Nexus - The Jupiter Incident Review

By Rob Fahey Published 3 November, 2004

In space, no-one can hear Rob scream...

Version tested: PC

Shop for games now at Simply Games.

Space. There is, to put it mildly, rather a lot of it. It's vast, dark and cold beyond comprehension, and filled only with emptiness. And lens flare, naturally.

Space is, quite frankly, a bit of a tough sell as real estate goes, but it's certainly very good for certain things - such as playing host to epic battles between hulking metallic capital ships, darting fighters and sleek alien starfaring vessels, all tearing strips off each other with exotic combinations of beam weapons, mass drivers and lethal torpedoes.

It's a good thing, then, that Mithis decided to add the space battling element to Nexus - The Jupiter Incident, since a game focused on looking at nicely rendered asteroids, planets and, er, hard vacuum, wouldn't be very entertaining. Instead, they've delivered a game which is a science fiction fan's wet dream - filled with the aforementioned epic battles, hulking capital ships and what have you, and presented with a sense of dramatic scale that leaves other space strategy games in the moondust.

Battle of the Planets

'Nexus - The Jupiter Incident' Screenshot 2

Nexus is, in short, a space strategy simulation. I can see the comparisons with Homeworld forming in your minds already, though, and you need to nip those in the bud. Where Homeworld was effectively a real-time strategy game with the added twist of a third dimension, Nexus is all about commanding a battleship or a small fleet through engagements with the enemy and other such missions. Rather than just clicking on a point on the map and telling a unit to head over there and mine some ore or shoot some bad guys, you're effectively placed in the captain's chair, and must command the ship(s) and crew on a much more up close and personal level.

The types of battles you'll be fighting in Nexus are quite different to those found in Homeworld or indeed in the vast bulk of space warfare games. Mithis are from a school of science fiction game design which sees capital ships as great lumbering beasts which maneouvere around each other in combat, vying for the best shooting positions, while smaller fighter craft dash around in the spaces between the ships almost too fast to see. In fact, this is more like naval combat than like any space combat you may have seen before, as the lumbering ships circle each other and turrets track their targets, each captain seeking to inflict the crucial blow of the battle.

The range of control available to you might seem slightly odd at first to those unused to this style of game - which, let's face it, will be most people. Your control over the ships you command generally doesn't give you second by second input into where the ship is steered, for example - that's largely left up to the crew. However, not only can you select which enemy craft to target, but you can also select individual sub-systems on the ship to attack, thus allowing you to disable a ship's systems rather than just pounding at its hull - or, if you're feeling nasty, to disable its systems and then pound at the hull anyway. You can also choose to launch your fighters, and despatch them to meet threats from enemy squadrons or just to harass a bigger ship while you move your capital ship in for the kill, and can even launch transports of marines to board crippled enemy vessels.

Space Hulks

'Nexus - The Jupiter Incident' Screenshot 3

The whole affair is superbly presented from a user interface perspective. The control system for the game is logical and clear, with a fairly simple set of buttons arranged around the edges of the screen, leaving you free to view the action and move your viewpoint around in the middle. Helpfully, you can select units - both friendly and enemy - from lists on either side of the screen, and just about everything that needs to be done can be done from the clear menu system, so you won't find yourself rotating the view and desperately scrabbling around to find a unit you've lost in the melee. A few more context menus wouldn't have gone amiss, though - the ability to right-click on a unit and select an action would have arguably made the game easier to play - but by and large it's an interface that any strategy game player will get used to very quickly, and the game does an excellent job of gently guiding you through the first few missions to get you accustomed to it anyway.

The problem with the control system - and this is more a function of the basic gameplay than of the user interface - is that you rarely actually feel in control of the events unfolding in front of you. Certainly, your actions have a major impact on the battle, but the immediate effect of issuing orders and changing tactics is often frustratingly intangible. This is arguably a feature of this type of game, rather than a flaw with Nexus in particular, but it can be very annoying even for the seasoned strategy gamer and is worth bearing in mind. Another feature of this sort of gameplay is the tendancy for play to be reduced into a case of pausing the game (hitting space freezes the action while still allowing you to move the camera around, select units and issue orders), changing your tactics, and then unpausing the action and sitting back for a couple of minutes to see what happens. Whether you consider this aspect of play to be positive or negative is largely a personal decision, but again, it's one to bear in mind.

The game is also, quite frankly, slow. You'll spend ages watching capital ships circle as they wear down each other's health, and while it's absolutely possible to create some very satisfying tactical solutions to the various engagements which are thrown up, all too often battles come down to a question of using your units to gang up on the enemy one at a time, while fending off the rest of the opposing fleet as you pick off ships in force. It's somewhat unfair to criticise a game for failing to achieve something it doesn't really set out to do, but Nexus regularly feels like it would have benefited from a little more Homeworld-style real time strategy along with its superb space battle simulations, just to add a bit of variety to your options in battle.

The Final Frontier

'Nexus - The Jupiter Incident' Screenshot 4

One of the most impressive things about Nexus is the 3D graphics engine that Mithis has assembled for the game, and suffice it to say that the eye-candy is every bit as gorgeous as the user interface is functional - and then some. Perhaps best described as "Doom 3 in space," the engine throws around intricately modelled and bump mapped ships with realistic shadows moving over their surfaces, countless projectiles and asteroids, detailed space stations and stunning particle and weapon effects which combine to make it into one of the best-looking space games ever to grace a PC. The excellent technology isn't let down by the quality of the artwork, either. Human and alien spacecraft are fairly varied and interesting, and uniformly well designed and detailed - although the jury's out on whether the recurring resemblances to spacecraft from various other science fiction universes is homage, or rip-off.

Perhaps it's that very resemblance that makes Nexus so reminiscent, at times, of watching a TV science fiction show. It's hard to miss the fact that the first ships you'll pilot are remarkably similar to those seen in 90's cult show Babylon 5, and that comparison leads to the rapid realisation that actually, the graphics you're seeing in real-time in Nexus hold up well in comparison to the pre-rendered efforts of Babylon 5 or that era of Star Trek. The direction of the cutscenes helps; although there are a few too many random lingering shots, there's also some great camerawork here that really shows off the scale of the universe and combines with the largely excellent voiceover work to make for a pretty solid way of delivering the game's plotline.

The plotline itself is fairly unremarkable, covering territory to do with the use of alien technology by a shadowy syndicate in Earth's solar system, the wormhole your father's spaceship disappeared through when you were still a child, and other such Shocking Revelations. Perhaps we're just jaded by too much SF, but it all seemed terribly predictable, although it's competently written stuff which acceptably fills a gap between majestic space battles.

Lost in Space

'Nexus - The Jupiter Incident' Screenshot 5

Despite its unquestionably high production values, excellent graphics and keenly realised battle simulations, Nexus feels like a little bit of a disappointment. The first couple of hours of the game are fantastic, as you're introduced to the universe, the ships, the stunning battles and the interesting gameplay, but for the average strategy fan, the realisation that the game is all about increasingly complex micro-management of your ships and crew is something of a let-down.

This game will unquestionably appeal to those who enjoyed the likes of Starfleet Command, and it has plenty to offer to fans of space opera type games as well - boasting as it does a great, if sadly limited, tactical gameplay system, graphics which make Homeworld 2 look like one of Cinderella's less aesthetically pleasing siblings and the potential for some excellent multiplayer if you can hook up with some friends in-game. For most strategy gamers, though, it's a curiosity - a well-crafted, incredibly good looking curiosity, but not one that's got what it takes to hold your attention for much past the first couple of hours.

Shop for games now with Simply Games.

7 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy
Picture of Rob.

About Rob Fahey

Rob Fahey is a former editor of GamesIndustry.biz who spent several years living in Japan and probably still has a mint condition Dreamcast Samba de Amigo set.

Read more articles from Rob by visiting the Rob Fahey archive page.

You may also like...

Comments (23) Latest comment 7 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • UncleLou #1 7 years ago

    Well done EG, reviews of Flatout and Nexus, two games I am really interested in. before anyone else, and before they are even released. Thanks. \o/

    Just a shame that Nexus sounds a bit tedious, then. :-/


  • UncleLou #2 7 years ago

    graphics which make Homeworld 2 look like one of Cinderella's less aesthetically pleasing siblings

    Oh, one more thing: judging by the screenshots, Nexus might be technically superior, but aesthetically, Homeworld 2 is hard to beat, imo.

  • pjmaybe #3 7 years ago

    The demo was a pain in the arse, control systems were dire - but oh god it's a beautiful game to look at on a decent rig.

    I'd agree that it looks better than Homeworld, certainly far superior "spacey" graphics and definitely better texturing on the ships but then Homeworld 2 is getting on a bit now.


    Peej

  • Macross #4 7 years ago

    I love space games, but no one ever seems to make them anymore let alone great ones :(

    bastards.

    long live freespace, homeworld & xwing alliance!

  • UncleLou #5 7 years ago

    but then Homeworld 2 is getting on a bit now.


    No, it's not.

    /sulks

  • Blerk #6 7 years ago

    Oooh... pretty.

    /checks PC
    /goes back to Elite

  • pjmaybe #7 7 years ago

    Don't get me wrong, I love Homeworld - I think like Lutzie I was rather more looking to this to be the next Freespace, but it ain't.

    It's not the next Elite either...

    Peej

  • prettyboytim #8 7 years ago

    Dammit, I want to see a space game in which space looks like space.

    Space should be mainly black.
    The lighting should be harsh, like in 2001 : A Space Odyssee.

    Grrr

  • commander dixon #9 7 years ago

    i will try the demo
    homeworld was great, huge
    homeworl 2 was disappointing IMHO (too hard to finish)

  • Clive_Dunn #10 7 years ago

    Homeworld 2 was far too easy to complete - only 14 or so missions.

  • Taximan #11 7 years ago

    Wether or not it was too hard or too easy depends on if you finished it before or after the patch :)

  • volb #12 7 years ago

    Space should be mainly black.
    The lighting should be harsh, like in 2001 : A Space Odyssee.

    People should look at the screenshots on the back of the box and be greeted with white shapes on a mostly black background.
    Oh, and game devs should be homeless.

  • spelk #13 7 years ago

    I can see where all the Homeworld comparisons and the other space games come into the chat, but Nexus wasn't designed to compete with those games at all. More to complement them. You have control at a totally different level. Its more in the cockpit as a commander of the ship - and the mention of the Starfleet Command games are much more of a truer comparison for Nexus.

    It always was going to be more niche than the likes of Homeworld. This isn't RTS. This is battle simulator. And subsequently I think you'll find it will gain a loyal following of gamers who appreciate this style of play. It fills a gap in the whole space game genre really, because the Starfleet games are long in the tooth, and are definitely showing their age and their reliance on a specifically branded space opera theme (Star Trek Universe).

    What wasn't mentioned in Rob's review of the game was the possiblities for dedicated mod coders to use the Nexus engine to develop specific branded mods for the popular space TV shows. Star Trek, Battlestar Galactica, Babylon 5, even Star Wars could all show up and be realised using the Nexus developers toolkit (that is freely available with the game). So Nexus looks gorgeous, plays to the strengths of large scale space combat simulation, and can be modded with a serious mod community for longevity. It'll sail on by in the game shops obviously, overlooked by most gamers, but it will have a following and a good lifespan simply because its moddable.

  • Clive_Dunn #14 7 years ago

    Well I'm going to get this, I loved SFC 1 & 2 ( 3 was horrible ) and Fighting Steel so I think this game will suit me.

  • Spanky #15 7 years ago

    If this game needs one thing its a time increase key, i gave up on it last night, i'm only a few missions in and am having to take out a couple of cruisers, some people might like to watch ships circling each other firing the same weapons for 23 mins while it plays itself out, i on the other hand cannot be arsed. Not only does it take ages to take a ship down, the ships also have a hard time taking specific commands, telling it to focus on one ship and it sort of heads towards it till it decides it'd rather take out the other ship, about turn, goes the wrong way. Pain in the arse and utterly frustrating.

  • Lutz #16 7 years ago

    ...
    It's not freespace...

    :(

  • Clive_Dunn #17 7 years ago

    Well I'm really enjoying it, manually controlling the ships targeting is the way to go.

    Looks beautiful, but there isn't a visible damage model on the ships. Bit of a disappointment for such a stunning engine.

    No 23 minute battles here Spanky, most are over in a couple of minutes. And I'm usually too busy micromanaging to notice.

  • Spanky #18 7 years ago

    Ach i'm just shite at it i guess, i don't think i understand the methods involved. I think i'm expecting it to do a lot of the work for me as i don't understand what its doing, especially when it doesn't seem to follow orders(even with focus).

    I'll wait on some cheats ;)

  • Hicksy #19 7 years ago

    worth £10 at play?

    /ponders

  • ave #20 7 years ago

    UNDOUBTEDLY worth 10 quid.

  • Xerx3s #21 7 years ago

    I luv the game but FFS! CANT THEY PROGRAM AI????????????????????!!!!!!

    I mean, how hard can it be for a ship just to follow a order "move to point"?

    I select some ships, and click them on att. enemy. What do they do? Do they unleash their well ballanced load of super weapons and make the enemy shit in his pants?

    Well actually, the enemy does shit in his pants, cause hes laughing his arse off! Instead of moving towards the enemy and attacing it, they use the clever distraction tactics of "turning around you own axis and not planning to shoot some1, ever", "moving the entire opposite direction" (also known as the "turntailandrunyoucoward" tactic) and of course, the alltime classic "dont do anything at all and pretend that your deff".

    These tactics leave the enemy in their underpantsu's, looking for a bigger evil masterplan that actually doesnt excist.

    IRmC.
    Edited by 1 at 05/01/05 @ 15:06

  • Xerx3s #22 7 years ago

    Hmm, then can you explain me where im a moron when i command my ships to attac shields (armed with antishield weapons and all settings optimised) and then they go the other way? Does that make me a moron? Because if so, wtf does it make you for making such a stupid remark?

    In case you didnt notice with your single shared braincell, i LIKE the game but i was just commenting on the poor pathfinding AI.

  • mustardkid #23 7 years ago

    i'm enjoying this ... but .... the voice acting is hilarious, its an epic production with a school play cast ... doh