Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Prince of Persia Revelations Review

PSP Review by Tom Bramwell

19 December, 2005

This came dangerously close to being a concept review. I'd just mistimed an attack directed at that stupid woman in the one-piece leather outfit for about the tenth time in a row, and as the game goaded me once again with the "Retry?" prompt I found that the red mist descended (this happens in the game too) and the PSP almost left my hand as I swung it at the wall in an attempt to channel all my anger and frustration into one furious gesture.

You get the feeling something similar happened when The Sands of Time didn't sell as well as Ubisoft had hoped. The developers were probably sitting there when they first saw what had happened - that a game considered by most critics to be the best thing released that year had failed to make the required impact on the usual festive dross spiting the face of the charts - and in crashing their fists down on their keyboards and mice they somehow managed to direct all that anger and frustration into the next iteration of the Prince.

Well, obviously that's not what happened, but I've still yet to hear a decent explanation as to why Ubisoft replaced the warm and friendly fireside glow of the Sands of Time with the cold, uninviting gothic angst of Warrior Within, and gave the Prince the air of a child refusing to tidy his bedroom when nobody ever asked him to in the first place.

So what was the concept review going to be? An invoice for a new PSP after I threw it at the wall screaming "YOU BITCH!"

Fortunately, I kept on playing. Well, fortunately for those of you who want to know what Prince of Persia Revelations is like, anyway.

'Prince of Persia Revelations' Screenshot fun

When you're jumping around, it's fun.

Porting Warrior Within to the PSP was a bizarre decision. Almost universally regarded as the worst since the series' revival, its attempts to darken the character of the Prince only worked in the sense that it left him a shadow of his former self, bereft of the charm that won so many of us over in the Sands of Time. Why not port Sands itself? Sands knew it was a game, shielding the brilliant platform puzzles from the often-tedious combat in a contrived manner that we appreciated nonetheless, and was full of clever ideas (like the foreshadowing of events when you hit a save point, tempting you to continue) and excellent level design (the menagerie, the library, the final ascent of the tower). WW did away with the boundary between platform adventure and laborious combat, failing to expand on the former or fix the latter in the process, and instead of a vibrant palace gave us a dishevelled husk of a setting - a fitting reflection of the way the atmosphere had been sucked out of it. The Prince was almost unrecognisable, Farah was gone, and instead of likable panto villains we had tediously sultry replacements.

Fittingly enough, time hasn't been kind to Warrior Within, nor has the process of porting it to PSP. With the advent of games like God of War and Spartan: Total Warrior, the "freeform fighting system" (or "FFS" as I call it) has been made to look even sillier than it did in the aftermath of Ninja Gaiden - success in combat boils down to repetitive patterns of hacking and slashing so much more laborious than the already poor combat of Sands of Time, and its integration into the general gameplay feels like an assault on what was good about it in the first place - as though shifting the whole thing into nu-metal overdrive wasn't sufficient in upsetting us. The PSP exacerbates things - using d-pad-left to centre the camera, and the rest of the d-pad for far-out views and first-person is actually quite a reasonable substitute for direct control through a second analog stick, and something other PSP platform games should take on board, but there are definite technical issues with sound in particular choppy, dialogue broken, constant load pauses and worse, the occasional stupid glitch - in fact, the game actually froze up on me on several occasions. The addition of new sections adds to the game's length, but certainly not its breadth, and while they fit comfortably into the framework of what we had in the first place, it's still a game that you won't be enjoying particularly when they crop up.

'Prince of Persia Revelations' Screenshot not

Unfortunately you spend more time doing this.

Even ignoring technical issues, the main issue is that WW never hits the first game's peaks, and doesn't really build on it in any positive ways. Enemies taunting you about your fighting prowess is irritating enough, but even worse because you find yourself agreeing with them as they mock you. "You call yourself a master swordsman?" No! I call myself a master platformer! Or I did. Once. There are still traces of that, thankfully. You still find yourself running along a wall and leaping from ledge to beam to rope to trapeze to platform and having to figure out how to get to where you're going. In this sense it's not without its moments - some platform sections come close to recapturing the fluidity and intelligence of Sands' design, while the chases involving the Dahaka (a shadowy creature trying to kill you because you messed around with the timeline) are quite fast and furious. Playing with time - rewinding it, or having to slow it down to complete puzzles, remains one of the best devices added to a platform game since the double jump. But even this is distorted by dead ends and arbitrary fighting sections.

It's just such a downer after Sands. Sands had you feel like you were lost in a colossal castle that you'd never escape, but the truth was that it was a place you understood and wanted to be in, with a real identity and so many lures to keep you exploring. WW is somewhere you don't want to be.

'Prince of Persia Revelations' Screenshot curtains

Ruining curtains was one of Warrior Within's best additions.

And I really can't be nasty enough about the combat. The idea was to do away with the tedious repetition and bouncing-off-the-wall frustration of Sands' combat, right? Well, it hasn't worked. The boss fight that almost ruined this review in the first place involves using one attack repeatedly, improvising during the period that it stops working (using the time-rewind whenever the game arbitrarily decides to kick you off a ledge into the abyss or unleash an unblockable attack in response), and then using that one attack again to finish things off. And what is that one attack? Jumping over your enemy's head and slashing her twice on the way down. In other words, you do what you usually did in Sands of Time, then when it stops working like it did in Sands of Time you flail about like you did in Sands of Time until it works again like it did in [I think they get it - Ed].

This isn't an awful game by any stretch of the imagination - mechanically at least, platforming has rarely been done as well in three dimensions as it's done in the Prince of Persia series. And please don't mistake these constant comparisons between Sands and Warrior Within for prejudice or simple bitterness - the quality that came beforehand certainly makes it harder to bear this one's faults, but it would fall down with or without the context. Somewhere along the line there was a wholesale misunderstanding of what made Sands of Time good, and the result of the change in approach is a game that manages to be less likable in just about every single way. I have no idea why it's been re-released on PSP instead of Sands, or even The Two Thrones, which sounds like it's a lot better, but inexplicable decisions seem to have flocked to this one, so perhaps there's some warped logic in it after all.

6/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Prince of Persia Revelations on PSP?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-30 of 30 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
morriss
19/12/05 @ 11:42
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
:)
kuzanagi
19/12/05 @ 11:44
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Completely agree. I hired this out at the weekend and had a very similar experience to Tom.
asphaltcowboy
19/12/05 @ 11:44
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
One-piece metal outfit, surely?
tengu
19/12/05 @ 12:00
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"the "freeform fighting system" (or "FFS" as I call it)"

LOL
Eighthours
19/12/05 @ 12:19
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Still, better than Kameo eh! ;)
Royal Fool
19/12/05 @ 12:42
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The fact that the metal ambience music keeps looping while you're platforming was what made me finally stop trying to enjoy the game.
GuiltySpark
19/12/05 @ 12:43
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
porting sands of time wouldnt of sold many units....

itz has 2 be down wit the kidz innitz
Fairlane
19/12/05 @ 12:51
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Better than Kameo ;-)
Psi
19/12/05 @ 13:07
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
better than the ds prince game
UncleLou
19/12/05 @ 13:29
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
but I've still yet to hear a decent explanation as to why Ubisoft replaced the warm and friendly fireside glow of the Sands of Time with the cold, uninviting gothic angst of Warrior Within
...

Porting Warrior Within to the PSP was a bizarre decision. Almost universally regarded as the worst since the series' revival

krudster, I've been to the Ubisoft PoP forums recently, and there are DOZENS of people who hated SoT, loved WW, and complained about TTT being too much like SoT. They miss the badass attitude, the music, ans what they think is "maturity" from WW.

So as worrying as it is, the success of WW probably wasn't only on the back of the quality of SoT, but people really preferred it.

I know forums aren't representative, but there wasn't only one thread like this, and not only one or two persons who preferred WW.
Artemus
19/12/05 @ 13:40
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ UncleLou

Makes you want to cry.
gypsumfantastic
19/12/05 @ 13:50
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A significant proportion of the human population are sad, angst-ridden teenboys. The best thing to do is to remember that they normally grow out of it.

In any case, we'll always have Sands of Time.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 19/12/05 @ 13:52
sleepless
19/12/05 @ 14:04
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Gameplay wise was very slightly better PoP: Sands of Time. In every other way PoP: WW suits my tastes better than Sands of Time and Two Thrones.

It was because of great mood and style of WW, not because of music. Surely, I love all sorts of metal and rock, but definitely not Yankee nu-metal in Godsmack style. Dark Prince is simply more interesting than naive ordinary Prince. Therefore my vote goes to PoP WW and PoP Revelations.
Max_Powers
19/12/05 @ 14:15
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/Puts sleepless on ignore list ;)

*Sigh* After SoT I tried to get back into the series with Two Thrones but alas - I just can't get over the shitty atmosphere and crap main character.

You know, the fact that it is a 'dark' game doesn't matter me so much, but Ubisoft doesn't understand what a good 'dark' game requires. The prince really feels like a boy - as the reviewer points out - that mopes about having to clean up his room.

If Ubisoft really wants to do 'dark' they should take some lessons from Kratos in GoW
Artemus
19/12/05 @ 14:23
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Max, what is it you don't like about the Prince in Two Thrones? He's pretty much the same character he was in SoT. Did you mean Warrior Within?
Freek
19/12/05 @ 14:24
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
krudster, I've been to the Ubisoft PoP forums recently, and there are DOZENS of people who hated SoT, loved WW, and complained about TTT being too much like SoT. They miss the badass attitude, the music, ans what they think is "maturity" from WW.

Why do you think official forums of any game are often seen as the place where the most moronic of the fans gather?
ToeWars
19/12/05 @ 14:24
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Excuse me? Hello?

Can we have an actual review of POP:Revelations on PSP now please?

I don't give a toss about how this game compares to a different chapter on another format. Critique the gameplay sure, but don't waste all those lovely words on mardy guff. What I want to know about are things like loading times, frame rates, art and sound quality...

Sounds like EG are the ones in a teenage strop.
trav
19/12/05 @ 14:27
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I still think Penny Arcade put Warrior Within in the best light. :)

http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/12/03
Feanor
19/12/05 @ 15:22
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"gave the Prince the air of a child refusing to tidy his bedroom when nobody ever asked him to in the first place."

Classic line. :)

Speaking of frustration, when PES 5 frustrates me on the PSP I have to fight the urge to put the PSP up to my mouth and bite it. But I've never thrown or broke a control pad in my life.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 19/12/05 @ 15:25
alimokrane
19/12/05 @ 16:29
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well they should've ported both SOT and WW and sold the two as a single bundle that would have been nice. This way each party is satisfied ... But I guess I live in a dream world ....
RabidMonkey
19/12/05 @ 17:53
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Warrior Within was horrid, The Two Thrones isn't much better. Why anyone would buy this is beyond me.
sleepless
19/12/05 @ 20:11
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/Puts sleepless on ignore list ;)

:( I see it's so damn easy to annoy someone unintentionaly.

/fall down on knees..die quickly


*Sigh* After SoT I tried to get back into the series with Two Thrones but alas - I just can't get over the shitty atmosphere and crap main character.

You know, the fact that it is a 'dark' game doesn't matter me so much, but Ubisoft doesn't understand what a good 'dark' game requires. The prince really feels like a boy - as the reviewer points out - that mopes about having to clean up his room.

If Ubisoft really wants to do 'dark' they should take some lessons from Kratos in GoW


Kratos and his adventures were fine, but too epic for my tastes. PoP: WW was more about inner darkness of our little hero Prince which is my cup of tea. What I really want is dark game in more civil way. Give me some rather average man or woman as a hero of his/her personal matter. There are many people, which must confront their own demons and darkness every day. Why don't developers at least try to draw inspiration from their stories? Maybe they should spend few days or hours in some sanatorium..
chromice
19/12/05 @ 21:02
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Tom, stop kicking WW, please... It is nearly dead already. IMHO, it was a very good game. In fact, it was only the third game which I decided to complete once again (well, the first two were Doom and Quake). Why? The Story, The Characters, The Atmosphere, The ****** EVERYTHING!!! It would be a perfect, if not a suddenly pretty challenging 'tutorial' boss... I nearly broke my teeth grinding the pad after 20+ 'one more try'... I just played the demo before where she wasn't that hard and so I knew what a lovely game to expect... after going to the dentist ;-)
azmol01
19/12/05 @ 21:40
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ah the Sands Of Time, what a game, one of the best this gen, a classic unsurpassed by both its sequels.
ChocNut
20/12/05 @ 19:39
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This is the best platformer on the PSP.
Excellent graphics,
excellent music.

Tough starter boss but the camera system and puzzles and environment seem great so far (ive just unlocked the time controlling thing).

I've not played all the way through but I can tell that this is a top notch game.
RabidMonkey
21/12/05 @ 13:00
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nah, Tokobot is the best platformer on the PSP.
Arwin
21/12/05 @ 14:31
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I agree with Chocnut, and had so much to say on the matter that I added my comments as a user review.

Interestingly, this game has been fully underrated by several boards, but the user review scores seem to tell the real story this time round.
Arwin
28/12/05 @ 13:34
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well, I talked to loads of people who played this and they all love it. This reviewer is waaaaaay off.
SeesThroughAll
30/12/05 @ 20:43
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I bought this myself, and find it fairly enjoyable. The bugs are NOT harming the overall experience, IMHO. I'd have given it a 7, myself.
poweredjj
17/02/06 @ 09:04
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't agree with the review. At first, I didn't like WW. First boss kicked me about 5 times, I didn't like the new Prince. But I tried again, after a few days - to find out, that the game is MUCH BETTER than SOT (or TT). The music, the atmosphere, the fighting system. Interesting story, good characters, Dahaka runs...

I played Revelations for about an hour (downloaded it to see if it's worth buying). The ONLY thing I don't like is reduced gore (no slicing the enemies in two :P). The rest is BRILLIANT. All the time I was looking the PSP screen and asking myself "how is that possible - the game is nearly the same as on PS2!".

It's one of the few games on PSP that are 100% worth buying.

I think that the reviewers just don't like WW... I played Burnout Legends for a while - crappy graphics, port of the old game, sometimes buggy. And it gets really good reviews. But when other not-new game (WW) is ported ALMOST PERFECT - people don't like it.

I don't get it.

Comments: 1-30 of 30 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery