Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Mace Griffin: Bounty Hunter Review

PlayStation 2 Xbox Review by Ronan Jennings

16 October, 2003

Space used to be the final frontier. There was a time when we'd gaze up at the stars and say 'what's it all about eh?'. And then we'd finish that bottle of vodka. Not any more, though. The universe no longer holds any mystery to us - its secrets are secrets no more. Because while NASA are busy sending probes off to boring, dusty, real-life Mars, we've learned everything we need to know about space from games. And if Mace Griffin is anything to go by, space sucks.

Stars In Their Eyes

'Mace Griffin: Bounty Hunter' Screenshot 1

Considering how long this game's development was delayed for, it's appropriate that this review should be as late as it is. That's what I told Tom, anyway. But, seriously, if this is what Mace Griffin is like after over a year of 'tweaking', then the original version must have been an abomination indeed. Even having taken all the time they needed on this, Warthog still couldn't manage anything better than a below-average, utterly careless shooter that fails to add anything new to this, or any other genre.

And yet, despite this, the sad truth of the matter is that Mace could have been very enjoyable if not for a few major issues with the likes of AI and the controls. But then again, isn't that always the way?

Like most FPSs, the plot driving the game - in a 1985 Lada, probably - is poor. But the thing is, so is Halo's. (Yeah, you heard me, fanboys!) The difference between the two is simply presentation. While Mace's story feels tacked on and soul-less, Halo makes you a part of its story. Neither would win any awards for imagination. For the record though, a man named Mace Griffin was once part of a special police force known as the Rangers. During one particular mission with said force, he is framed for the death of his squad [by the Celtics? -Ed] and locked up for ten years. Upon his release, Mace vows to take revenge on whoever set him up. Once this vow is taken, a brilliant plot twist sees... no, wait, that's it actually. Oh well.

Mace becomes a bounty hunter in order to get his feet back on the ground - or in orbit, technically - and in turn the missions he takes lead him to the truth about his past. The missions themselves mainly revolve around two gameplay types; the first is a space combat section in Mace's ship, where you generally have to destroy a few enemies and then dock onto wherever the mission is taking place. The second are the FPS bits, which make up the majority of gameplay.

Mutiny On The Bounty

'Mace Griffin: Bounty Hunter' Screenshot 2

The ship bits are very standard fare, with the player given full, 360-degree control over the vehicle's movement, including the use of thrusters, rolls and lock-ons. While Mace takes control of a few different ships in the game, the repetitive dogfight nature of these missions takes away from the initial novelty of having such gameplay in a first person shooter. In truth, this aspect of Mace Griffin really annoyed us after a while.

If Mace were able to fly from mission to mission on 'real' space journeys, Freelancer-style, then we would have approved greatly. But instead, like many aspects of the game, the space combat sections feel tacked on. If they held any rewards for the gamer - like the ability to unlock new weapons for the FPS bits, for instance - then perhaps they might have been tolerable. Instead, we kept wishing we could skip them.

Unfortunately, the shooter sections aren't much better. This is down to a whole bunch of issues, but there are a few whoppers - especially on the PS2. For a start, the game has no stick sensitivity options, which is just plain silly. While we know it's not the only game to suffer from this, most other titles default at a decent balance between the left and right stick. Mace doesn't. Not on the PS2 at least. This isn't helped at all by the game's tendency to get sluggish on Sony's machine, which went a long way to ruining the game for this reviewer.

Artificial

'Mace Griffin: Bounty Hunter' Screenshot 3

Still, even with the smoother Xbox version, there's plenty to give out about. For a start, the AI and level design is overly frustrating. Many of the levels feature large open areas with enemies dotted all over the place, ready to attack as one. So you might have an enemy hiding behind a crate a level above you, three in front of you, three more behind more crates in the distance, and so on. Sometimes, this is challenging in a good way - for instance, if one enemy starts lobbing grenades, three move in and the rest fire from distance. Other times, however, it's just plain crap. The guys behind the crates start hiding from you; the guys nearby don't know you're there until they're dying; grenades are welcomed with open arms (and, subsequently open bodies) etc, etc.

At one point we walked into a room with about six or seven enemies in it, then backed out again as they overwhelmed us. After a few seconds, one of them followed us around the corner and out the door, and we easily killed him. Then, one by one, each of the enemies proceeded to walk straight into our fire, killed almost instantly - like bloody Lemmings. And with a self-charging, Halo-style energy shield to protect us, there wasn't much chance of Mace dying. Half-Life 2 it ain't. Er, presumably.

If the weapons were fun to use then this would, of course, have helped matters. But (as if you haven't guessed already) they aren't. It's the same old boring, boring arsenal. Machine-guns that overheat; all manner of uncomfortable laser weapons; a shotgun; zoom-scope sniper rifle; rocket launcher - who cares? Not Mace, not the enemies, not us. Lots of FPSs could be labelled poor on this level, but with Mace it just adds to the overall sense that this game isn't trying very hard to be original.

Warts And All

'Mace Griffin: Bounty Hunter' Screenshot 4

You have to feel sorry for the art team who worked on Mace, too, because if the game had been on time it might have looked OK. Instead, it just looks dated, like a PC game from a few years back. The most striking downside to the visuals is the way levels often appear as if they were constructed with Lego bits - all edges and flat surfaces.

Still, Warthog deserve credit for at least trying to make an atmospheric game, even if they failed in their task. The game's first mission is very promising on this level, with some exciting explosions and a tangible sense of dread. It's all downhill after that though, especially in crowded missions where all you hear is "get the infidel" over and over.

Of special note, however, is the excellent music. The orchestral score attached to the game is really good when it gets going, even though it isn't used as much as it should have been. If they do a soundtrack CD, buy it.

It's AAALIVE! Comatose, but AAAALIVE!!

Mace Griffin is Frankenstein. Bits of his body were 'borrowed' from other games, but unfortunately those games must have been terminally ill at the time of donation. Because for all it brings to the table - space combat, Halo's shield, varied levels - not one single aspect is truly worthy of praise. A great console FPS needs to be comfortable to control and very atmospheric. Mace is neither. Of course, a brilliant multiplayer mode might do the trick, but, er, Mace has no multiplayer options. Even Fire Warrior got the basics right.

Mace Griffin is one of those games that tried too hard to be something, and ended up losing its shape entirely. Give us a NASA probe sim over this any day.

4/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Mace Griffin: Bounty Hunter on Xbox/PlayStation 2?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-25 of 25 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Killerbee
16/10/03 @ 09:27
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
4/10.

Oh dear, and I thought this one was looking to be above average at least.

Ah well...
ssuellid
16/10/03 @ 09:34
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I quite enjoyed the XBox demo - the bits where you got drugged were quite impressive. No mention of Rollins? I suppose most of the EG staff and the market are too young to know who he is.
Tricky
16/10/03 @ 09:45
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
My god, it must be bad for countlippe to give up halfway through on his eskimo song...
Soul_quake
16/10/03 @ 09:57
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Dislike the demo intensely ... was just so boring and below average... and the controls



TipTop
16/10/03 @ 09:58
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
...tis indeed a sad day for Mace if the Eskimo song didnt get an outting.
Alastair
16/10/03 @ 09:59
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sometimes the cancellation of the Cube version is a blessing in disguise....
:o)
jaa
16/10/03 @ 10:00
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Is it just me or you guys rarely give 5's?


Disclaimer: This is a general point. I'm not saying this game deserves a 5. I've never played it. The only review I've ever read about it ended up
giving it a 4. ;)
bungalooBunny
16/10/03 @ 10:44
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Is it just me or you guys rarely give 5's? "

It's funny you say that because a few days ago someone was complaining about two 5's given in a row by the same reviewer.. Just look at some the latest reviews and you'll find a couple of them.
CyberClaw
16/10/03 @ 10:44
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Don't care for the author's lack of Halo knowledge. He probably doesn't know that Halo's cannon is composed of such things as Halo: Fall of Reach, or Halo: The Flood (which tell details of the story that would be to heavy for a FPS game). He probably d6esn't even know there is a thing that holds the whole cannon together called Halo Bible, yet unpublished ^^; I could go on and on about how Halo correlates to Marathon, or how Halo is full of religious interpretations (eg: Halo's hero, Master Chief, is called John-117. Without no hint what so ever to it, you can read John's scriptures, 11-7 or 1-17, both relate to Halo and MC.)
ralphwolfenstein
16/10/03 @ 10:57
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've been playing this on Xbox, was fourtunate enough to get a free copy as I certainly wouldn't have shelled out for it and...

I kind of enjoyed it for a bit. And I know it's merely average, agree with most of the points in the review. It has a certain atmosphere, whether it's the gritty asteroid-mining-colony basis of the world's society, or the spartan steel surfaces (which have a nice metallic sheen in the Xbox version), or the weapons (which, whilst a little uninspiring, do at least 'feel' right)...

I've been frustrated by poor level design, badly positioned save points, awful signposting, some slightly obscure 'puzzles' and the stupidity of mapping jump to Halo's reload button and reload to Halo's jump button, which results in me performing a dainty little jump in the middle of a firefight, or re-loading whilst plummeting down a ravine...

The space sections are rubbish...

I don't know what it is though. It's quite a solid experience. Killing alien scum feels... satisfying
krudster [mod]
16/10/03 @ 10:58
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't imagine many people take it all that seriously really.

I know who Henry Rollins is! A good catch for a gaming voiceover I'd say...considering what a loon he is.
jaa
16/10/03 @ 10:59
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's funny you say that because a few days ago someone was complaining about two 5's given in a row by the same reviewer.. Just look at some the latest reviews and you'll find a couple of them.

Ah. Er... well... yes.


Anyway, for a site that states that 5 represents the 'average' game (whatever that is), very few games are awarded it. But I do not want to start another score discussion, so it's probably better to move on...
Soul_quake
16/10/03 @ 11:11
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hoolie Uk: . Good length also unlike the game I replaced it for (CDS2, finished in 9 Hours!!!!)

We have spent about 15 hrs on CDS2 and are only on mission 7. That said we do play through each stage about 5 times, trying every route etc
and imho a better game than Mace! only my opinion though!
Soul_quake
16/10/03 @ 11:12
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Anyway, for a site that states that 5 represents the 'average' game (whatever that is), very few games are awarded it.

Notice neither does edge or Gamer print mags! not that I have noticed!
DDevil
16/10/03 @ 11:12
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
HENRY ROLLINS!!! GIVE IT AT LEAST A SIX!

Actually don't its not worth it.
Abscido
16/10/03 @ 11:37
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Don't care for the author's lack of Halo knowledge"

Hehehehehe *giggles insanely*. I knew that would annoy some people! Just to clarify, I feel Halo's story is infinitely better than Mace's; I was just making a point about the way FPS handle their plots. Or was trying to anyway :).

Henry Rollins cameos stopped being fun when I heard him on Tool's Undertow (though it was a good cameo: "And my fear is naked..").

One other thing I forgot to mention in the review that annoyed me were those stupid time-countdown bits. I firmly believe most countdown missions in any game are cheap attempts at excitement. You have 3 minutes to reply.
CyberClaw
16/10/03 @ 12:00
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Shit too late. Reload.
krudster [mod]
16/10/03 @ 12:26
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think there are plenty of games that get rated 5 and below here, but maybe you don't care about them enough to bother reading the reviews?

Also, we only have time to rate so many games per month, and naturally we steer clear of games that are obviously going to cause us much pain and misery to play. Makes sense really. That doesn't mean we don't play them, but there's only so many hours in the day - and most games take a bloody age to finish.
ssuellid
16/10/03 @ 12:33
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
XRGA and Fire Warrior are two 5/10 recent reviews.
jaa
16/10/03 @ 12:52
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
krudster: no, I tend to read all reviews (er... it seems I missed a few lately but I was on holidays!) . I guess you guys just don't review games that you expect from the start to be average at best. At least, not often. So most 5's (and less) are probably given to disappointing (i.e., worse than expected) games.

Being the average, 5 should be the most frequently used score - but only if you reviewed all the games in the market.

/re-reads to see if it makes sense
CyberClaw
16/10/03 @ 12:54
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was referring to the big orbital Covenent projectile launcher. A cannon right? :D Actually, thanks for the correction ;)
ssuellid
16/10/03 @ 15:53
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Maybe you should get the EG code monkies to write something that strips numbers from posts - then noone can complain about the score? ;)
Kronos
16/10/03 @ 17:50
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wheres the blood?
Abscido
17/10/03 @ 14:23
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I can understand why some people think Mace deserved better - but the truth is that within its genre the game is below average. There's no point giving a game like Fire Warrior 5/10, as Martin did recently, and then Mace an equal score when the former (though still uninspiring) delivers a better package.

"Sometimes I think reviewers have this idea that a game must be groundbreaking, innovative and bring new things to the table - and do everything brilliantly before it's worth playing."

Gamers SHOULD be demanding excellence before shelling out £40 on a game! Anyway, the problem here is that some genres (like FPS) are so saturated that there's a big difference between good/great titles and the rest: Mace is a 4/10 shooter, because it does basic things like AI, level design and controls wrong.
danzo
17/10/03 @ 17:08
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
thank god for blockbuster - i had high hopes for this game but the controls are crap.

Comments: 1-25 of 25 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery