Primal Review

A female videogame star? That'll never work...

Version tested: PlayStation 2

Sony Europe really wants Primal to be well received. You can always tell a home grown Sony effort from its American or Japanese brothers, mainly because of the enormous marketing efforts that accompany every SCEE-developed release. As well as the recent Primal Art exhibition, there's been a truck load of advertising and even a lovely super-rare press pack: a whopping great box with a claw slash across the front, revealing a lavish character art book mounted in mock red velvet, and also housing a ribbon tied numbered art print [which Kristan kept, folks -bitter deputy]. Great stuff; but isn't it interesting that such beyond-the-call-of-duty efforts weren't afforded the recent SCEA developed titles Sly Raccoon, and The Mark of Kri? Both total flops in the UK, we might add, despite being two of the best games released on the PS2 this year.

Anyway, yes. Primal. Developed by Sony's Cambridge studio; the same bods that brought us the two award winning Medieval titles, along with the technically excellent, but less revered C-12: Final Resistance. But this is the Big One; its labour of love, where Chris Sorrell and the team have been given the time and the budget to create a lavish, deep, dark, adult action adventure that really shows off their talents and what the PS2 can do.

Sony wants you to believe in Primal and has constructed an elaborate back story for the game world, as well as each of its many characters. The realm that you inhabit during the course of the game is based somewhere between the mortal world and the afterlife, where the balance between order and chaos has tipped dangerously towards the latter. And it's your job, as 21-year-old coffee bar waitress Jennifer Tate, to sort this sorry mess out.

Demon ate my Rock Star

oct023b

In a coma after witnessing her rock star boyfriend being captured by a giant winged demon, Jen has her spirit ripped from the mortal world by a stone gargoyle called Scree, who insists she is the chosen one, without properly explaining why this is the case. Naturally Jen's a tad confused and concerned. All she wants to do is find her beloved Lewis.

In true gaming tradition, we stick with whatever plot nonsense is thrown at us, because we hope that at some point it will start to make sense. Even if it doesn't, at least there's a decent game to prop it all up isn't there?

But the explanations keep on coming (sorry, we are trying to keep this concise). At the heart of the 'Nexus' sits a being by the name of Chronos, who is fused to a giant machine. He balances the forces of order and chaos across the four realms: Solum, Aquis, Aetha, and Volca, and is having a bit of a rough time of it at the moment, thanks to the battle between Arella (order) and Abbadon (chaos). In a nutshell, this area acts as Primal's hub. Jen, with Scree in tow must visit the four realms in turn and kick whoever's arse needs it most - which is generally most people.

With all the longwinded background out of the way, what about the game? At its core it's a straightforward exploration-based third person action adventure, with its fair share of puzzle elements, object collection and combat. At any point the player can switch between Jen and Scree (by hitting select) in order to progress. Jen, being tall and svelte, can squeeze through narrow gaps and shimmy along ledges, as well as kick the crap out of the numerous minions of doom. Scree, on the other hand, can climb up walls, as well as drain corpses of energy, and 'possess' statues as a means to unlocking doors, or to kick the crap out of enemies otherwise too big to deal with.

Why let one person solve a puzzle when you can have two?

oct022b

Most doors in Primal's world are far too heavy for one person to open on their own, so guess what? Yes! You have to push/lift them together. The buddy dynamics can be a tad contrived at times, in the same way that Resident Evil Zero foists arbitrary puzzles upon you that only two characters working together could solve, but at times it can work well in an ICO-esque sense. Insisting that two characters must open a door together, however, is just plain annoying after the 15th door.

Scree also serves as the game's in-game hint provider. Tapping triangle prompts the noble gargoyle to offer occasionally useful advice of where to head for next - we say 'occasionally useful' as for the most part his clues are so obscure as to be practically worthless. Sometimes, the best bet is to hit the Start button and observe the map, which will display a symbol to indicate precisely where you should be heading for next. This is important, as the environments are sprawling multi-level affairs, and it's easy to find yourself wandering around cursing bitterly like a headless Mugwum after 14 Hoegaardens. We can't emphasise enough how important it is to keep referring to the map, as Primal can otherwise degenerate into a frustrating aimless wandering farce in no-time. We're emphasising it, because the game certainly doesn't point this vital fact out.

Half Lara, half Dante

oct026b

Part way through the first realm, it transpires that Jen is, in fact, half demon (Devil May Cry, anyone?) and can transform herself by hitting left on the directional pad. While this undoubtedly fulfils her ostensibly Gothic ambitions, it makes her a better fighter, as well as able to perform higher jumps. As you progress, the range of forms Jen can take increases - for example, in the Aquis realm, the previously aquaphobic Jen is suddenly blessed with the ability to swim underwater without breathing, as well as communicate telepathically. While she assumes this state, she has limited energy, but is able to draw strength from Scree if he's in the near vicinity. Should she run out, Jen switches back to her weakened human form.

Primal tries hard to take the hassle away from the general, everyday controls, by removing the need to learn 14 commands, Tomb Raider-style. Instead, what you get is a context sensitive system that jumps and crouches as and when required. More specific commands, such as performing a shimmy onto a narrow ledge, climbing a rope, pulling a lever, smashing a barrel or opening a door can all be taken care of with use of the X button in the correct scenario. Sometimes it feels like you're playing with a straight jacket on, but it does work reasonably well, allowing the player to concentrate on the task at hand, without degenerating into a trial and error exercise in command learning.

Mash those buttons

oct0212b

Curiously, the combat commands have been assigned to the shoulder buttons. R1 acts as a block, L2 and R2 deliver a strong blow and finishing move when performed at the correct time, while L1, L2 and R2 individually deliver context-specific spins, swipes and kicks. Our preferred method, rather worryingly, was to mash R2, occasionally pull off the finishing move (certain creatures won't piss off until you do), and win every single time, no matter how many creatures tried to eat our face. With no jump command, or individual kick and punch commands, it very quickly feels like the combat was a stitched-on afterthought. In earlier builds we convinced ourselves that the enemy's curious AI must be a quirk that would eventually be rectified. How wrong can you be?

Even if a gang of five monsters appear, the ones that you're not immediately attacking just back off until it's their turn for punishment. They stand around looking utterly gormless, maybe occasionally swiping, but provide very little challenge. To say the combat is a disappointment is the understatement of the PlayStation era, and given that you can avoid confrontation most of the time merely highlights the problem. It's as if these drones have been placed at specific locations to make the world feel more alive, rather than actually offering the player anything other than an irritating distraction, and a chance to fire up a turgid, lamentable Goth rock soundtrack. Without exaggeration, Primal serves up the limpest attempt at combat that we've seen in a modern videogame. It may not be the game's staple diet, but playing this after, say, Indiana Jones, the chasmic gulf in class is there for all to see.

And the annoyances don't end there. The camera system is woeful, and catastrophically short of being an acceptable window to your world. Anywhere near a restrictive viewpoint it freaks out, often turning the viewpoint into a twitching, glitching mess. In Aquis, it's just plain disorientating as you roll and flip underwater unexpectedly, forcing you to switch the compass display on in a vain attempt to get your bearings. It's not something that just happens now and then, either, and conspires to remind you every few seconds that this is a mere videogame, after all.

Pay attention! Assumed knowledge alert!

oct0216b

The tasks at hand rarely inspire much enjoyment either. Most often, the game mechanic is thus: visit point A, view cut scene, go off and get object X, take it to point Y, find out you need to go and talk to character Z, and cue fisticuffs melee. And that's if you know where you're supposed to go. The levels are impressively expansive and carefully crafted, but if you've not been paying 150 per cent attention, the point that Scree suggests that we go and seek out that ornate locked door, you'll want to smash his stupid stone face into dust with a mallet.

So often the game assumes that you'll remember every single character, location and object that you encounter, and repeatedly makes reference to things and places you'll have long forgotten about. As we mentioned earlier, the map displays an icon pointing out where you're aiming for, but that's never made clear. Metroid Prime this most certainly is not, and the lack of any kind of 3D map makes referring to it a painful experience. Of course, you learn your way around eventually, but only after hours of repeat visits.

If it wasn't for the tediously moribund combat, glitchtastic camera and reliance on repeated exploration, Primal might stand a chance of being entertaining. In its favour, the storyline is very well thought out, and provides a credible template for the game. For a fantasy related story to not bore us to death is a triumph in itself, although we'd still have to admit that it's not our cup of freshly drained Ferai blood.

By far the most impressive aspect of Primal is its visuals. The game boasts arguably the most detailed, high-res environments the PS2 has ever seen, and for once we're treated to the full set of 16:9 mode, 60Hz and even Progressive Scan support for those with the necessary kit. The intricately-crafted character models and texture-laden environments feature such a staggering attention to detail, and are seamlessly presented with a Jak & Daxter-esque no-load streaming data system that very rarely trips up. If there's one major incentive to owning or playing Primal, it's to experience one of the best-looking games out there, with a consistently impressive array of tricks that proves yet again that the PS2 has plenty up its sleeve.

To the untrained eye, this has all the hallmarks of a must have title…

It's refreshing, also, to note that the array of cut scenes always utilise the in-game engine, and are no less impressive for it. If anyone can think of a more technically impressive PS2 title, then let us know. A well put together promo video of Primal's glorious moments would mark it out as a must have title.

Sadly, the end result is a long way from the intentions: a rank combat system, quirky camera and a lack of inspiration at the game's exploration/puzzle core make playing the game hard work. The bottom line is that Primal is rarely very much fun. Call us old-fashioned, but isn't having fun the whole point of playing games?

5 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (43) Latest comment 5 years ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • ssuellid #1 9 years ago

    So it looks good, has 16:9 support, surround sound and progressive scan but someone forgot about the gameplay? Shame - does look mighty pretty tho - maybe one to pick up when it comes out on Platinum?
  • Blerk #2 9 years ago

    context sensitive system that jumps and crouches as and when required

    My major bug-bear with the demo version. You never feel like you're in control - it's almost like you're just hitting 'forwards' to move between fights automatically rather than really exploring. They may as well have just made each level a big long totally-straight corridor with monsters every two minutes or so. Shame.
  • Cyhwuhx #3 9 years ago

    .::: So sad... I was really looking forward to this a few months ago as "PS2's Metroid"...

    Ah well, back to Soul Reaver again...
  • UncleLou #4 9 years ago

    Hm, it never really appealed to me anyhow - just sad that all the programmers' obvious technical abilities have been wasted for the time it was in development. I guess this would be a prime example for a polished turd then?
    Edited by UncleLou at 11/04/03 @ 15:02
  • Blerk #5 9 years ago

    There's nothing really wrong with it, I wouldn't call it a turd. But it's just so.... dull.
  • krudster #6 9 years ago

    Nothing wrong with it? The combat is just embarrassing. A travesty. Surely the focus testing and the team themselves must've realised how bad this element of the game was/is?
  • Blerk #7 9 years ago

    Never really noticed that it was much different to any other game. My combat method always involves mashing one button as fast as possible. :-)
  • krudster #8 9 years ago

    I cannot believe how many good reviews this game has had...here's a quick rundown from the trade marketing.
    Official PS2 mag: 8/10 : "A finely crafted adventure - this is epic stuff."
    PSW: 9/10 "Stunning looks [granted], classy combat [WHAT THE FUCK?!], a compelling tale, and cunning challenges make this a superb action adventure that'll have you muttering 'Lara who?' when it's all over [only because your brain has turned to custard]/
    Max: 84%: "Definitely worth a look" [yeah, look at it, but don't, for god's sake, buy it]
    PSG 24/7: 9/10: "This is how fantasy games should be made" [Oh god help this idiot]. "One of the most impressive titles on the PS2 to date"
    Please. Shoot these idiots. Before it's too late.
  • UncleLou #9 9 years ago

    They can't all be wrong, can they, krudster? Anyhow, graphics over gameplay me says.

    /off to EG shop to order it

    Oh?
  • Blerk #10 9 years ago

    Games TM gave it 4/10 last month. Nice to see a bit of honesty in print rather than just on the 'net.
  • Blerk #11 9 years ago

    top notch voice-acting

    Scree's voice is exceptional. Jen's voice makes me want to break things.
  • Nemesis #12 9 years ago

    Sound like a love/hate/murder someone kinda game then...
  • Killerbee #13 9 years ago

    Great review Kruds.

    I was really looking forward to this a while back, but I think there are enough objective criticisms mentioned to put me off. It's a shame because the screenshots and the TV ad look great, the story sounds interesting and the basic idea of a 3rd person, combat-laced puzzler with switchable characters has such potential to be a great template for a game.
  • krudster #14 9 years ago

    Yeah, as Ronan points out, it can be quite absorbing despite the long list of flaws, but then WE get it for free! Imagine saving up for weeks/months and then finding out it's not actually that good. If you want a good action/exploration title, then my money's on Indiana Jones - but even that had its problems.
  • Blerk #15 9 years ago

    If you want a good action/exploration title, then

    ...wait for Silent Hill 3?
  • Shinji #16 9 years ago

    "Scree's voice is exceptional"

    Andreas Katsulas, unless I'm very much mistaken - G'Kar from Babylon 5, in other words. Takes quite an actor to create such an excellent character from under all that make-up. :)

  • LaundroMat #17 9 years ago

    I've been looking in the second hand bin a lot lately. 2 advantages:
    - costs a lot less
    - teh intarnet is chockfull of reviews by the time a game arrives in said bin, so I'm an informed customer

    A nice side-effect is that I'm a lot less stressed; I follow up on the games news, keep in mind the promising titles, and browse the aforementioned bin accordingly. And in twenty seconds I got a game that's worth its money.


    Errr. Post!

    Edit - My spelling sucketh.

    Edited by LaundroMat at 11/04/03 @ 17:53
  • BradlayLaw #18 9 years ago

    Looks like one to pick up from my friend at scee for £14 then.
  • Daryoon #19 9 years ago

    "...a lovely super-rare press pack: a whopping great box with a claw slash across the front, revealing a lavish character art book mounted in mock red velvet, and also housing a ribbon tied numbered art print..."

    Proof that, if you give the journo's lots of flashy freebies, they'll reward you with a good score no matter how bad your game is...
  • Nemesis #20 9 years ago

    Well I'm about, what, 3-4 hours into the game and I'm liking it so far..

    The camera is a bit pissy, most noticably when Skree is trying to climb walls and stuff. Without the map you'd definately wander around lost.

    The main female is very similar to Rynn and the first realm has a definate Drakan look.

    Technically the engine is superb. No loading on the levels, the animation and textures are bloody superb. Story is cool, if not a little bit of the standard "generic orphan shite" variety. Music and voiceovers are top notch.

    I'll keep plodding on! Ask me again Monday and I'll probably be bitching like crazy about it ;-)
  • lee3p0 #21 9 years ago

    I see they are selling this in GAME already at 19.99 for a special edition with soundtrack cd. GOD this game must STINK!!!

    I`ve gotta say though, It looks REALLY nice!
    Edited by lee3p0 at 13/04/03 @ 21:59
  • Nemesis #22 9 years ago

    I wouldn't say it stinks, but a 5 (average) is probably about right. It's a looker though, I'll give it that.
  • skalmanxl #23 9 years ago

    I never had any problems with the combat really. Button mashing takes you nowhere though. It require rythm and timing to work.
  • ghearoid #24 9 years ago

    um, that awful GAME place has already reduced this one to £19.99!

    g
  • skalmanxl #25 9 years ago

    Oh look, another rubbish PS2 game....loads of those around and people still buy the sandwich toaster.

    Alert alert alert! Blind man waving with a stick!
    Edited by skalmanxl at 12/04/03 @ 11:16
  • Celeborn #26 9 years ago

    Why is everyone getting on Sonys back so quickly. It wasnt THAT long ago that another strongly backed and advertised game in The Getaway was released: a flawed game again yes but still full of quality.

    In fact there are a lot of similarities between The Getaway and Primal: both have a large vision in whats wanted to be achieved: both technically wonderful, but then both are flawed and not perfect by any means.

    I'd tell Sony to keep on what theyre doing: Microsoft are just buying companies that look to have good games (Halo) and then churn out sequels for them (Halo 2). Sony is trying to do something different at least.. which you don't get much of these days
  • Henrik #27 9 years ago

    It's got a 74 average on metacritic.
  • #28 9 years ago

    Yes, Primal has poor combat, some truly annoying gameplay elements and isn't exactly very challenging. If you don't like the story or the characters, this review is spot on.

    If you a) like fantasy (Neil Gaiman etc.), b) fight using combos instead of button mashing and c) can enjoy a game that's based on exploring a massive, gorgeous world, I think you'll love it. I know I did - for me, Primal was more of an epic, story-driven event than a conventional game. In fact, I love it so much I felt the need to speak out here, after years of shameless lurking on EG (I am velly, velly sneaky :-)
  • Blerk #29 9 years ago

    Can anyone tell me if the camera still goes the opposite way to what you'd expect when you move the right stick left/right? That really pissed me off in the demo version.
  • krudster #30 9 years ago

    the camera and controls are reversable
  • Blerk #31 9 years ago

    Thank flip for that! At least they took one of my comments on the demo into consideration. :-)

    For all my ranting earlier... I might pick this up if I can find it for £20. But I'm not hopeful - our local GAME seems to be run by the descendants of Scrooge.
  • Nemesis #32 9 years ago

    Where did you get stuck?
  • Viktor #33 9 years ago

    The story is piss-poor fantasy. It's an insult to call it something like Neil Gaiman. Even David Eddings is a nobelist compared to the SCEE scriptwriters.
  • frantyk #34 9 years ago

    HAhahah my mate thought GAME had made a mistake when he seen this game for £20 (they lied about a once in a lifetime promotion, neglecting too mention that the game is 5/10 material),,,, and he bought it..lol

    maybe i should tell him of the great impartial games review site that is (not gettin and cash from SCEE to pimp this game) Eurogamer.net

    and when i played it i though the script was a bit pants aswell..
    Edited by frantyk at 19/04/03 @ 04:42
  • UncleLou #35 9 years ago

    Oh look, another rubbish PS2 game....loads of those around and people still buy the sandwich toaster.
    Xbox owner and proud of it.


    Hey, if we treat him carefully, maybe he can become a worthy member of the WWE Raw thread?
  • christian #36 9 years ago

    Yo, did you guys know that ps2 is fuckin gay? You wont admit it, but ps2 is going down the drain. Once halo 2 comes out, ur all gonna fuckin die. And those of you that say halo sucked, you obviously havent played it or havent played it right. If you think it sucks, try it again. Ur just afraid to admit that halo was good. You know, it was game of the year. Yeah, ps2 has good games, but splinter cell looks like shit on gaystation 2. Xbox has got halo, brute force, a GOOD splinter cell, raven shield, return to castle wolfenstein, and everybody said red faction was better than halo on ps2, but... ITS ON XBOX TOO!!! And online on xbox is soooo much better, and theres many more live games comin. Admit it, u bought the wrong system. If you have a ps2, you can keep it, but buy a fuckin xbox.
    Edited by christian at 19/04/03 @ 19:26
  • Cyhwuhx #37 9 years ago

    .::: Oh... dear...

    Well Happy Easter everybody...
    Oh and I got Primal... And the disspointment about the game even surpasses that of my previous 'fave' StarFox Adventures.
    A pity though, the game's ambition can be felt from the very start and it does have some nice touches. Far too little to overshadow it's weak points though.

    The main thing bothering me is the inconsistent use of abilities. Scree can climb walls, but for some reason only when needed. (A castle wall cannot be climbed until you suddenly need to use it to cross a gap for example). Jen also can jump great distances in Ferai form, but somehow needs to walk around a hole in the wall she could easily jump over.

    Primal's full of these little annoyances draining it of any fun because you never truly know when you CAN use your abilities. Besides that, they should shoot the PR-clown who thought of adding the rockmusic. It's almost an insult...
  • eviltobz #38 9 years ago

    someguy - And those of you that say halo sucked, you obviously havent played it or havent played it right.
    has the concept that some people actually just dont like the game and the genre ever occured to you? its not hard to grasp. i wouldn't pay a penny for a copy of halo cos it does nothing for me, and before you start getting all hormonal on me, and call my sexual preferences into question, i have all the current consoles, including your beloved xboxen. also bear in mind that although many console gamers liked it, a lot of pc gamers who played it thought little of it.
  • christian #39 9 years ago

    I really dont care about those bastards. Tell me what games u like, what pikmin or somethin gay like that? Windwaker? Pokemon? Those gay fuckin dancing games on playstation 2, or should i say gaystaion 2.
  • christian #40 9 years ago

    If you dont like halo, well then thats fine. But it also means ur a stupid son of a bitch and deserve to rot in hell. Pikmin... go ta hell. Pokemon... get the fuck outta here. Halo, congradulations. Not only do u not suck like every other ps2 and gc game, but ur the best game ever. Xbox actually spends time on their games so they turn out good, that meens more than one day.
  • eviltobz #41 9 years ago

    wow, to be called stupid by someone of your most highly esteemed intellect* is harsh indeed. i shall depart forthwith to sit in the corner with a dunce hat on.

    * some proof of this intellect can be found in the majesty of the following extract "Xbox actually spends time on their games so they turn out good, that meens more than one day." its a beautiful example of the english language in action. /wistful sigh/
  • Cyhwuhx #42 9 years ago

    .::: I especially liked the "congradulations" part of that comment...
    I also don't get how my PS2 can be gay... I mean it doesn't exactly fancy another PS2 let alone my Xbox or GC. Unless you're talking about link-up, and what's Xbox Live in that respect? An orgy of appearantly gay consoles because they are all connected to one another?

    And if you hear a scream of agony it's the same kid discovering that "those gay fuckin dancing games" are headed to his favourite black/green box as well...

    Oooh happy joy joy!
  • Steroyd #43 5 years ago

    Steamboat chronicles