Jump to navigation
Also on the site...
Advertisement

PS3 WipEout HD ads causing problems? News

PlayStation 3 News by Robert Purchese

4 August, 2009

Brand new WipEout HD in-game advertising may be causing load times to double before races begin.

A comparison video on YouTube (spotted by IndustryGamers) shows a clear difference of around 10 seconds between loading a level with no adverts and one with.

In-game ad agency Double Fusion announced the WipEout HD deal yesterday. The video adverts, we were told, will be restricted to loading screens. One obvious conclusion is that load-times are being prolonged so the adverts more exposure and a better chance at being absorbed.

So far this is unconfirmed, although we have approached both Sony and Double Fusion for comment. Eurogamer's resident blacksmith of the future, Digital Foundry, is having a look at the performance allegation as well.

Meanwhile, Double Fusion plans similar adverts for a further "handful" of premium PS3 games by the end of the year.

Advertisement

Are you excited about WipEout HD: Fury on PlayStation 3?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Related Games

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-28 of 28 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
LiveForever
04/08/09 @ 08:56
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If true this is really gona help the PS3 sales.
woodnotes
04/08/09 @ 09:02
#3
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
TTP makes an impressive rush from GAF with his Sony defence.
schnide
04/08/09 @ 09:03
#5
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
BOYCOTT. With the 360 dashboard ads as well, this thing is clearly trying to become a trend. We may not be able to hold it off forever, but we can hold it off for now.
Miths
04/08/09 @ 09:05
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
There's a 21 pages thread about it on the WipEout Zone forum (started July 30) so you would sort of think there might be something to it.
I haven't dived into online yet - nor bothered to read said thread - so I can't say what is or isn't true.
septimus
04/08/09 @ 09:07
#7
+16
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If true, utterly disgusting. I paid for Wipeout HD, I don't want adverts shoved down my throat. Either free updates with adverts or paid with no adverts. FFS.

/moving house so don't have time to check for myself...
Edited 1 times, most recently on 04/08/09 @ 10:09
Dizzy
04/08/09 @ 09:09
#8
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Great! I hope this is not a sign of thing to come. Pay for something and get long loading times? It doesn't make sense. Only turn on ads in demo ffs.
mr_bez
04/08/09 @ 09:11
#9
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't know how they justify adding adverts in the first place. Fair enough having ads in a product to begin with, but if you've already bought an ad-free product, it should stay that way. Are they going to start adding commercial breaks to Sony Blurays next via BD-Live?
Widge
04/08/09 @ 09:13
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I remember a mate saying he saw ads come into gaming with Splinter Cell on PC many years back. I forget which one.

Still, OUTRAGE ra ra ra.
Dizzy
04/08/09 @ 09:16
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"I remember a mate saying he saw ads come into gaming with Splinter Cell on PC many years back"

Yeah that was Gilette I think. Was a bit annoying.
Steroyd
04/08/09 @ 09:18
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Youtube clip is dodgy, I don't ever remember the loading bar not filling up to the other end like that.
skillian
04/08/09 @ 09:18
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"In 2005, spending on in-game advertising was US $56 million, and this figure is estimated to grow to $1.8 billion by 2010 according to Massive Incorporated,[1] although Yankee Group gives a lower estimate at $732 million."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-game_adv...

Yes, this is a sign of things to come.
photoboy
04/08/09 @ 09:22
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Dizzy

Don't forget Splinter Cell Chaos Theory which had close-ups on packets of Airwaves chewing gum in every cut-scene! :)

Given that in the UK many broadband providers provide fixed download limits a month e.g. 3GB, it seems a bit poor to me that Sony would use up people's bandwidth with video adverts. Still, if the adverts are being streamed the answer is to get yourself a good router that lets you block specific IPs and IP ranges and block the game from being able to download its adverts! ;)
kangarootoo
04/08/09 @ 09:23
#15
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@TTP

You will have seen the other article by now of course. Good work Watson.
kangarootoo
04/08/09 @ 09:24
#16
-3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Don't forget Splinter Cell Chaos Theory which had close-ups on packets of Airwaves chewing gum in every cut-scene! :)"

Did anyone really genuinely care about those packets of gum? I can't believe anyone was really bothered except those that set out to be bothered.
skillian
04/08/09 @ 09:27
#17
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Did anyone really genuinely care about those packets of gum?

Yes! It was the most jarring advert I have ever seen in a game, and utterly ridiculous in context.

I'd say that if you're not bothered about that example then you're simply not bothered by advertising in games in general, because that was about as bad as it gets.
designerheadache
04/08/09 @ 09:31
#18
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I can totally understand advertising on the PSN store, or even "some targeted ads"to the XMB (although i wouldnt like it) considering that the PSN is free.

But to put advertising in a game You Paid For is just plain dumb.
SL33PY
04/08/09 @ 09:35
#19
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Vistrix
04/08/09 @ 09:36
#20
-7
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sony fixed this before this article was posted... TTP was right guys.
Schiraman
04/08/09 @ 09:51
#21
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Regardless of the ads causing problems, there shouldn't be any ads in the first place. Having ads in a game you've paid for is bad enough, but sneakily adding them in an update so you don't even have a chance to vote with your wallet is really low.
Vistrix
04/08/09 @ 09:54
#22
-4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@MilkybKid1985 Its not true hough. The article is wrong... Sony fixed this problem last night, very promptly.

It may of been true yesterday, so the article was false to begin with.

EG should update the original article.
brof
04/08/09 @ 09:58
#23
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
loading times is the most sensible thing ... if you prolong them just to show the ads longer, then this is a very, very bad decission...
sarcasmoidosis
04/08/09 @ 11:55
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"But to put advertising in a game You Paid For is just plain dumb."

Um.. don't you pay for TV? Or magazines?
ZenithPuzzle
04/08/09 @ 12:07
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Yes! It was the most jarring advert I have ever seen in a game, and utterly ridiculous in context. "

I got that experience when playing Mercenaries 2 and all the billboards in the game were advertising the new Wolverine movie. Looked really silly.
Zebula77
04/08/09 @ 12:07
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Umm, haven't seen ads, and I got the update when it came out. Am I blind?!?
sarcasmoidosis
04/08/09 @ 12:10
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"slightly bad example i know as some of the licence fee money does go to the other chans but you get the point!"

That was my point too. There are things that pride themselves on not having adverts (HBO and such), but paying for something does not guarantee that it's advert free. The Super Bowl is pay-per-view and it has really expensive ads. But increasing loading times for ads IS wrong :)
el_pollo_diablo
04/08/09 @ 12:49
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Not unlike splitting articles up on a website over 3 pages to triple impressions then.

:-D

Comments: 1-28 of 28 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery