Jump to navigation
Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War - Dark Crusade Review

PC Review by Alec Meer

28 October, 2006

Dear Santa, for Christmas please bring me a Warhammer 40,000 MMO. This is, after all, the franchise that cheerfully pilfers every single great idea sci-fi has ever had, sticks it all in a giant fiction-blender and then adds several pints of bubbling blood. Just imagine all that presented as a living online world to carve your way through. The sights you'd see, the things you'd kill and be killed by - aliens, mechs, demons and men in a startling array of flavours, all itching for a taste of your Heavy Bolter. Imagine, just imagine playing as a Space Marine and falling prey to the corruption of Chaos, then choosing the fascinatingly monstrous ways in which your body mutates and gains dark new abilities. But no, instead we get another couple of dozen cheerless grind marathons filled with elves and wizards. I'm so bored of elves and wizards. If I met one in the street, I'd probably punch him. Why, why, why is the first Games Workshop MMORPG the upcoming Warhammer Online, which, however good it may turn out to be, enters into such an overcrowded online fantasy market when there's a near-vacant sci-fi one GW could just stroll right in and, thanks to that incredibly rich Warhammer 40,000 universe, take without contest? Sigh.

Which means, for now, that the 40K RTS Dawn of War is as good as we get. But man, it really is good. Most games are lessened come the second expansion pack, but DoW is as strong as ever. It's a significantly flawed expansion pack, true, but the two new factions it brings to the table are so spectacularly over-the-top that the weaknesses seem far more marginal than they are. The flaws certainly don't matter if you play DoW predominantly online - the Necron (voodoo death robot-things) and Tau (stealth, heavy armour and bestial aliens) will slide proudly into the existing roster of playable races, and are so much ultra-violent fun that you'll have a hard time wanting to play as anything else ever again.

Without having undertaken a few dozen online bouts with them though, it's tricky to know for sure whether the new factions are entirely balanced with the older ones. They're both very different to what's gone before, especially compared to the rather subdued nature of the Imperial Guard introduced in the last expansion, Winter Assault. For instance, the Necron especially are incredibly deadly, and all-but unstoppable once they reach the peak of their powers. Being demolished in seconds by a city-sized floating pyramid firing Death Star lasers at everything you own, while a hundred-foot high Grim Reaper (scythe and all) picks off any stragglers, is certainly a spectacular way to die, but is it fair? It essentially forces the Necron's opponents into rush tactics, hoping to wipe them out before they hit the top of the tech tree.

'Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War - Dark Crusade' Screenshot 1

The Tau can choose between beasts or mech suits for their best units.

That said, there are signs of meticulous balancing - the Necron will build incredibly slowly unless they've captured large numbers of strategic points, so clearly are carefully designed to be that much more vulnerable in the game's earlier stages. They also don't have any vehicles or troop transports to speak of, but by way of return, some of the infantry can teleport over huge distances of the map. Whether ultimately such mechanics prove totally fair or not (either to the Necron or their foes), they do genuinely introduce new strategies to a game that could otherwise have been considered set in its ways. Dawn of War is all the fresher for it. Is it fair to presume that any imbalances that do appear from weeks of online battles will be addressed by later patches? We're not talking about bugs here, so I think it is - look how many patches down the line Warcraft III or DoW itself is, all as a result of careful monitoring of how people play, forever tweaking here or retuning there to ensure the playing field remains ever-level. Creepy and anal, in a way, but also effective.

Noble intentions are also evident in the revamped single-player campaign. As described in our preview a couple of weeks back it throws out the linear string of missions offered in the previous two DoW instalments in favour of a strategy map whose territories you conquer in an order of your pleasing, each offering different resource rewards. This is A Very Good Idea, for the reasons outlined in said preview. Disappointingly, it's not quite as good in extended practice - with every one of your chosen faction's unit types already sampled in the campaign's earlier stages and the storyline cut-scenes not being hugely gripping, the impetus to strive onwards begins to atrophy. There are no surprises, simply long, grinding repetition and ever-escalating difficulty. Only a dedicated and insane few are ever going to tackle the single-player with each of the seven factions.

'Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War - Dark Crusade' Screenshot 2

The Necron Nightbringer, bringing some night.

And with that, we're circling around Dark Crusade's fundamental flaw. The campaign's really, relentlessly hard, even if you set the AI to easy. The enemy builds and attacks at inhuman speeds - making it a sterling challenge even for DoW vets. That's fine to a point, but men of similarly imprecise RTS skills to mine will pray for a patch that activates Very Easy mode. That fundamental trouble is that this is a standalone expansion, and therefore hoping to ensare newcomers to the game. Without the mollycoddling of Dawn of War vanilla and Winter Assault's fixed campaigns, they're in for a hell of a tough time. They'll quite likely either give up, default to the far easier but less interesting skirmish missions, or dabble online - only to find that the five non-Necron or Tau races they've been cheerfully campaigning and skirmishing with aren't available in multiplayer. Unless, of course, you already own DoW and Winter Assault, in which case you'll lap up both the new races and the additional units for the existing factions.

So, though standalone, Dark Crusade doesn't really make sense on its own. Through-and-through it seems made for long-term players; for them, this is mostly great news, though the single-player difficulty and repetition will frustrate them too. It's only masquerading as its own game - really, coming straight to this without having played its predecessors will be frustrating and bewildering, and the inability to play as Space Marines, Orks et al online a real slap in the face.

Don't think of it as its own game and the red mist recedes fast. The new races are incredible, some of the most imaginative fare the often too stiff-upper-lipped RTS landscape has ever seen. They're going to make for some spectacular online clashes, far more so than Winter Assault's guardsmen ever did, and devout DoW players will be the happiest of genocidal bunnies for their inclusion. That brutal learning curve aside, you can't really wish for more from an expansion pack. It's hovering on the absolute razor's edge of scoring an 8 - and if the punishing campaign gets a spot of noob-friendly spit and polish down the line, it'll almost definitely get one, but until then...

7/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War - Dark Crusade on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-20 of 20 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
holy_bazooka
28/10/06 @ 10:25
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
first!!!!!!!!!!!!
first one was a great game by the way, never played the expansion though.

Edited 1 times, most recently on 28/10/06 @ 11:27
Nithron
28/10/06 @ 11:31
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
How big does the comments section on a site have to be, before you get these people turning up and boasting about getting first comment?
Dragul
28/10/06 @ 12:32
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I really need to get this... I loved DaW and DaW:WA... It's a must buy for me!
Poorandugly
28/10/06 @ 13:03
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I want more games set in the wild wild west.
Whitey McCool
28/10/06 @ 13:05
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Its not -too- hard in campaign mode I don't think - I'm absolutely useless and managed to blunder through large sections of it on normal. I think the problems arise later on in the game when enemies get entrenched (each zone you attack has a defense rating, the higher this is the more buildings/units/bases the enemy starts with). Totally agree with the review about the slightly flawed story system though, you can understand why they ditched the narrative driven campaign, but when one of the big draws of the game is how brilliant the Universe is, anything that detracts from being immersed in it is always going to be a step backwards.

The world does indeed need a 40k MMO as well. The only possible reason I can think for not doing one is to wait until technology can really do it justice.
JediMasterMalik
28/10/06 @ 13:27
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
WA was a dissappointment for me, the new races weren't all that great imo, but after playing the demo, the Tau seem really fricken cool, so I'm gonna get it.
jonnyreb
28/10/06 @ 15:03
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Picked this up yesterday after enjoying the original Dawn Of War and finding Winter Assault 'only OK'.

It's really good actually - the map domination structure feels a bit of an afterthought, but the Tau and Necrons are really fun and add some new challenges to the skirmishes and online.

BTW - the thing I really hated about Winter Assault was the voices of the Imperial Guard....after such amazing voice acting in the first game, the voices in WA were just........MEH - and extremely annoying too (I actually ended up turning voices off in the options menu).

Necrons have no voices (just weird electric sounds) and Tau sound cool - cross between robots and 'English' humans.

Online it seems that Necrons basically pound everything into dust......some balancing is obviously required.

Overall a really good expansion to a great game that makes up for the dissapointing Winter Assault.
ratso
28/10/06 @ 16:03
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
where did you get it?

i didnt think it was out in eur until 3rd nov
jonnyreb
28/10/06 @ 16:04
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
In Sweden it came out on the 27th Oct......not sure about the rest of Euroland.
SentientNr6
28/10/06 @ 21:28
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Woow dude tooo hard?
I play on normal and so far didn't lose a single battle.
Thought it was too easy so far actually.
And I am not that good a player, get my butt kicked online everytime I show it.

This expansion pack is waaaaaaaaaaay better than winter assault.
It's stand alone, cheap and has great replay value.
It's fun too.

7/10 is a shitty score for this game. It deserves 9, at least an 8.
YourMessageHere
29/10/06 @ 00:17
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Like all the previous Relic games, the AI is still a bit dodgy. On easy mode it's too easy, the enemy only makes crappy units and does little research, but put it on standard and lo and belold, the enemy commander's in your base before two minutes is up. Hard mode is actually slightly easier than standard as the enemy tries to amass an army before attacking, letting you get some defences together, rather than unceasingly hurling troops at you like on standard difficulty.

Too hard on easy? Having finished the SP campaign as Tau on easy, as I'd rather have an easy victory than get frustrated by an AI that's blatantly cheating, I never lost a battle. I suck at RTS, by and large, always get killed first in MP, but even I find easy mode easy.

I don't get people being disappointed by WA. As expansion packs go, it added tons of maps, new units for each army and an entire new race. Not many expansion packs do that much. Plus, this game, two years old now, remember, looks better than any other RTS I've seen in ages; part of that's the WH40000 art design but the animations and effects give this way more personality than, say Rise of Legends. Given how all the armies are different, the two new ones in this make it a completely essential purchase for all vanilla and WA DoW owners.
Smugglarn
29/10/06 @ 01:19
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm definitely getting Dawn of War: Anthology. 3 in 1 and quite a bargain!

and yes, the AI needs some tweaking - overwatch does not work very well and there is rampant pathing problems.

BTW Does anyone know if DC will install separately in the Anthology edition as well?
Edited 3 times, most recently on 29/10/06 @ 02:55
Schiraman
29/10/06 @ 10:27
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Looks like a good expansion, I'm really looking forward to it.
Is the single-player really that hard? The demo was fine.

It was supposed to be out in the UK on Friday, but it seems to have been delayed until the 3rd now for some reason.
jonnyreb
29/10/06 @ 15:43
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I wouldn't say the single player is hard - more like frustrating and / or unfair on normal mode, and piss-easy on easy.

In normal, I put 6 hellfire dreadnaughts plus 2 bosses against 40-50 imperial guards.......as fast as I could kill them the AI brought new, completely re-inforced units every 30 seconds - just 5 mins into the game, whilst my requisition (with 6 captured points plus listening posts) increased sooooooooooo slowly I couldn't even push out some standard units.

Still, I bought it for the online which rocks.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 29/10/06 @ 15:48
Donjohnni
29/10/06 @ 20:20
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Dude you write like a mong. You couldn't punch a little girl without getting beaten up you nerd!!!!!!
Ihya
29/10/06 @ 22:49
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
We could have lived without the first paragraph to this review. You hardly endear a reader to the relevance of your opinion on a game when you start by wishing the franchise was elsewhere.
Crashdown
29/10/06 @ 23:02
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
boooooooooooooooooriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiing
Nasty
30/10/06 @ 11:29
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Fully agree on the 40k mmo.
oneshotgame
06/11/06 @ 16:57
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
woot, enjoying it majorly. this game brought me back to RTS. a field of gaming i left when TFT made Warcraft 3 a huge pile of luck and WORK.

SentientNr6
13/11/06 @ 12:31
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
K Finished the game with the necrons on normal.
Was fun, not really a challenge though.
Thought maybe the necrons were overpowered so started the game with the marines to see the reviewers point.

Half the map conquered so far, no opposition worth mentioning.
How on earth can you blame this game for being too hard???

Comments: 1-20 of 20 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery