Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six 3: Raven Shield Review

Martin wonders why ravens need shields

Version tested: PC

Rainbow Six is a true benchmark for the tactical action genre. However Red Storm seemed disappointingly keen to continue milking the first two titles in the series with absolutely no shame, with mission pack after mission pack slowly diluting our enthusiasm for the fine originals. Now, at last, Raven Shield - the sequel to Rogue Spear - sets out to offer fans of the genre what they've been gagging for all these years.

Who need stories when you've got guns?

'Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six 3: Raven Shield' Screenshot rvs01

Rainbow Six games have never been great at storytelling, and Raven Shield is no exception. It attempts to set up the tale of a neo-fascist plot to take over the world or something like that, but it's just a weak frame on which to build a string of missions that have little or no significance to the story. This we aren't too concerned about; we don't play Rainbow Six for the complex, emotional plot or exquisite character development and wouldn't have expected it now. Where the games did need work, though, was in the visuals department, as Red Storm's proprietary engine simply wasn't cutting it against the competition any more.

Thankfully, the employment of next-generation Unreal technology has lent the series a much-needed facelift; the whole game from the environments to the weapon and character models feels a lot more solid than before. The use of rag doll animation on the characters means that downed tangos and soldiers alike crumple to the floor and roll down stairs with convincing aplomb, and when at rest limbs will dangle lifelessly over ledges, all of which enforces a deeper realism that hasn't been present in Rainbow Six titles gone by.

In fact, atmospherically the game has come along leaps and bounds. The lavish textural and structural detail that has been expended on each of the game's maps is impressive, and coupled with the brooding incidental score and ambient sound effects, the game rarely fails to grip.

An assault on a cartel mansion, for example, became wonderfully theatrical as we wormed our way down to a huge, plush lounge area. Muffled opera could be made out ahead, and as we got close and swung the door open we were greeted by a grand piano behind which a terrorist was taking cover, along with a couple of friends on the other side of the room. The radio warnings started up at the same time as the terrorists shouting for backup, and as the firearms began to ring out the piano sang random notes with bullet strikes all to the operatic strains, amounting to an inspiring moment of gameplay. There are little moments like this scattered throughout the game, and it's worth playing through all the missions just to savour them alone.

Tricky

'Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six 3: Raven Shield' Screenshot rvs02

Oddly though there isn't a learning curve as such. You're pretty much thrown in at the deep end, and newcomers to the series are going to be surprised at just how challenging the game can be, particularly with the lack of a mid-mission save feature. Personally, we can do without one, but some are going to see this as a major flaw when they have to restart some of the trickier, more daunting missions over and over.

There is also a startling lack of variety in the scenarios; you'll usually find yourself rescuing hostages, neutralising all the terrorists, rescuing hostages and neutralising all the terrorists, or in one infuriatingly hard mission that recalls the villa mission from Rogue Spear, entering a house and planting bugs on a phone and laptop and exiting again without being discovered. Granted, this is what counter-terrorism teams usually do, but more variety from the "enter building, shoot people, exit building" dynamic would have been welcome.

The implementation of the AI in both your teammates and enemies is again hit or miss, as seems to be the standard for Rainbow Six games. Soldiers still have door navigation issues when a large group of them are trying to fit through, but seem to find their way around each map fairly well when there isn't anything lying around to obstruct them. They are generally adept at covering your back though, and only very rarely lapse into insisting that they all pile through a door and get shot one after another. Enemies seem to exhibit a curious mix of deviousness and cunning; defending themselves effectively before becoming completely oblivious to your presence again - despite the stream of unsilenced assault rifle bullets streaking into the wall mere inches from their faces.

Gunplay

'Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six 3: Raven Shield' Screenshot rvs03

Multiplayer is easily as absorbing as the single player campaign, probably more so, and just about manages to urinate on all contenders from a great height because it's just so damn compulsive. This is what Raven Shield is going to live on for the next couple of years we should imagine, and that's no bad thing.

Nothing can really beat the thrill of the team-based survival matches, but there is also all-against-all survival, a Counter-Strike-style escort-the-VIP (or in this case, pilot) game type, bomb activation/defusing, and hostage-rescue modes to play with, alongside co-operative versions of the single player missions.

The network code is pretty solid when it's not telling you that you have an invalid CD key (Red Storm, sort this out now), and the community has thus far proved to be a polite, co-operative bunch, actually interested in playing the game properly, instead of getting some kind of perverse thrill from filling their buddies with lead [unlike Ghost Recon on Xbox Live, then -grumpy Ed].

Counter-progressive

'Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six 3: Raven Shield' Screenshot rvs04

What is really surprising about Raven Shield though is how little the game has changed in the last five years. Here we have a game that manages to achieve some truly inspirational moments, yet singularly fails to build upon the standard it established. Even the planning stages before each mission remain just as impenetrable as ever and barely changed; you're probably better off just loading the pre-packaged plans as they tend to work well enough. If you're really unhappy with the way a mission pans out, you can always take the time to tweak the tangled mess of waypoints and go-codes, but starting from scratch seems... well, masochistic.

There are some functional improvements, certainly; namely the contextual menu with which to communicate rudimentary orders to your team - to open doors, flashbang suspicious rooms or clear them out, etc - and the replacement of the HUD-based planning map with visual, first-person waypoint indicators was a good move. Also of note is the inclusion of "fluid movement"; toggling this and moving the mouse up, down, left or right allows you to precisely raise or lower your body position, ideal for popping up Time Crisis-style and slaughtering firmly entrenched opposition without getting 'headshotted'. Sadly, though, there's rarely ever a convenient moment to actually use this feature properly, apart from the tutorial.

Overall, there just isn't much evidence to suggest Raven Shield is pushing the tactical action genre forward. We suppose the question is 'should we care?' Probably not. Frankly, Raven Shield is an absolutely tremendous game, and there is no denying it that. We haven't played a more atmospheric single or multiplayer tactical action game since SWAT3, and despite its shortcomings there is still nothing that comes close to rivalling it for sheer breathe-down-your neck tension. It may not drive the genre in a new direction, but it has almost everything you could expect from it, whether you're an anal-retentive gun nut or just an FPS fan up for a weighty challenge. See you in a few months for the first mission pack.

9 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (26) Latest comment 9 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Blerk #1 9 years ago

    Using poor defenceless birds as shields is inhumane! Lock 'em up, I say.
  • Tiitiz #2 9 years ago

    Think I'll get this baby on Xbox when it comes out.
  • #3 9 years ago

    Nice. Know how much the different console versions deviate from this one?
  • FWB #4 9 years ago

    I suck at these games. I love them, but I'm just god-damn awful.
  • mouse Verified Graphic designer, Eurogamer Network #5 9 years ago

    Nice. Know how much the different console versions deviate from this one?

    No idea whatsoever.
  • #6 9 years ago

    Ok. Plan on doing quick takes of each of them then .. or?
  • Mike_Hunt #7 9 years ago

    >...particularly with the lack of a mid-mission save feature. Personally, we can do without one...

    I can *feel* the smugness from here!
  • mouse Verified Graphic designer, Eurogamer Network #8 9 years ago

    I can *feel* the smugness from here!

    Heh, I didn't mean it come out like that. I do think the game is better off without it though, it makes the really tricky missions just that bit more tense. Frustrating, yes, but never mind eh? :)
  • mouse Verified Graphic designer, Eurogamer Network #9 9 years ago

    Plan on doing quick takes of each of them then .. or?

    Well we'll probably have a play of them if/when we get a hold of copies and make the decision then. Occasionally if a port is significantly screwed up or improved upon, it'll warrant a review.
  • #10 9 years ago

  • Nemesis #11 9 years ago

    If anyone is purchasing this at retail and not the EG shop (and shame on you!) look out for the silly version complete with mock R6 black hood, gun poster (not that great either) and (the only decent bit) some A5 cardboard art.

    It doesn't cost any more, but be warned it's a bit Poundland.
  • MaTTy_P #12 9 years ago

    hmm, personally, i love this game...its about time CS had some sort of rival, and this is it. Its a bit 'oooo far too complicated controls' at first, but you soon get over that.

    Deffinitaly worth a 9

    any1 actually spotted a raven in it though...
  • UncleLou #13 9 years ago

    Lol Nem, I saw that in the shops. Is the hood actually big enough for the head, or is just to make the box look "1337"?
  • Nemesis #14 9 years ago

    It is the size of the box and makes it look, er, l33t.

    You can just about fit it over your hand. Superb if you want to do the R6 Puppet Show I guess.

  • #15 9 years ago

  • Merefield #16 9 years ago

    I love it when you stumble into gas and think, "damn, shouldn't have packed the Heartbeat sensor"
  • William #17 9 years ago

    Martin, AFAIK Raven Shield has been developed by Ubisoft Montreal, with some design input from Red Storm Entertainment. It's more correct to list Ubisoft Montreal as the developer.
  • Slim #18 9 years ago

    Sigh. One really has to wonder why Eurogamer keep giving these clancy games to you to review. Once again, like your previous clancy games reivews, you open with a big winge about how the licence has been milked. Rainbow six had one mission pack, eagle watch. Rogue spear had one mission pack, Black Thron. Covert Ops was a stand alone game. Ghost recon had one mission pack, Island Thunder. How exactly is that "mission pack after mission pack"? Each one added as much content as the original game had, and was superb value, why is that a bad thing exactly and one that warrants continual bleatage by eurogamer?

    Surprised to see you slag enemy AI too, which is vastly improved over previous games. Enemies react a lot better to clues of your location, running to you, teaming up, or ducking and taking cover when you wound them. It's vastly improved over the older games where the enemies would just happily sand and get shot repeatedly without blinking.

    But my biggest gripe is your claim that the genre hasn't been pushed. In Rainbow Six, you couldn't even lean for gods sake! It's been improved loads, the fluid stance is superb! The claymores and door breeching is fantastic and adds a completely new method of securing hostage rooms that the other games just didn't have. Given that that's most of the objectives, it's a massive change.

    The planning is changed mostly by giving you the pre-defined plans, which is a bit of a shame in my book. Play any mission with the pre plan on observer and your team wins. Handy for seeing how to play a mission but it makes things a little easy for me.

    There's also the significant addition of the dedicated server, allowing isp's to host games which they couldn't do with Rogue Spear or Rainbow six.

    Bizzare that after all the bleating you've given it a 9/10, you hardly had a nice thing to say about it!
  • UncleLou #19 9 years ago

    There have been a few more addons iirc, like Urban Operations and GR:Desert Siege.

    Anyway, Slim, just wanted to thank you for your contributions to the Mafia thread, which brought me to buy the game in the end. Even though you were a bit too abusive for my taste (sometimes). :-)
    Edited by 3 at 03/04/03 @ 14:14
  • Slim #20 9 years ago

    But they're all bringing something new in, urban ops adding urban levels, Desert Siege adding desert levels. How does that justify the continual panning. His Ghost Recon review: "But after the numerous
    Rainbow Six mission packs, rehashes, and re-rehashes". Ghost recon mission pack review: "Here we go again. The milking of the Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon license has begun in earnest". And now this. Panning it as a rehash then giving it 9/10, what the fek?

    Glad you liked Mafia Lou, top game. I'm not abbrasive, I'm to the point :)
  • DNM #21 9 years ago

    Anybody else find that after reading the review you were somewhat surprised by the 9/10 score?! Reads like it's gonna get 7 at best. Excuse me if this has already been mentioned in the comments btw, cba to read. :)
  • Slim #22 9 years ago

    It does seem to be that way on eurogamer these days. Probably needs a 9/10 so they can flog it in the 'good games only' shop.
  • MaTTy_P #23 9 years ago

    hmm, i think GR had 2 mission packs......
  • DNM #24 9 years ago

    >> Probably needs a 9/10 so they can flog it in the 'good games only' shop.

    Heh, I wasn't actually suggesting that tbh, but there just seems to be too much in the way of negativity for it to hit an 8, let alone a 9.
    Edited by 1 at 03/04/03 @ 14:38
  • DNM #25 9 years ago

    ...and regarding the mission pack thing, as someone said if this game is your love and life in the gaming world, you are quite simply going to give your right arm to get as much out of it as possible. A world without mission packs and addons would be a dull place indeed. Hell, some of my best Unreal and Morrowind moments have come from their mission packs.
  • Shinji #26 9 years ago

    "Probably needs a 9/10 so they can flog it in the 'good games only' shop."

    It's a bit of a shame that your life is so empty and boring that you feel the need to desperately try and bait people with clapped-out trolls like that, Slim. :)
  • Slim #27 9 years ago

    Hey, it's a slow day at work :)

    In seriousness Shinji, you got to admit that the review and the score (once again) doesn't match? Bring Gestalt back I say, he never ballsed up reviews :)
    Edited by 1 at 03/04/03 @ 15:11
  • mouse Verified Graphic designer, Eurogamer Network #28 9 years ago

    All I've done is point out some places where I thought the game slipped up nastily, but I didn't think the problems really overshadowed how completely fantastic it is. It's my job to be critical, and I've identified where I had problems with it, and where I think it got it right.

    I'm sorry if the review seems unbalanced to you, perhaps you've had a drastically different experience with the game to me, but I can't help that.
    Edited by 1 at 03/04/03 @ 15:22
  • Merefield #29 9 years ago

    Stop beating up on Mouse!

    I think it was a great review and both the comments and score were fair.

    The AI is weak in the places he mentions...like the lack of reaction to bullets hitting the walls next to an enemy...

    And yeah, its basically a storm-building-simulator so the missions aren't varied much beyond that genre.

    But its still, despite these very minor flaws, its completely fantastic, especially in MP.

    The audio is superb, the way footsteps on wood in the next room can be heard adds to your situational awareness, excellent.

    And I'm with those FOR expansion packs.

    Will people STOP whinging about the cost of these...they are only set at prices where the company thinks they will sell, and they DO sell!

    If you want to wait 2 years for the Gold/Platinum/GotY Edition that bundles the lot, then be my guest...but I wanna play quality like this TODAY
  • Slim #30 9 years ago

    I think the usual 20 quid is fine for mission packs, if they at least double the old game.