Retrospective: Project Eden

Savage garden.

Games reveal a lot about humans. Action games? They exist because we can't get enough of violence. Experience points and achievements? Our brains are so hard-coded with the idea of incentives that we get a quiet, bottomless thrill from watching numbers increase. God games? Best not think about that one. But we must face up to the truth: as a species, we are fruity and doomed.

However, there is one noble trait that games expose about us, which is how we're drawn to explore. Look how compulsive roguelikes are. These are games which only ever end in you dying alone hundreds of feet beneath the world's surface, yet we find ourselves pulled down those same shadowy staircases over and over again. The unknown has a grip like a bear trap on our imagination.

It was Project Eden's roguelike narrative that I found most interesting back in 2001, and I still love it now. The idea is that in the future humanity takes to building cities vertically, with the stratospheric upper stories acting as the prime real estate and the endless lower levels gradually descending first into poverty, resentment, and finally abandonment.

Except something's stirring down there in the dark. The player in Project Eden controls an entire squad from the Urban Protection Agency, an organisation that comes across as quite slick despite being the worrying combination of a police force and call-out handymen.

The game opens with your guys en route to investigate the disappearance of a couple of technicians working at the Real Meat Company, where Something Has Gone Terribly Wrong. It quickly drags you further and further down.

1

For a sci-fi game based around the conceit of weird future building materials that allow cities to grow vertically, I'm realising now that there are a lot of bricks and wood here. Maybe the bricks made of a rare cortosis weave, or something.

You end up following the trail of the technicians down into the research lab of Real Meat. Then you follow their captors down into the unfinished building site beneath that. And then down, down and down again, through empty apartments, a barren car park, a looted shopping mall and much more, all with the creeping sense that you're leading your team further and further away from the gleaming safety of civilisation.

In a sense Project Eden was a game of urban exploration before it came into vogue and hipsters the world over began snagging their jeans on fences just to upload a photo of a water-damaged piano to Flickr. It's also a game with an emphasis on verticality before it became an industry buzzword.

At the time the only thing anybody had to say about Project Eden was that it was a spiritual successor to the ancient, venerable Blizzard game The Lost Vikings, which is partly true. The Lost Vikings gave players a team consisting of a fast viking with a pointy helmet (Erik), a fat viking with a shield (Olaf) and an angry viking with all the weapons (Baleog) and in requiring players to use these various abilities in tandem and in a careful order, it turned traditional-looking platform levels into intricate, head-scratching puzzles.

Going back, it's easy to see that Project Eden doesn't even come close to reaching the puzzle-related highs of The Lost Vikings. It never coughs up those glorious moments where you're left staring at all the pieces of a problem, mentally moving your team about like jigsaw pieces to try and solve it. But then, I'm not sure it's fair to compare the two directly. While solutions in Project Eden are almost always less chin-strokingly teasing and often rely on you simply spying something in your environment, they're also that much more believable.

You're not using Baleog to shoot an arrow at a switch so Erik can jump down and get a key which he'll give to Olaf who'll hang-glide down to a door that Baleog will run through and kill the monster on the other side so he can then pull a level that finally scratches Erik's arse. Project Eden wouldn't be seen dead prancing about arranging 14-step brainteasers like these.

Instead, it wants you to laboriously move a crane to fix a sparking control panel, or shoot out a wooden chock so a column falls down and becomes a bridge, or use a flying drone to turn off a conveyor belt from its distant control panel so you can run up it.

Project Eden doesn't just want to give you puzzles, it wants to convey an atmosphere of sci-fi spelunking. That's why co-operative puzzles often take a backseat to simply dropping into the shoes of your favourite team member and taking point as the lot of you navigate rickety scaffolding or have a few firefights, and that's why it's unfair to compare it to The Lost Vikings.

To say that Project Eden's lack of interest in traditional puzzles means the game isn't making the most of this four-character mechanic means you're failing to see this mechanic's subtleties. The benefits of giving the player a team to control instead of a lone explorer don't begin and end at contrived puzzles. Project Eden's limp combat is saved by the way your team all open fire at the moment you're ambushed, and more significantly the fact that you're swapping between perspectives forces you to see your team as individuals rather than faceless avatars.

The game's thick foreboding is heightened as you tug these lost men and women first through riotous explosions and destruction, and eventually down to where everything weak has already rotted away, leaving the stillness and moss of death.

Where Project Eden does fail is that despite this whole dramatic setup your team displays an icy, professional stoicism throughout the entire game, which robs them of the personality and chatter that should have been the game's driving force.

It would have created a perfect cycle - the team's despair would keep you playing, so you'd push the team deeper, and the team would go even madder. But outside of the scant, brief cut-scenes you might as well be steering around four robots. Although that's a poor choice of words - your robot, Amber, is actually the only distinctive character on your team.

2

In one other nod to The Lost Vikings, nobody can jump. Your team are more dignified than that, choosing to nose their way through filthy pipes instead.

Amber is a glance at what Project Eden should have been - as a kind of bulky sister to Robocop, Amber is only really used when you need someone to go wandering headfirst through fire, steam, noxious gas, electrified flooring or whatever other hazards you stumble across.

Poor Amber. It's hardly the most imaginative of talents, but compared to the rest of your tedious team (specialising as they do in repairing things, hacking things and, in your spectacularly underqualified commander's case, nothing but opening high clearance doors), Amber's a card. She also boasts a little rocket launcher in her wrist and she's so big that your viewpoint goes leaping up whenever you take control of her, making tight corridors seem that much more claustrophobic.

Why couldn't the rest of your team have received this kind of attention to detail? It wouldn't have taken much. Make nerdy Minoko a little smaller and faster, give tech-specialist Andre a stronger shield, lend captain Carter a first aid kit. And while you're at it, give the team some incidental chats to have as they probe the undercity.

There's one bit very early on where the destruction of a bridge ends up splitting your team in two, and you have to spend the better part of an hour trying to re-unite them. The level reaches a climax with the slightly drastic play of sending Minoko sprinting through a garbage crusher to the waiting arms of her friends. It's a powerful idea, but there's nowhere near enough of it throughout the game.

As much as I might want to distance Project Eden from The Lost Vikings, this is one lesson to which it could have paid more attention. The Lost Vikings had its protagonists bickering between levels, and this was all it took to give that game hopeless charm.

Once the player's under this spell, convinced of the personalities of their team, you don't even have to do anything - every trap or scrap of co-op becomes more engaging because it's happening to these characters the player's gotten to know.

The only other regret I have about Project Eden is that it ends in an overwhelmingly ninetie mutant laboratory, when really it should have had a final level set in some fossilised vision of the 21st century. Your shiny, tired future-squad could have ended up crawling through a compacted obstacle course of brittle cathedrals and mouldering pubs.

But then I'm just still trying to crowbar personality into a game which really doesn't seem to want it. Shame. The tiniest bit of heart in any creation goes such a long way.

Comments (43) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Haloboy #1 2 years ago

    I have nothing but great memories concerning this game. Always hoped for a second but then CORE went the way of the dodo.
  • Clive_Dunn #2 2 years ago

    I worked for Eidos when this was released, I remember about 5 people buying it. Shame on you all.
  • HermitArcader #3 2 years ago

    Post deleted at 09:17:39 22-12-2011
  • node #4 2 years ago

    Very much a lost gem. Not perfect by any means, but I just love games like this with four very different characters to flip between to move and solve puzzles with their unique abilities.

    They did a really nice job on this which really surprised me, even if the ending was a bit disappointing. I don't lame people for not buying it though, it's bit of a hard one to sell with either description or screen shots.
  • Benno #5 2 years ago

    I bought this, was a great little co-op multiplayer title when the lads were round
  • Benno #6 2 years ago

    PS, calling this retro makes me feel ooooooold
  • ardamillo #7 2 years ago

    I remember enjoying the character swapping puzzles in this but I never finished it. I think the environments all became a bit dull and samey after a while.
  • Stuz359 #8 2 years ago

    I think probably the concept was bit too soon for the developer to this justice. It was decent, but it just felt unpolished/unfinished despite the concept being rather good. Good ambition but I don't think the hardware could do justice to the concept.
  • HermitUK #9 2 years ago

    Have to say this is one that seems to have entirely passed me by - not sure how or why, either, as it sounds like something right up my street.

    I love the premise, though, both in terms of the vertical design and the character mechanics. It's a shame Core aren't around anymore - sounds like the sort of game crying out for someone to take another stab at the idea.
  • JayeM #10 2 years ago

    I bought it. I loved it.
  • JediMasterMalik #11 2 years ago

    I never did finish this game, but I said Holy shit when I saw this posted here. Fond memories indeed.
  • JamieR #12 2 years ago

    I had a love hate relationship with this game was fun but then id get stuck and stuck again and again but i didnt have the net back then now i can look up walkthough for games
  • CptSupermarket #13 2 years ago

    bought it, completed it, loved it. quintin can f off with his hate.
  • BlitzwingHaz #14 2 years ago

    I got this from Game for £3 years ago. Never really got into it. Feel a bit guilty now.
  • Testotm #15 2 years ago

    make a retrospective about one of the ultima games
  • spiritsnake #16 2 years ago

    Please do a retrospective on the metal gear games before ps1.
  • thehat #17 2 years ago

    I played this while living in a shared house, and the best thing I found at the time was its co-op. The team was split so that each player controlled 2 team members, so that as well as figuring out the puzzles you had to coordinate between you. Although this occasionally meant that one player had to be constantly swapping between his two characters while the other player did bugger all, it was generally a fantastic co-op experience that at the time we found comparable to Perfect Dark.
  • trip919 #18 2 years ago

    Got this game for a couple of quid the other day, after reading this article I'll be moving it up my list to play soon!
  • WinstonWolf #19 2 years ago

    Oh, man... Project Eden. The whole vertical city idea was mind-blowing at the time and the game successfully managed to create an awesome atmosphere around this idea (going further and further down the city, discovering the past, the architecture... it was an eerie sense of going back in time). Loved it.
  • Slipstream #20 2 years ago

    This gae would've been amazing and would've flourished in current times, what with online co-op etc.
  • jellyhead #21 2 years ago

    @Clive Dunn, i've bought this game 3 times over the years. In effect that's almost half of your sales :)

    Loved the game, still love it. I've really fond memories of playing through it several times and it was one of the few games that would play on my laptop when i was recouperating for months. Cheers, Clive & co!
  • FogHeart #22 2 years ago

    Bought it and was hooked, loved the puzzles, which were just my level of patience. I recognise what you say about the team being quite...well at the time I though 'cold'. The finale didn't disappoint me, but it never occurred to me to wish it looked like a deserted 20th century town. Loved using the toy car. Oh yeah, and that shuddering rag doll effect when someone is brought back to life.
    Edited by FogHeart at 02/05/10 @ 12:15
  • clip-clamp #23 2 years ago

    I might have to go out and find this
  • Clive_Dunn #24 2 years ago

    Sorry, I'm a mere minion - game was nothing to do with me. Just expressing my disappointment that a fine game went unrewarded at retail. Or course some wise arse could point out that it might have succeeded if it had an even half decent marketing campaign....

    Still the game is still nestled on my shelves, in between Project IGI, Hitman, Startopia and Warzone 2100. I see a recurring theme here.
  • Lukey__b #25 2 years ago

    I rented this and me and my mate played it over the weekend with very little sleep. At some points one of you wouldnt have anything to do so we would power nap while the other searched for some switch.

    It really was a great co-op game.
    Edited by Lukey__b at 02/05/10 @ 14:03
  • JamieR #26 2 years ago

    I'd like to see Core go back and polish The Angel of Darkness. I'm probably the only person who thinks that is the best tomb raider and the best game Core made. I think with a bit of extra time in development it would of worked wonders.
  • JamieR #27 2 years ago

    @Clive Dunn

    Warzone 2100 is a classic i totally loved that game great concept to the story too.

  • Jamiesan #28 2 years ago

    The vertical structure of the city always reminded me of the way Coruscant is described in the star wars books (yep I'm a nerd, what can I say?) Used to play this with 2 others. Sometimes we'd get a 4th and force them to be the useless commander guy "Your ability is to open doors and start conversations" lol
    Also, was that cannibal really called Fridge or did my brain just shortcircuit while remembering the game?
  • Kaminari #29 2 years ago

    Project Eden really has nothing to do with The Lost Vikings. It's more like a mix between Tomb Raider (without any jump feature, which is a significant point to the game mechanics) and BioShock. Yes, BioShock.

    People who know me sometimes ask me why I was not stormed by the BioShock hype. Truth is, I really enjoyed BioShock 1 & 2 -- in great part because they both reminded me of this underestimated forgotten jewel that was Project Eden. Project Eden didn't benefit from any decent marketing campaign from Core/Eidos (which was a shame), despite being created by Tomb Raider 1 & 2 programmer Gavin Rummery and level designers Neal Boyd and Heather Gibson. What Project Eden lacks in narrative, it makes up for in atmosphere.

    Note: I strongly suggest playing the PC version instead of the PS2 port. This game was one of the first PS2 titles and it unfortunately shows in every department.
  • Kami #30 2 years ago

    I still have this game, my old PC CD-ROM copy.

    Good times. Good, good times...
  • Doctor_What #31 2 years ago

    Okay, own up, who broke the front page? (18:05 Sunday)
    Edited by Doctor_What at 02/05/10 @ 18:03
  • Dave #32 2 years ago

    @Clive Dunn

    Startopia! That really was an awesome game I completely forgot about until you mentioned it. Might just install it this coming week :)
  • bf #33 2 years ago

    I bought it. But I suspect the 49p price tag had something to do with the games commercial success... Still a very good game though, something for GOG to sink their teeth into.
  • jaywalker3010 Verified Mastering Manager, Square Enix #34 2 years ago

    @clive dunn
    Heya long time no speak ;) oh the old days eh? U managed to get out I am still here :)
    Still playing warzone 2100 too ;)
  • Zebula77 #35 2 years ago

    I've some warm memories of this, despite getting completely stuck about two hours into the game. I liked the premise and the way you progressed through the game.

    Would love to see a new spin on this. :)
  • The_Smircher #36 2 years ago

    Oooh, bought this recently for 99c in a bargain bin. Must load it up and have a look.
  • BBIAJ #37 2 years ago

    Just picked this up from eBay for £9.99 new and sealed on PStwo.

    I played the demo back in the day, but never bought the full game
  • Clive_Dunn #38 2 years ago

    Good to hear from you Jason, yes - the good old days of releasing tons of good quality product and having a laugh whilst doing so. Seems a long time ago.

    Still there eh ? They let killers out in less time mate :p
  • RandomTerrain #39 2 years ago

    I loved this game, played it with my dad all the way to the end. Wasn't bored for a second. True a bit more chit chat between characters would have made such a great game even better, no doubt.

    I tried to get some friends to play this four player co-op but it's not a pick up and play title for pizza and beers, so they didn't really get on with it. Shame. Just got rid of most of my PS2 titles, but I'll never sell this one.

    And I agree, the chit chat in Lost Vikings was really good. Would love to see more of that kind of thing in some games.
  • Scimarad #40 2 years ago

    I wish someone would make your version of the game - That sounds great!
  • Joco84 #41 2 years ago

    I loved playing this with 3 of my mates, was one of my most played games on the PS2!

    Oh the memories..... multitap, split-screen, Amber!!!
  • Fear_Itself #42 2 years ago

    Absolutely loved this game. The part mentioned in the article when your team of four is split in two is one of my favourite parts of any game I've played.

    Incidentally, I'm pretty sure Amber was male (insofar as a cyborg has a gender, anyway).
  • metalangel #43 2 years ago

    I finished this, alone, in a flat in one of the worst times of my life.

    It was an excellent game, at least. The increasing decay of each level as you descended, the the basic concept behind it, the darkening 'sky' the lower you got. However, there were several problems:
    -the puzzles were far too obtuse in places, and I had to resort to walkthroughs for some of the sections, and on completing them wondering to myself how the hell anyone would have figure them out.
    -once you got the (I forget the names, sorry) 'slow down time bubble' and 'dissolve enemies into weapon batteries' weapons the combat was rendered null and void. Just fire the slow-mo bubble and then easily disintegrate each enemy into far more ammo than you'd just expended killing them.
    -an obnoxious, evil little girl with a posh accent. I hate this cliche, and it is for this reason I'll never play a FEAR game. (and it almost spoiled the first Resident Evil movie for me)

    There was also a huge spit in the face/kick in the crotch/flipping of the bird by the devs. Remember the hospital level? You search the hospital, painstakingly gathering parts to reassemble an MRI machine so you can lure one of the monsters through it to get some information on it. Having spent HOURS doing this, you successfully lure a creature into the machine only for it to explode. 'Oh well' says your controller, 'just get one to the roof and the ship we've just sent down will catch it in a tractor beam'. This takes maybe two minutes, is a million times easier than the whole hospital level, and raises a whole host of angry questions like: a) why the FUCK didn't we just do this in the first place and b) why can't we get on a similar dropship and just fly down to ground level and c) did you really think such an anticlimax would motivate players?

    I recalled Kieron Gillen (was it him?) in the initial review responding to the bit where the one character gets captured by wondering why she can't just shoot herself in the face, knowing that she'll respawn back at the nearest UPA reconstruction point.

    This game, incidentally, spawned the in-joke in my household of 'WHEEEEE!', which is what you shout in a high-pitched tone of faux-glee while hurling a game character off a precipice in frustration.

    Overall, though, it was before its time. I'm sure a modern remake/XBLA release would delight people today as they could enjoy the excellent co-operative play that - shock - isn't combat centric in a way that only a lucky few with LANs could back when this first came out (and say what you will, split-screen hampered the atmosphere of this game)