You may also like...
-
Warp Review
-
Why Can't Games Do Sex?
-
Remedy's message to Alan Wake PC pirates: "enjoy the story!"
-
The Kickstarter Conundrum
-
Assassin's Creed 3 release date announced
-
Dear Esther Review
-
Full-length Far Cry 3 cinematic trailer
-
NCsoft confirms Guild Wars 2 on console
-
Alan Wake PC version footage
-
Huge range of PlayStation 2 Classics storm European PlayStation store
-
Japan PlayStation Vita sales at lowest ever weekly total
-
Indie game Dear Esther profitable in less than six hours
-
Assassin's Creed Revelations getting Desmond single-player DLC
-
Bethesda on Skyrim's viewable Morrowind, Cyrodiil: "maybe we'll use it one day"
-
App of the Day: Tongue Tied!
-
Valve selling a virtual Team Fortress 2 ring for $100
-
Syndicate launch trailer blasts out the dubstep
-
Solitaire Blitz Preview: Why PopCap's Approach to Facebook Gaming is Anything But Casual
-
Capcom registers new Darkstalkers trademark
-
Notch can match Schafer's $13m Psychonauts 2 budget valuation
-
UFC Undisputed 3 Review
-
PS3 exclusive JRPG Ni No Kuni out in Europe Q1 2013
-
Far Cry 3 release date revealed by leaked trailer
-
The Walking Dead screenshots shamble in
-
Ubisoft and TrackMania dev announce ShootMania Storm














Comments (50) Latest comment 4 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Craig though, he's...just....not...bond.
I'm not saying Casino Royale was a bad film, it wasn't. Sure he's not George Lazenby, but like Pierce he has just got something missing that Sean (god), Roger and (IMO) Tim brought to Bond.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Tim? are u kidding. thought George was better then him. Least we knew George couldnt act ;) whats tim's excuse?
(lol love how am calling them by first names as if i know them heh)
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Having grown up with bond movies I totally agree with you. Bond was never about the grit and violence. It was always about a british agent with charm, style, a wicked sense of humour and a gadget for all occasions. He always got the girl (though never kept her) and saved the day. Pierce was a good bond but, a little too charming without portraying that steel edge that Sean and Roger had. You could never quite believe he'd kill you where as with Sean, you just knew he was coiled for action even when sipping a martini. Craig just comes across as a violent thug to be honest.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
OK forget Living Daylights :) License To Kill though is great Bond and Daltons performance (apparently) is closer to Flemings Bond than anything, even the great god Connery. In terms of style of Bond I'd say Craig's Bond has more in common with Daltons than anyones.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Do you know that (so I've heard) Moore needed a stunt double for scenes with fast walking.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
LOL, thats hilarious
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Yeah it made me laugh when I heard it, still great though. The only bad Bond has been Lazenby, Well maybe the original Casino Royale :(
http://www .youtube.com/watch?v=xEnoKqiGJFI
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Exactly. While Fleming would certainly not approve of Bond's reworked background, he always wrote the character as a callous sadist. I'm sure that's not how he saw him, given that Fleming was a rather reactionary old Imperial warhorse, but that's how the character appears today. Casino Royale is the first Bond movie in years to draw its tone from the books rather than the girls, gadgets, glib remarks that Hollywood foisted on the character.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Just you. Casino Royale was the kick up the arse the franchise needed.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
As for Tim & Moore? Don't make me LOL, they were both dires, especially moore. The guy was pure cheese.
I'm a connery fan (as an actor, not even as a bond), but people say he's the best simply because he was the first.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
There's some truth in this. It's also notable that Daniel Craig is the first actor to inherit the role with no residual baggage - they were reinventing the character, so there was less pressure to follow what people popularly think of as "Bond-like". Connery was the only other actor to start with such a blank slate.
I'm actually surprised that Casino Royale did so well. Die Another Day was the most successful Bond film ever, in terms of box office, yet it's an absolutely awful film on pretty much every level. I was convinced that the general public were quite happy to see Bond in any old shite.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
What have you not seen the Tomb Raider films !
;)
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'm hoping they can add a bit of the same magic that Rare applied all those years ago.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Just you. Casino Royale was the kick up the arse the franchise needed.
It needed a kick, but that film was more like a limp slap across the shin. It still came across as dated, weak and targeted at 13yr olds. Lots of people loved it at the cinema, got caught up in the hype and were pleased to hear how it'd become more action blah blah. But when you watch it again, it pales to most other action films. Bourne is much more interesting to watch (apart from the last one). Different films I know, but I didn't roll my eyes as much when watching Bourne. Differing opinions I guess.
Anhoooo I digress. The game? Bet it'll be average. So hard to make good games from films... too many cooks involved in final decision making process.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The lighting on this looks a few notches below what Infinity Ward managed to extract from the engine.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Your a knob head....thats all.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Oh and Dalton was the WORST - Bond needs to be a bit sleazy and Dalton was nothing more than wet and a bit girly.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Oh right, because the PC has had LOADS of good games in the past 2 - 5 years.
*snigger*
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
*snigger*"
a) It's not about what good games the PC has or hasn't had, the fact is PC reviewers are frequently a lot tougher on multiformat FPS titles. Look at the ratings Halo 2 got compared to its Xbox outing. There are a great many more shooters on PC so only the very best are rated highly. And all too often console ports suffer on a technical level. The main target for QOS is going to be the mass console market, which increases the likelihood that the PC version will be an afterthought.
b) Crysis, Sam 'n' Max, World of Warcraft, Gothic 3, EVE, Trackmania, Battlefield, Flight Sim X, Half-Life 2, Company of Heroes, STALKER, Civ 4, Titan Quest, Unreal Tournament, The Witcher, World in Conflict, Guild Wars, Trials 2, Dark Messiah, Football Manager...and a fuck-ton of others. You're right, there has been no good games on the PC at all!
*snigger* *snigger* *snigger*
Comment below viewing threshold Show
(steps out of time-machine)
Comment below viewing threshold Show
*snigger - shudders at the thought of RPGs*
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Yes, because your dislike of a genre means they are all bad games. Well done.
And is the *snigger* meant to be clever? Because it makes you sound like a ten year old having an argument in the playground.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
/repeat X100hrs
Enjoy your games, I do mine. :)
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Now back to the playground with you.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'm not saying Casino Royale was a bad film, it wasn't. Sure he's not George Lazenby, but like Pierce he has just got something missing that Sean (god), Roger and (IMO) Tim brought to Bond.
Roger? Roger Moore was only a step removed from Austin Powers by the end.
"Prediction 6-7/10 on Xbox and PS3, 4-6/10 on PC."
Oh right, because the PC has had LOADS of good games in the past 2 - 5 years.
*snigger*
Even if it wasn't a fact that the PC has had loads of good games over the last 2-5 years, you're still missing the point entirely. Consoles - or at least using a gamepad - require different design to PC games, especially for FPS'. A game ported over to PC is never going to be able to take advantage of the different controls (for example, using vertical movement/aiming when placing enemies or allowing for more precise aiming - see Halo) in the same way as an FPS designed for the controls is. So it's going to place lower in the overall rankings (much in the same was as a console FPS which failed to use the gamepad properly would).
Comment below viewing threshold Show