Prince of Persia Revelations Review
It'll never be king.
Version tested: PSP
This came dangerously close to being a concept review. I'd just mistimed an attack directed at that stupid woman in the one-piece leather outfit for about the tenth time in a row, and as the game goaded me once again with the "Retry?" prompt I found that the red mist descended (this happens in the game too) and the PSP almost left my hand as I swung it at the wall in an attempt to channel all my anger and frustration into one furious gesture.
You get the feeling something similar happened when The Sands of Time didn't sell as well as Ubisoft had hoped. The developers were probably sitting there when they first saw what had happened - that a game considered by most critics to be the best thing released that year had failed to make the required impact on the usual festive dross spiting the face of the charts - and in crashing their fists down on their keyboards and mice they somehow managed to direct all that anger and frustration into the next iteration of the Prince.
Well, obviously that's not what happened, but I've still yet to hear a decent explanation as to why Ubisoft replaced the warm and friendly fireside glow of the Sands of Time with the cold, uninviting gothic angst of Warrior Within, and gave the Prince the air of a child refusing to tidy his bedroom when nobody ever asked him to in the first place.
So what was the concept review going to be? An invoice for a new PSP after I threw it at the wall screaming "YOU BITCH!"
Fortunately, I kept on playing. Well, fortunately for those of you who want to know what Prince of Persia Revelations is like, anyway.

When you're jumping around, it's fun.
Porting Warrior Within to the PSP was a bizarre decision. Almost universally regarded as the worst since the series' revival, its attempts to darken the character of the Prince only worked in the sense that it left him a shadow of his former self, bereft of the charm that won so many of us over in the Sands of Time. Why not port Sands itself? Sands knew it was a game, shielding the brilliant platform puzzles from the often-tedious combat in a contrived manner that we appreciated nonetheless, and was full of clever ideas (like the foreshadowing of events when you hit a save point, tempting you to continue) and excellent level design (the menagerie, the library, the final ascent of the tower). WW did away with the boundary between platform adventure and laborious combat, failing to expand on the former or fix the latter in the process, and instead of a vibrant palace gave us a dishevelled husk of a setting - a fitting reflection of the way the atmosphere had been sucked out of it. The Prince was almost unrecognisable, Farah was gone, and instead of likable panto villains we had tediously sultry replacements.
Fittingly enough, time hasn't been kind to Warrior Within, nor has the process of porting it to PSP. With the advent of games like God of War and Spartan: Total Warrior, the "freeform fighting system" (or "FFS" as I call it) has been made to look even sillier than it did in the aftermath of Ninja Gaiden - success in combat boils down to repetitive patterns of hacking and slashing so much more laborious than the already poor combat of Sands of Time, and its integration into the general gameplay feels like an assault on what was good about it in the first place - as though shifting the whole thing into nu-metal overdrive wasn't sufficient in upsetting us. The PSP exacerbates things - using d-pad-left to centre the camera, and the rest of the d-pad for far-out views and first-person is actually quite a reasonable substitute for direct control through a second analog stick, and something other PSP platform games should take on board, but there are definite technical issues with sound in particular choppy, dialogue broken, constant load pauses and worse, the occasional stupid glitch - in fact, the game actually froze up on me on several occasions. The addition of new sections adds to the game's length, but certainly not its breadth, and while they fit comfortably into the framework of what we had in the first place, it's still a game that you won't be enjoying particularly when they crop up.

Unfortunately you spend more time doing this.
Even ignoring technical issues, the main issue is that WW never hits the first game's peaks, and doesn't really build on it in any positive ways. Enemies taunting you about your fighting prowess is irritating enough, but even worse because you find yourself agreeing with them as they mock you. "You call yourself a master swordsman?" No! I call myself a master platformer! Or I did. Once. There are still traces of that, thankfully. You still find yourself running along a wall and leaping from ledge to beam to rope to trapeze to platform and having to figure out how to get to where you're going. In this sense it's not without its moments - some platform sections come close to recapturing the fluidity and intelligence of Sands' design, while the chases involving the Dahaka (a shadowy creature trying to kill you because you messed around with the timeline) are quite fast and furious. Playing with time - rewinding it, or having to slow it down to complete puzzles, remains one of the best devices added to a platform game since the double jump. But even this is distorted by dead ends and arbitrary fighting sections.
It's just such a downer after Sands. Sands had you feel like you were lost in a colossal castle that you'd never escape, but the truth was that it was a place you understood and wanted to be in, with a real identity and so many lures to keep you exploring. WW is somewhere you don't want to be.

Ruining curtains was one of Warrior Within's best additions.
And I really can't be nasty enough about the combat. The idea was to do away with the tedious repetition and bouncing-off-the-wall frustration of Sands' combat, right? Well, it hasn't worked. The boss fight that almost ruined this review in the first place involves using one attack repeatedly, improvising during the period that it stops working (using the time-rewind whenever the game arbitrarily decides to kick you off a ledge into the abyss or unleash an unblockable attack in response), and then using that one attack again to finish things off. And what is that one attack? Jumping over your enemy's head and slashing her twice on the way down. In other words, you do what you usually did in Sands of Time, then when it stops working like it did in Sands of Time you flail about like you did in Sands of Time until it works again like it did in [I think they get it - Ed].
This isn't an awful game by any stretch of the imagination - mechanically at least, platforming has rarely been done as well in three dimensions as it's done in the Prince of Persia series. And please don't mistake these constant comparisons between Sands and Warrior Within for prejudice or simple bitterness - the quality that came beforehand certainly makes it harder to bear this one's faults, but it would fall down with or without the context. Somewhere along the line there was a wholesale misunderstanding of what made Sands of Time good, and the result of the change in approach is a game that manages to be less likable in just about every single way. I have no idea why it's been re-released on PSP instead of Sands, or even The Two Thrones, which sounds like it's a lot better, but inexplicable decisions seem to have flocked to this one, so perhaps there's some warped logic in it after all.
6 / 10
You may also like...
-
Happy Action Theater Review
-
ModNation Racers: Road Trip Review
-
Call of Duty: Black Ops has best game ending ever, says Guinness World Records
-
Sony confirms PS Vita 1st Party digital only game prices
-
Mass Effect 3 Demo: The First 20 Minutes
-
Why Devs Owe You Nothing
-
Tim Schafer: publishers aren't evil
-
Halo 4 Master Chief action figure flaunts new suit design
-
Face-Off: Final Fantasy 13-2
-
DICE working on multiple Battlefield 3 fixes
-
EGTV: Eurogamer playtests PlayStation Vita
-
App of the Day: Monkey Bump
-
Sony's $50m Vita marketing campaign targets PS3 owners
-
UK Top 40: Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning beats Darkness 2
-
Fallout: New Vegas dev asks fans what game they would like it to Kickstart
-
Apple begins Foxconn factories inspections
-
Retrospective: Star Wars Episode I Racer
-
Digital Foundry: PS3 Skyrim Lag Fixed?
-
Metal Gear Solid 5 expected between April 2013 and May 2014
-
Metal Gear Solid 3D demo on eShop this week
-
Activision: games are relationships, "brands in people's lives"
-
Making FIFA Street in the FIFA engine's image
-
FIFA Street footage pits France vs. Germany
-
Ridge Racer Unbounded delayed by four weeks
-
Gotham City Impostors Review









Comments (29) Latest comment 6 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
LOL
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
itz has 2 be down wit the kidz innitz
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
...
Porting Warrior Within to the PSP was a bizarre decision. Almost universally regarded as the worst since the series' revival
krudster, I've been to the Ubisoft PoP forums recently, and there are DOZENS of people who hated SoT, loved WW, and complained about TTT being too much like SoT. They miss the badass attitude, the music, ans what they think is "maturity" from WW.
So as worrying as it is, the success of WW probably wasn't only on the back of the quality of SoT, but people really preferred it.
I know forums aren't representative, but there wasn't only one thread like this, and not only one or two persons who preferred WW.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Makes you want to cry.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
In any case, we'll always have Sands of Time.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
It was because of great mood and style of WW, not because of music. Surely, I love all sorts of metal and rock, but definitely not Yankee nu-metal in Godsmack style. Dark Prince is simply more interesting than naive ordinary Prince. Therefore my vote goes to PoP WW and PoP Revelations.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
*Sigh* After SoT I tried to get back into the series with Two Thrones but alas - I just can't get over the shitty atmosphere and crap main character.
You know, the fact that it is a 'dark' game doesn't matter me so much, but Ubisoft doesn't understand what a good 'dark' game requires. The prince really feels like a boy - as the reviewer points out - that mopes about having to clean up his room.
If Ubisoft really wants to do 'dark' they should take some lessons from Kratos in GoW
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Why do you think official forums of any game are often seen as the place where the most moronic of the fans gather?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Can we have an actual review of POP:Revelations on PSP now please?
I don't give a toss about how this game compares to a different chapter on another format. Critique the gameplay sure, but don't waste all those lovely words on mardy guff. What I want to know about are things like loading times, frame rates, art and sound quality...
Sounds like EG are the ones in a teenage strop.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
http://w ww.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/12/03
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Classic line.
Speaking of frustration, when PES 5 frustrates me on the PSP I have to fight the urge to put the PSP up to my mouth and bite it. But I've never thrown or broke a control pad in my life.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
/fall down on knees..die quickly
*Sigh* After SoT I tried to get back into the series with Two Thrones but alas - I just can't get over the shitty atmosphere and crap main character.
You know, the fact that it is a 'dark' game doesn't matter me so much, but Ubisoft doesn't understand what a good 'dark' game requires. The prince really feels like a boy - as the reviewer points out - that mopes about having to clean up his room.
If Ubisoft really wants to do 'dark' they should take some lessons from Kratos in GoW
Kratos and his adventures were fine, but too epic for my tastes. PoP: WW was more about inner darkness of our little hero Prince which is my cup of tea. What I really want is dark game in more civil way. Give me some rather average man or woman as a hero of his/her personal matter. There are many people, which must confront their own demons and darkness every day. Why don't developers at least try to draw inspiration from their stories? Maybe they should spend few days or hours in some sanatorium..
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Excellent graphics,
excellent music.
Tough starter boss but the camera system and puzzles and environment seem great so far (ive just unlocked the time controlling thing).
I've not played all the way through but I can tell that this is a top notch game.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Interestingly, this game has been fully underrated by several boards, but the user review scores seem to tell the real story this time round.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I played Revelations for about an hour (downloaded it to see if it's worth buying). The ONLY thing I don't like is reduced gore (no slicing the enemies in two
It's one of the few games on PSP that are 100% worth buying.
I think that the reviewers just don't like WW... I played Burnout Legends for a while - crappy graphics, port of the old game, sometimes buggy. And it gets really good reviews. But when other not-new game (WW) is ported ALMOST PERFECT - people don't like it.
I don't get it.