shore up your defence.

That said, with characters swapping dynamics with every weapon-change and only eight levels, there isn't a huge amount here to hone, nor a great deal to encourage lone replay. All the characters have quirky outfits and silly back-stories (the cute little knight likes Renaissance fairs, the unlockable tree-man is pissed off that he's all alone in the world), but they don't have much else to distinguish them once you get into the flow of a game, and the actual plot is limited to a page on the options screen.

'Small Arms' Screenshot 2

When you're running out of ammo, a little exclamation flashes up. Which is nice for it. Good to see it getting work.

The weapons are all solid and fun to master, at least. You can fire bullets, green blobs, freeze rays, heat-seeking this, that and the other, William Tell inspired bow-cast explosive apples, even mines, and there's a handsome sword if you want to run after people shouting BANZAI. But even so there's nothing especially novel about any of your tools. It's more Unreal than Worms. And that lack of variety and novelty has a worrisome effect on the game's long-term prospects, particularly offline, where the AI can be really quite dreadful in places (happily sitting on the other side of a level waiting for you to pick it off, in the worst cases).

Then again, this isn't the sort of game designed to be played extensively on your own. The idea is to get some friends round or go online. In both areas Small Arms comes to life, but voice comms are a bit of a must if you're playing on Live. Otherwise playing with strangers can be a bit uninvolving and standoffish. Better to get a group together and gang up on each other.

Ultimately though it's none of these things that stops Small Arms short of greatness - even without the technical depth of a Street Fighter or Smash Bros., it's still riotously enjoyable in the right context. Instead what lets the side down is the controls. Having to move around, jump, aim and fire simultaneously is too hard to do comfortably, even if you can graduate from using the A button to favouring one of the bumpers for jumping.

It still feels clumsy, and while it's possible to overcome this in time and reach a decent standard, it robs the game of some of its accessibility - something critical to its multiplayer appeal - and your ultimate proficiency in moving, jumping and firing at the same time is only likely to announce itself long after you've exhausted what depths there are to excavate. Hopefully there'll be some reasonably priced downloadable content to keep things going and stave that fatigue off though, because Small Arms is certainly worthy of a trigger-happy Friday night, even if it can't quite match the spectacular genius of Smash Bros.

6 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (34) Latest comment 5 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Xerx3s #1 5 years ago

    Quite agree. Played it and it isn't a bad game, just fails to grab you.
  • penhalion #2 5 years ago

  • Carlo #3 5 years ago

    Fucks sake!

    /goes back to playing a pretty average Viva Pinata
  • Xerx3s #4 5 years ago

  • lennon #5 5 years ago

    Im not surprised by this after playing the demo.

    /Wants to go back to playing the awesome Viva Pinata but has to work ;)
  • Der_tolle_Emil #6 5 years ago

    I tried the demo and was really having a hard time getting accustomed to the controls. I don't really like switching between the right analogue stick and the buttons all that much.
  • Darkedge #7 5 years ago

    All the way through the review sounds like a Live arcade game.. is it?
  • Rambaldi #8 5 years ago

    How there's so much difference between this and Smash Bros. is beyond me. They're both a dull bunch of pants IMHO.
  • cyacomini #9 5 years ago

    I was so looking forward to this, totally ruined by poor controls...

    woe. is. me.
  • Carlo #10 5 years ago

    LeD. I think you might be right about this being the wrong kind of console for me.

    Though I'm not sure you're entitled to say you're a little 'sick of me polluting 360 comments threads'... I think you'll find me very much missing from the majority of them, and when I do comment, it's because I've actually played them.

    The 'fucks sake' is because I had hopped this was going to be a better game than it turned out to be. Unlike Viva which I thought would dissapoint me, but I'm finding to be supprisingly distracting and subtle.
  • platinum #11 5 years ago

    I bought the game and it's actually good fun. A feature that really shines is the ability to play mixed local/online multiplayer. While my buddy an I play localy on my 360 the game allows for online competitors to join the game on the fly swapping out CPU controlled foes. Sure enough it's not the deepest game but I wasn't expecting it to be, anyway. I just enjoy it for what it is: a great frantic arcade experience that's ought to be played with friends – smack talk and swearing guaranteed!
  • jlaakso #12 5 years ago

    The demo really let me down, mostly due to the poor controls, but also because it just lacks likeability. The characters (apart from the nice knight) just don't appeal, there's no color or cheerfulness. Shame.
  • Carlo #13 5 years ago

    I think Viva is pretty average, and was plesently supprised by that. I actually thought I'd made a mistake by buying it (curses crap game salesman who kept telling me all the negative things about this game, and to get GOW insted :S).

    So where are all these comments threads I'd 'polluted' LeD? Besides, why does me showing my dissapointment of a review that failed to meet my expectations cause you such anguish?

    Cool it LeD

  • Carlo #14 5 years ago

  • geepersd #15 5 years ago

    the controls did bug me, but once I stopped treating it as a platform version of robotron and more as an old school platorm shooter like Fatal Rewind with dual stick control only used when not jumping to give it a Gunstar Heroes feel I found it great.

    Especially as I like to keep the same weapon and so need those ammo drops, jumping becomes all about dodging, using the air dodge drift move thing and kicking peeps off ledges becore reaching a nice plateaux and sniping accros the screen.
  • trevd72 #16 5 years ago

    if they remapped the jump to a bumper button or put secondary on the RB and jump on LT it would solve the control problem i would imagine.
  • geepersd #17 5 years ago

    @ trevd72

    the bumpers are already set to be jump I think - I found it a bit better, but then went back to using A, but changing my play style
  • binky #18 5 years ago

    Yup, bumpers allow you to jump.

    Got to say, I think this is a great little game and worthy of 800 marketplace points. Tis good as a wind down game after a session of Gears, CH and the like.

    Each to their own though I guess.
  • The-Bodybuilder #19 5 years ago

    Is this an XNA/LIVE game or what?
  • Der_tolle_Emil #20 5 years ago

  • trevd72 #21 5 years ago

    did not know that.....will have try it out
  • driptray #22 5 years ago


    Surprised by the negative comments for this: it's absolutely genius multiplayer!

    I've had no problem with the controls at all.

    Best thing on live arcade since Geometry Wars imo.
  • Macross #23 5 years ago

    I think that AdamOfEternia is quite possibly more funny then UKResistance :)
  • Carlo #24 5 years ago

    "So pretty average is the new good?"

    In an age of multi-million pound game development costs, games that would score 5/10 or less are *rarely* published these days (Hence IMO you rarely see scores below 5/10 on here).

    I think the game (Viva) is pretty average (and that's still better than Small Arms IMO). I've actually played it, and while that opinion is bound to change (for better or worse) as I spend more hours on it, that's my opinion of it.

    You want to call an opinion of a game that a person has played 'trolling', go ahead. You'd look pretty fucking stupid though.
  • glaeken #25 5 years ago

    Yep tried the demo on Live and could not control it. The whole moving and aiming with different sticks is tricky enough without the addition of a platform game element.
  • Carlo #26 5 years ago

    LeD:

    You can like a pretty average game.

    You can conclude differently from other people, and that does not make you a troll.


    Want previous examples? My Reader Review on 'Lost in Blue', and my recommendations for Age of Empries: Age of Kings DS - both of which I notice you didn't run out screaming 'troll' because my opinion differd from most other people).



    EDIT: And I'm still waiting for an appoligy from you for falsely claiming I 'pollute 360 game comment's threads' which I clearly do not ;)
    Edited by 1 at 04/12/06 @ 13:27
  • Makkuro #27 5 years ago

    Best bad pun ever.

    Anyway, it's possible to like something that isn't particularly good, and it's possible for something average to be very good indeed. For instance, the average spacecraft is quite well engineered. It's also possible for something average to be nauseatingly horrific, like the average post by AdamOfEternia. Think again before calling people trolls needlessly.
  • Carlo #28 5 years ago

    @LeD

    then I gladly appoligise for understating Viva's appeal. from my PoV, Viva was going to disapoint me. To find it was as good as I found it was a plesant supprise for me.

    Lets just blame the bloke in Game for saying I wasn't going to like it and it was shit and I should have bought GOW instead. :)
  • haowan #29 5 years ago

    OK, now you both kiss. Kiss, damn you
  • TonyBlair #30 5 years ago

    Carlo & LeDilettante can't you two just do the dance of love...

  • Calgon #31 5 years ago

    I think LD has a point, Carlo's behavior is baffling... just wasting his money on games that he thinks will be crap(since he most likely hates MS/Xbox), wassat about then? So he can get an opportunity to say he's "played it and it's crap"?(possibly... perhaps I should enter loads of competitions for a PS3, win one --even though the console and games have failed to interest me in the slightest-- and tell everybody how crap PS3 gamers tastes are in their forums... but then I can think of better things to do with my time).

    These are strange times this industry is going through, the fanboys are getting stranger all the time as a result.
    Edited by 1 at 04/12/06 @ 17:12
  • Calgon #32 5 years ago

    Ok where was I?... Ah yes the game :)

    Shame that, this was one of the more promising looking Live Arcade games.
  • cyber_nicco #33 5 years ago

    EG, please correct the score. It obviously deserves a 7.
  • bloodflowers #34 5 years ago

    Generous review - game is horribly broken in places, and the controls are terrible. Even moving secondary fire so jump was the left trigger would make it 5x better, but there's no reconfigure option (many games fall down here - so sad). If you happen to fall down a ledge on the train level for example, good luck finding your character again. Weapons are unbalanced to say the least. Meh.
  • NthSimulachum #35 5 years ago

    Not as good as gears then?

    *wonders when meme will die*