Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Cold Fear Review

Xbox PC PlayStation 2 Review by Kristan Reed

4 May, 2005

We're not sure why Western game developers seem to find it so tough to produce horror adventure games that can be talked of in the same breath as Resident Evil, Silent Hill and Project Zero, but it's one of those puzzling anomalies that's been going on for years now. The crazy thing is, the entire survival-horror genre was born in France in the early '90s with the seminal Alone In The Dark trilogy - a concept that a succession of Japanese developers have refined and made great strides with ever since.

Frustratingly, publisher Infogrames practically handed the likes of Capcom the survival-horror concept gift-wrapped by waiting fully six years to deliver the not-bad-but-not-nearly-good-enough Darkworks-developed sequel. Tragically, by the start of the noughties, few gamers knew of or cared about a new Alone In The Dark game. Instead of it being greeted like a returning hero, critics shrugged, the public looked the other way and it went down as a glorious missed opportunity.

Almost five years on, Darkworks, meanwhile, has somehow managed to tough it out, and signed up with fellow Frenchmen Ubisoft to re-emerge with a grim and grisly survival-horror title by the name of Cold Fear; a windswept, rain-lashed tale of US Coast Guard Tom Hansen's attempts to uncover the mysterious goings-on aboard a stricken Russian Whaler in the Bering Sea.

Storm bringer

'Cold Fear' Screenshot 2

Cold Fear kicks off in promising fashion, luring players into a storm-ravaged marine environment that has you dodging crashing waves one minute, swinging cargo the next, while the violent swell of the sea threatens to drag you of the side of the ship into the raging torrent if you're not careful. The first few minutes you'll spend just lurching around, desperately trying to get your sea legs, squinting through the sea spray and lashing rain and admiring one of the most convincingly oppressive gaming environments yet. But it doesn't last.

Once you've got your bearings and manage to suss out how to get inside the vessel, the game quickly settles on traditional territory: a sense of dark foreboding, destroyed cabins, corridors, locked doors, more locked doors, random objects, ammo clips, health packs, things that leap out on you. You know the drill.

In a game that wears its Alien/The Thing influences on its sleeve, it's no surprise to learn (via the usual discarded diary pages and letters) that one of those oh-so-dastardly secret experiments has been going on, and that almost everyone on board has turned into cleaver-wielding zombies with glowing red eyes. Even less surprising is when you learn that parasitic, tentacled creatures called Exocels are prowling the ship, capable of crawling on the ceiling, dropping down and crawling into the mouths of their accommodating hosts.

Thus kicks off a game positively chock full of opportunities to do battle with said respawning creatures of death, while attempting to go about your business of reuniting keys and key codes with their respective doors, while scooping up the liberally placed health and ammo packs. You could say that Darkworks were comfortable with sticking to well worn game mechanics.

Reanimator

'Cold Fear' Screenshot 3

No surprise, then, that the over-the-shoulder view used with such success in Resident Evil 4 has been replicated here, complete with laser sight for added accuracy when you're trying to pull off vital headshots to send these perpetually reanimating goons back to their respawning maker. As such, you'll spend a good deal of your time in Cold Fear trying manfully to get a decent shot on target, but in the absence of a lock-on it's something of a lottery that usually results in taking down your subject but not actually killing them. Most of the time, you're faced with a frantic race to stamp on their head before they get up and carry on ripping chunks out of you, but even that tends to be fraught with error.

Given that a lot of the combat in Cold Fear takes place in corridors, and given that the game maps the 'open door' button to the same button required for stomping zombie face, you quite often find yourself accidentally entering another room rather than squishing skull. More annoying still is to return into the room you've just accidentally exited to be instantly attacked by the same zombie you've just emptied your gun into, which not only wastes a load more ammo but probably a chunk of health into the bargain. Genius.

So, if you're not annoyed enough by minor quirks like that, or the overt darkness of a game that forces you to have your gun drawn (and therefore holding down the left trigger for hours on end) to be able to shine your torch beam around, or a game that regularly disorientates the player by switching the camera perspective around as soon as you let go of the over-the-shoulder view (usually right in the middle of trying to stomp on a zombie head), then you'll love the fact that there's absolutely no map facility. Wonderful.

Although Cold Fear is a pretty straightforward 8-10 hour game, we promise that at least half of that will be spend wandering around lost trying to find your way to your next port of call. As any survival horror aficionado will tell you, trying to memorise layouts is hard enough at the best of times, never mind when most of it looks the same and the camera perspective keeps switching, giving you no chance of really getting a grip on what's where. Cold Fear then defecates on your progress by introducing one way doors which force you to take massive detours via more respawning zombie death machines. Great.

Captain Sensible

'Cold Fear' Screenshot 4

And if that wasn't retarded enough, one particular puzzle near the end of the first half of the game has you looking for the Captain's Quarter (having just found the key), but then manages to design it as a location with two entrances - only one of which your key will work in. More confused wandering later and you'll find it, but not before you've shouted at alarming decibel levels at the game designers for managing to dream up all-new ways to irritate the gamer. If you then happen to somehow fall victim to the game's prescribed save system, you'll probably wonder why you're bothering at all; it just feels designed to hold the gamer up for the sake of it.

Later, when the game's setting moves onto a similarly-stricken oilrig, the same overall principles endure, but by then you've long since realised that the game's initial promise has dissipated into an extended jaunt around a zombie-filled playground in what are - in the main - fairly humdrum environments. In typical fashion, the ante is upped, the enemy count increases, the weapons get better and more powerful (the flame thrower and grenade launcher two such examples), but no matter what the game throws at you from then on, it never becomes more interesting for it.

If the story was well scripted, with great characters that were convincingly acted and somehow compelling, we'd probably forgive many of the minor issues, but everything about the whole affair is so horribly predictable and feels done to death. And beyond. Again, if the creatures weren't so generic in terms of how they look and how they behave it might be a different story. For a game that gradually becomes so combat-centric, you'd think Darkworks would have infused the whole thing with convincing unpredictability to keep you on your toes, but the truth is that you know exactly what each of the creatures are going to do. The only thing that ever holds you back is the unwieldy control system and the game's irritating tendency to inconsistently repopulate previously cleared areas. Other than that it's the kind of sub-par action that you wouldn't put up with in any other game.

Cold reality

You can see that Darkworks had a great basic idea but never really got to run with it beyond the game's opening scenes. After the novelty of the atmospheric opening rain-lashed storm scene wears off what are you left with? Half-destroyed cabins in the dark, cold rooms with strung up corpses, generic corridors with the same consistently reappearing zombies and Exocels springing up to annoy the hell out of you? The predator-style creature that appears in the second half might be deadly and scary, but then becomes so awkward to fight you may as well just run away. The further we got into Cold Fear the less we cared, and that's a sad reflection on a game we were initially impressed with for its atmospheric attention to detail.

The whole thing just feels a bit half-baked, with moody but unimaginative environments, done-to-death one-dimensional characters, exceptionally tired gameplay mechanics that favours basic A-to-B object collection rather than injecting anything even vaguely resembling a puzzle and a combat system that's at best functional, and at worst unhelpful. There are many vastly superior survival-horror games out there in the market, and although Cold Fear isn't a bad game by any stretch of the imagination, there are too many annoyances and there's too little inspiration to recommend that anyone but adventure completists give it the time of day. Yet again we're staring down the barrel of another well meaning but ultimately lacklustre effort to revive the Western survival-horror scene.

5/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Cold Fear on Xbox/PlayStation 2?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-36 of 36 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
kentmonkey
04/05/05 @ 12:05
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Such a shame, I really liked the look of this from previews
Blerk
04/05/05 @ 12:14
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Surprised at the score, given the words. Sounds like a 4 at best.

This line:
chock full of opportunities to do battle with said respawning creatures of death

... is what really kills it for me. I could possibly forgive all the other stuff but loads of respawning baddies to shoot? Bugger that. I shall pass.


Incidentally, if you're looking for a great Western survival horror title then you should check out Obscure. Very well done (if a little short), and probably dirt cheap by now.
CrispyXUK
04/05/05 @ 12:14
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Better than Halo then?
Kami
04/05/05 @ 12:33
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Err... no. Survival Horror, as a concept, started in Japan in 1989 with the greatly unknown Sweet Home - an RPG/Horror concoction focused on surviving with as many of the characters as was possible, because they could die. Even now, you look back and there are very VISABLE Resident Evil elements - spooky house, the door animations between areas... the game, for its day, was deemed "too scary" for the west I believe... heh heh. Sorry, I do find that kinda funny. Sweet Home, for those who might be interested, was actually made by Capcom.

I think that Survival Horror was REFINED in the early 90's with Alone in the Dark, Clock Tower and (obviously) Resident Evil, but by no means born in the early 90's. The RPG elements were removed, up until Squaresoft (at the time) decided to put them back IN for Parasite Eve - another game we didn't get in Europe because the censors didn't like it.

It's really quite funny to look at how horror games have come along, from Sweet Home to Resident Evil 4. Especially the censorship of things, even Resident Evil was censored for the West. In the first release, Chris' profile after the intro showed him lighting up a cigarette - you guessed it, had to be different for the health-concious western market. It is little things like that which really surprise you - they censor that, yet not the at the time impressive popping of zombie heads with a shotgun, showering red chunks and red spritey blood everywhere... seems so minor compared to the actual in-game violence.

... err, not that I'm obsessed with my Horror games... oh no. Not at all. Just.... I... err... oh crap. LOOK BEHIND YOU! A three-headed monkey!

/runs away. VERY fast.
DUFFMAN5
04/05/05 @ 12:34
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I had this a good while ago. and it is pants, you can have TOO DARK graphics some times, a shame. With the latest Resi we should start getting better horror titles. My fav style of game when done well. Nothing to do with this game but does anyone have any info on the Family Guy game ? if you haven't watched the prog it is brilliant,excellent and more.
Cheers
G

*well done LFC, basta*d Chelsea nicked our title!!! .AFC 2005/6
absolutezero
04/05/05 @ 12:36
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Obscure fails in its American teen cast, that and the partner AI is terrible. Cold Fear is also cheap aswell now, I think I've seen it for Ģ15 already.

I want Kuon and I would like it now.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 04/05/05 @ 14:12
absolutezero
04/05/05 @ 12:40
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Also anyone think were going to get Michigan?
ses
04/05/05 @ 12:42
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I mostly agree with the review, except that I don't think it has respawning enemies - at least not in the sense I understand the word. Most of the enemies will rise again unless you crush their head, but once dead they stay dead.

Since you do a lot of backtracking some areas are occasionally repopulated with a new set of enemies (triggered by one of the save points), but the alternative would have been to let the player wander around an empty ship for most of the game. Still, the number of enemies is fixed.

That apart, I actually found the first half of the game quite fun. There are plenty of minor flaws, but the graphics are well done (especially when outdoors). Unfortunately, after you move to the oil rig, it's like playing a lost level from Doom 3, except with poorer graphics.
Blerk
04/05/05 @ 12:45
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Obscure fails in its American teen cast, that and the partner AI is terrible.

The teen cast is obviously intended to appeal to the "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" generation and isn't all that irritating as far as American Teens go. The partner AI isn't great, granted, but equally it doesn't really ruin the game because it's perfectly possible to complete the whole thing using a single character. The extra computer-controlled player is just a handy 'extra fist' in a fight. Plus the whole thing takes on an entirely new light when you play co-op with another human player.
Blerk
04/05/05 @ 12:47
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Alright, now I'm confused. ses's description make the 'respawning' sound exactly like an old-style Resident Evil game. So it's not "fight baddies, leave room, come back to face same baddies again"?
Aretak
04/05/05 @ 12:55
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hmm... OPS2 gave this a 7/10 and the review actually made it sound quite good. I realise that they're an official mag, and as such have the whole stigma that they rate everything too high, but I find their reviews to be quite good.

I really enjoyed Carrier on the Dreamcast, and that got some pretty poor reviews... this seems like a very similar concept. Might check it out despite this review.
krudster [mod]
04/05/05 @ 13:05
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
To clarify: I said the respawing was "inconsistent". Effectively there are two types of enemies. The ones that stay dead and never return to a room, and the ones that return when you come back to a room a bit later. The enemies don't respawn in terms of contining to appear in the game room over and over. They do, however, repopulate areas that you will have already cleared multiple times, and that - as I've said over and over again - is just lazy game design to make the game world feel alive.
ses
04/05/05 @ 13:06
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If you killed all the enemies in a room - and finished them off - that room will be empty until you trigger a checkpoint repopulating it. At least that's how it worked for me (playing on normal difficulty).

The "creaking Russian ship in violent storm"-thing is done very well, but the rest of the game is indeed mediocre. I'm sorta hoping they do a sequel, since it has potential.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 04/05/05 @ 14:07
krudster [mod]
04/05/05 @ 13:09
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hmm, I bow to Kami's in depth knowledge of survival horror, but I sense more than a little pedantry good sir! Fair enough, there are many elements in Sweet Home by the sound of it, but the survival horror game "as we know it" did very much kick off with AITD, and Resi Evil borrowed from it wholesale in terms of its use of 3D graphics, static camera, *all* of its game mechanics/inventory management/health system/boss fights etc.

I'm not sure what Sweet Home looked like, or what platform it was on, but it sounds like a very different beast to me! Thanks for filling us in though, sounds interesting.

Edited 1 times, most recently on 04/05/05 @ 14:10
renzo
04/05/05 @ 13:14
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Looks positively frightening to me.
Blerk
04/05/05 @ 13:17
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sweet Home.

Looks more RPG than Survival Horror tbh, Kami. Shall track it down and have a go, though! :-)
Razz
04/05/05 @ 13:17
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
;_; I really wanted this to be good.
sickpuppysoftware
04/05/05 @ 13:22
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Err... no. Survival Horror, as a concept, started in Japan in 1989 with the greatly unknown Sweet Home - an RPG/Horror concoction focused on surviving with as many of the characters as was possible, because they could die.
What about The Evil Dead game for the speccy?
The forbidden forest on the C64?
Blerk
04/05/05 @ 13:30
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Shall track it down and have a go, though!

Didn't take long. Hey, it looks really good! \o/

Edit: Er... remember - illegal ROM downloads are bad, kids!
Edited 1 times, most recently on 04/05/05 @ 14:31
Kami
04/05/05 @ 13:45
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sweet Home was an NES game released in 1989 in Japan, so you have to appreciate that it does look slightly different and yes, it is 2D and yes, it does have an RPG-esque battle system, but there are noticable elements of Resident Evil in there - it's almost the spiritual predecessor of the game. Arguable whether it is the actual start of "survival horror as we know it", but without it maybe we'd never have seen Resident Evil - who knows?

I don't know if you can find the game any more... well, obviously there are less legal means of obtaining it but the actual Japanese original... I am not sure. It's certainly a bit of a history lesson, is all, and I think considering it's focus on keeping the characters alive, i.e. survive, it should be classed as Survival Horror.

As for Cold Fear, I have to say, I saw preview screenshots of this and I thought it might actually be a good game. It's a crying shame that it's only, at best, average... it sounded like a cross between Resident Evil and VIRUS (Admittedly, not a good game but the film was alright). It's a real shame it doesn't pull it off... once again, the potential of a game is wasted. Is it me, or does that seem to be happening a lot now?

edit: Never played Evil Dead on the Speccy, so can't really say much about it, or Forbidden Forest on the C64. I was an Amstrad person... oh damn, that isn't good. Back in that era, I was more into Dizzy... see, why did they stop making Dizzy games? Oh wait, that's a whole 'nother discussion and would be going seriously off topic... err, yes. Any more early horror games anyone knows of? Fills up the "bank of useless knowledge"...

edit #2: Blerks message: Do as I say, not as I do...
Edited 2 times, most recently on 04/05/05 @ 14:50
Blerk
04/05/05 @ 13:51
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Never played Evil Dead on the Speccy

Tip: DON'T!

It's god-awful shite.
sickpuppysoftware
04/05/05 @ 13:55
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Never played Evil Dead on the Speccy

Tip: DON'T!


True, I still haven't a clue what you were supposed to do.

The forbidden forest and it's sequels were very good for the time. The graphics are very dodgy though.
Kami
04/05/05 @ 13:58
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Thanks for the heads-up Blerk, although I must say I'm not overly surprised to hear it isn't too good...

Forbidden Forest sounds interesting though. Dodgy visuals aside (We're talking about a C64 game here, dodgy visuals come as standard), it sounds rather intriguing... hmm...
Vinicity
04/05/05 @ 14:57
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The first survival horror game I remember playing was Friday the 13th on the C64 way back in 1985.

I don't know if you have played it, but you choose one of the youngsters from the first or second movie, and then you run around some spooky locations (a graveyard, inside a gothic church, a dark forest) while some scary organ music plays. You collect weapons (like an axe, a pitchfork, a machete...). Your friends run around too, but eventually one by one they end up dead, and every so often you run into Jason himself. When that happens, the game totally shocks you with a blood curling (digitised) scream and a gory picture, typically of a severed head.

I remember falling off my chair the first time I heard that scream... Amazing atmosphere. Me and my friends were scared to death but we couldn't stop playing it. I was more scared then, than I've been while playing any Resident Evils, Project Zeros, or Silent Hills!
Zuiyo
04/05/05 @ 15:01
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought the first survival horror game was Arkanoid.
krudster [mod]
04/05/05 @ 15:06
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ah yes, Friday the 13th....the game Crash memorably rated 13%...
Kami
04/05/05 @ 15:10
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
See, we're actually having a discussion on the earliest forms of horror games! Who said we're not educational and informative in these comments sections...
krudster [mod]
04/05/05 @ 15:24
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm sure there's still time for some emotional Cold Fear fan to pop up and tell me how stupid I am...
Nikanoru
04/05/05 @ 15:35
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sounds and looks as if they tried their utmost to be RE4.
renzo
04/05/05 @ 15:37
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Aha! I found something older than 1989! ph3ar!
Martin
04/05/05 @ 18:20
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Damn, I had my hopes up on this one. :(
barchetta
05/05/05 @ 07:30
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Re- Old Survival Horror.

Anyone play ALIEN by Argus Press Software. Man was that creepy.
Lousy graphics but turn the lights out and play alone for maximum effect.

Forbidden Forest had a damn cool soundtrack if memory serves right.
Lots of heavy bass and ghostly white noise...
Kami
05/05/05 @ 15:50
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I remember playing Alien 3 on the Sega Mega Drive... that was an awesome experience! Really creepy, but more a platformer than a horror title. Still, lights off and played at night, it was a satisfyingly creepy experience.

... what Cold Fear reminds me of is Virus: It Is Aware. A god awful game of an average horror film. Seems it falls into the same traps too... but hey, at least Cold Fear looks OK and is playable. Unlike Virus...
Galvanizer
07/05/05 @ 13:51
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What a rip off of Resident Evil 4!
gonzax
31/08/05 @ 13:59
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i really canīt agree with anyone. I have played this game several times and it is a fantastic game with great ambience and controls. Enemies never respawn, you just have to shoot their heads off, thatīs it.
The game is not as good as Resident Evil 4 but then, which game is? i canīt believe the reviewer gives it a 5 out of 10, UNFAIR. do yourselves a favour and play the game, its really worth it, believe me.
bloodflowers
13/11/05 @ 20:06
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Don't know if anyone will see this comment so far after the release, but for all you fellow bargain bin surfers:

Review is very harsh IMHO, while it doesn't bring anything hugely original to the table, the setting is unique, and everything appears to have been done with a degree of care - fantastic graphics (not just on the ship deck), and great sound throughout. The enemies do not respawn, even newly repopulated areas are different creatures and positions, but they will get back up until the brain is destroyed. There's the old keys/codes/doors thing, but actually the game has been designed so that you take different routes between the areas, theres no proper backtracking so to speak. Holding down the left trigger to aim all the time isn't necessary, you can hold it, or tap to toggle. Having no autoaim is a HUGE benefit - you can grab the railings to steady your aim if needed, it's just not scary if you can aim vaguely near somethings head to kill it. The one big gripe I have is grabbing the rails makes you initially face away from the grabbed object - annoying as the thing you want to kill is then to your side and you have to turn to face again.

I would have given it a strong 7 at RRP, but now that it's cheap and littering the shelves of Sainsburies (yes really), it's a worthwhile purchase.

Comments: 1-36 of 36 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery