Small Arms Review
Smashing.
Version tested: Xbox 360
Small Arms has been billed as Smash Bros. with guns, and that's a reasonable summary (unlike the weather outside these days, which is unreasonably wintery), but where you might imagine some sort of collusion between platforming combat and shoot-where-you-go gunnery, the controls are actually dual-stick, closer to something like Robotron.
And so players leap around manically, double-jumping and grabbing the edge of ledges, and as they go they're using the right analogue stick to aim and the triggers to fire off bullets, rockets, plasma, icicles, and even high-calibre sniper rounds. You can still go up to someone and punch them in the head, but it's actually a bit of an afterthought; the bulk of the combat is ranged, and sees you jumping to evade enemies rather than to meet them.
There are 12 combatants (four of which are unlockable) and eight stages (one unlockable), and as well as a health gauge you've also got an ammo meter to marshal, either replenishing it with pick-ups or picking up a new weapon, of which there are quite a few to replace your character's standard offering. You'd be wrong to expect the depth and diversity of a proper beat-'em-up though. Instead of special moves, the protagonists have default guns, but, with several life-bars to exhaust before death, you can expect a game in Small Arms to adopt a different timbre as often as new weapons present themselves. Characters effectively swap characteristics when they do.
Really it's the character of the levels that has the most impact on the scale and tactics of a match, and the eight provided are neatly varied. Most are static, having you hop around a particular single-screen environment trying to aim your projectiles between platforms, up and over the nose of a rocket in a silo, through holes in rotting logs and under canopies. Others scroll as you play, like a train-top level with multiple carriages, crane wagons and so on, and a weird tornado level where you're hopping from giant tyre to uprooted mansion to floating scaffold and so on. Some walk the line between the two, with moving elements or platforms that shatter under the weight of rockets.

Some up, getting beat 'em. Yesterday.
Graphically the 360 does a lovely job of all of this, even if it's a bit dark in places (brighten up, Xbox developers!), and the little yelps and explosive effects mean it's obvious when you've hit someone, while an array of relatively simple achievements mean there's good cause for pillaging the single-player game several times over. Like Street Fighter's old-days barrel and car smash-up levels, there's also a shooting gallery that pops up between rounds, and there's a standalone version available in the main menu (although, once you've managed 10,000 points there for the achievement, you're unlikely to return often).
Offline there's also a Challenge mode, where your aim is to survive against a long sequence of AI adversaries. Like the main single-player game, you're often pitted against several at once, and this is likely where you'll focus most of your attention if your aim is to play Small Arms alone - the leaderboards are already alive with some worryingly impressive feats, and it's a good place to go to hone your targeting skills and shore up your defence.
That said, with characters swapping dynamics with every weapon-change and only eight levels, there isn't a huge amount here to hone, nor a great deal to encourage lone replay. All the characters have quirky outfits and silly back-stories (the cute little knight likes Renaissance fairs, the unlockable tree-man is pissed off that he's all alone in the world), but they don't have much else to distinguish them once you get into the flow of a game, and the actual plot is limited to a page on the options screen.

When you're running out of ammo, a little exclamation flashes up. Which is nice for it. Good to see it getting work.
The weapons are all solid and fun to master, at least. You can fire bullets, green blobs, freeze rays, heat-seeking this, that and the other, William Tell inspired bow-cast explosive apples, even mines, and there's a handsome sword if you want to run after people shouting BANZAI. But even so there's nothing especially novel about any of your tools. It's more Unreal than Worms. And that lack of variety and novelty has a worrisome effect on the game's long-term prospects, particularly offline, where the AI can be really quite dreadful in places (happily sitting on the other side of a level waiting for you to pick it off, in the worst cases).
Then again, this isn't the sort of game designed to be played extensively on your own. The idea is to get some friends round or go online. In both areas Small Arms comes to life, but voice comms are a bit of a must if you're playing on Live. Otherwise playing with strangers can be a bit uninvolving and standoffish. Better to get a group together and gang up on each other.
Ultimately though it's none of these things that stops Small Arms short of greatness - even without the technical depth of a Street Fighter or Smash Bros., it's still riotously enjoyable in the right context. Instead what lets the side down is the controls. Having to move around, jump, aim and fire simultaneously is too hard to do comfortably, even if you can graduate from using the A button to favouring one of the bumpers for jumping.
It still feels clumsy, and while it's possible to overcome this in time and reach a decent standard, it robs the game of some of its accessibility - something critical to its multiplayer appeal - and your ultimate proficiency in moving, jumping and firing at the same time is only likely to announce itself long after you've exhausted what depths there are to excavate. Hopefully there'll be some reasonably priced downloadable content to keep things going and stave that fatigue off though, because Small Arms is certainly worthy of a trigger-happy Friday night, even if it can't quite match the spectacular genius of Smash Bros.
6 / 10
You may also like...
-
Why Can't Games Do Sex?
-
Dear Esther Review
-
UFC Undisputed 3 Review
-
Eurogamer.net Podcast #100: Ellie returns! And we filmed it!
-
Girl Vader stars in Kinect Star Wars trailer
-
Remedy discusses Alan Wake 2
-
Assassin's Creed 3, Splinter Cell: Retribution coming this year?
-
Darksiders 2 release date announced
-
Will there be a PS3 version of The Witcher 2?
-
Mojang won't sue FortressCraft dev, "bored" by Minecraft clones
-
Metal Gear Online to be switched off in June
-
Mass Effect 3 teaser trailer invades Earth
-
If I Were in a Sealed Room With a Girl, I'd Probably XXX trailer
-
Only Modern Warfare 3 made more money than Skyrim in 2011
-
Total War: Shogun 2: Fall of the Samurai gameplay
-
Motorola Xoom 2 Tablet Reviews
-
App of the Day: Candy Train
-
PlayStation Vita trailer launches new Sony campaign
-
Happy Action Theater Review
-
Dead Island dev's Haste becomes Mad Riders
-
Why Devs Owe You Nothing
-
Skullgirls trailer features Nurse Valentine
-
Who Killed Rare?
-
Wii RPG Pandora's Tower release date
-
Resistance: Burning Skies PS Vita release date









Comments (34) Latest comment 5 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
/goes back to playing a pretty average Viva Pinata
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
/Wants to go back to playing the awesome Viva Pinata but has to work
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
woe. is. me.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Though I'm not sure you're entitled to say you're a little 'sick of me polluting 360 comments threads'... I think you'll find me very much missing from the majority of them, and when I do comment, it's because I've actually played them.
The 'fucks sake' is because I had hopped this was going to be a better game than it turned out to be. Unlike Viva which I thought would dissapoint me, but I'm finding to be supprisingly distracting and subtle.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
So where are all these comments threads I'd 'polluted' LeD? Besides, why does me showing my dissapointment of a review that failed to meet my expectations cause you such anguish?
Cool it LeD
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Especially as I like to keep the same weapon and so need those ammo drops, jumping becomes all about dodging, using the air dodge drift move thing and kicking peeps off ledges becore reaching a nice plateaux and sniping accros the screen.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
the bumpers are already set to be jump I think - I found it a bit better, but then went back to using A, but changing my play style
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Got to say, I think this is a great little game and worthy of 800 marketplace points. Tis good as a wind down game after a session of Gears, CH and the like.
Each to their own though I guess.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Surprised by the negative comments for this: it's absolutely genius multiplayer!
I've had no problem with the controls at all.
Best thing on live arcade since Geometry Wars imo.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
In an age of multi-million pound game development costs, games that would score 5/10 or less are *rarely* published these days (Hence IMO you rarely see scores below 5/10 on here).
I think the game (Viva) is pretty average (and that's still better than Small Arms IMO). I've actually played it, and while that opinion is bound to change (for better or worse) as I spend more hours on it, that's my opinion of it.
You want to call an opinion of a game that a person has played 'trolling', go ahead. You'd look pretty fucking stupid though.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
You can like a pretty average game.
You can conclude differently from other people, and that does not make you a troll.
Want previous examples? My Reader Review on 'Lost in Blue', and my recommendations for Age of Empries: Age of Kings DS - both of which I notice you didn't run out screaming 'troll' because my opinion differd from most other people).
EDIT: And I'm still waiting for an appoligy from you for falsely claiming I 'pollute 360 game comment's threads' which I clearly do not
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Anyway, it's possible to like something that isn't particularly good, and it's possible for something average to be very good indeed. For instance, the average spacecraft is quite well engineered. It's also possible for something average to be nauseatingly horrific, like the average post by AdamOfEternia. Think again before calling people trolls needlessly.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
then I gladly appoligise for understating Viva's appeal. from my PoV, Viva was going to disapoint me. To find it was as good as I found it was a plesant supprise for me.
Lets just blame the bloke in Game for saying I wasn't going to like it and it was shit and I should have bought GOW instead.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
These are strange times this industry is going through, the fanboys are getting stranger all the time as a result.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Shame that, this was one of the more promising looking Live Arcade games.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
*wonders when meme will die*