Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Project Gotham Racing 3 Review

Xbox 360 Review by Tom Bramwell

22 November, 2005

I used to live down a road that curved left, banana-like round to my house at the end. To get onto it you had to do a 90-degree right turn. What I used to do when I drove in was lock the steering hard right to enter, and then see how far I could get up the road as the steering wheel unravelled itself before the indicator registered the straightening and clicked off. Until it did that, it sounded like Kudos-clicking. That's about as close as I've ever come to PGR in real life.

(I'm going to die alone, aren't I?)

Anyway, PGR was always a brilliant idea. When it comes to that warning about not using these driving techniques in real-life that devs whack on the front of racing games these days, it lurks somewhere in the gap between Ridge Racer's "because you will die" allusions and GT's "because nobody's this good". When you clamp the accelerator and fishtail the back of the car and then wrestle it straight, it isn't just forgiving, it actually awards you points. Applying this to exiting tight turns and using a model that rewards sharp braking and traction loss was inspired.

It was inspired in Metropolis Street Racer, it was inspired in the first PGR. It's still inspired. It's not a realistic game - you bump and scrape when you should be deflating like a turbo-accordion, and the collisions between cars on the track and the AI drivers' apparent lack of concern about them and the way you're all bashing past each other is wrong, but that's easily overlooked because the core skill that it asks you to develop is so satisfying. And that clicking of the Kudos meter, which tots up points for drifting, drafting, riding the curb tightly, and comboing it all together and suchlike, tickles your ears with the promise of points to go with your podium positions.

'Project Gotham Racing 3' Screenshot jal

The closest you can get to Japan in a game without flying JAL wearing Connect 4 as a hat.

PGR3 arrives on Xbox 360 with surprisingly little to add to the mechanics and structures that underpinned PGR2. Career mode allows you to pick one of five difficulty settings before tackling each challenge - and your daring or confidence in your ability informs the choice, because if you don't live up to the goal you've set you won't bank any points. Challenges range from racing and time trial affairs that are about speed to more technical cone and drift challenges that are about stringing Kudos-heavy moves together, and each adopts a different route through one of the game's city areas - London, Vegas, Tokyo, New York and Nurburgring (Ok so Nurburgring's not a city, but it might as well be for the distance and range it offers). On top of that, every single task synchs ever so elegantly with global leaderboards, so even the highest-ranked will have something more to push for.

Its principle divergence is in the way it separates these tasks from car classes. Now you simply go to a shop and buy yourself a car with credits earned by completing challenges - the idea being that you can use your favourite car throughout if you like. Along with the five grades of difficulty, this gives the game a level of accessibility that would've been alien in MSR or PGR, and even PGR2. You can make easier progress and move off tougher tasks by brushing them aside on lower difficulties, and the balance is such that even an accomplished racer will need to work for those Hard (gold) medals, which lurk tantalisingly just out of reach when you first attempt them, and their credit benefits, and Hardcore achievements are just that. Collecting cars as you go rather than having them prescribed will please everybody who ever whinged about the truck class in PGR2.

But you know what? I hate those bastards who whinged about the truck class, given what's happened. The concessions have bred profligacy by design. You gain enough credits by smashing through the relatively easy silver-medal band of races that you can amass a garage of Enzos, DBR9s, TVRs and other high-end machinery within a few short hours. The central Kudos mechanic of having to put your own imagined potential where your BHP is by selecting a target score before a race remains good - although personally I preferred the way you played with your shades of ambition by more closely defining your goals in the older games, half-second by half-second - but this is now more of a personal quest than a predefined one. It lacks incentives beyond the colours of medals, the ranks on Live and the badges you can earn that celebrate 360 spins and tasks completed in one combo. These are good incentives admittedly, but they're not as good as cars and new tracks were in the olden days.

'Project Gotham Racing 3' Screenshot incar

The in-car view models everything, but being able to glance at the rear-view isn't much more useful than holding a button to look behind.

PGR3 also plays with the separation of offline and online, and does this to better effect. Live's integration in single-player is limited to leaderboards and downloadable ghosts in Career mode (two of the best things ever done with Live, frankly), but now there's a distinct Online Career, with its own Live-specific Kudos-accumulation. There's a range of events to join in with at any given time. You can also set up your own Live races of course, in the game's Playtime area, and the way the game matches your connection speed and skill level to random opponents seems to work even at this early stage in the console's life.

The Route Creator, meanwhile, opens up a great many possibilities. It's simple to set up routes between start/finish and the waypoints available, and the results are easily distributable. But while the selection of cities is decent and the number of possibilities is barely conceivable (until a load screen somewhat comically suggests you "create over 100 million"), and nobody's questioning the devs' meticulousness in modelling each environment, the area covered is actually surprisingly small. Take London for example (since I live here) - the area covered is a fairly small section about ten minutes from my front door (by foot, mind you - not in a DBR9 or anything), and runs from Victoria Embankment through Trafalgar Square, loops round Piccadilly Circus without reaching upper Regent Street, and then circles back down to Pall Mall, St James's Park, and straight back to Big Ben. It's not that big. The Getaway's mapped area was many times the size and you could do the in-between bits. What is included works well - each city section features several memorable turns, straights and distinctive sections that combine to good effect, and to be fair Vegas and the winding sections of Tokyo feel more varied than London - but you have to wonder whether all that time wireframing buildings might have been better spent.

Which leads us inexorably to the question of how the game looks. This is undoubtedly the main thing people know about PGR3 at this point: the cars are enormously detailed, the environments are thoroughly mapped and modelled, and the visuals are presented in resolutions hitherto unseen on console hardware. And yeah, you've picked up on the tone - this is the point in the review where I say I don't think it makes as big a difference to the play experience as everyone's been so breathlessly declaring elsewhere.

'Project Gotham Racing 3' Screenshot bulb

This is a beautiful screenshot. When it races past your head at 150mph, though, it's harder to take in the shape of the bulbs within the headlight.

Someone asked me a whole bunch of questions about PGR3's graphics yesterday. If it was true that the tarmac was virtually photo-realistic, if it was true all the pedestrians were 3d models, if it was true that you could stop and read the hoardings on the buildings, and see the light bouncing off windows and so on. Frankly I don't really know. My recollection of the tarmac is that it passes under me like a blurry grey conveyor belt, because I'm moving so damn fast. The spectators I only see when I stop, and that's only when I've screwed up, and when that's the case they're hardly my priority. The things you notice are the big things - the sun creeping over the skyscrapers in Shinjuku, the incredibly pronounced and sometimes blinding effect when you emerge from tunnels, the trees lining a road, the wealth of scenery. In terms of providing a world around the track, PGR3 goes the furthest so far, and yes, everything's presented in ways that other consoles can't present it, in a game that even PC owners who can reach these visual heights haven't much to compare directly to.

But you're only really going to notice where most of the grunt went in replays. Or on Gotham TV. The latter is a nice idea, but kind of ignores the unspoken truth about replay modes: they are boring. Watching the best of the best do their stuff is interesting, but watching eight mediocre players bashing into each other is not. Being one of as many as 30,000 people doing so simultaneously is a technical accomplishment, not an extra point on the score. Then if you look around, you're forced to admit that the spectators are automatons, and the trees aren't moving. It's quite a sterile environment, for all its definition and the wealth of objects outside the track boundaries.

But let's say you view it as a spectacular whole - even at this, for the most part the enormous amounts of incidental detail presuppose that you aren't actually racing. When you are, the key things are being able to see the next corner, or the next cone gate distinctly, and here the game is no better than any other. You'll notice far more impressive effects and depth of background material than you ever have before, and when you fiddle with that Photo viewer mode and actually marvel at the vehicle exteriors, you'll be hard pressed to think of another car model that includes as much. It's like watching those GT videos before Polyphony actually had to run them through the ancient PS2 graphics tech.

'Project Gotham Racing 3' Screenshot ferrari

But we do still truly love the clicking of the Ferrari.

Hop into the cockpit view, which many are eulogising, and you'll certainly feel more immersed than you have elsewhere, owing thanks to the terrific engine sounds and enormous amount of in-car detail. But it's also kind of peculiar, because when you're in a car you don't find that half of your view is taken up by steering wheel, dashboard and the frame of the car; you focus on what's outside of the windscreen. The windscreen filter here is lovely, but unless you really divorce yourself from the interior modelling it feels more like you're leaning forward from the backseat, and the viewing window is quite restrictive. In the end I preferred the bumper cam, as I often do, not least because it's much easier to get a handle on the precise demands of the Kudos challenges and see what's coming when the track ahead fills the whole screen.

Let's give it its dues: when played from this perspective, PGR3 is an excellent, well-refined racing game. Cone Challenges, Drift Challenges, Street Races, Hot Laps, Eliminators, Time vs Kudos (where you stop the ticking down of the clock by playing up to the Kudos system - an excellent idea) - all are good, most are ridiculously compulsive thanks to the superb balancing of the medal targets, so much so that you'll happily pause and restart them every time you spin off and the chap ahead quickly builds up an unassailable lead. And while the range of challenges will probably feel a bit narrow to people who have stuck with the series since its birth on the Dreamcast, the temptation to try and scale those greater heights will appeal to the arcade mentality that still lurks within a lot of players.

But, as I keep saying, too much of what's changed since PGR2 is superficial once the initial novelty value of the graphics, Gotham TV, etc. wears off. PGR3's is a slightly flawed but overwhelmingly engaging framework for an already excellent skew on the driving models we're traditionally used to, and there's little else I'm going to turn to on Xbox Live for a significant time to come. But when I answered my friend's questions yesterday I simply said that it's like playing PGR2 on a system that can do it justice - and that comes close to summing it up. I will always love the thought of turning into my drive listening to the clicker, and PGR3 is still that feeling in game form - unfortunately, I'm starting to feel like I got home a long time ago.

8/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Project Gotham Racing 3 on Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 199 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
disc
22/11/05 @ 14:13
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Cool :)

I clicked.
Retroid [mod]
22/11/05 @ 14:17
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/Wishes he was getting a 360 this Xmas ;_;
bivith
22/11/05 @ 14:18
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"The Getaway's mapped area was many times the size and you could do the in-between bits. "

Yes but it was the only city in the Getaway! Hardly an apt comparison.
squaylor
22/11/05 @ 14:18
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The Routecreator sounds interesting. I think this is one of those games that don't force you to buy a console - but if you buy the console you feel you have to get it. If you see what I mean.
blizeH
22/11/05 @ 14:19
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Mario Kart is indeed the king of racers!

/hugs Yoshi and his red homing shells
Shinji [mod]
22/11/05 @ 14:20
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yeah - it's not a reason to spend 300 quid on a new console, but if you're spending it anyway, you'd clearly be mad not to buy this.
bivith
22/11/05 @ 14:22
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This review puzzles me. Is the reviewer seriously suggesting that next gen racing games should not be graphically more impressive, just ... because???
jack_klugman
22/11/05 @ 14:23
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
THIS or Burnout Revenge on PS2 anyone please.

The one not costing me £300 please.
Shinji [mod]
22/11/05 @ 14:27
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
bivith, I don't get that from the article at all. I think that what he's saying is that actually, the graphical upgrades are not as amazing a step forward for the game or the genre as you might think - so what you're left with is another great PGR game with better graphics, rather than any kind of major leap forward. Which, based on what I've played, is very fair comment.

I guess - totally my personal opinion here - part of the problem is that the stuff which the next-gen does well and which developers can do now isn't best shown off in a racing game - it's really good at very detailed lighting and animation and character models and so on, but it doesn't do so much for buildings flying past in a 180mph blur.
blizeH
22/11/05 @ 14:27
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hmm, not really Shinji. Give me Burnout Revenge and Mario Kart DS over this anyday!

And like Jack said, the current generation currently offers so many better games, look at some of the titles coming out for the PS2/GC and then look at the lineup for the Xbox 360, best to save your pennies imo!

@ beng, heh, can't beat a bit of Rainbow Road! ;-)

Ordering Mario Kart later this evening, anywhere know the cheapest place to get the Wi-Fi dongle from? Thanking you.
octo
22/11/05 @ 14:27
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No - I think the reviewer is suggesting that the game is graphically impressive when you stop to look around. i think the point about "life" within the game is also well made - as the next gen develops the little details will draw you out of the game more completely. Other than that it's a sexier PGR2. Which will please everyone who bought that game.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 22/11/05 @ 14:21
saysomething
22/11/05 @ 14:30
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
8/10, it's funny because it's true!
caligari
22/11/05 @ 14:31
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The X-Box zealots have gone a little quiet.

I sense them rounding up for a major "I haven't just wasted £300+" retaliation.
disc
22/11/05 @ 14:32
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh caligari they're on their way...
HarryOla
22/11/05 @ 14:33
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Xbox zealot: A prettier PGR2. Bonzer.
Celeborn
22/11/05 @ 14:34
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"This review puzzles me. Is the reviewer seriously suggesting that next gen racing games should not be graphically more impressive, just ... because???"

The review is suggesting that the next gen racing games should not be ONLY be more graphically impressive. So what if everything looks shinier, newer and smoother? If it doesnt effect gameplay AT ALL, then this whole "next gen" stuff is pointless. My overall message from this review, was that it was PGR2 but better looking. Aside from graphic whores, is that any reason to buy an expensive new console and rebuy that game?
Artemus
22/11/05 @ 14:34
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/looks at reader scores. See's 2 and 3's. Sighs.
Furbs
22/11/05 @ 14:35
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
lol@saysomething
blizeH
22/11/05 @ 14:36
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
But there are also two 10's which this game doesn't deserve.

Pretty graphics != 10/10.
Gremmi
22/11/05 @ 14:37
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
And already you can see fanboy votings on the scores. A 2 and a 10? I'm willing to bet the voters haven't played the game, too.
Shinji [mod]
22/11/05 @ 14:40
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think you're being a bit unfair there - I'm not sure I've ever met anyone who's a bigger fan of the MSR/PGR series than Tom. The fact that he can scream blue murder about red shells on occasion surely doesn't entirely remove his ability to talk about what is, effectively, a more realistic but nonetheless arcade-style racing sim?
disc
22/11/05 @ 14:40
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Manic Miner: You have to admit that PGR have been losing it's perfection racing in its later versions.

(I haven't played PGR3 yet but PGR2 compared to 1 or MSR you must admit is a lot more forgiving)
Artemus
22/11/05 @ 14:40
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
And already you can see fanboy votings on the scores. A 2 and a 10? I'm willing to bet the voters haven't played the game, too.

Of course they haven't. That's why this new reader review rating thing is crap. So obvious this would happen.
blizeH
22/11/05 @ 14:40
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm not happy that this game has taken away the top spot on the page from the superior Mario Kart!

/shakes fist at Tom
Carlo
22/11/05 @ 14:41
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well.... 8/10 is about what I expected it to get.

This could well be the 'game to have' on the 360 for the people who (in their own wisdom and for whatever reasons) decided to PRE-ORDER a console without a single independant review for launch day.

At least there is /something/ to play on it... Just hope you all like car-games
gamingdave
22/11/05 @ 14:42
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Live's integration in single-player is limited to leaderboards and downloadable ghosts in Career mode (two of the best things ever done with Live, frankly)"

MSR had online leaderboards and some ghost downloads. It was supposed to have uploadable ghosts aswell, but time and money got in the way of that. There were lots of ideas for online features in MSR that were dropped due to either budget or technical limitations, many of them actually being realised now.
Shinji [mod]
22/11/05 @ 14:42
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
eurogamer simply isn't a credible site for reviews sadly, king kong better than PGR3?

Neither of which you've actually played, I'll wager.
Zomoniac
22/11/05 @ 14:43
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
THIS or Burnout Revenge on PS2 anyone please.

Well given that Burnout Revenge is a truly awful game, this. If it was between this or Burnout 3, then that would be harder. But probably this. Just.
Tonka
22/11/05 @ 14:43
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't get why people compare EG's scores with other sites/magazines scores. Shouldn't we all be happy to read different opinions. There are no such things as absolute truths when it comes to videogame scores. (Or much else for that matter)

EDIT for clarification.
I can see the value of comparing different reviews. What I find completely pointless however is
"A said 9 and B said 7 so someone must be wrong"
Edited 1 times, most recently on 22/11/05 @ 14:36
Eighthours
22/11/05 @ 14:44
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Seems that Bizarre's decision to make the game more user-friendly hasn't gone down too well at EG Towers. The platinums are still rock-hard, by the way.

This'll be one of those reviews where people will look back at the score in 6 months' time and wonder what game Tom was playing. In my opinion, of course!

No mention of Geometry Wars? For shame!!
Carlo
22/11/05 @ 14:44
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
BTW... Want to stop all this 'fanboy' ratings getting out of hand?

PUBLISH THE USERNAMES OF THE VOTERS WITH THEIR SCORES. Only allow registered users.

Humiliation will force them to be honest.
ralphwolfenstein
22/11/05 @ 14:45
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think these 'how others have voted' graph shapes are going to get very familiar...

I mean, which twats actually voted '2' and '3' ? (Likewise, the '9' and '10's)...

Eurogamer - it's the new Amazon.co.uk...
UncleLou
22/11/05 @ 14:45
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
BTW... Want to stop all this 'fanboy' ratings getting out of hand?

PUBLISH THE USERNAMES OF THE VOTERS WITH THEIR SCORES. Only allow registered users.

Humiliation will force them to be honest.


Excellent idea.
Furbs
22/11/05 @ 14:47
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh look! Its arnie!
rauper [staff]
22/11/05 @ 14:47
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"PUBLISH THE USERNAMES OF THE VOTERS WITH THEIR SCORES."

We will - there will be measures in place to prevent vote rigging. We currently set it so you can't vote for games more than 2 weeks before they are released, but maybe we'll change that to release day... And we will be banning people who are repeatedly posting crap votes.

"Only allow registered users."

This is already the case
Pac
22/11/05 @ 14:49
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@blizeH

I think, even without playing it, the trusted reviews I have read would put it at 8 or 9.

The 2s and 3s are clearly readers with an axe to grind.

I don't know why people bother rating games if they are not going to give them a fair crack of the whip.
Artemus
22/11/05 @ 14:51
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Eurogamer - it's the new Amazon.co.uk...

I was thinking GameFAQs. Christ.

PUBLISH THE USERNAMES OF THE VOTERS WITH THEIR SCORES

Do it EG. Then we can see exactly whos being a twat. You could even ban the idiots from voting.
ruckus
22/11/05 @ 14:52
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Single player: Does this allow you to choose the number of ai and the cars they drive - like the arcade/quick race option in MSR?
MoFo
22/11/05 @ 14:52
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh god users are rating this XBox 360 game below ten! Must vote ten now to stop it getting a low score!

Can't we just ban people from voting 10 or anything below 7. Infact only let people vote for 8/10 and save all the hastle.
Furbs
22/11/05 @ 14:57
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wow, arnie is gone already. Nice work mods.
ralphwolfenstein
22/11/05 @ 14:59
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
8/10 is a good score on Eurogamer, and pretty much what I was expecting... I've actually been amazed at how high the scores for launch games have been on the US sites - 8's and 9's generously sprayed around...

Surely no-one expected a series update to score higher on this site? Still hoping for a 9 for PDZ, but other than that I can't see why even the most avid 360 advocate (and I would consider myslef one) would expect anything more than a competent line up...

So it might not be the greatest launch line-up ever as Allard claimed - that accolade arguably belongs to the original Xbox - but its looking like there are two or three good, solid titles worth picking up if you are an early adopter...
UncleLou
22/11/05 @ 14:59
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh god users are rating this XBox 360 game below ten! Must vote ten now to stop it getting a low score!

Can't we just ban people from voting 10 or anything below 7. Infact only let people vote for 8/10 and save all the hastle.


You don't need to be a fanboy to be annoyed when people vote "2" and "3" for a game that isn't even out yet. It's simply childish, and annoying, as it sabotages the whole thing.
blizeH
22/11/05 @ 14:59
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh god users are rating this XBox 360 game below ten! Must vote ten now to stop it getting a low score!

Can't we just ban people from voting 10 or anything below 7. Infact only let people vote for 8/10 and save all the hastle.


:D
Artemus
22/11/05 @ 15:00
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Don't understand where all the user reviews are coming from... not only is the game not out, the hardware you need to play it isn't either!

Aye. It's bloody ridiculous. Voting from the actual release date should be applied as well.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 22/11/05 @ 14:55
blizeH
22/11/05 @ 15:01
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/points and laughs at Artemus
thegamesthething
22/11/05 @ 15:02
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Surely no-one expected a series update to score higher on this site?"

HL2?
Artemus
22/11/05 @ 15:04
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/points and laughs at Artemus

What's so funny? What I meant was you can only vote from the actual release date.
UncleLou
22/11/05 @ 15:04
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Surely no-one expected a series update to score higher on this site?"

HL2?


*sigh*
blizeH
22/11/05 @ 15:06
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Artemus, I'm not sure, it's just the way you're getting so wound up over people giving the game a low score.

You don't seem to realise that for every person giving the game a low score for the sake of it, there's going to be ten others giving the game a high score just for the sake of it. For example, ten people rating this game a ten when none of them have probably played it is a joke, the likelyhood of this game justifying a perfect ten is very slim too.
thegamesthething
22/11/05 @ 15:10
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
ah yeah, sorry - i meant

HL2, twice

Comments: 1-50 of 199 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery