Jump to navigation
Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

Serious Sam 2 Review

PC Review by Kieron Gillen

14 October, 2005

Serious Sam was the most first-person shooting first-person shooter in the world (even if you were mad enough to try and play it in the third-person mode). Serious Sam 2 is the same game, but prettier, madder, bigger and packed full of more options, so is obviously not nearly as good.

Let me explain.

Let's play alternate history.

This game could be one - maybe two - marks better if we could get another time machine. Instead of going to work for Valve doing whatever it is he's doing, Chet OldManMurray worked on this. Erik can stay at Double Fine, because we don't want to lose any bits of Psychonauts he may have been responsible for. We'll package up Chet, send him back through history and off to sunny Croatia where he can wave a little of his game-deconstruction/scatological magic all over this. And it'd be a better game.

At the very least they'll have an expert in the use of crates on hand.

(Or was Erik the only funny one? I don't think so. It's been a long time.)

'Serious Sam 2' Screenshot horn

Serious Sam gives us the horn. Or at least tries to.

Serious Sam was notable for its virtual lack of plot. There was probably one, of course, but it kind of disappeared beneath an endless wave of enormous bull-like beasts. With a bigger budget - pretty much the first gag in the game notes the fact - they've gone and added one, along with much more of the often funny, if slightly-self-indulgent humour which was present in the first. But while that was done as an aside in the first, now similar gags are presented in cut-scenes. They're amateurishly done, often killing the jokes even when they are funny. And, even when they work, they break up Sam's momentum.

If they were to really stress The Funny in cut-scenes, they needed someone funnier to do them. In other words, our time-travelling Chet. Also, while Chet was there, we can hope he'd point out every time that they were losing the plot. Serious Sam 2 isn't quite just another shooter - its personality is entirely unavoidable - but occasionally comes worryingly close. In the same way that Far Cry was worst when simply aping Half-Life and Doom ("The best first-person shooters have moody interior bits. We must do a bit, to show that we too are master FPS designers!") rather than doing the original and thrilling outdoors thing, when Serious Sam 2 lobs in vehicles, gun turrets or cut-scenes it doesn't work. We've seen these before, and their appearances here are distinctly half-hearted. While the explosion physics are impressive, that they don't noticeably effect the vehicle you're driving leaves us distinctly nonplussed every time we're forced to drive one.

When the formula isn't being fiddled with, though, it still presses the buttons Serious Sam did. When it was released, Serious Sam was often described as a retro-throwback to Doom (in terms of numbers of opponents) and Duke Nukem (in its cheery comedy attitude). It wasn't quite true. There had never really been a shooter like Sam when it came out - it was so shamelessly relentless, taking as much from Robotron in its trap-you-in-room-and-here-they-come design as anything more modern. While FPSs are generally renowned for their delight in inspiring claustrophobia, Serious Sam was the agoraphobic's nightmare. This created a different rhythm to play, stressed by Croteam's gleeful disregard for anything approaching realism. Doom III's Monster In The Closet design mainly caused eye-rolling due to the hyper-real world it was trying to portray. In Sam, when you blow up a crate to reveal a monster was hiding in it, you accept it as you do in the way that you do Gold Coins appearing in Super Mario or whatever. Spawning monsters into attack positions is something for you to react to and kill, not something to break atmosphere.

'Serious Sam 2' Screenshot unrealistic

Oh, that's so unrealistic. Everyone knows that T-rexs aren't purple. They're not even trying!

No one asks where the Space Invaders are coming from. If Serious Sam was (and is) a throwback to anything, it's a throwback to games ten years earlier than what's normally cited.

In Sam 2 there are a variety of locations far beyond the original game (or its half-sequel, The Second Encounter). In your quest to collect all five parts of a medallion required to defeat the still brilliantly-named Notorious Mental, the five planets you pass through are wildly different. From the opening world which shares a similar South-American Amazon feel to the mother game, on through the micro-worlds, gloriously weird re-imaginings of the East, Tim-Burton Skeleton-pop-horror, Shrek-esque mock fantasy and... oh, it goes for it, and everything's as colourful and overblown as you could wish.

In a world where first-person shooters tend towards 'You can have it in any colour, sir, as long as it's brown' colour schemes, Serious Sam 2 is a welcome excursion into the other parts of the spectrum. It occasionally even goes too far. When moving through the Micro Machines style Tiny-tiny-Sam level which closed the second world, the riot of colours caused problems with losing the weird-ass flying witches in the undergrowth.

Which segues into another of Serious Sam's better qualities: the design of the enemies. Other developers work out grand design bibles where all characters come from a true imagined society, forming a neat fabric. Conversely, at least to these eyes, it appears Croteam doesn't care in the best possible way. If it thinks it'll work, it's in there. Models vary in actual quality of construction, but it ejects ideas like nothing else. The old favourites from the last game are all re-imagined - the bomb men now have actual bombs for heads, the bulls are enormous clockwork beasts - and intermixed with the new cast. These are either the most impossibly macho creatures you can ever imagine, or the most ludicrous, or both. Take the hulking American Footballers who charge and lob footballs at you, or, on the lighter side, the grotesquely fat clowns on unicycles presenting a uniquely bizarre appearance.

'Serious Sam 2' Screenshot ea

"Same every year? This'll show 'em". EA's radical Madden 2007 makeover is sure to prove controversal.

It's enormously silly and all the better for it.

However, just because there are a huge array of things to see and shoot in it, doesn't mean that it's not repetitive. It's not a game which anyone but the most slaughter-hungry can play for entire days at a time, and the largest encounters - which is pretty much all of them - are physically draining things. Serious Sam will tend to be something you boot up upon occasion rather than fall obsessively in love with. The co-operative play alone will mean that a true devotee of the death of imaginary people will have to return, if only to share a special, bloody moment with a friend.

But what drags Sam down is the pace-breaking additions, which in turn make it easier to notice its other faults. While the understanding of how to entertain someone in a game where there may as well be nothing but the fire key is huge steps beyond second-raters like the tedious Painkiller, it doesn't manage the consistency of Sam. There is a tendency in the level design to encourage Sam to be passive, pull back and let the monsters come to him rather than move through an environment and having them counter-attack. While the waves of enemies were always noticeable in Serious Sam, they're even more so in this one.

Serious Sam's still an enormously likeable game. Where games can be antiseptic, it's always clear that this is a game made by human beings with desires, tastes and things which they think are funny that no-one else has done. With the luxury of a budget, Croteam has tended to indulge a little too much in the latter and it's resulted in a less elegant game. But it's hard not to find at least some love for a game which thinks (for example) it's a good idea to put a crocodile in a Croatian jersey, hide it in a level and provide a CROcodile secret bonus.

7/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Serious Sam 2 on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-34 of 34 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
MORZTAN
14/10/05 @ 06:30
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
First ever!!

I'll pass on this one
Talha
14/10/05 @ 06:31
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A fair enough evaluation, although the hopeless Far Cry fanboy in me (not to mention ultra-sensitive) cannot ignore the jibe at the game's indoor levels. They served to provide a good contrast and anyway the EG review did not even find the outdoors too thrilling at the time. It would get grilled if it did not contain any indoor level and anyway they were not half bad. In fact this game is so different to Far Cry that it seems doubly insulting to cite that game in order to throw one more insult at it.

And by the way, what does Doom 3 contain but 'boring, indoor levels?'

Sorry for the rant guys - just had to get it off my chest. Back to this game, though: agree with the review.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 14/10/05 @ 07:30
UncleLou
14/10/05 @ 06:38
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hohum hohum. If this would have been released a few weeks ago, I would have immediately picked it up, but there's too much coming out now in the next few weeks.

Good point that it's physically draining, that's how the demo felt. One for the next gaming drought in early 2006 probably.
SaccharinMetric
14/10/05 @ 06:39
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Kieron, don't you think that Serious Sam (1) took the shmup mentality and transferred to a situation where you were in first person and on the ground? If there was any kind of aping going on, I agree, it wasn't Doom or Duke Nukem, it was Gradius. I felt the oncoming waves were the attraction of the first game, and the pseduo-sequel, which I feel gave a more fun experience, strayed from the purity of the first's 'battle porn' mentality, but delivered more atmosphere and choke points to vary up the gameplay.

Painkiller was strictly for Iron Maiden fans. I therefore think it rocked.

Thanks for the heads up on the Old Man Murray boys - I had no idea about either of those two career moves. Come back Zinc, you're sorely needed!

EDIT:Fixed

Anyway, good review. I'll be sure to ninja/pirate a copy post-haste.

-Xian
Edited 1 times, most recently on 14/10/05 @ 07:52
Machiavel
14/10/05 @ 07:10
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
tile machine? :)

You complaining about the textures?
Lothar Hex
14/10/05 @ 07:33
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm nipping into work on my way to Uni today. I'll pick either this up or Spartan: Total Warrior.
Ulgen
14/10/05 @ 07:40
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'd rather go with Spartan...
Lothar Hex
14/10/05 @ 07:45
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Eh depends whats in.
finian
14/10/05 @ 08:21
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Any word on the xbox version??????
Macross
14/10/05 @ 08:28
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
rofl that review was almost as mental as the game, i was being constantly attacked by waves of funny looking words and I think its too early in the morning :p

anyway, shame it doesnt live up to the original, still if it shares anything with it itl be worth picking up just for the insane fun value of facing down 100s of monsters charging at you and your mates with your backs to each other and chainguns blazing, ah so liberating ;)
Xerx3s
14/10/05 @ 08:32
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Will the xbx version support SS Coop? >:)
captainrentboy
14/10/05 @ 08:46
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've been playing the xbox version in work lately,I found it surprisingly good,apart from the fact that I find myself not blinking for 10 minutes at at time.A real major letdown is how wide a range your gun's aiming reticle thingy has,it seems that it can be a few metres either side of a monster and you'll still kill them,which makes these wave of enemies piss easy to whoop.
smelly
14/10/05 @ 09:06
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sounds Great! Deffo type of fps i want to play

Im off to order a copy..
symmetry
14/10/05 @ 09:19
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't care about the score, I must play this game.

Especially in co-op mode.
CargoCult
14/10/05 @ 09:22
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
While the explosion physics are impressive, that they don't noticeably effect the vehicle you're driving

Tut-tut! ;-)

Edited 1 times, most recently on 14/10/05 @ 10:21
kangarootoo
14/10/05 @ 09:25
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm speculating, but I'd be amazed if this didn't have a co-op mode, given that the previous two titles included it.

As Far Cry: Insticts got a mention, I feel justified in mentioning I played through the first large indoor area last night and it is way better than the indoor sctions of the PC version. Plus the dialogue is really growing on me (Jack's amazed exclamation of "No f*cking way!" when you jump a ravine in feral mode for the first time is well funny and very appropriate).
DNM
14/10/05 @ 09:44
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Actually, if SS1 is anything to go by, co-op is where it's at anyway... Stupendous fun. :)
Xerx3s
14/10/05 @ 09:52
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I know that it will have xbl coop, but Txbx.com says that it will only be one player on one xbx. Has anyone played the xbx version and check this out yet? Split Screen in SS1 coop was ace.
Lothar Hex
14/10/05 @ 10:09
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Picked up this AND Spartan: Total Warrior if anyone cares.
MikeD
14/10/05 @ 10:16
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't entirely agree with the review. Serious Sam the original did have humour and over the top things. But not AS over the top as in this one. Yes the world were bright. But they weren't hugely neon coloured 'in your face' colourful. They were quite natural feeling, in fact.

Yes, the enemies were 'unrealistic' in the sense of the real world. But they their designs weren't necessarily silly as they are in Serious Sam II. They ranged between cannon fodder (normal soldiers) to scary (the bomb guys the first time, who DID have bombs for head, just not the size of the nagasaki bomb, slight faulty memory their Kieron) to impressive (the bulls, the endboss, the big 4 four-armed creatures). In SS II almost each and every creature is supposed to be silly, funny and odd. And it just doesn't quite work the same.

I agree about the comedy. It was very unobtrusive in the original game. Mostly found in secrets in fact. Once the designers read how much people enjoyed the funny bits they decided that there must be more of it and it must be all the time. It stopped being funny (mostly).

Hopefully it'll sitll be fun in a co-op romp. Can't comment on the score and general sense of quality mentioned in the review as I haven't played it yet. but it sounds like you nailed it.
IJ
14/10/05 @ 10:18
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought this was out absolutely AGES ago? Like a year ago or something?
MikeD
14/10/05 @ 10:30
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hmmm. Then they carried boms in their hands? please?

Damn!

/should have eaten breakfast before posting

Yes, it's my day off.

Anyway, imo that just reinforces my point. They were headless and scary before (standing in an open plain. Hearing screaming in teh distance. It's coming closer. More screaming. Jesus that's a lot f screaming. Oh god, there they are, kill them now NOW< NOOOOOOOO!!!!). Now they are silly and slightly disturbing at most. :-)
smelly
14/10/05 @ 10:33
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I liked the unexpected things like the whole room spinning around you in the first.

Does this version have stuff like that?

if so.. im deffo buying...

Also what's it like multiplayer?
MikeD
14/10/05 @ 11:15
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No, next encounter was made by a seperate team especially for ps2 and gamecube.

Serious Sam II is the REAL next-gen.
flippet
14/10/05 @ 11:41
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Where exactly are those Space Invaders coming from?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 14/10/05 @ 12:41
Ulgen
14/10/05 @ 12:05
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Lothar Hex:
Guess that was a good call... ;-)

BTW, I read somewhere that SS2 Xbox DO NOT have split screen. That was a big dissappointment to me, as split screen on the first xbox version was a blast. Hah! "A blast"... I could almost get a job here at Eurogamer... ;-)
BremXJones
14/10/05 @ 12:25
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Talha: Doom III is much worse than Far Cry, and I don't believe I said otherwise. Far Cry was one of my favourite games FPS of the last couple of years, just that trying to do what everyone else did was misguided Keeping Up With The Jones.

Saacharin Metric: Yes, I do. Agreed pretty much entirely.

Flippet: The top of the screen, you fool!

KG
MikeD
14/10/05 @ 13:32
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Kieron Gillon a Doom 3 hater? No surprised there.

Not enough emergent gameplay, eh? :-)

incidentally. Keeping up with the jones was a great game, multiplayer.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 14/10/05 @ 14:46
krudster [mod]
14/10/05 @ 16:02
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I still don't get why everyone lets Crytek get away with The Worst Voiceovers in the History of FPS Titles. Talk about shattering your sense of disbelief.
ssuellid
14/10/05 @ 16:18
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Worse than Sudeki?
Talha
15/10/05 @ 02:33
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@KG: Thanks for sharing my enthusiasm for Far Cry. As for Doom 3 being much worse, of course I agree but look at the EG scores. But then, its a matter of opinion.

@Krudster: Yeah I agree the voiceovers sucked big time, but (1) there were not many of them, (2) we have seen much worse as well and (3) they did not seem out of place in the overall OTT nature of the game. And hey, give the guys a break, it was their first game!!!!
MrAtheist
15/10/05 @ 14:02
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Krudster just let it go, stop going on about the bloody voice acting in Far Cry.

Cheesy voice acting in Far Cry? I agree, but what about the stiff-upper lip British commander from HL2? The yoda speak aliens? What about that Mr Double Standards!? :)
bootsy_NL_30
15/10/05 @ 22:00
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
krudster and anyone else I disagree ...the worst voice over of all time is quite clearly henry rollins in Mace Griffen

allen
16/10/05 @ 03:15
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
how about a game of lucky hit ?

Comments: 1-34 of 34 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Metaboli

X View gallery