Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Star Wars Jedi Starfighter Review

Xbox Review by Tom Bramwell

20 June, 2002

Spaced

'Star Wars Jedi Starfighter' Screenshot 01b

I think he's having engine trouble

Introduced by Episode II, the Jedi Starfighter is a nimble craft with the ability to symbiotically harness the powers of the Force with the help of its pilot. In the videogame of the same name - now available on Xbox - it's piloted by a librarian of a Jedi Master named Adi Gallia. Adi's tale begins with an assignment from the Jedi Council to investigate a disturbing trend of unrest in the Karthakk system, a system under the suspected leadership of Count Dooku and teeming with Trade Federation types. Something odd is going on there, and Adi has to go and find out what, allying with tentacled space pirate Nym, the only surviving playable character from Jedi's predecessor Star Wars Starfighter.

Obviously the game has had to move from the Dual Shock to the Xbox controller, and it's a surprisingly painless transition. The left analogue pad controls pitch and the right analogue rolling and centering on surface levels, whilst the shoulder buttons allow you to adjust your speed, A controls basic lasers, B handles secondary weapons (for Nym) or Force powers (playing as Adi), and the other face buttons switch targeting. You can pick from the two views, external and nosecone, using the 'Back' button.

Overall the system works just as well as it did on the PS2 because there is little need to reach over the top of the face buttons and brush X or B accidentally, although as with the PS2 version, the Options menu doesn't make it clear whether inverted pitch is on or off by default, and you can easily pick the wrong one and then have to exit and go back in to make the change. For your reference, pitch is inverted by default - stick with it.

Your change, Master

'Star Wars Jedi Starfighter' Screenshot 02b

Coruscant in all its chugging glory

The Xbox port of the game has also picked up a handful of improvements. The greater power of the console has given LucasArts the opportunity to iron out some, but not all, of the single player slowdowns, and to enhance the various explosions and other minutiae with a blurry white translucency, which is an improvement over the blocky, insubstantial blasts from the original. Thankfully they've also smoothed out the previously clunky menu interface, but other than that it's graphically the same as the PS2 game. That isn't a huge problem though; ships are reasonably detailed, and the larger vessels have moving turrets and other surface attractions, which can be destroyed individually to soften the ship up for juicier bombing runs.

Furthermore, Xbox owners are privy to a new multiplayer level set on Coruscant. LucasArts would have you believe it was kept over for the Xbox version, but we suspect it was simply too judderingly slow on the PS2 hardware to be playable. Available as a prize for achieving one of the bonus objectives in the single player game, the Coruscant level is a kind of capture-and-hold game with commentary from the annoying two-headed sports announcer fromEpisode I, and even on the Xbox it chugs. It may feature the Slave 1 (in a total mismatch against one of the allied ships from the single player game), but the framerate is too poor and the screen too busy for it to be all that enjoyable.

However, the rest of the game is. The three episode single player game gives you a fair mixture of levels in Adi's Jedi Starfighter and Nym's Havoc, and the plot is quite engaging thanks to the vastly differing personalities of the cautious, mindful Adi and her gung-ho Han Solo-cast comrade Nym, and the voice-acting throughout from virtually every character hits the spot, both in-game and during the competent cutscenes. Mission objectives change as you play, bathing the adventure in excitement and giving it a very unpredictable feel, and there are some terrific cameos from recognisable ships like the early Star Destroyers, Trade Federation capital ships and even a planetary ion cannon!

Conclusion

Jedi Starfighter has made a perfectly reasonable transition to the Xbox from its previous home on the PlayStation 2, and now occupies the position of the best Star Wars game on the Xbox. It's a completely different proposition to the Cube's Rogue Leader, and a lot easier to boot, although a mixture of difficulty levels, a two-player co-operative mode and a huge number of secret bonuses to unlock (including various ships for use in the single player game, like the X-Wing, TIE Fighter, TIE Advanced and Slave 1) mean that you will certainly need to allot a good deal of time if you plan to complete it thoroughly. As an accompaniment to the movie, this is first class, and as a game in its own right, it makes a Forceful impression.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Star Wars Jedi Starfighter on Xbox?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-33 of 33 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
jaa
20/06/02 @ 14:23
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I have the PS2 version and don't like it that much, so I'm only going to say something and then leave:

What? This one year old more-of-the-same-star-wars-space-shooter gets the same score as Halo?!?! You... you... you... (I'm leaving now)
Gestalt
20/06/02 @ 14:25
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Heh, I told Tom someone would say that. Might've guessed it would be the first comment. :p
Blerk
20/06/02 @ 14:26
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
now occupies the position of the best Star Wars game on the Xbox

The other one being the utterly dreadful Obi-Wan? Not much of an accolade! ;-)
FeZZ
20/06/02 @ 14:27
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
At least for once I don't have to say it now ... ;p
Jesus: Action Figure
20/06/02 @ 14:30
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The controls actually frustrate me. As you're not using the speed controls on the triggers too often, I reckon having the fire controls on the triggers would have been better.

That way, you can still manoeuver with the right thumbstick when you want to fire.

Anyone agree? ;o)
Nemesis
20/06/02 @ 14:31
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Damnation that was my line.....
pjmaybe
20/06/02 @ 15:14
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Not sure why these games get such good reviews because even the very first star wars arcade game was better than this!!

Pales in comparison to Rogue Leader II

Peej
FeZZ
20/06/02 @ 15:20
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I waz wondering when rogue squadron was gonna come up ...
Errol
20/06/02 @ 15:24
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Old people sometimes struggle to get their 'rogue squadron' to come up at all; so we should be grateful.
Nemesis
20/06/02 @ 15:27
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Errol aka Pele by all accounts.
Whizzo
20/06/02 @ 15:29
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Looks like that review/score you gave Halo will be the bane of your existence here at Eurogamer.
Maybe Halo on the PC will get a big enough score to please Xbox fans and it'll be dropped as stick to beat EG with.

Hold on what am I saying "Halo on the PC" HAHAHAHAHA
I told you that my SAN was getting low didn't I? :-)
eviltobz
20/06/02 @ 15:31
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Looks like that review/score you gave Halo will be the bane of your existence here at Eurogamer.

As well it should.


damn straight, scoring any boring FPS wolfenstien clone higher than 1/10 is sheer stupidity.
Nemesis
20/06/02 @ 15:31
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I told you that my SAN was getting low didn't I? :-)

You mean it hasn't always been thus??????
jaa
20/06/02 @ 15:44
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Think you're confusing this one with Star Wars: Starfighter

You're right, I was. Thanks, Toxic ted.

Please ignore the one year old part. But just that.
binky
20/06/02 @ 17:30
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
bought this a few weeks ago and would recomend it to star wars fans, and shoot em up fans. not played the multiplayer bit yet, and am about half way thru it!!

prefer the jedi missions to the nym missions.
BlankOBlank!
20/06/02 @ 18:19
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Okay, anyone want to explain to this guy any of the many reasons why that statement is pure stupidity? :)"

If he means what he says literally, he's probably right. If he means that Halo is a boring clone of Wolfenstein, he's bonkers.
Sucram
20/06/02 @ 18:26
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
But Wolfenstien wasn't a FPS...
BlankOBlank!
20/06/02 @ 18:30
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wolfenstein 3D was...
mentat [mod]
20/06/02 @ 18:37
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
can't you guys automatically filter out all messages with the phrases
'Scores more than Halo'
and
'scores less than Halo'?

Go on, you know you want to!
FeZZ
20/06/02 @ 21:01
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Halo got a 8/10 because EG wanted to distinguish itself from the other sites, so give it a rest.
I used to take offence on some of the scores here, but the best way is still to go out and play the games for yourself, just ignore the scores.
Since the only score I ever agreed to is the one RallySport Challenge got, and I've enjoyed Halo a lot,scores just lost their meaning, if there ever was any.
AOFanboi
20/06/02 @ 21:22
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"even the very first star wars arcade game was better than this!!"

That's because the first Star Wars arcade game (I assume you refer to the vector-screen wireframe piece of gaming history here) is the best ever created.
UncleLou
21/06/02 @ 08:14
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I assume the people who blindly defend Halo and cannot tolerate a different opinion have been console-gamers rather than PC-gamers in the last few years and miss a bit FPS-experience.
skalmanxl
21/06/02 @ 08:15
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
->football man

I asume you're an expert in the area sir?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 21/06/02 @ 09:15
UncleLou
21/06/02 @ 08:16
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Daaaaaaaamn right. ;-)


edit: Oh, I see!

edit2: Not watching what may not be mentioned in this thread, skalmanxl?
Edited 3 times, most recently on 21/06/02 @ 09:21
skalmanxl
21/06/02 @ 08:29
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
edit2: Not watching what may not be mentioned in this thread, skalmanxl?

Not really interested in that sort of sport, got the TV on, I can hear the goals though.
UncleLou
21/06/02 @ 08:33
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Life's unfair sometimes - I'd give my right leg to watch the match, but no tele near me - depending on a Live-ticker once again...
Super Stu
21/06/02 @ 08:35
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
o the reviewer of Halo I say this to you-- You sir are a dumbass, nothing more and nothing less.

Then kindly fuck off to another site.
otto [mod]
21/06/02 @ 09:52
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oxymoronic sums up that 'review'.

lol - note to 'football man': invest in a dictionary
Jeex
21/06/02 @ 10:58
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Site improvement suggestion

How about adding more than one reviewer's marks for each game reviewed? Although that would probably take too much of your time, it would allow for a more "global" opinion... Or how about allowing registered users to give their own marks for games they've played, in addition to the original reviewer's marks?
Gestalt
21/06/02 @ 13:01
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"How about adding more than one reviewer's marks for each game reviewed"

That's not really feasible. We have a fairly small staff and there's no way we can all play the same games to get multiple opinions on them. Often we get different people to review different ports of the same game (eg Tom and me have both reviewed various versions of Max Payne, and I'm probably going to do the Xbox version of Agent Under Fire), but that's about as far as we can go.


"Or how about allowing registered users to give their own marks for games they've played"

That's something we've discussed, and allowing readers to post their own mini-reviews or scores may become part of our long-term master plan for the site. :) It's still being debated though, so no promises.
Jeex
21/06/02 @ 13:06
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
long-term master plan for the site

So what we see now on eurogamer.net is just a hatchling of what's to come? Wicked ^_^

With the impressiveness(?) level of the current site hovering around the 90% mark, that sounds promising!
otto [mod]
21/06/02 @ 13:07
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
allowing readers to post their own mini-reviews or scores

I thought we already did!
andrewfromdoncaster
21/06/02 @ 19:00
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Rogue Leader is absolutely sensational. It never has been arcadey, there's a lot more time needed to develop strategies, get used to individual ships and get deep into the Star Wars experience.

Comments: 1-33 of 33 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery