Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Mario Party 7 Review

GameCube Review by Ellie Gibson

1 February, 2006

Will it ever end? Apparently not. The Mario Party games are still proving hugely popular with vast numbers of GameCube owners, judging by the amount of copies shifted - and the fact that we're now faced with a seventh instalment in the series.

But let's resist the temptation to slag off Nintendo for churning out more of the same old stuff. Instead, let's slag them off for churning out more of the same old stuff without bothering to fix any of the infuriating problems which the previous six games - SIX, mark you - suffer from.

Mario Party 7 is utterly the same as Mario Party 1, and 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, except it comes bundled with a microphone. Oh, hang on a minute, Mario Party 6 came with a microphone, too.

So, Mario Party 7 is utterly the same as etc., except, er, it's set on a cruise ship. Yes, just the kind of creative innovation we've come to expect from the people who gave us a handheld that lets you play brilliant games with a plastic stick and are planning to give us a console that lets you play games with a crazy remote control thing that looks like it was invented in space by some kind of doctor of The Future. Well done. [Er, well, er. She only means about half of this, readers. I hope. - Ed]

Right, back to the cruise ship. So, Mario and all his chums are going on this cruise, only they haven't invited Bowser, presumably because he is a miserable old tosser who will only end up trying to kidnap Jane MacDonald and imprison her in a big castle or something.

Bowser isn't very happy about this, though frankly we can only assume that's because he has failed to realise that making your way around endless bloody game boards when all you want to do is PLAY AN ACTUAL GAME is in no way any more fun if you're on board a stupid boat.

Board stupid

'Mario Party 7' Screenshot 1

Ain't no party like a Mario Party. Apart from THE OTHER SIX.

That's the major problem with Mario Party 7, as indeed with all the Mario Party games. There's no fast-paced pick-up-and-play fun here, oh no - instead, you have to make your way round stupid game boards, watching and waiting while everyone else rolls the dice, makes their move, picks up some extra coins, visits the stupid "orb shop" etc. etc., whilst begging, PRAYING for someone to land on a square that actually launches a mini-game.

That said, the mini-games themselves are fun, and there are plenty to choose from - more than 80 in total. Although some of these are rather similar to other games featured both in this Mario Party title and previous instalments, there's still enough enjoyable stuff to be going on with.

None of the mini-games are particularly complicated - don't expect to be tasked with using more than one button and the analog stick in any of them - but this is a party game, and such simplicity is a welcome bonus for the young or drunk.

About a dozen of the games require you to use the microphone, but just as with Mario Party 6, there's a frustrating amount of inconsistency when it comes to your commands being recognised. Plus, in many of the mic games there seems to be an irritating delay between you speaking and the game responding, rubbishly.

Turn off

'Mario Party 7' Screenshot 2

Yoshi pauses to consider the futility of his existence whilst traversing yet another game board.

Too many of the mini-games are turn-based, and they're all over far too quickly. Which means you spend longer trying to make your way around the game board than bashing buttons, and most of your time feeling like you might as well give up and get the Star Wars Monopoly out (Ep II for preference).

There is a way round this, though - you can forget the game boards entirely if you select the Mini-Game Cruise mode. Except there's only a tiny selection of games to choose from when the game begins; you'll need to make your way through all five Solo Mode boards to unlock the rest. If there's one thing more tedious than watching your friends make their way around a game board, it's watching fictional characters do it, which makes Solo Mode an utter chore to play through.

But let's get back to the game's "new features," such as Bowser Time. As you make your way around the game boards, Bowser gets crosser and crosser, and a gauge shaped likes his big fat face fills up. Once it's full, Bowser Time kicks off, which means he goes round nicking coins, stealing stars and generally messing everyone about.

This, and let's be clear here, is NOT ANY GOOD AT ALL. It is neither fun nor challenging; it's just another thing that makes you want to throw your GameCube in the bin and lie sobbing in a darkened room until the Revolution gets here. Not to mention the Bowser spaces on the board - land on these and you're forced to play a special mini-game. Hurrah, you might think, at least we're playing a game, but wait - if you lose, you'll also lose coins or stars. If you win, you get nothing. Rubbish.

Share and share alike

'Mario Party 7' Screenshot 3

This squid serves only to remind you that you'd rather be playing Mario Kart.

The other new feature (singular) is the option to play games with up to eight other opponents. To do this, you'll need to share controllers, with each player using a stick and shoulder button on either side of the joypad. This system works well enough, but seeing as there are only a dozen or so eight-player mini-games to choose from the fun doesn't last for too long.

So, to sum up, Mario Party 7 introduces two new features to the series - Bowser Time (tedious) and eight-player games (moderately entertaining. For a bit). Mario Party 7 also sees the return of the utterly tiresome game board system, for reasons we completely fail to understand.

If you own any of the other games in the series, you don't need this one. If you're not a Mario Party fan, there is no chance that this game is going to change your mind. It's such a shame that Nintendo - the creator of Mario Kart, which is arguably the most fun you can have with platonic friends - just can't seem to sort Mario Party's problems out, even for the seventh instalment in the series. Roll on number eight, eh...

3/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Mario Party 7 on GameCube?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 89 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
smoison
01/02/06 @ 08:25
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This shows off Nintendo NEWs idea, sequels FOREVER.

I really don't see why they charge 60 bucks for a remake. I know they do it for every football, F1 and other sports games, but this is just a joke to me.

Nintendo needs to make some ORIGINAL games, its getting repetitive to juste have remakes. This will not help my Cube.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 01/02/06 @ 08:26
Xerx3s
01/02/06 @ 08:41
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"I really don't see why they charge 60 bucks for a remake. I know they do it for every football, F1 and other sports games, but this is just a joke to me. "

And why is that exactly? Because i fail to see why one should pay for the same game every year again.
MadMirko
01/02/06 @ 08:50
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If this were Final Fantasy, people would justify its existence by pointing out how different the setting is between the titles, and that they all have their own backstories. Seems to be in the eye of the beholder.

Truth is, there is a No. 7 because enough people bought parts 1 through 6 to make it worthwile to produce another sequel. As long as it's profitable, this will continue.
Daan
01/02/06 @ 09:00
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well Final Fantasy IS quite different from the other titles in the series every time a new game comes out. You can't really say that with a game like Mario Party fucking SEVEN.
Psi
01/02/06 @ 09:02
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Mario the party's over, you brought one bottle of cheap wine and have exposed yourself to everyone here. Now please leave before I have to call the police.
Genji
01/02/06 @ 09:09
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well, actually, me and my friends like this one a lot better than the other Mario Parties.

Please don't hurt me.
Aretak
01/02/06 @ 09:13
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It would be impossible for you to find a game which fills me with more of a sense of apathy than this.
Ignatius_Cheese
01/02/06 @ 09:21
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
To be honest, I partly blame Hudson for their inability to make decent games... I mean, I really enjoyed Mario Party back in the Nixty4 days but NOTHING has really changed with the series... They're doing the same thing to Mario Party that they did to Bomberman a long time ago...

But wait, Ninty isn't out of the firing line! At the end of the day, they're the ones green lighting the project but can understand them if they just want to sit there with their wallets open and watch the moolah flow in... And they wonder why they have a reputation for lazy sequels!? o_O
redneon
01/02/06 @ 09:22
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The reason I buy the new Mario Party every year is because I WANT more of the same. I spent the previous year playing the previous Mario Party and in the end, after hours and hours of playing it, was sick of playing the same mini games over and over and over again. Each new one brings in hundreds of new mini games which I can play (usually whilst very drunk, with friends) until I get sick of the same mini games and then wait for the next one.

I don't see why changing, what is in my view a winning formula, would benefit the game. Considering how well it sells I can only assume that other people go through the same vicious cycle as me.

"SCRAMBLE!"
Rambaldi
01/02/06 @ 09:24
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Extract from 'The State vs. Sickly Cute Childish Japanese Garbage':

"Your honour, I present to you exhibits M1 through M7"
Dynamize
01/02/06 @ 09:37
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ooof! Now roll for damage!
smelly
01/02/06 @ 09:40
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The crass cash-in-franchise-misuse weak underbelly of Nintendo is exposed!


LMFAO!!! And the others are any different how? Oh wait.. that brand new racing/fps/football game is TOTALLY different to the last one...
Edited 1 times, most recently on 01/02/06 @ 09:41
01/02/06 @ 09:41
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
THIS is the Nintendo party I'm interested in.

http://www.mcvuk.com/newsitem.php?id=758

:-o
Garulon
01/02/06 @ 09:42
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Is there a mini-game where you get to milk Mario until his nipples bleed? And is it called "Nintendo"?
Rambaldi
01/02/06 @ 09:44
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
LOL!!!
Zero_
01/02/06 @ 09:52
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Will we see a another Mario Party on the Revolution, and if so, would it score higher than it's predessescor on the GC, given the only difference (Apart from graphical and different games), is the way of controlling it?
Rambaldi
01/02/06 @ 09:53
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"LMFAO!!! And the others are any different how? Oh wait.. that brand new racing/fps/football game is TOTALLY different to the last one..."

Maybe not, but at least all the new: racing/ footy/ golf/ baseball/ platform/ fighting/ RPG/ party/ puzzle/ tennis games don't have the SAME BASTARD CHARACTERS IN EVERY BLOODY TIME!!!!!!!!!

\cringes at thought of EA Rooney Fight Round 12, Need for Rooney Most Retarded, Midnight Rooney: Chav Edition and Ghost Rooney: Advanced BarFighter
Edited 2 times, most recently on 01/02/06 @ 09:57
reality_cheque
01/02/06 @ 09:57
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Frod: That sounds like it'd be a cross between Sega Soccer Slam and Speedball 2: Brutal Deluxe. So I'd buy it.

"Master Chief nimbly sidesteps a grunt - how does he do it in that armour? - quick hook over to the left field, recieved nicely by Sergeant Kelly... and she's going for it! Leaps over 1 grunt, spins round a second, she's only got the goalie to beat now... lines up her shot... and it's saved! With a remarkable beam-sword smash to the head by the Covenant player/coach The Arbiter, proving once again why he's the highest paid alien footballer in the Galaxy Cup! Sterling stuff, now over to you Truth for the action replay of that quality piece of action"
Eighthours
01/02/06 @ 09:57
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
LMFAO!!! And the others are any different how? Oh wait.. that brand new racing/fps/football game is TOTALLY different to the last one...

Oh, so it's alright for Nintendo to do it because other devs do it. Oh right, how stupid of us.
Derblington
01/02/06 @ 10:02
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ellie, seriously, corner Rauper and make him let you review somethiing decent, just once...
ProfessorLesser
01/02/06 @ 10:19
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Just what I was thinking, Derbs :-D

Smelly, seriously, just for once, please do youself a favour: stfu and go away. Just this time. Try it. See how your mental wellfare will benefit.

All the times I hear people crediting Nintendo with not having the rabid kind of PS2/Xbox fanboys, I think yeah, that's fair comment. Mostly true, anyway. There is still that little bit of me that thinks "Wait... there's smelly..."

Come on man, on a serious note, Nintendo are not the infallible, all-powerful company you so unfailingly make them out to be. God knows they are good, and they are certainly my own platform/games dev of choice, but they are not without their faults. Everyone recognises that Nintendo has its dark side. Well, two dark sides. Namely, Nintendo Europe and their Mario division....
asphaltcowboy
01/02/06 @ 10:23
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So what score would it get if you don't already own a Mario Party game (and don't hate Mario/the Mario party games)?
LetsGo
01/02/06 @ 10:30
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Will ellie ever get a good game to review?
reality_cheque
01/02/06 @ 10:42
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If you don't own a mario party game, which is the best?

No doubt it still won't be as mental as Fusion Frenzy :)
Genji
01/02/06 @ 10:52
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Tbh, I think this one is the best. The low score is only a result of this being, like, the 7th one. If you had never played a Mario Party game before, I'd say play this one. Because it is a lot of fun.
reality_cheque
01/02/06 @ 10:59
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Even with this Bowser nonsense? I'm surprised, I would have thought 6 would have been the best (same game, no Bowser Time).

They should have made it "Miller Time" where you have to successfully move your character from a pub to your front door despite controls that change every 5 seconds, if you fail you have to spend some of your coins on a taxi.
Talha
01/02/06 @ 11:06
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Smelly: Sorry pal, I feel inclined to agree with Rambaldi here. Racing games, sports games and shooters are VERY DIFFERENT - we like to play the same thing over and over again with new bells and whistles because (1) we like them and (2) developers put considerable effort into reinventing your average FPS/Racer/Sports sim every year. GT4 has four times the cars and tracks over GT3 - PGR 3 is effing nEXT GEN, for heaven's sake - Half Life 2 is VERY different from Half Life - Tiger Woods just about makes a case for itself every year.

Which MARIO does not, I am afraid. People are thirsty for racing games and sports games and shooters (due to the duffers they are), and somehow Mario Kart, Mario Smash Football and Paper Mario are failing to fill that gap (wonder why?). We much prefer the earth-shattering explosions and gritty environments of BLACK to kiddy color palettes and boing-boing sounds of a typical Mario outing.

Don't you honestly think GC sales are suffering because of it? I know people do like Mario and all, but that does NOT mean that Mario Party 7 can be equated to your next PES sequel - that analogy is totally broken.

And please don't start about how GC is the most profitable of all consoles - been there, done that.

Sorry for the rant - I am not against games like Mario Party - it is just that when people use them to ridicule fans of other game genres, I really get PO'ed.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 01/02/06 @ 11:08
asphaltcowboy
01/02/06 @ 11:32
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"developers put considerable effort into reinventing your average FPS/Racer/Sports sim every year"

Er... really? I'd say some do, but "your average FPS/Racer/Sports sim" tends to be just that: average.
smoison
01/02/06 @ 11:34
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Its nice to see i'm not the only one who is disapointed with a new Mario Party. I like to think they could have made a more original title . At least one that isn't on its 7th sequel in less then 6 years. (all of which are VERY the same)

But, for the fans of the series, enjoy. And if you've never tried one, pick up number 4 for a fiver, and make up your mind.

The wait continues for Zelda...
Genji
01/02/06 @ 11:35
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Talha

So you think the sales of GC consoles may be suffering because of this? How, exactly? Surely you would buy a console because it has games that you want to play. The GC still has those for many people. If anything, this "Mario-whoring" would lead to a drop in sales of new Mario games, not the console itself.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 01/02/06 @ 11:36
sopje
01/02/06 @ 11:41
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Mr. T's link: http://www.mcvuk.com/newsitem.php?id=758

“Nintendo is moving into a very exciting and innovative time as we expand the definition of gaming and broaden the population of video games players,”

LOL!
Talha
01/02/06 @ 11:42
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Genji: As I said, I do appreciate that there is an audience for these sort of games. It is just not that big, but it is fanatical. But when someone goes out to buy a new console and Mario games are not his kind, he is much less likely to buy a GC (nevermind that so many great games exist for GC), precisely due to Ninty's Mario-whoring, having developed a cetain image for the console.
Genji
01/02/06 @ 11:45
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I believe them when they say they want to broaden the population of game players. It's a noble aim, and a large part of why I like Nintendo.

But they also need to make money.
Mario makes money.
Therefore: insofar as Mario continues to make money, Nintendo will make more Mario games, to pay for all of the more noble stuff.
Talha
01/02/06 @ 11:50
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Genji: Sure Mario makes money. Does it make it any good? Does it make the likes of Need for Speed Underground any better?

And what would be the 'noble stuff' precisely? I do like Ninty, they do their own thing. But I think MS and Sony are also doing a lot for gaming, and certainly reaching more people in the home console market, and their cash cows are far less repetitive and far more in number, therefore less irritating.
Genji
01/02/06 @ 11:56
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Talha

When I buy a console, I have a list of games that I want to play. I would refrain from buying it if I couldn't, for example, play GTA, or the latest Burnout, or Crash Bandicoot, or whatever. This would be a reason to not buy a GC. I would never say "gee, there's a lot of [genre/character] games on this console. I hate [genre/character], so I guess I won't buy this console." You see what I'm saying?

EDIT (responding to later comment): I don't recall ever saying that Sony and Microsoft aren't doing anything good for gaming. I just respect Ninty for "doing their own thing", as you say it, for trying to take the medium in new directions, even if those directions don't turn out to be very compelling. I think it has a unique position in the industry, even moreso with the upcoming Revolution.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 01/02/06 @ 12:10
Talha
01/02/06 @ 12:05
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Genji: Precisely. That's what I said basically. First time console buyers ARE quite thick - not everybody goes to gaming sites or does proper research before buying a console, let alone a game. And they are the one who expand the market, not experienced gamers. At least that is what I have experienced, might not be true for you. I have friends who call me up to ask about a latest game instead of bothering to click their mouse a few times. Why else do you think absolute wrecks sell millions?

So there - call me thick all you want and employ all sorts of sarcasm, but I spoke from experience.
smelly
01/02/06 @ 12:05
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think you're being naieve to think that if microsoft or sony had a character which sold games they wouldnt be using it just as much if not more.

But I think MS and Sony are also doing a lot for gaming

Personally i'd disagree with that one. Unlike nintendo, neither microsoft or sony actually make games themselves, so rely predominately on 3rd parties to make the games for them. So apart from hardware itself, i dont see how that helps gaming?

Sure, Sony helped gaming to become mainstream, but i'm not 100% sure that's a good thing looking at the only types of games which sell, and subsequently now the only types of games which get made.

and certainly reaching more people in the home console market

Well i'd agree on that one with sony, but not microsoft.


As for mario party, I dont see the appeal myself and would certainly not pay full price for it, BUT a lot of my friends who have kids love it as a simple fun game that the whole family (from kids, to parents to gran) can sit around and enjoy. You lot (myself included and the reviewer) are judging it as a hard core game, how many games can you think of where everyone from kid to gran can figure out how to play and enjoy as a whole family? Not many. That is this games market, not any of you or I.


As for overuse of mario, he's just a character. If every single mario game was the same, then i'd agree with you. But all the games are different, so i dont see the problem? I'd rather have mario in sports/racing/platformers/party/etc games, than lots of different characters in only racing games (for example).

My only bone about mario is they dont make enough platformers with him in any more :-(
Genji
01/02/06 @ 12:09
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Talha

Well, I don't think you're thick. You seem to be one of the most intelligent people on this forum. I can't say that I completely agree with you, but this place would be pretty damned boring if everyone agreed.

Consider the "thick" call retracted. I'll do it right now, in fact.
MisterFalseName
01/02/06 @ 12:10
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've only played Mario Party 5, but I still think it's a really good game. Goes down a storm with a few brews too...
Talha
01/02/06 @ 12:16
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Smelly: I hate to admit it, but I did love Mario platformers. And I wholeheartedly agree with you about the market for games like Mario Party. It is not right for me to ridicule Mario games because I am simply not their target market - point well taken.

That said, your other assertions are odd. Sony have plenty of first party developers, and there is such a thing called Microsoft Game Studios (whose last project was Forza, nothing less). Yes they have to rely on third party devs, mainly because so many are out there and for one reason or another they chose to support the hardware made by MS and Sony. And how can bringing gaming to the masses can be bad in any way? Is it only because Sony did that and not Nintendo?
Yes, most games that come out are crap, but that is true of any platform. And there are a few gems too in there.

My only bone here is that just because you don't like the 'mainstream' games, does not mean that those of us who do like them are in any way inferior - that is how you come accross.
Jaz666
01/02/06 @ 12:23
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
'Yes, just the kind of creative innovation we've come to expect from the people who gave us a handheld that lets you play brilliant games with a plastic stick and are planning to give us a console that lets you play games with a crazy remote control thing that looks like it was invented in space by some kind of doctor of The Future. Well done'

Finally, someone said it....
Talha
01/02/06 @ 12:30
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Genji: It's OK man - I have always liked to read your comments, and I look forward to you coming on forums. And I don't entirely blame you for the 'thick' call for I would sound thick to anyone living amidst gaming-aware people. Sadly, that is not the case with me, so it is just a case of different experiences.

And thanks.
Cloudane
01/02/06 @ 12:33
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Stick with Mario in his platforming adventures and karting series please Nintendo.

Everything else is a joke.
Genji
01/02/06 @ 12:40
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh come on. The tennis and golf games have been pretty damned good, too.
Rambaldi
01/02/06 @ 12:45
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Smelly

"Unlike nintendo, neither microsoft or sony actually make games themselves"

a) That's factually incorrect and you need to go and have a word with yourself
b) Nintendo don't make most of 'their' Mario games - they get other studios to do it e.g. Camelot (Tennis/Golf)
c) If you're quite happy with a camp, short-arsed, fat, helium-voiced, generally irritating plumber in all of your games instead of embracing a degree of aesthetic maturity I suggest you recend my first recommendation and, instead, move to Japan, apply for a Hello Kitty credit card and develop a fetish for long white socks and pleated tartan skirts.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 01/02/06 @ 12:47
Genji
01/02/06 @ 12:51
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Does "aesthetic maturity" mean that we should be playing sports games featuring women with large knockers? And guns?

I think it does.
reality_cheque
01/02/06 @ 12:53
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Why else do you think absolute wrecks sell millions?

Because 50% of the people out there are of below average intelligence.

c) If you're quite happy with a camp, short-arsed, fat irritating plumber in all of your games instead of embracing a degree of aesthetic maturity I suggest you recend my first recommendation and, instead, move to Japan, apply for a Hello Kitty credit card and develop a fetish for long white socks and pleated tartan skirts

Errr, if I suddenly decide I like fat plumbers, will you pay for my plane fare then? :D I'm sure I could cope with a schoolgirl fetish if it was made up for by having access to games when they're released in Japan.
Rambaldi
01/02/06 @ 12:56
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Genji

No. Not really.

There is a middle ground y'know.
Rambaldi
01/02/06 @ 12:58
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Reality_Cheque

If it means you can watch the new MGSolid movie before the rest of us...go on then: here's your ticket ;)

Genji
01/02/06 @ 12:59
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"There is a middle ground y'know."

So just the boobies then, or just the guns? Don't forget the dark, brooding male protagonists!

Comments: 1-50 of 89 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery