Jump to navigation
Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

Evolution GT Review

PC Review by Jim Rossignol

2 May, 2006

It must be tough to be a racing game. Of course I've never been burdened with being a racing game myself, but I do rather suspect that there would be two things I'd be concerned with were I to be so magically transformed.

Firstly there's the matter of my portrayal of speed. Racing games need to get that adrenal gland pumping, and they're not going to do it if they feel like you're hitching a ride on Grandma's shopping trolley. Evolution GT only just manages to fulfil this basic requirement. It feels solid, but stolid - dependably automotive. You've seen this a dozen times before - realistic to the degree that some sense of fun is lost, but with no sense of accurate simulation acquired. The sensation of zipping along at life-curdling speeds is what makes racing enjoyable, and to ignore it is to misunderstand why videogames have been made into these kinds of experiences the first place.

Secondly, were I a racing game, I'd need to be challenging. But where would one find new challenges for you jaded gamers? Normally it needs to come from your own skills, pitted against those of your gaming opponents. If I were being honest to the world of racing then I'd be concentrating on this singular problem, rather than on any peculiar gimmicks that it might be possible to invent. Racing is about being the best, being the fastest, and not, for example, being able to rewind time...

But that's not how Evolution GT sees things. It desperately wants to be an individual amongst the gaggle of racing sims. And, instead of getting a tattoo and smoking spliffs in the park, it decided to try and reinvent the racing genre by stealing tricks from other games. As a result it's a bit of a mess - a mish-mash of ideas lamely tacked over the familiar physiognomy of the contemporary multi-formula racer. It could have been a contender, but instead it has thrown the race with its desperate desire to be different. It's a bloated beast, only dimly aware of what its existence could have been.

'Evolution GT' Screenshot 1

Gabriele Tarquini is happy that you have heard of him.

Things don't even begin well. GT's contrived format is taught to us via an unbelievably ill-advised introductory tutorial, presented by an over-dubbed champion race driver Gabriele Tarquini. "You must drive headfirst," his dislocated non-voice informs us.

Tarquini introduces the special features which define Evolution GT's numerous failings. The first of these is 'intimidation', which is implemented via a small slider bar attached to the cars of your opponents. Put the pressure on them by keeping close and their nerve will eventually fail, allowing you to overtake with ease. And hey, as I type I realise that this sounds okay in theory, but the implementation in the game itself is impossibly naïve. The bar goes down, the bloke in front's steering goes wobbly and you overtake. It makes no real sense, and makes a mockery of the racing skills you'd want to exhibit in a game like this. It's not a simulation, but an aberration.

Worse, far worse, are the same effects of intimidation on you. If other racers keep close behind you then your vision starts to blur. Yes - YOU GO BLIND! Insane as it might sound, otherwise fairly sturdy Italian developer Milestone has created a racing game which portrays the pressure of furious bumper-to-bumper driving by making you lose the ability to see. It's ridiculous.

Then there's 'the cunning overtake'. I have almost no idea what this is supposed to represent, except that you are occasionally able to go faster for no reason that I can fathom. Tarquini seems happy about it though, so we'll leave it at that.

'Evolution GT' Screenshot 2

This is what it looks like when I'm racing normally and confidently.

The last ability is what Tarquini claims racing drivers call 'The Tiger Effect'. Attempting to simulate the uncanny ability of drivers to predict what will happen moments before it happens, the developers have seen fit to include a 'rewind' function where you can, at any moment, rewind what just happened and get that corner just right, or avoid slamming into the scenery for the sixty-fifth time. Actually, to give due credit, this is a feature that actually works okay. It's quite useful and it goes a long way to alleviating the problems that arise from not having learnt a course all that well and making a mess of it on the first few runs through. But it does seem like the equivalent of the quick-save in the FPS: you might as well hit rewind and start that braking sequence again and again. A built-in cheat.

Anyway, all these special abilities reflect a certain element of stat-crunching that goes on as you progress through the game's career mode. Each of these elements, as well as obvious things such as handling, have driver-dependent statistics associated with them. Gaining experience from racing allows you to spend points pumping up your abilities. In the first few races you'll go regularly blind as other cars approach from behind, but if you don't want to drive by sound alone you'll be able to combat this effect by spending points on concentration.

And you can see why a racing game would want to go this way. It has looked enviously upon those clever platform games and their time-rewind functions, and it has seen the RPGs with their fancy statistics and attribute-fiddling. But Evolution GT's efforts to innovate have resulted in it becoming rather boring. It's trying too hard and forgetting what makes racing loveable in the first place. And that, I'm afraid, is unforgivable.

5/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Evolution GT on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-19 of 19 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
disc
02/05/06 @ 10:44
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
5 seems VERY generous.
boabg
02/05/06 @ 10:49
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Some of those features sound completely ridiculous!
neuroniky
02/05/06 @ 10:50
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've alwas hated Milestone games. The fact that they are the only Italian developer of some regard is a real letdown for us italians.
Talha
02/05/06 @ 11:06
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
At least you would think that an Italian dev (sharing the neighborhood with likes of Ferrari and Alfa Romeo, not to mention Lamborghini) would do a racing game right. And yes, the 'intimidation' thing is one of the craziest I have heard.
Stickman
02/05/06 @ 11:20
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"a racing game which portrays the pressure of furious bumper-to-bumper driving by making you lose the ability to see"

Genius! :D
Dr_Fripp
02/05/06 @ 11:21
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/goes back to playing Superkarts
PearOfAnguish
02/05/06 @ 11:30
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Racing would be a lot more interesting to watch if the drivers went blind at random points. I would pay money to see that.
Talha
02/05/06 @ 11:37
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Big_Bad_Blonde : Oh my God, you too are hooked on to the Photo Mode. I thought I was the only one on the planet. Isn't it the greatest thing ever?

@Pear: You would have witnessed just such an incident in the last GP when Alonso suddenly appeared to go blind and perhaps lost the only chance of winning it. It proves that 'intimidation' also works from ahead. Pity these guys forgot to incorporate that!
Edited 1 times, most recently on 02/05/06 @ 12:40
Stormflood
02/05/06 @ 11:45
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@BBBlonde

Very nice indeed.
VibratingDonkey
02/05/06 @ 12:13
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't know what's up with Milestone lately. First S.C.A.R and now this. Stop it with the weirdness. A demo has been released apparently.
http://www.milestone.it/eng/EvoGT/evogt.shtml

Seems like they'll be going back to what they did best though.
http://pc.ign.com/objects/821/821313.html
kangarootoo
02/05/06 @ 12:26
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The tiger effect.

Ohohohoho, my eyes have been intimidated with tears of mirth, where's my tissue.
valli
02/05/06 @ 12:35
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The PC demo is utter, utter tat. Avoid!
glaeken
02/05/06 @ 12:37
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Milestone used to be good :( Screamer and its sequel were great. Mind you that is going back quite some time.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 02/05/06 @ 13:38
jeff
02/05/06 @ 12:44
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
the superbike games on the pc where great a few years ago but milestone seem to have lost there way since then
Zerimski
02/05/06 @ 14:29
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Didn't S.C.A.R. do the Tiger Effect thing as well? I'm certain something was mentioned by that name in relation to S.C.A.R.
citizenHUNTER
02/05/06 @ 16:42
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This game sounds like it's b******s.

Anyways, as far as I'm concerned nearly all racing games are rubbish, very unfulfilling variations on the arcade racer format. The only games I've loved have really been Gran Turismo, the very first one where the size and scope of it was immense (now it's just incredibly boring and tiresome and the unrealistic format of races.. 6 cars etc.. is a real let down). Also, F355 Challenge on the Dreamcast with a wheel was immense, if only I had the 3 screen arcade set up, though admittedly it could get a bit boring with a few tracks and just F355's to race.

GTR looks like it is exactly what I'm looking for.. but I don't have a PC, just as well it's been anounced it's coming to the 360.. all I need to do now is buy one of those :p However no one's made a force feedback wheel, to my knowledge, and sadly since MS won't allow people to plug in, for instance the GT Force I have for my PS2, guess I'll have to wait for Logitech to make a 360 version... come on guys!!!

Erm, this is nothing to do with this game, except of course that it looks like a COMPLETE waste of any money whatsoever, even if I had a PC. Makes you wonder who and how and why people buy and play this, and how the developer got so far as to completing and releasing something which is most likey pants.

Then again, Nintendo called their console Wii.... so maybe people in the games industry are just a bit stupid.
Kostabi
03/05/06 @ 09:41
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
How did Milestone manage to get Tarquini to front this rubbish? It's not like he's exactly strapped for cash at the moment.

@citizen

If you like games like F355 and GTR then you really should buy yourself a decent PC as there's a whole raft of them out there. Even GTR is old hat now compared to newer efforts.

Talha
03/05/06 @ 10:00
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Kostabi : I heard that GTR is the pinnacle of PC racing sims (not played, just heard). Are there even better games out there?
Kostabi
03/05/06 @ 10:49
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
GTR is based on an old engine now, GT Legends and the soon to be GTR2 use the new ISI base. rFactor by ISI is also just as good and with the mods available (Porsches, F3, touring cars, NASCAR, etc) it's probably the best all round sim.

The real pinnacle of simulation however is Live For Speed S2. It's just the daddy when it comes to online racing.

NetKar Pro came out recently and by all accounts has the best physics so far but it's still buggy and incomplete.

Comments: 1-19 of 19 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Metaboli

X View gallery