Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Quantum of Solace: The Game Review

Xbox 360 PlayStation 3 Review by Kristan Reed

3 November, 2008

Page 2 of 2. <- Page 1

Once in a while though, it hits upon something genuinely interesting, like a good set-piece. Having to guide a drugged-out Bond out of Casino Royale itself is a particular highlight, as is the Venice level set in the crumbling building and the one set on a train. But these bits are far too rare to elevate the overall quality of the experience and distract you from the mediocrity surrounding them, and for the most part you're funneled through corridors instead, dispatching brainless enemies and wondering whether EA would have done a better job after all.

To give Treyarch credit where it's due, Quantum of Solace does at least look presentable throughout, although it's a dinner jacket rather than a dinner jacket. Daniel Craig's likeness is genuinely excellent, and the seamless way the game employs the cover system is a useful (and convenient) means of ensuring the star gets enough time on-screen. The levels are also reasonably detailed, with a good deal of variety ensuring the Call of Duty 4 engine is given a run for its money, with over-the-top explosive effects and loads of destructible objects throughout, so you won't be complaining much about the way it looks, or the way it sounds either.

In fact, the audio chaps can skip detention entirely, with an array of excellent voice talent contributing to slick mission briefings, mid-mission chatter and plenty of incidentals. The soundtrack's great too, so in certain respects the game does its job of creating a suitable atmosphere. It's just a shame the core gameplay's so vapid and uninspired, and not helped at all by the utterly confusing way the narrative flits around the timeline of both Casino Royale and its sequel. If you're not a student of Bond, you will neither know, nor probably care why, in the middle of the game, you're suddenly thrown into flashback, or playing bits of the Casino Royale timeline which didn't make it into the film.

'Quantum of Solace: The Game' Screenshot 3

Use some cover Mr. Terrorist!

And while we're not ones to complain too much when games are short these days, in this case Quantum of Solace is unacceptably brief. Clocking in at around the five to six hours even for cack-handed old grumps like me, you could clear the single-player campaign in a single evening without breaking a sweat. Sometimes it's great for a game to be on the short side if it's crafted and poetic (ICO, for instance), and massively replayable (Portal), but that's never the case here. Some of the Achievements (like taking out a posse of snipers with one bullet each) are a nice touch, but enough to make you want to play it again?

Inevitably at this point there's always a chance for the multiplayer to help save face, and Bond does passably. Among all the standard modes are a couple that stand out - there's Bond Vs, for instance, where one person plays as 007 trying to disarm bombs placed by players representing the 'Organisation' - and the popular Golden Gun mode also makes an appearance, giving one player Saruman's one-shot-killer and everyone else the rank-and-file. Meanwhile, Bond Evasion mode is pretty good, with players trying to escort a VIP between locations. The weapon upgrade system, meanwhile, gives the multiplayer side a bit of longevity, with cash-based unlocks allowing you to customise weapons with a series of attachments, and improve reload times and damage levels. It's all too little, too late, though, and struggles to escape the stigma of the rest.

'Quantum of Solace: The Game' Screenshot 4

If Bond walked into his local Sainsbury's he would probably find at least 16 things to blow up. It's the rule of 007, apparently.

That's because in a genre as super-competitive as the shooter, it's easy for minor elements to prove to be the deciding factor, but when it comes to Quantum of Solace, the problems are blatant and fundamental. As a piece of interactive merchandise for the masses, it does its job: it's polished, intuitive to control, and approximates the Bond Experience, albeit with about as much subtlety as Vesper Lynd's neckline. For everyone else though, it's brainless, dull, and ridiculously easy. Rather than giving the Bond game its Casino Royale moment, Activision and Treyarch have simply carried on in the joyless tradition of dumbed-down shooters designed for thickos, and GoldenEye has never seemed so far away.

5/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Quantum of Solace: The Game on Xbox 360/PlayStation 3?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 91 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
RedPanda
03/11/08 @ 13:21
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Fantastic! Another game off the list - my bank balance breathes a sigh of relief
the_dudefather
03/11/08 @ 13:21
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
the game's bland, james bland

edit:
'although it's a dinner jacket rather than a dinner jacket'

what?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 03/11/08 @ 13:25
Der_tolle_Emil
03/11/08 @ 13:22
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So we're back to the good old days of traditional movie tie-ins.
Trane
03/11/08 @ 13:22
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Meh, when are they finally going to release a decent bond tie-in?
Darren
03/11/08 @ 13:23
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
C'mon... we all knew it wasn't going to be good, didn't we? Just because the game uses the CoD4 engine, doesn't guarantee it will be good... not when Treyarch are behind it! ;)
Azazel
03/11/08 @ 13:23
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Quelle surprise.
Mentalist(air)
03/11/08 @ 13:26
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"it's a dinner jacket rather than a dinner jacket"

donkey jacket?
dr_faulk
03/11/08 @ 13:26
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
oh w0w lol sum oF d gRphX are TEH BEZT!
turnget2005
03/11/08 @ 13:27
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
still it was better than halo 3! :)
BartonFink
03/11/08 @ 13:30
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
penhalion
03/11/08 @ 13:31
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Much like the actual movie then. No gadgets, a thug version of bond and no real plot to speak of.

Why the heck is the evil organisation called quantum of solace instead of specter. Who's idiotic idea was that. An organisation who's name means an infinetesimally small amount of solitude WTF
septimus
03/11/08 @ 13:31
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Horrid game, thanks Gamestation for allowing returns!
DFawkes
03/11/08 @ 13:32
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I have to echo the_dudefather - "although it's a dinner jacket rather than a dinner jacket. " means what? I'm easily confused at the best of times, but I read that one bit several times to see if I could get it. I can't.

I'm hoping the Wii version won't just be a broken version of this. Please.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 03/11/08 @ 13:32
FWB
03/11/08 @ 13:32
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Barton: That's a joke, right?
Gremmi
03/11/08 @ 13:34
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Why the heck is the evil organisation called quantum of solace instead of specter. Who's idiotic idea was that. An organisation who's name means an infinetesimally small amount of solitude WTF"

Partly because it's a reboot, partly because the rights of SPECTRE were a hotly contested issue. Additionally, the group is just called Quantum, not Quantum of Solace.
Gremmi
03/11/08 @ 13:35
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Also the Dinner Jacket line is referencing something in Casino Royale - "There are Dinner Jackets and then there are Dinner Jackets".

Obviously the emphasis is somewhat lost in plain text.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 03/11/08 @ 13:36
Lebowski
03/11/08 @ 13:38
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Give the lad Sackboy a dinner jacket, he'll make a good Bond game.
dr_faulk
03/11/08 @ 13:40
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What did everyone think of the film? I thought it was singularly boring. What a waste.
BartonFink
03/11/08 @ 13:40
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@FWB - nope apparently not.
Check it out http://www.officialnintendomagazine.co.uk/
Edited 1 times, most recently on 03/11/08 @ 13:45
designerheadache
03/11/08 @ 13:41
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
crap like the film then
theiceman
03/11/08 @ 13:42
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
OUCH! worse than goldeneye i see. I am now officially worried about COD:WAW.

when is a dinner jacket not a dinner jacket?

when eurogamer says so.
the_dudefather
03/11/08 @ 13:42
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Gremmi

ahhhhhhh

add italics to review please EG :)
Fab4
03/11/08 @ 13:44
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Game spin-off from movie, in mediocrity shocker!
tiddles
03/11/08 @ 13:45
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
er, did "Saruman" really have a golden gun? I missed that bit in LOTR... Scaramanga must be jealous! :P
Gremmi
03/11/08 @ 13:45
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The thing that annoyed me most about the game was that all the interesting setpieces (including the entirety of the car chases) were shown as low-quality pre-rendered cutscenes. Though I suppose, like most Bond games, they couldn't adequately do a combination of driving, shooting, flying etc so decided not to bother.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 03/11/08 @ 13:46
Rodafowa
03/11/08 @ 13:49
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"I want a quantum of solace
But no more than a quantum
I know they do big bags of solace
But I don't want 'em..."
3TPete
03/11/08 @ 13:52
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
..and the popular Golden Gun mode also makes an appearance, giving one player Saruman's one-shot-killer

eh?

have I missed the Lord of the Rings/ Bond crossover film?

\tiddles got there first
Edited 1 times, most recently on 03/11/08 @ 13:53
Norfolk'n'Clue
03/11/08 @ 13:53
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Trane - what do you mean 'finally' release a decent Bond game. Did you not play Goldeneye on the N64?
PatrickEwing
03/11/08 @ 13:54
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I can testify that this is the shortest SP game I've ever played, 4 and a half hours in and you've suddenly completed it, effing rip off. there are some nice touches in it however. Who wants to swap this and one of my finest camels for Dead Space?
Marshall2008
03/11/08 @ 13:55
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Game isn't as bad as they say. Not a keeper by any means but definitley worth playing through.

One thing this game is though is WAY better than the movie. QoS is a stinking pile of shit compared to Casino Royale. Theres about 10 action sequences punctuated with little dialogue and even less story. I would give the game 6.5 and the movie 4 or 5 out of 10.
PearOfAnguish
03/11/08 @ 13:56
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well, that was completely expected. Did anyone think this was going to be good?

Partly because it's a reboot, partly because the rights of SPECTRE were a hotly contested issue. Additionally, the group is just called Quantum, not Quantum of Solace.

And maybe because the name SPECTRE is silly.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 03/11/08 @ 14:00
Trigga_Tybalt
03/11/08 @ 13:56
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i hear ya red panda. i was getting worried this might be good and worth buying.
Joco84
03/11/08 @ 13:58
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Played the PS3 version at the weekend, thought it was dull and severly lacking in anything interesting.

Whats more, the graphics were terrible. While I don't usually think GFX make or break a game, when it looks worse than CoD2 from years ago, you have to start wondering just what the hell happened.

40 quid saved for me, thanks a lot Treyarch!
mazzl
03/11/08 @ 13:59
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
haven't seen the movie yet, the game does look nice, but euro 59 for 8 hours of mediocre fun is a bit much.
jstar
03/11/08 @ 14:05
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
amusingly one of the broadsheets said this was brilliant. I still wonder why the main stream press even bothers to review games. They obviously just get some chump to do it who wants to be a ploitical correspondent and is willing to do anything. Probably tries to shave with his PSP before cracking an egg on top of his non-stick PS3 Pan before settling down to write a review.

Saw the film last night. It's rubbish.
FWB
03/11/08 @ 14:08
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Then the Wii looks shockingly bad.
Meho
03/11/08 @ 14:10
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
On PC the game is... how shall I put it... As if made for three year olds... I've probably never made so many headshots in a FPS game and you barely have to bother aiming because even blindfiring from cover will kill the thugs most of the time. The graphics are silly and the level design is lke something out of 2001. There is very little challenge and even less freedom to improvise (I mean, why even bother shooting the explosive barrels and such when the ehemies are easily dispatched as it is, except, of course, to shorten the experience...) However the game DOES throw a lot of explosions around and designed to be idiot friendly, I guess it's a good starting point for newcomers to the genre... Er... this is about as nice as I could come up with.
Mogs
03/11/08 @ 14:13
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Any game based on a film that is made to tie in with said film's cinematic release is doomed from the start due to rushed development. That's why such games are universally meh if not LOL!
Toothball
03/11/08 @ 14:13
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was in Gamestation on Thursday. The girl behind the counter was like "Quantum of Solace is out tomorrow! It's the best Bond game yet!".

"Better than Goldeneye?", I asked.

"Well...", came the answer. Then she tried to sell me Fallout instead.
paulf
03/11/08 @ 14:26
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
the review is a bit harsh imo, tune the difficulty level up from easy to agent or 00 level (the hardest 2 settings) and you will have much more of a challenge on your hands, sure it is linear but on these difficulty settings the game creates a good sense of urgency and danger, and on certain levels I found myself swearing at the deviousness of the ai. The online multiplayer is solid too its not a great game by any means but a 6 or 7 would of been a fairer reflection
Razorus
03/11/08 @ 14:30
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Obvious Phail. And the film was a shitty mess too!
PearOfAnguish
03/11/08 @ 14:32
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
KingsXKing, you make no sense.
kinky_mong
03/11/08 @ 14:39
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'll echo what has been said that the game must be very faithful to the film because that deserved 5 out of 10 too.
Hog-lumps
03/11/08 @ 14:46
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
er, did "Saruman" really have a golden gun? I missed that bit in LOTR... Scaramanga must be jealous! :P

Wasn't scaramanga and Saruman both played by the same actor (Christopher Lee) though? If so, aren't EG just being facetious with their saruman comment?
siro
03/11/08 @ 15:04
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh my, I get really good at predicting scores. :)
krudster [mod]
03/11/08 @ 15:06
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yes, the Saruman comment is related to Christoper Lee. It's deliberate.
Gremmi
03/11/08 @ 15:12
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"@pearofanguish

"To give Treyarch credit where it's due, Quantum of Solace does at least look presentable throughout, although it's a dinner jacket rather than a dinner jacket."

If this makes sense to you im happy you fuckwit"

If you read the rest of the comments thread, you'll see where I pointed out what this means.
Gremmi
03/11/08 @ 15:14
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"First things first: we must apologise for the absence of Quantum of Solace and Red Alert 3 reviews. They are in progress, and will be up as soon as humanly possible (probably Monday morning), but they won't be done before the games' release tomorrow.

Saddest of all, we only have ourselves to blame. The Eurogamer Expo meant we weren't in the office much this week, and so we couldn't hunt down review code when the PRs dragged their feet. There were some extenuating circumstances. EA sent Red Alert 3 to my Mum's house, brilliantly, and for the second week running Activision only distributed review copies of a shifty-looking licensed game at the last second - whatever could it mean? (Presumably the total absence of Crash Bandicoot code is another good sign too). But we can't blame all that. We're just rubbish. Leave in droves. That's what we'd do."
krudster [mod]
03/11/08 @ 15:14
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Gremmi explained it perfectly. If you know the dialogue in the movie, you'll know what the comment in the review refers to. Tom added in the gag and decided it didn't need italics. I can see why people would read it and think it was a mistake.
Quint2020
03/11/08 @ 15:17
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I bet this a really fun, if a little unoriginal shooter that deserves about a 7, sort of like Timeshift.

Comments: 1-50 of 91 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery