Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Gene Troopers Review

PlayStation 2 PC Xbox Review by John Walker

20 February, 2006

Cauldron, let's go. Come on. Let's take it outside. I challenge you, the developers of Gene Troopers, to a fight. Name the time and place, I'll be there. That's the only way we're going to settle this.

The majority of my time playing this game was spent face down on the sofa, having crawled there from my beanbag in aimless rage, thumping the carpet and furniture along my way. At one point, I bit my arm. I BIT MY ARM.

You know when you're in a service station, and they have that left turn, then right turn before you enter the toilets so no one can see in? And you know how sometimes when someone else is coming the other way, as they walk around the corner you drop down dead? NO. No you don't. BECAUSE WALKING AROUND A CORNER IS NOT A LETHAL ACT. Welcome to Gene Troopers, everybody.

The premise of this storm from the bumgut of Satan: you're someone who has been half-turned into some sort of warrior, and are apparently looking for a daughter you didn't realise was missing. Which means, during the brief pauses between load screens, you must first-personally shoot at some scenery-coloured aliens.

Ooh, but it's got RPG elements in it! In much the same sense that asking if you'd like me to wee in a bucket of pig manure or not before throwing it at you would be an RPG element. Dead enemies drop pink blobs, which give you DNA points and allow you to augment your abilities. In other words, rather than just occasionally giving you new weapons or tools, you choose them from a list. It's a new world, my children.

The first new ability allows you to see in the dark. It's possible to get right after the game's killed you about sixty-seven times by having creatures shoot at you from the dark. It gets lighter right about then. Such brains. Which goes some way to explaining the AI. Artificial? Tick! Intelligence? It would look stupid in a classroom of planks.

'Gene Troopers' Screenshot 1

The future's dull. The future's rubbish.

First of all, the game offers you occasional companions. Even Half-Life 2 managed to make a complete arse of this; in a project with feet already embedded in blocks of concrete disaster, it can only be another punch to an already bruised groin. Determined to either stand exactly three feet from you, or charge off to clear out the enemies from the next three rooms before you get there, they are either extremely brave or extremely stupid. Ha, I'm joking of course. They're only extremely stupid. After I crawled under an electric barrier, my elongated brown buddy stood stock still within its arcing stretches until dead. He collapsed to the ground, lifeless. And then got back up again. Which seemed odd. And he stood in the electricity, and promptly died once more. And got back up again...

Meanwhile, the enemies live upon that oft-recognised, but hard to find line between idiocy and genius. With pinpoint accuracy they can pepper your body with bullets from hundreds of feet away. Then throw a charge at a wall they're facing, and patiently wait for it to blow them up. Some stare at the ground while you kill them. Dropships merrily bomb their dropped troops the second they hit the ground. Others, as I might have mentioned, KILL YOU BY MERELY GOING NEAR YOU. Often, no matter how many times you shoot them. To the point where you start to accidentally self-harm and violate the couch.

'Gene Troopers' Screenshot 2

Ah, some sexism to accompany the unutterable tedium.

Each corridor or linear outdoor route is a pitiful series of instant deaths and agonising load times. Impressively, deaths don't even require even the presence of enemies. Inexplicable mortalities occur extremely often. After one load into an empty room, I dropped down dead instantly. That caused much laughing. Wait, not laughing. Something else. Crying. That was it.

Accompanied by regularly crashing one of the more stable gaming platforms in existence, this is about as disastrous a game as I've ever seen. And I played Lula 3D.

As if it matters with all the above, it looks weary, the sound is atrocious, and the voice acting a poor struggle against an utterly nonsensical script. Even the weapons fail to offer satisfaction. Either there's no visual confirmation other than the enemy falling over, or it feels like a nailgun unloading into your thigh.

This PS2 incarnation of the cross-platform offence is entirely without worth. It's agony in 1s and 0s. Don't even touch your bargepole with a bargepole.

1/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Gene Troopers on PlayStation 2?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-28 of 28 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Talha
20/02/06 @ 09:17
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yeah, brilliant review. Seems like the one for 'so bad it is good' category.
Zero_
20/02/06 @ 09:34
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's that bad huh? Might get it just to see how bad it is. See, Eurogamer.net. If you want people to purchase Psychonauts, should've given it 1/10. :P
Darkedge
20/02/06 @ 09:38
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"This PS2 incarnation of the cross-platform offence is entirely without worth. It's agony in 1s and 0s. Don't even touch your bargepole with a bargepole."


sound appaling - but doesn'e it say this IS the PS2 review at the top or am I stupid?
Machiavel
20/02/06 @ 09:39
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wow, who's instantly awarded it 8s and 9s in the average readers' score?

/salutes
drumbaby
20/02/06 @ 09:42
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Another system seller!
Steve_Ince
20/02/06 @ 09:48
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Wow, who's instantly awarded it 8s and 9s in the average readers' score?"

The publisher? :)
Genji
20/02/06 @ 09:49
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
OMG EG IS BIASED AGAINST THE X36... wait.

Oh.
Hicksy
20/02/06 @ 09:53
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
ROFLOL!

Great Review :D

So would you part with 50p for this? :o
Talha
20/02/06 @ 09:57
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@TK421 : I am all for it, although I daresay GameSpot has that one sewn up. Now let's hope they come out with a sequel.
SeesThroughAll
20/02/06 @ 10:08
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Spot on, Genji. Don't tease them too much though.
Talha
20/02/06 @ 10:11
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Genji:

This game was reviewed for PS2.
PS2 is a console, and a black one.
So is XBox.
It is on DVD.
XBox also runs DVDs.
People who read this review won't buy the XBox version either.
EG didn't question and lambast the very existence of PS2, of Sony, of Japan, despite it having such a horror.
So there, hence proven:

EG ARE BIASED AGAINST XBOX
Genji
20/02/06 @ 10:27
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I wish my mind worked as well as Talha's does.

Kudos to you, my friend. It all makes sense now.
Talha
20/02/06 @ 10:28
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Don't worry friend. You will learn.
drumbaby
20/02/06 @ 10:31
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This review is SO pro GCN, I'm gonna hurl!
Eiskis
20/02/06 @ 10:33
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh_my_non-existent_god! No game can possibly suck this hard.

But, like TK421 said, this game has to be bought, no doubt about it.
Talha
20/02/06 @ 10:33
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@blackdog: Huh?
Talha
20/02/06 @ 10:39
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh, now I get it. Yes, I understand perfectly - only my dreams these days are directed by CoD2. So you can imagine.

By the way your post suggests genuine writing talent.
Genji
20/02/06 @ 10:42
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Blackdog's post seems to be a satirical look at the advent of New Games Journalism, a form of review where you spend a lot of time talking about anything but the game.

Or maybe it isn't.

And yeah, one of my many problems with HL2 was the AI teammates.
Talha
20/02/06 @ 10:44
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Blackdog: Hey man, that's a can of worms - don't touch your bargepole with a bargepole. I once suggested giving out separate scores for single- and multiplayer content on these very forums. My eyes still hurt from the responses.

@Genji: What AI Teammates? They were dead before I so much as looked at them. Fodder, more like.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 20/02/06 @ 10:46
botherer
20/02/06 @ 10:44
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You've all completely misunderstood - it's an anti-Atari Jaguar review. I'm so biased against them.

I HATE YOU, ATARI JAGUAR, AND I WILL HAVE MY DAY.

"Sounds so bad I must have it. To see how bad it is."

No. No no no, really no. Don't you see? I bit my arm. BIT! MY ARM!

I didn't mention the car - the car that can't drive up hills. Or the twenty minutes of meaningless cutscenes midway through. Or that it autosaved FOUR TIMES during the unplayable, non-interactive cut-scenes, AND NOT ONCE WITHIN THE LEVELS.

/dies
Edited 1 times, most recently on 20/02/06 @ 10:46
Rufus
20/02/06 @ 10:45
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Eurogamer said: "The premise of this storm from the bumgut of Satan".

Fan of Chris Morris perhaps?
botherer
20/02/06 @ 10:47
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Fan of Chris Morris perhaps?"

Very much so, Rufus. With the depressing addition of: until 2002, when he suddenly became astonishingly rubbish.
brainbird
20/02/06 @ 10:58
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hey, I liked the Jaguar.
It was only that the games sucked. And the pad, maybe.
AHiFi
20/02/06 @ 12:10
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Did any of you play the Xbox demo?

Trust me, his review is justified...think Fire Warrior, but slash it in quality by about five.
Bursk
20/02/06 @ 12:55
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This game has Bad AIDS.
Triggerhappytel
20/02/06 @ 13:45
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Don't even touch your bargepole with a bargepole."

That's my favourite new saying :)

I feel honoured; I think this is my first 1/10 I've seen since I've been a regular in these parts.
Talha
20/02/06 @ 13:55
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Triggerhappytel : I am glad someone shares my state of unqualified euphoria. And yes, I absolutely loved the bargepole one. Only on EG, eh?
Pho-Zoon
20/02/06 @ 15:44
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
quote: 'No. No no no, really no. Don't you see? I bit my arm. BIT! MY ARM!

I didn't mention the car - the car that can't drive up hills. Or the twenty minutes of meaningless cutscenes midway through. Or that it autosaved FOUR TIMES during the unplayable, non-interactive cut-scenes, AND NOT ONCE WITHIN THE LEVELS.'


No. No no no, I love generic angry review formats. LOVE! GENERIC ANGRY REVIEW FORMATS!

/dies in an explosion of attempted humour and hyperbole.

(Although I did like the bargepole comment)

Comments: 1-28 of 28 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery