Jump to navigation
Advertisement

S.L.A.I. Steel Lancer Arena International Review

PlayStation 2 Review by Martin Coxall

25 November, 2005

As Albert Einstein would have probably said (if he wasn't, you know, dead), game ideas should be as simple as possible, and no simpler. When an idea is simple, yet well executed, you can end up with awe-inspiring things-of-legend, which continue to draw whimpers of delight from folk for years. But if a game crosses that fine line into the too-simple, it becomes a forgettable, put-down-in-half-an-hour outcast.

This then. This S.L.A.I. It's something in-between.

It's an arena game that involves running, jumping and blasting the living toiletries out of chums, as becomes obvious when you decode the name: Steel Lancer Arena International. It wobbles and clunks its way unsteadily along the line we've mentioned, and occasionally plonks a big metal claw the wrong side of it.

Along with the aforementioned runny-jumpy-blasty, you've got network options to allow the unleashing of metal death on insomniac Americans. It features a range of highly death-equippable futuristic mini-metal-gear-like so-called SV models; a large but underwhelming single-player mode, destined to be largely ignored; and a good-sized but barely more-than-whelming networked multiplayer mode. This is all wrapped in enough truly lovely post-cyberpunk gift-wrapping that you occasionally wish they'd shown quite as much love to the main game as they have to their menu systems and array of cute loading screens.

But, cute packaging is not quite enough; as I've already said, it's all about the delivery.

Regrettably, the biggest element of S.L.A.I. is the single-player game; regrettably because, frankly, if you buy a game like this it's because you want to frag real people across an area of the Internet the size of Belgium.

'S.L.A.I. Steel Lancer Arena International' Screenshot guns

I know that these guns will make you happy.

In the one-up mode, you are given control of an upgradeable 'chip' and then lease or buy a psycho stalkbot to build around it, take into the OMG Virtual Reality arena, and do explody battles within servers hosting a pretty 'cyberspace' landscape, backronymically betitled the 'Hyper Advanced Virtual Environment Network'. Or HAVEN, presumably.

Within this cyberpornographic vision of a future Internet devoted entirely to blowing up robots, you may buy and sell luxury options and dash-mounted trimmings for your beloved instrument of death so that they'll be ready to rumble again in time for the next virtual-murderous outing; fortunately, there is an odd but useful non-linearity though the passage of time, which means that you can do this without having to worry a great deal about schedules and other micromanagement trivia. In fact, you can fight whenever you want to really, and it always seems to be time for the next fight.

But S.L.A.I. doesn't want you to always be fighting; occasionally it's in your best interests to go wandering the Gallium Arsenide corridors of the online world, expansive as they are, just so the programmers can show you the attention they've lavished on everything except the gameplay.

The Neuromantic world on offer is huge and gorgeous. It's stuffed full of cute features like chat rooms, random Windows-esque crashes, frag-lag, and other coy simulacra of network effects to evoke the spirit of the guts of a regional gaming server. It's a cute way of luring players into a coherent universe. It's also clear that the developers spent more effort on it than they needed to at the expense of the main gameplay, almost certainly because they wanted to, because it was fun.

'S.L.A.I. Steel Lancer Arena International' Screenshot lift

I know that explosions lift you up.

HAVEN also offers a soul-destroyingly endless series of tutorials; but the game is simple enough that I doubt anybody will get more than halfway through, thinking "flip this" and move on to the exam. There's also oodles of other stuff; machinists, configuration zones, mechanics, botmakers, manufacturers, music vendors, and loads of other great stuff.

It's bonkers fun to just meander around; yet however highly polished, the lovely informatic overload is not what it should be about. Unfortunately, it may well turn out to be what it's remembered for, because the one-player gameplay is forgettably bland.

Pre-match, the game provides you with the opportunity to put together thousands of potential deathbot-weapon combinations; specific modules can be then be further customised, but once you've made your choice, the game seems to ignore it. It's fast, stupid, bulky and gangly. Any pre-match strategy is irrelevant - either your robot is up to task or worthless. More bizarrely still, the actual play doesn't represent any of this beyond a simple win/death boolean. The game, for as fast and clumsy as it is, either leads to well-equipped and exceedingly powerful mechs, or ones that are just completely useless.

Good choice, you win. Bad choice, you're dead. The gameplay is completely unbalanced; if you get lucky, you will create an unstoppable mechadeath on your first go, and make fifty kills without taking so much as a graze on your undercarriage. This game is easy. The gameplay is fun, functional, and dare I say it, rather classically good, but challenging it isn't. That's why this game has to be played against meatspace denizens. Only then is anybody ever likely to put up a fight.

'S.L.A.I. Steel Lancer Arena International' Screenshot frag

So frag for my love.

Netted up, its simplistic strafe-and-frag classic gameplay comes into its own. Evoking primordial memories of Armagetron LAN parties, the good aspects are multiplied and the bad become bearable. With three other players, it's possible to while away many hours in classic jump-and-shoot four-way rumbles, while others queue up outside the gate for the privilege. This one-in-one-out mechanism serves the game beautifully; there was no lag or performance degradation at any point.

Online is S.L.A.I.'s raison d'etre. Easy play becomes classic fun, but only when facing off against multiple opponents.

Few games offer quite as much, yet in as shallow a fashion as S.L.A.I. From the large-yet-dull single-player mode, to the simple-but-gleeful multiplayer, and the glorious presentation of HAVEN, this game is something of a triumph of style over substance. The look of the environments is varied, yet so-so in aesthetic, a bit blocky, definitely current-generation, daahling. Even the soundtrack is diverse and eclectic, and full of unexpected genre-pieces whilst still being unfulfilling.

It's this lack of depth which allows the cracks at the seams to gape somewhat. Tedious one-man combat with endless enemy-respawn, restrictive environments, and some truly shocking collision detection detract credibility from the one-player game to make it utterly ignorable.

Looking firmly along the line of simple-as-possible, it's clear that the developers, in focusing so much on the presentation of the HAVEN, rather than gameplay faults, have allowed it to stray too far into the bad half. For one player, this game, despite its expansiveness, has little to offer. But for some joyously venerable online mano-a-mano goodness, arena-based shoot-lovers will be missing a good 'un if they don't equip their shoulders with this one.

6/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about S.L.A.I: Steel Lancer Arena International on PlayStation 2?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-17 of 17 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
ImGameCube
25/11/05 @ 08:51
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
T.S.Q.I.T.M.
This Sounds Quite Interesting To Me...
Edited 1 times, most recently on 25/11/05 @ 08:53
Carlo
25/11/05 @ 09:09
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So they didn't agree with the 'less HUD makes the game more immersive' then :)
Jontacular
25/11/05 @ 09:10
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What's wrong with Phantom Crash as a name? I.D.G.I.
jack_klugman
25/11/05 @ 09:17
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Martain Coaxiall in da hizzy!
Blerk
25/11/05 @ 09:20
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
?

I've not even heard of this one!
space ace
25/11/05 @ 09:23
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
typical konami side project
?
lordofdeadside
25/11/05 @ 09:53
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
phantom crash was/is ace, quite simple, but hundreds of mech parts and it was really really playable. And animal AI computer chips, awesome! just 10 more fights...
Teeth
25/11/05 @ 09:58
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I found the review to be very compelling writing.
Perry
25/11/05 @ 10:32
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Excellent review thanks. I'm not an online player, so will give this a miss.

Cheers
disc
25/11/05 @ 10:41
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Isnt this Phantom Crash?
marmaduke
25/11/05 @ 10:45
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Joyously venerable"

Does the reviewer even understand the words he is using?
Jontacular
25/11/05 @ 11:06
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yes, it's Phantom Crash 2050 (or at least I think that was the name when it was announced).

I honestly can't fathom why they'd want to saddle it with such a shite name, but there you go.
gypsumfantastic
25/11/05 @ 11:10
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Do you mind telling me what's wrong with "joyously venerable"?

To paraphrase Mr Dumpty, the words I use mean what I choose them to mean; nothing more, nothing less.
marmaduke
25/11/05 @ 13:24
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
'Joyously venerable' would mean 'pleasingly deserving of reverence due to age', and I fail to see how that would be true with regards to an online multiplayer game involving giant robots shooting at each other that has recently come out.

"To paraphrase Mr Dumpty, the words I use mean what I choose them to mean; nothing more, nothing less."

That doesn't make any sense. If the words mean what you choose them to mean, and you do not explain that meaning, then those words are then meaningless to anyone else. Writing something in a private language and then showing it to someone is just pointless. In fact, this might not be a review at all- it might be a dissertation on Hungarian farming techniques from 1835-1842.

Anyway, I liked most of the review, just not the bits that didn't make sense ;)
gypsumfantastic
25/11/05 @ 13:38
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Tsk.

The gameplay is venerable, man. GAMEPLAY!

It's classic deathmatch arena fun, online. Thanks for enjoying the bits you understood, though. ;p
asha
25/11/05 @ 14:09
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So if this is Phantom Crash shouldn't it say that its developed by Phantagram and not konami?
Dairylee
25/11/05 @ 16:02
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm not really a fan of games involving mechs but I had the privelidge of testing this game and I found it very enjoyable and even had the chance to battle it out with the Developers. I think a 6 is a fair score but it's still worth a rent atleast.

Comments: 1-17 of 17 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery