Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Ridge Racer DS Review

DS ntsc-us Import Review by Tom Bramwell

14 December, 2004

There's a reason people don't use pens to steer cars. Try to guess what it is.

If you chose, "Because it's a stupid idea and it will never work," you win! If, on the other hand, you started shifting uneasily in your seat and thinking "Yeah, but what if they did this," and envisioning madcap steering wheel gizmos with styluses flailing and dials and readouts sprinkled all over the screen and crazy men screaming "YEAH! FINAL STRETCH BABY!" and Space Invaders playing on screens as you drive past, then you probably work for Namco. Or NST. Or whoever ported this from the N64. And you probably ought to ring up your car insurer and apologise in advance.

Stick to what you're good at...

'Ridge Racer DS' Screenshot 1

To be fair though, the idea of using a touch-screen to turn a steering wheel might sound doable on paper. It's just that, having spent a very, very long time swearing profusely at Ridge Racer DS [and, readers, by profusely, he means enough screaming to warrant neighbours filing an anti social behaviour complaint -Ed], we have to wonder whether any of the designers actually did stay with the game beyond that critical paper phase. If they did, surely they would have realised that moving a stylus tip left and right of an invisible centre point would never be as accurate or intuitive as using a directional pad or analogue stick, because you simply can't judge that pivotal middle area of the screen without glancing down or receiving the sort of tactile feedback you get when an analogue stick is centred under your thumb.

And having witnessed that, they wouldn't have left us with a pair of alternatives that are, respectively, even more uncontrollable on the one hand and similarly lacking in necessary feedback on the other. Using the D-pad to steer may be the most natural thing to do, and we stuck to it for hours, but the digital input is too imprecise and you wind up overcorrecting all the time and bashing into things - and porting the notoriously frustrating Ridge Racer 64 and its shoddy collision detection was always destined to accentuate that, literally at every turn.

Using the thumb strap is ultimately the best option, even if it feels incredibly strange to begin with (and reminds us why everybody in console-land uses analogue sticks instead of releasing laptop-style touchpad controllers). The idea is that it accepts input left or right of wherever your thumb strap point first touched the screen, in much the same way that Super Mario 64 DS creates an "analogue zone" when your stylus tip first touches the screen, and measures input within a certain radius of that point as if you were edging an analogue stick away from its upright position. The result, in the case of Ridge Racer DS, is a more controllable but unnervingly uncomfortable and intangible steering mechanic that we've never quite been happy using. Even if it is the most effective of the three.

The controls, then, are a bit of a mess, albeit one you can work with - and that doesn't get Ridge Racer DS off to a good start.

You can buff that out

'Ridge Racer DS' Screenshot 2

As we struggled beyond our initial reservations about the control scheme and got stuck into the meat of the game (which, although we feel a bit redundant pointing this out after all that jabbering, is an arcade racing game that involves going very fast and doing silly powerslides - called "drifts" - around tight bends. Just in case anybody is suffering from retrograde amnesia and doesn't know what "Ridge Racer" is), it became apparent that while matters don't go and make things worse by diving rapidly downhill subsequent to those first few frustrating attempts at "Quick Race", they don't really do that much in the ascendance either.

Apart from the redistribution of screen clutter between top and touch screens (on top: time remaining, current placement; on bottom: a giant representation of a steering wheel, a small track map, lap times, gear shifting information, and for no good reason a total lack of a rearview mirror), RR DS is virtually a straight port of the N64's Ridge Racer 64, and that means some 20 Grand Prix races and 32 cars to unlock in total. Thanks to the DS's new feature-set and what we can only assume was a creeping sense of guilt on the part of the developer, all that's joined by a new six-driver wireless multiplayer mode, which happily lets you race against up to five pals with only one game card between you. But more on that later.

In terms of the single-player action, the game splits your attention between Grand Prix and Car Attack modes. The Grand Prix consists of various track layouts derived from three key island road structures, including reverse versions, and the goal is to finish first in a field of around 12 - do so in all three of your currently available races and you win a trophy and unlock the next three. Car Attack, on the other hand, consists of tackling various cars one-on-one on each of the GP tracks to unlock them for use in subsequent races, and obviously you'll want to be doing that as you go along, or you're just going to make things harder for yourself.

And, frankly, Ridge Racer DS is plenty hard enough as it stands. Just steering effectively is a pain in the rear spoiler, as we've pointed out at length, but that's by no means the only source of the often crippling frustration we felt when we played it. Another perhaps even more crucial failing is the way the game seems to totally louse up drifting, surely the single most important thing about the entire driving experience in a Ridge Racer game.

Tails of woe

'Ridge Racer DS' Screenshot 3

As in every other Ridge Racer, you can drift on the DS in order to take even hairpin turns at outrageous speeds - all you have to do is release the accelerator as you turn in and then clamp it back down as you exit, steering away from the near side to stop the car fishtailing, or, for slower turns, clamp the brake and then the accelerator instead as you enter and exit. Except, in Ridge Racer DS, managing to stop the car fishtailing is not just an art, it's an abstract, mangled-faces-upside-down-inside-a-volcano-dancing-a-jig-reciting-Nietzsche kind of art that simply makes no sense. In the end we got so frustrated trying to straighten the bloody cars up after turns that for a while we gave up drifting more or less completely. On the one or two turns per track where it was absolutely unavoidable, we simply slammed into the barricade and drove off. With any car capable of reasonable acceleration this proved a damn sight less restrictive than drifting and then slamming back and forward into barriers and other cars as we attempted to exit. Drifting does get a bit easier with time, and with better cars, but only marginally. Never enough. And did we mention there are no gravel traps or any other spillovers protecting the lightning pace of the racetrack from the brutal solidity of the trackside furniture? Imagine how this dovetails into our fishtail dilemma, and truly understand our silly pun at the top of this section.

But wait! There's so much more aggravation still to get through! On top of being unable to control the game particularly easily, skewering its unique selling point (or at least coating it in Baby Oil), and designing tracks that give you no margin for error (or any margins at all for that matter), the team behind Ridge Racer DS has also failed to rein in the outrageous AI opposition. Although you can make steady progress in Ridge Racer DS for a good few hours, happily (or at least not too unhappily) conquering the first few tiers of competition, by the time the game introduces the reverse stages the requirement to place first is really quite brutal. It took us several hours to overcome three tracks on the fourth tier when most of the rest had capitulated after just a handful of attempts.

The AI's not content with just being fast though. We're not saying they cheat, but they do seem to get the rub of the green more often than not. Any time you slam into a wall or an AI car, you take a massive dip in speed, but they generally don't. What's more, you can't help but slam into the buggers, because the default bumper cam (despite being by far the best option for Ridge Racer games, and a darn sight better than the third-person view here for a multitude of reasons) makes it very hard to judge small gaps, so you wind up hitting cars when you think you should snake through them, or worse, as happened on a few occasions, you come too close together at one side of the track leading into a tunnel or narrowing road and the game holds you both up for a fraction of a second and then spits your opponent out with a burst of unlikely acceleration. Yeah. And did we mention the AI cars often swerve to get in your way?

Signal failure

'Ridge Racer DS' Screenshot 4

More woe: despite having two whole screens to play with, there's something about the viewing angle and the quality of the visuals (which are often very bland, even for an early 3D racing game, and even if they are characteristically Ridge Racer) that makes it too hard to react quickly to sharp turns, particularly if they come in anything approaching quick succession, and this renders the game needlessly frustrating on any course more complex than a few straights and light turns. Granted, you could make an argument that it's at its most satisfying when you finally grasp the track design and start turning previously soul-destroying chicane into white-knuckle rides through an adrenaline shower. But we'd counter that with the assertion that games like Ridge Racer Type 4 gave you those thrills during the first few hours you spent with them anyway, rather than forcing you to take a cheese grater to your tolerance levels, and that the process of getting really good at those tracks gave you an even bigger thrill than anything Ridge Racer DS can deliver. Oh, and we'd also beat you round the head with various clubs bearing slogans like "CRAP CONTROLS", "STUPID COLLISION DETECTION" and "CHEATING AI".

In the end, we found Ridge Racer DS so frustrating that when it did eventually let us win, we even suspected it was being dishonest about that. We began to wonder if it had some sort of stress-o-meter, which used the built-in microphone to gauge the volume and severity of our complaints and then introduced subtle computer aids when our wailing reached crescendo. We have no proof of this of course, but it did seem a bit easier after we took to threatening it in-between races and hoping it would wilt in terror.

So, er, what do we say in its defence? We've been bashing it more or less all the way through, after all. Well.

Chief amongst Ridge Racer DS's achievements is the game's wireless multiplayer capability. Six players racing along using just the one game card is quite a feat, and the downloading parties have only the loss of commentary and music to bemoan. Or, in this case, celebrate. You can even use AI opponents to plug the gaps in your starting grid if you're particularly suicidal. And even though we think it's a badly designed racing game for the most part, when every party is suffering the game's problems simultaneously it's something of a leveller.

Furthermore, despite the level of ranting and raving this game fostered in us (and, believe us, the severity of abuse was so acute that our neighbours probably recalled the time we played the last level of The Getaway on PS2), we still can't help turning on the DS to play it every now and again, perhaps while we're waiting for a file to upload, or an email to come back. It fills the time - so often badly, and with malice aforethought, but it does. Whack on a track that doesn't involve too much drifting - preferably in Time Attack mode so there are no other cars around - and you can even derive quite a lot of pleasure from just whizzing around without too much incident.

Crestfallen

Still, it isn't going to take much to top it. There's just too much about it that gets up our nose, and however much we jam our finger up there trying to straighten it out, favouring the outside line or not, it still slides back and forth just out of reach. Which seems like a suitably unpleasant metaphor to close on.

As a port of an N64 game, Ridge Racer DS is another example of the technical burden the DS can happily shoulder. It runs at a solid 30 frames per second throughout, and looks exactly like it used to do. As a product in its own right though, it's beset on all sides by problems. The course design lacks variation and is too restrictive with no room for error; error which is piled on regardless courtesy of poor collision detection, awkward controls, and an unreasonable difficulty curve that slopes too far upwards too soon - regardless of whether you have less trouble with the drifting mechanics than we did. Racing games, particularly quick-fix arcade racing games, shouldn't be this frustrating, and no game should ever kill you off with design failings more than it knocks you back when your skills are in question. Yet, wireless multiplayer aside, we can't help but feel that's the only thing Ridge Racer DS particularly excels at.

6/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Ridge Racer DS on DS?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 53 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
dokodemo
14/12/04 @ 09:15
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Surprisingly high review score.
Eighthours
14/12/04 @ 09:23
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Surprisingly high score.

Does this mean that the DS is totally unsuited for certain genres, thanks to the (baffling) lack of an analogue stick?
Xensor
14/12/04 @ 09:26
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Judging by the large volume of negative commentary i would have expected no higher than 5 but then again what do i know???
Whizzo
14/12/04 @ 09:32
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Does it have a 60Hz mode? ;-)
The Great Cornholio
14/12/04 @ 09:37
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
6/10 ?!?! WTF?!
gizmo
14/12/04 @ 09:37
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
AGAIN, DS control issues - its all you ever read about it. Square peg, round hole. The opening line of the review sums it up totally.
tiddles
14/12/04 @ 09:45
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Anyone ever played Live For Speed? That had a great steering control system using the mouse, where you very simply had a slightly curved bar along the bottom of the screen, with a big red marker moving left and right to show you how sharply you were steering. Maybe something a bit more like that and a bit less like "here's a steering wheel" might have worked better here...
Aretak
14/12/04 @ 09:54
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Baffling final score considering the review content.
Shinzou
14/12/04 @ 09:59
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
oh dear. wonder what the psps analogue 'nipple' is going to be like for these sort of games.
Tiger_Walts
14/12/04 @ 10:00
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This was a 9/10 game but they removed the motorbikes, and the monkeys.... and the ninjas. Come to think of it, there may have been a pirate vessel on the bay at one point.
gizmo
14/12/04 @ 10:05
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Lol, that huge steering wheel is hilarious. It just re-iterates why DS will flop IMHO - we just want one screen and proper control!
spindizzy
14/12/04 @ 10:12
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Everyone's said this already but I'm going to say it again (because I like the sight of my own text on screen ;-) but that score really doesn't match the tone of the review. I was expecting 3/10... 6 is "better than average", no?
drumbaby
14/12/04 @ 10:20
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think using the stylus for the windscreen wipers would have been the way to go.
disc
14/12/04 @ 10:27
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
this is an area the NDS really shouldnt try to compete with the PSP on... never mind the control problems...
luisalis
14/12/04 @ 10:30
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Surprising score. Expected to see nothing more than a 4/10 after the review.
dynarama
14/12/04 @ 10:44
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Err... so where did the 6 out of 10 come from then?
Harpe
14/12/04 @ 10:51
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sorry, does seem a bizarre score given the tone.
Smiggs
14/12/04 @ 11:09
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
why did they bother with this at all? Surely it should have been a case of looking at the control system and just saying 'NEXT!' quite loudly.

It'll be interesting to see what nintendo come up with for mario kart
The Great Cornholio
14/12/04 @ 11:56
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Maybe we'll get an Edge-style, 'ooh sorry there was a printing error we meant to give it a 3'.
Roamer
14/12/04 @ 12:04
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Does the PSP have an 'analog' stick like the PS2? If so, I think a digital pad would be preferrable.
Pina
14/12/04 @ 12:11
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Dont you usually score a game on graphics independently of the platform? Then why the high score?
Ghetto-lapin
14/12/04 @ 12:52
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Color me confused.... 6/10 ?
Artemus
14/12/04 @ 13:38
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Fugly.

Think I'll stick with the PSP version.
mojojojomo
14/12/04 @ 13:41
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
People, people, people, chill for a sec, what exactly is the big problem with the score, did any of ye moaning about the score actually get what the reviewer was saying(i don't mean READ it, i mean GET it???)
seems a grand score altogether!!!

anyway 'scores' are an absolutely ridiculous way of comparing games ;-)
koopaman
14/12/04 @ 13:49
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I agree with Razz re: Eurogamers struggles with control on DS games - I think it's best to gloss over those bits because some of us can actually use the thumbstrap :-)

I'm more concerned with comments about the difficulty level, because I bloody well love Ridge Racer games and the idea that the cars don't slide around the tracks as they should upsets me.

Just an aside, why are people going nuts over the PSP Ridge Racers? I've been hanging about the 'net for several years and 90% of the stuff I've read about the RR series online is always negative, manly by people who hate the lack of 'realism' and the fact that the cars handle like a stick of butter on a hot frying pan. Could I suggest that people are only interested in it because they are graphics wh*res? ;)
v3rtigo
14/12/04 @ 13:59
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Seemed a bit pointless to shoehorn an old N64 racing game onto the DS - touchpad steering works nicely in a mini-game on Feel The Magic but I didn't think it would pan out or this. I think it's a bit of a shame that namco have churned this out - I think the DS will suffer by comparision to PSP Ridge Racers.
I still think it's a great handheld though that's bubbling with ideas. I'm fairly entranced with mine.
ruttyboy
14/12/04 @ 14:10
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This is why I love my DS, the same old lazy concepts ('cars and guns')won't work. Admittedly this is why it might fail here, but then what's new? And with it being region free it's not going to worry me :)

Now I'm just waiting for someone to come up with a game that was designed with the touchscreen in mind. Imagine an RPG where for instance you have to cast spells by drawing a certain shape on the touch screen, drawing two in a row allows you to combo spells, drawing it in different areas of the screen has different effects etc. etc. etc., the possibilities are huge!
onyxbox
14/12/04 @ 14:21
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
drawing two in a row allows you to combo spells, drawing it in different areas of the screen has different effects etc. etc. etc., the possibilities are huge!

By the sounds of it, I think the thought of those possibilities are making you huge ;-)

...carefull
ruttyboy
14/12/04 @ 14:24
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hehehehe, well it would be a J-RPG so I guess scantily clad, busty teenage girls with big eyes would be involved ;P
onyxbox
14/12/04 @ 14:25
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
...stop it!
onyxbox
14/12/04 @ 14:29
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
hey you could be onto something there.

stroking girls with my stylus has a whole new meaning now... hmmm. I wonder if Nintendo have considered the porno potential of the touch screen.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 14/12/04 @ 14:31
ruttyboy
14/12/04 @ 14:29
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
And you could use the touch screen to caress their curvy pixels, until they don't feel like fighting anymore and cast a different kind of spell...

;)
ruttyboy
14/12/04 @ 14:30
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
HA! See you're just as bad as me! ;P
Menace
14/12/04 @ 14:52
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Maybe you could use your wiener instead of the stylus?

(I hope this will not get me banned)
ChocNut
14/12/04 @ 15:49
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
In spite of the content of the review (which was to be expected after all) I had a feeling that the final score would be higher than it should be.

There seems to be a DS-defending ethos on Eurogamer these days (both the forum and the main site). I can only put this down to early adopters trying to justify their purchase combined with a general sense of loyalty to Nintendo.

I do agree that it's unfortunate that Ridge Racer came to both the PSP and the DS as it is an unfair comparison, but the fact remains that the DS may have difficulty adjusting to quite a lot of successful game styles. What's next? A fighting game where you have to draw your own fireball attacks?
ChocNut
14/12/04 @ 16:01
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I find your comments most amusing Rainbow and Im sorry I cant hang around to argue as it'd be nice to reveal reality to you - but here's a glimpse:
Battery Life: more than 40 minutes!
Ports? PSP: none. DS: Mario 64!
And as for the comment on the shape of the PSP - well if you prefer the shape of a DS to the PSP I cant take anything you say seriously.
ruttyboy
14/12/04 @ 16:03
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hmmmm, perhaps there is a DS defending ethos because the early adopters really like their kit?

Odd that you use a fighting game as an example as that would work fine (probably better than anything else) with the DS's SNES'a'like controls...
The Great Cornholio
14/12/04 @ 16:10
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
EG were given free DS's by Ninty. I think they have to be nice boys about it.
IronGiant
14/12/04 @ 16:13
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"drawing two in a row allows you to combo spells, drawing it in different areas of the screen has different effects etc. etc. etc., the possibilities are huge!"

That comment is exactly why i believe the DS and PSP both will be successful in their own right.. i love playing games on my PS2/XBox, what i'm not at all interested in is playing games with a touch screen or a stylus.. im certain there are a helluva lot of people who feel the same.

I believe Nintendo are right in that they will get people who weren't too bothered in consoles and handhelds before into gaming purely because of the interactivity of the DS.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 14/12/04 @ 16:16
barabbas
15/12/04 @ 00:09
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Lately I have noticed couple of other reviews too where the text appears much more negative than the rating, but this is the worst offender I have seen so far.

I am currently a bit lost with Eurogamer reviews. I used to trust reviews on this site very much - more than any other review site. Reading Eurogamer review gave me a very good idea whether I'd like the game. But lately too many reviews have left me confused. Many reviews seem to go on and on about the problems in the game, only to negate all that in last paragraph by brief "it's still fun, though" and giving the game a good rating. The reviews are long, well written and contain lots of useful information, but they fail to communicate to me whether I'd enjoy the game.
The Bodybuilder
15/12/04 @ 00:30
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"There seems to be a DS-defending ethos on Eurogamer these days (both the forum and the main site)."-ChocNut

I thought I was the only one that noticed it. It seems EG and its merry crew are trying very hard to love the DS, simply because it is a ninty product that tries to do something "different".

"I'm certain there are a helluva lot of people who feel the same."-Iron Giant.

Same here. I've really tried to like the DS, but I have absolutely NO INTEREST at all in playing games with a stylus.
I have big hands and finger, and I hold pens (and other such objects) in an onorthodox fashion, much different from others.
Don't ask my why, but I just do, and it makes writing for a long period of time a pain.

Thierfore the DS doesn't interest me one little bit. The only game that may warrant a purchase from me is ninja gaiden DS (whenever that's released).

The PSP is a rollercoster. At first I hated its lack of originality and "do it all" mentality.
But the PSP does seem to have the games that I want to play, and does seem to use some sort of anaoluge "stick" (or disk if you will).

However, all the talk of low battery life seemed to have stopped me dead in the tracks. All it does is give me memory of meplaying me game gear with a charger connected to a socket.
I want something that will last a while.

What other option do I have? an n-gage? a GIZMONDO? lol

I think I may just skip handheld gaming alltogether this generation (unless ninja gaiden DS is released and/or the PSP gets a better source of power).

meh, I'll stick to games on my mobile thank you.
3william56
15/12/04 @ 05:46
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wot? No mini games? O_o

IMHO this brightly flags up the big risk to Ninty and the DS: the hyponotic appeal of the touch screen (and lack of other analogue control) is going to have devs shoehorn otherwise workable concepts into touchypadness, with often tragic results like this.

Ruttyboy is dead right in noting that the DS design *should* force new game ideas because traditional stuff like this will often fail, and that'd be great, but lets face it, (a) folks like the traditional games (it's why they're traditional after all) so a lack of them may dent the DS's appeal, and (b) how many good, original touchypad ideas will be out there?

If there'd been an analogue stick/pad as well as the touchpad, DS owners could have had the best of both worlds. But by hamstringing the console for more conventional games, Ninty are taking their usual gamble on folks liking quirky quality over conventional quantity. Trouble is, we all know how that usually ends up.

:'o(
The Great Cornholio
15/12/04 @ 09:33
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Interesting to note that none of the EG staff have made comments defending this terrible review and it's ridiculous score...
Rob
15/12/04 @ 10:43
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Interesting to note that none of the EG staff have made comments defending this terrible review and it's ridiculous score...

What would be the point, you have your opinion and that is theirs. Just because you don't perhaps agree with it (though I doubt you've even played the game) doesn't make it wrong.

A review is just an opinion - there is no right and wrong text and score.

Now, run along.....
The Great Cornholio
15/12/04 @ 11:43
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm hardly alone in thinking the score doesn't match the text. Read all the comments and you'll see that with your own eyes.
Rob
15/12/04 @ 12:08
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Fine, it may seem weird to some (not me personally as I think they sum it all up (and justify the score btw) at the end by saying that despite everything they still pick it up and play it quite often).......but "terrible review" "ridiculous score" is just way OTT.

It's just a pet hate of mine when people crow on about a score in this fashion when there is a 99.99% chance they have never even played the game themselves.
The Great Cornholio
15/12/04 @ 12:40
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
OK I take back 'terrible review'. My comment on the score stands though.
The Great Cornholio
15/12/04 @ 14:51
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm perfectly calm thank you.

/shoots cat
Celeborn
15/12/04 @ 17:41
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm normally one who says that the review is more important than the final score, BUT....

the review says you cannot control the car easily or well, the actually gameplay isn't any good, the graphics hinder the games sometimes, the difficulty isn't balanced and the ai sucks. Now, correct me if im wrong, but isn't that EVERYTHING important about a racing game that decides whether it is good or not??!? In which case the review indicates that all these aspects are poor at best......
The Great Cornholio
16/12/04 @ 22:01
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hmmm still no comment from Tom then. Interesting...

Comments: 1-50 of 53 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery