Jump to navigation
Advertisement

The Matrix: Path of Neo Review

PlayStation 2 Xbox Review by Tom Bramwell

12 November, 2005

Here's what I don't get about Enter The Matrix: It wasn't about Neo because Neo is too powerful. Too powerful for what? Too powerful to be a videogame character? Don't we, um, routinely withstand the organised might of entire armies when we take on the mantle of an ordinary-guy-with-nothing-to-lose? I've been rookies-on-the-force with nought but a handgun and an entire drugs cartel out to get me, and emerged a cigar-smoking, rocket-launching, bullet-dodging lunatic standing on a mountain of erstwhile goons. We are programmed to overlook the average lead's implausible capacity for violence and utterly ludicrous resilience in the face of everything from headshots to head-stomps from 90-foot robot-dragons. So Neo can punch people 10 times a second, jump between skyscrapers and take on two hundred Hugo Weavings simultaneously. That rules him out of the running for the latest vacancy under my thumbs how, exactly? It sounds more like he inquired about the room in my PS2 and then turned up with a reference from Kurosawa and a character statement from Doomguy. He's made for this life.

And so it proves in The Path of Neo, which follows him from "Wake up Neo" to machine city.

When Neo runs up someone's torso and delivers a skull-crushing volley to the face in slow motion, it ticks the box next to "true to source material" and the one next to "suitable videogame moment" so quickly you'd swear it was using two pens. When he cuts down an enemy with a samurai sword, and then without even turning fires the blade into the chap behind him and then boots him off it again before spinning into a roundhouse to someone's slacking jaw, you don't even have to suspend your disbelief. It's meant to be like this.

Where Path of Neo succeeds most is in the collusion of combat control and spectacle. Of course you can't expect to throw every punch, land every kick or parry every attack. What you can expect is to feel like the force behind every flurry, the crankshaft behind every windmill pole-attack, and the momentum behind every combination. There's a very solid base of push and pull here, as there is in any fighting game; it's just that here your exertions are amplified accordingly, and evasion is practically capoeira.

'The Matrix: Path of Neo' Screenshot motto

Why do one when you can do them both at once? S'my motto.

Building up gradually over the course of various tutorials - filling in the blanks between that spike-to-the-back-of-the-head moment and "I know Kung Fu" - and at predetermined intervals in-game, the combat system develops from the initial hapless 'shove', to three-hit kick combos and the occasional run-up-someone's-face to a devastating arsenal of uppercuts, aerial attacks, sword-slashes, roundhouses, and more recognisable moves than you'd find flicking through Hello!'s celebrity housing special.

The way it all dovetails together, the enormous variety of outcomes that key into every combat context, and the way, Killer Instinct-like, that it distils the spectacle into basic combos and simple prompt-response button jabs is enormously satisfying - both to watch and do. There's so much that you can do, and so much that can play out above and beyond that, that repetition of motions doesn't necessarily mean repetition of outcome - particularly when you start to make use of the slow motion element, Focus, which acts as a modifier, as well as framing the finishing moves more excitingly, and allowing you to activate things like Bullet Dodge and, later, Neo's Force-like ability to stop bullets in mid-air and redirect them. And, brilliantly, whenever you round off an awesome combo, the final attack is couched in slow-mo while you're able to spin the camera angle round with the right stick in real-time. Nay - Bullet Time. Inspired.

The initial purely tutorial-based section is perhaps overlong, and certainly full of missteps, but even this isn't without its standout moments. As you'd expect, it peaks in hand-to-hand - when you reach for the wooden poles in the Morpheus dojo-construct fight, you can tell where the game's strengths truly lie.

What's utterly, utterly depressing, however, is that this is virtually the only place they lie.

Outside of the kicking-people-in-the-face, the way the game uses film material is variously awkward, bizarre and outright crap. The use of actual film footage is the most obviously demented thing. Instead of simply peppering it throughout in order to bind the interactive elements together, it's spliced together in montages that cut back and forth, often to split-second glimpses of things that you won't actually do for another half an hour and tries to give you a sense of Neo's... well, actually I have no idea what it's trying to do. It certainly doesn't do anything useful, like tell the story.

'The Matrix: Path of Neo' Screenshot h5

HIGH FIIIIVE!

Elsewhere, the way the film crosses over with in-game events often feels forced and rarely comes off. The rooftop sequence, home to one of the most iconic moments in the entire trilogy, is dreadful. Having acquired Bullet Dodge and established that you're meant to do the lean-back-and-get-your-thigh-grazed thing to dodge an agent's bullets while Trinity caps him in the side of the head, you discover that creating those circumstances is fraught with difficulty. You'll go into Bullet Dodge when you shouldn't, or Trinity will be too busy clubbing the agent with her fists to actually fire, and all the while that "Trinity! ... Help." sample is played for every attempt. Then, er, you have to do the same thing again, first wiping out SWAT reinforcements so the agent won't be able to immediately respawn. Which, when more reinforcements arrive, he, er, does. Trinity! Help. Then you get to take a ride on the chopper and use your mini-gun to liberate Morpheus. But only after you've gone through a tedious on-rails shooting gallery exercise. TRINITY. HELP.

Away from the main filmy bits, your missions don't so much draw out the superfluous sequences as strap them to a rack and stretch them to breaking point. When Trinity, Neo, et al escape just after Morpheus is captured, they do so through the sewers, fighting identikit enemies in identikit rooms, accessed after you've done an identikit blow-up-the-doorway-with-a-detpack-under-duress.

Sometimes it moves into areas unexplored by the film. Like Neo's extraction of troubled souls in-between The Matrix and Reloaded. The characters you help out are similar to the subjects of some bits of The Animatrix, for anyone who's seen that. Elsewhere the game colours certain details like the extraction of the Captains after the early-in-Reloaded meet-up. Since you're Neo, and not a fly on various walls, you miss out on most of the freeway fun with Trinity and Morpheus, but there's still lots for you to do - and in this area of the game it splits the missions into little clumps so that you can tackle them in your preferred order.

Problem is, the missions it sets up are contrivances. Set-pieces are telegraphed and then executed according to specific instructions. This is true of the game as a whole, in fact - there's no sense of really discovering Neo's powers yourself, and there's little opportunity to really discover anything within the levels either. At the merest hint of ambiguity, the game grabs you by the arm and tells you what to use or blow up. If a door needs blocking, you're told which support to shoot out with your gun.

'The Matrix: Path of Neo' Screenshot code

Code vision allows you to find hidden stuff. And is just generally cool.

Guns are something you probably expected to hear about sooner. Their presence down here in the guts of the review ought to be telling and, indeed, they're mostly just plain annoying or superfluous. The gun tutorial itself demonstrates camera and control issues. Fortunately you don't need them often, but I can't really forgive the fact that what ought to be their moment of triumph, the lobby scene, is one of the weakest levels of the whole lot as a result of their shortcomings.

For a game based on a film trilogy that rapidly descended into style over substance [revisionist! - Ed], Path of Neo presents itself awkwardly, and takes an age to get going. The opening sequences - a dreamy facsimile of the lobby scene, and a stealthy scamper through the halls of Neo's office building, leave you confused and bemused. You simply can't get a handle on the lobby action, because you don't know enough, and yet you will learn about it just fine. It comes off as utterly pointless. And the stealth is terrible - lots of clunky leaning-against-the-wall and manoeuvring to hotspots in accordance with Morpheus' galling enunciation. "Move arROOUUnd the desk." You move, you bald-headed dimwit! Where's MY freaking chopper?

There are moments when it has a good idea. Being able to change the course of the film by escaping Neo's office instead of surrendering alters events slightly. It's something you don't have to do, but you'll want to see what happens. It's a frantic, often perilous climb to the roof followed a frenzied descent, racing past the menace of an agent and barrelling over guards in an attempt to reach the exit. But these film-breaking bits are all too rare and often poor. Yes, you can opt for the blue pill, but nothing interesting happens. You just reload the level.

Even so, sometimes, even the set-pieces work. When Neo's trapped in a room with an agent he can't kill yet, and his guns are off-limits because he's holding the detonator for a nearby explosive charge, the only option is to hold out until the others can break through and he can leap an enormous, surely impassable void - blowing up the charges behind him simultaneously. The adrenaline really surges as it looks like you won't make it. Indeed, what happens seems absurdly implausible. "Ok, maybe you do know kung fu," Switch quips. But there's simply not enough of this. "Hm, upgrades" - surely the funniest line in the whole of the second film - is virtually the only other chucklesome moment. Most of your fun has nothing to do with the film's events - it's about creating your own action set-pieces, a bit like FEAR does.

'The Matrix: Path of Neo' Screenshot hula

Enter the hula hoop contest.

Despite Shiny's repeated proud boasts, it's technologically hamstrung in places too, and glitchy to boot, with characters sometimes switching positions inexplicably. Now, they said normal mapping couldn't be done on the PS2. Maybe it just shouldn't be. The game throws vital frames away at the expense of its technical ambition with a foolhardy degree of recklessness. It's very impressive to see pillars fracture, bells fall out of the roofs of churches, blossom fluttering through a studio apartment and Neo's fists cutting through shafts of light as beautifully wasteful texture quality around him falls into real-time shadow, and it's nice to see every pixel putting some time in during a Chinatown slug-fest, but it's not entirely necessary. It doesn't quite work either - the textural detail looks grainy at any distance, and no amount of crafty lighting algorithms can mask Neo's triangular knuckles. No wonder people don't get up when he punches them...

Fortunately, the fighting animations are superb. And that's really what it's all about - it's a game that exists to make you feel superhuman and cool. It deserves credit for delivering that in combat. Neo's abilities are empowering, and the balance between The One and the many red-shirts is just about right. Some of the ways it achieves this outcome are obvious: the enormous variety of context-sensitive moves, the carefully choreographed kung fu animations. Some are less so, like the way the AI SWAT teams won't shoot you if you're engaging one of them hand to hand.

It's never going to score too highly. What with the technical issues, the contrived mission design, the awful film editing, the animation glitches, the awkward gunplay, the restrictive camera, the handholding, the slow start, the inconsistent checkpointing, the mishandling of key events, and the ludicrous manner in which the Wachowski brothers actually walk into the game and present the alternative end sequence.

But, as I sit here convincing myself it's rubbish on account of all this, I realise that I genuinely have enjoyed playing it enormously. The combat may lack depth in skill terms - certainly you wouldn't compare it to something like Ninja Gaiden in terms of technique - but in the end Neo's the perfect embodiment of stuff you want to and now can do in a game. It's just the Path that's the problem.

7/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about The Matrix: Path of Neo on PlayStation 2?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-42 of 42 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
admir
12/11/05 @ 08:43
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
this game is much better then enter the matrix
theiceman
12/11/05 @ 08:44
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Two attempts and they still can't get the matrix games right. Oh well.

/plays gun instead
Shadar
12/11/05 @ 09:33
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So this probably means that I will enjoy the game if I want to? Good. I nearly managed to enjoy Enter the Matrix by pure force of will. Is the combat system similar to the fluttering madness that passed as pugilism last time, or is Path of Neo actually a little more substantial? Does it offer a good counter system or some of that good ol' rolling-away-stuff that I kind of require from a good fighting game? Or does it offer alternatives?

In short: Does it hold a candle to the Japanese variety of fighting games? Or will I walk away disappointed if I expect that?
Derblington
12/11/05 @ 09:33
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I actually fancy getting this but I'll wait until it's sub £15. January sales are gonna rock this year.
AOFanboi
12/11/05 @ 09:38
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Three attempts: Don't forget the Matrix Online MMORPG. Though the makers gave up and sold it to Sony, it had quite a few interesting ideas in it's City of Heroes-eque heart.
zErOb_cOOl
12/11/05 @ 09:49
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The irony that 'The MAtrix' is basically one big VR computer game.....yet they can't make an above average real life game. Oh the irony!
Juriel
12/11/05 @ 10:07
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Funny how the games based on Matrix, and should be style over everything else, manage to be so visually crappy...
alimokrane
12/11/05 @ 10:23
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
QUOTE : ***** It's never going to score too highly. What with the technical issues, the contrived mission design, the awful film editing, the animation glitches, the awkward gunplay, the restrictive camera, the handholding, the slow start, the inconsistent checkpointing, the mishandling of key events, and the ludicrous manner in which the Wachowski brothers actually walk into the game and present the alternative end sequence. *****

That'll get people to buy the game LOL but I have to agree with that anyway ..
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/11/05 @ 10:16
asphaltcowboy
12/11/05 @ 10:34
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It is pretty flawed, but the fighting is just so... right. The gunplay becomes a little easier as you play (when you learn to stop clicking the right thumbstick and putting your guns away), but I agree there are major camera/targeting problems - what I disagree with is that it spoilt the lobby level, I thought it was great! Since it's a pretty open space the camera isn't really a problem. The way they've spliced the film clips together are minor annoyances, along with the fact that it looks pretty bad! The animation for the fighting is great, but the rest of it is not very good. Definitely worth a rental, if not picking it up when it's a little cheaper.

Despite the flaws, it's inexorably cool ;)
12/11/05 @ 10:46
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I always thought shiny were a bad choice to do the matrix games, i think ubisoft would have done a much better job.
ClansOfIntrigue
12/11/05 @ 11:52
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I wonder what Dave Perry's excuse will be this time?

Personally I wouldn't give something that's sometimes fun despite its crapness more than a 6, which is where that review seemed to be heading to me...
davyuk
12/11/05 @ 12:02
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Because this reality is actually within the Matrix, this game is technically running in emulation - an emulation of its self - and that's why it's so bad.
Furbs
12/11/05 @ 15:32
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Its a good point Fruity. Maybe its getting older or becoming an increasingly (/shudder) casual gamer, but I'm becoming more and more tolerant of decent, if flawed, games. SW:Battlefront 2, LA Rush and this are all games I'm enjoying, even if they are never going to be top quality. Maybe its that the overall standard of game is rising due to ever spiralling production costs. Publishers/devs cant afford to make awful games so even the less than brilliant ones are still half decent.
Chtulie
12/11/05 @ 16:00
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Only one mentioning of FEAR and no mentioning of Devil May Cry, Ninja Gaiden or even Hulk: Ultimate Destruction (I really thought any of the latter three might be mentioned in the intro).
I salute the willpower of thy constraint reviewer.
Xerx3s
12/11/05 @ 16:08
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Is this also the same as on other platforms? Cause i actually had high hopes for this :(
asphaltcowboy
12/11/05 @ 16:32
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
" Is this also the same as on other platforms? Cause i actually had high hopes for this :("

What are you talking about? It's a decent game!
Nikanoru
12/11/05 @ 16:43
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
and no amount of crafty lighting algorithms can mask Neo's triangular knuckles.

A problem 3D games just can't seem to get rid of even in nextgen.
DDevil
12/11/05 @ 18:57
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hold on, what's going on? No-one has taken a dig at the review or the reviewer yet!

Come on, you're supposed to say they're both shit!
Artemus
12/11/05 @ 19:38
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was expecting worse...
ChocNut
12/11/05 @ 20:14
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's a great game - and I think the re-edited footage works considering everyone's seen the non-montage film sequences a zillion times and if they hadnt been spliced up it'd be boring - some of the editing is inspired too.

Anyway - back to the game - the shooting IS good and in fact Im gonna stop talking now and go play. Fun Fun Fun (by the way I agree with the slow start - but it REALLLY gets going the more time you put in).

8.5/10
BBIAJ
12/11/05 @ 20:37
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
How can the shooting be good, when the lock-on remains on a dead body for what feels like the best part of forever?

The only half decent work around I've found for this, is to holster your guns, and then get them out again, but during this time, you can be getting riddled with bullets...

The hand-to-hand is far more satisfying though.
ImGameCube
12/11/05 @ 22:23
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The first comments section I have read on this site for a while that hasn't been ruined by people critising the review. Lord be true, I'm a happy boy!

I'm a very casual gamer, don't have a PS2 or Xbox, so will probably never play this game. Still, I like the idea of being able to punch like Neo (as opposed to just liking the idea of punching Neo).

Pow...powpowpowpowpow!
sleepless
13/11/05 @ 00:03
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
ImGameCube - The first comments section I have read on this site for a while that hasn't been ruined by people critising the review. Lord be true, I'm a happy boy!

Sorry, I don’t want you to be happy :)

For me it is 4/10 at best. But I don’t have a reason to bash review or reviewer. I have my opinion; he has his own opinion. :)

Fighting is somehow enjoyable in small doses later in the game when Neo/player could use special abilities of Neo from film. But other parts of game are seriously broken.

Horrible beginning section, so so visuals with ugly character models and overused special effects (Perry's pride? heh), really bad camera (even if compared to bad camera in Shadow of Colossus), horrible shooting (using R2 and R1 is not good choice), crappy alternative ending with Wachowski thieves and badly told story via good cutscenes.

Shiny did poor job again. I can't believe they are the same people who made such a gems as Sacrifice, MDK or Earthworm Jim series.


Lost_in_Darkness
13/11/05 @ 00:07
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The game is actually quite fun to play. Though it does have some gaping flaws, they can be overlooked for the sheer pleasure of playing with the powers of Neo. Definately agree with the 7 though, some decent and fun gameplay bogged down by bad extra story content and a lack of a proper aiming system for the combat...stuff just seems to happen by chance at some points rather than what exactly you were aiming to pull off. Definately a pick up for a matrix fan, bargain bin price.

Though having said that, the Matrix franchise is probably one of the most videogame friendly properties out there, it's just such a shame that it was given out to a now second rate developer. Sure Shiny had some great games back in it's heyday, Sacrifice, MDK and Messiah come to mind, but clearly all it's talent has left to go elsewhere and the company was left with Dave Perry and the lack of any real talent.
Games based on the matrix had potential to be an amazing phenomenon with countless possibilities....but now that they've dragged the franchise through the mud, i'd be very surprised if we ever see another one again....and i would frankly not miss the fact either since they just don't seem to be able to choose the right people to make the games anyway (or create the sequels for that matter ;p)
Bezzy
13/11/05 @ 12:15
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So here's my question:

Who is the better actor; CG Keanu, or REAL Keanu?
space ace
13/11/05 @ 18:21
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
what is the ending?
Aretak
13/11/05 @ 22:47
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"after Earth Worm Jim, Shiny sort of lost the plot ^_^"

Oi! Wild 9 was awesome.
The Bodybuilder
13/11/05 @ 23:29
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
>"Neo's the perfect embodiment of stuff you want to and now can do in a game. It's just the Path that's the problem."

What a way to finish a review. Nice touch.

>"Who is the better actor; CG Keanu, or REAL Keanu?"

Which is which?
3william56
14/11/05 @ 05:25
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
There's a real Keanu? Sure. Like anyone real could have a name like that.
Talha
14/11/05 @ 06:38
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@theiceman: Two attempts and they still can't get the matrix movie sequels right. Oh well.

/watches Star Trek (4-6) instead
Talha
14/11/05 @ 06:49
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Isn't it high time people stopped trying to make/re-make Matrix movies/comics/games/documentaries/albums and got on with life?

The original one was pure, true, compact, subtle, classy and complete in itself. The two needless sequels were relatively boring, pretentious, cheap, badly acted, bloated mostrosities (sorry to everyone who likes those, I am just comparing them to the original). I never thought it would require patience to sit through a Matrix movie, especially if you are trying to educate some non-believers. Needless to say, I couldn't.

And don't even mention the games. This franchise has been ruined in every iteration since the first movie, except for the anime's, and you know why? It isn't a franchise at all. Every below-par Matrix offering has been selling on the brilliance and the legendary style and mystique of the original.

All I can say is, I don't remember thinking through the credits of Matrix 1, hey, I can't wait for a sequel.
freedumb
14/11/05 @ 08:52
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Much like Driver 3 last year, ther promblems with Enter the Matrix were greatly exaggerated, it was a really fun and enjoyable action game, WITH ITS OWN STORY created especially for the game. You don't go into it thingking its gonna be ICO, and you'll enjoy it.

I also like the fact that you played as two side characters that were diferent from the main ones, and that had a small part in the movies. You got to see a different side to the Matrix uinverse. Plus it was more original and btter than simply playing through Neo's story in this game, which you already know.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 14/11/05 @ 08:47
space ace
14/11/05 @ 08:55
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
anyone remembers neuromancer the game? hard-core.
Markusdragon
14/11/05 @ 09:33
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"You don't go into it thingking its gonna be ICO, and you'll enjoy it."

I went in thinking it'd be 'ET'. I still didn't enjoy it.
Talha
14/11/05 @ 09:57
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@rdexter : Yeah, we all have been lusting for another Matrix cynical cash-in, a.k.a. spin-off.

I am thinking it would be cool to shoot clones of Wachowski Brothers (sorry for the spelling - too lazy to look it up) in a shooter based on the Matrix universe.
Stickman
14/11/05 @ 10:32
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Talha, the matrix was always going to be a trilogy. I can honestly say that I did sit through the end credits of the first one thinking, "WOW! I can't wait for the sequel!".

Still amazes me just how much they managed to fuck it up. It took even George Lucas thirty years to bury his legacy. The Wachywochi people managed it in three!
Talha
14/11/05 @ 11:53
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Stickman: Hey I didn't know that - round these parts we don't have a lot of background info on things. Had I known, I would have had grand ideas too, not knowing better!

Glad to know you agree that they indeed f**ked it up.

BremXJones
14/11/05 @ 14:23
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
space ace: I do.

KG
mr_steve100
14/11/05 @ 19:08
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Does anyone have anything to say on the differences between the PS2 and XBox versions? e.g. frame-rate, graphics, control methods, etc.
It's just that this reviews for PS2 and I've got any XBox.
Juriel
15/11/05 @ 08:36
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Having played this now (on PC), I can say that while the kungfu is cool, the only thing more awful than its gunplay, are its graphics. It plays like a well-done Max Payne mod, from a team who didn't have much in the way of a graphics person.

Oh, and this official Matrix game manages to have a hugely worse lobby scene shoot-out than the one I played in Max Payne 1 many, many years ago...
rinoaMW
15/11/05 @ 10:54
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
this is rubbish.. bought it yesturday, brought it back today... bad framerate, terrible camera, awful anims and horrible graphics. Two words: "Mip-Mapping!"

terrible, terrible waste....
Ikuze
15/11/05 @ 21:01
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Reckon it's better than the first game, but, as with that one I played it with a feeling of disappointment, agonizing about how restrictive it all is. I just can't help imagining the Matrix game I'd love to play.
One that gives you the Megacity to run around in carrying out missions (keeping the decent stuff of these two games, like the fighting and bullet time) and actually being given a bit of freedom. (ain't that one of the themes of The Matrix?) Just imagine a GTA style free-roaming city (er...whilst conveniently forgetting the online game...) where you carry out your missions and have to find a hardline to get away from agents,(it could take you to the Neb, which'd be the game-hub/base thingy) forcing you to improvise with the cool abilities these games lend you. Jump across rooftops to avoid civilians who might become agents any moment, race against the agents to a phonebox you've spotted.
Use that Matrix telekinesis to lob cars at SWAT squads or block an agent from following you down an alley. Or jump on a car and float yourself around on it! Also, you could have hundreds of button press cheats (like the ones in San Andreas, but simpler) that would help you alter and control the Matrix, turn off gravity, alter the weather, whatever. The theme of the films is perfect for a game that'd ENCOURAGE you to cheat! It could be sooooo good... Sigh,sorry for waffling so long. Reckon I'll go back and play it a bit and imagine what could've been. Anyone else have any ideas of what they'd like to see in these games?

Comments: 1-42 of 42 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery