Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Prince of Persia Interview

Xbox 360 PC PlayStation 3 Interview by Ellie Gibson

30 May, 2008

Page 2 of 2. <- Page 1

Eurogamer: You mentioned controversial decisions earlier, and one those is likely to be the introduction of the Prince's new sidekick, Elika. For many action adventure fans part of the thrill is the sense of isolation, of going solo. Adding a sidekick doesn't always work out - take Kurtis in Tomb Raider: Angel of Darkness, for example...

Ben Mattes: Ben Mattes: Did you play Shadow of the Colossus? Did you consider yourself to be isolated in that game? We look at Shadow of the Colossus and ICO as inspirations for the Prince and Elika. You are in this big, scary, oppressive world and the two of you alone have to solve that challenge.

We firmly believe that with the way we're designing Elika's gameplay and the way we're treating her as a character, she's going to make the things you love about the Prince better. His acrobatic abilities - better. His puzzle-solving - better. She brings out the best in him, because her role is to support him and just make him cooler.

In terms of the isolation element, maybe a little of that, you might feel, is lost, because they are going to be talking as they navigate through this world. But in terms of the feeling of it being you against the world, the significance of the challenge that's before you, it's there. It's there in spades.

Eurogamer: Can you give us some examples of how Elika will help you out? How will she help you perform acrobatic moves - will she throw you over a ledge or give you a leg-up, that sort of thing?

'Prince of Persia' Screenshot 3

We like the black edging effect, because we can do it in Photoshop and it makes us feel special.

Ben Mattes: Ben Mattes: Yeah, basically exactly like that. Say you're running, you jump from a wall and you need help. You summon Elika with the 'Help Me Elika' button. The AI makes sure she's close enough behind you all the time so if you need her in order to do an acrobatic move, in she pops. By collaborating, the two of you can reach destinations you might not have been able to reach on your own.

In combat - if you're fighting an enemy, Elika's just on the periphery, kind of dancing around and ready when you need her. If the enemy has thrown up a magical shield to block your sword attack, you'll need to break that shield. Press the Y button and Elika will jump into the middle of the frey and perform a magical attack. She's not way in the background casting lightning bolts - she's literally jumping and flipping and attacking with you.

If you keep pressing Y, she'll keep doing magical attacks. If you switch back to X, the sword button, she's back on the periphery. She's there if you need her, but she'll stay out of the way if you don't want her there. That encapsulates our Elika philosophy.

Eurogamer: Atari's Phil Harrison was recently quoted as saying he reckons Alone in the Dark will be one of the last big budget, single-player adventure games, that gamers want more online functionality and downloadable content now. Do you agree?

Ben Mattes: I read that, and I don't totally agree. I know where he's coming from - I certainly see a lot of the industry moving in the direction of more community, more multiplayer, that sort of stuff.

But in my opinion, there are things you can do in a carefully crafted single-player game - experiences you can create, emotions you can elicit and magnitudes of engaging the player - that you're not going to reproduce in the uncontrolled environment of multiplayer.

For some time yet, there's going to be a market of people who say, 'You know what, pander to me. Suck me into your world and just make me believe. I don't want to be distracted by griefers and high scores, and dealing with the stuff not everybody loves about multiplayer games.' I do think there is still a significant market there.

'Prince of Persia' Screenshot 4

We do this all the time.

Eurogamer: You've said Prince of Persia is out this "holiday", which suggests it's six months away or so. That's not very long in development terms, and UbiDays is your company's big event of the year, so why aren't you showing the game off here?

Ben Mattes: It sounds like a cheesy answer, but because we want to do it this way. It's part of the PR and marketing plan we created back in January. We wanted to start with screenshots so the hardcore can see the artistic direction, then have the teaser trailer - here's the Prince, here's Elika, they fight together, it's cool, that's it.

Then everyone will get to see the game in action in what will hopefully be a real wow, impactful moment at E3.

Prince of Persia is coming to PC, PS3, Xbox 360 and DS at the end of this year.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Prince of Persia on PlayStation 3/Xbox 360/PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-26 of 26 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
MBar
30/05/08 @ 14:04
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yeah.

So.

The black outline on everything?

Are we cell-shaded now or something?
[maven]
30/05/08 @ 14:15
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I certainly find the style (and by that I'm talking more about the character and enemy design; not the shading) interesting. Consider my curiosity piqued, especially if the bit about acrobatics and exploration is true.
MrXBob
30/05/08 @ 14:27
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@MBar: Yes. It's cel shaded. Get over it, please.
sailesh
30/05/08 @ 14:30
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
E3 eh.....

referring to a Y button eh....

hmmmmm eh....

ccfb
30/05/08 @ 15:06
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't understand the decision to promote the idea of avoiding combat in favour of acrobatics and exploration, only to slap you with a boss fight which (I assume) you have to complete before proceeding.
Machetazo
30/05/08 @ 15:14
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
That's great that the focus is pulling more towards exploring, and puzzles. I imagine they intend to make most fights more in the vein of Prince's initial tussle with Shahdee, in Warrior Within - and in that way, expanding on the action, bringing stronger value to each encounter; than the one-two-tap, rinse/repeat often forgettable affairs of the last series. I think their stated approach should work really well, so that when you do encounter enemies, it really is a fight; but at other times, your enemy is more the world around the Prince. :)
Edited 2 times, most recently on 30/05/08 @ 16:16
alimokrane
30/05/08 @ 15:57
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This game is going back to the roots of the original classic prince of persias more than sands of time ever did and this can only be a good thing. SCREW combat, I can play ninja gaiden if i wanted combat, Prince of persia HAS NEVER been about combat.
JonFE
30/05/08 @ 16:17
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
There are some bold statements in that interview; I sure hope the final game will back them up. An acrobatics/puzzle PoP is far more interesting than a combat one.
ChthonicEcho
30/05/08 @ 17:05
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"What made the previous Prince of Persia trilogy special? Was it the fact there were Sands of Time powers? I don't think so."

I do. On the other hand, that's one of the gameplay elements that made the previous trilogy special, so I don't blame them for moving on.
Waldo
30/05/08 @ 17:12
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The fighting was always the weakest part of the series; nice to see they're moving more away from it.

As far as I'm concerned, if you can't have fighting as good as Severance, don't bother. ;)
laur
30/05/08 @ 17:21
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Shame it's not as linear as Sands of Time. I liked being told exactly where to go - the fun was in working out how to do it and pulling it off, not trying to work out where to go next.
PinkSpider
30/05/08 @ 17:41
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Interesting.

I could certainly go for a more focussed acrobatics-fest (minus boring rooms of baddies).

Dont mind bosses though, as long as they feel in place. Baddies should be a challenge, like bosses. Not a horde to mow down :/
PinkSpider
30/05/08 @ 17:41
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Interesting.

I could certainly go for a more focussed acrobatics-fest (minus boring rooms of baddies).

Dont mind bosses though, as long as they feel in place. Baddies should be a challenge, like bosses. Not a horde to mow down :/
Pasco
30/05/08 @ 18:22
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The game looks gorgeous but if Ben Mattes is responsible for Two Thrones then I don't trust him. They promised to go back to the roots with that game as well and what we got was a Dark Prince with even more brutal kills, a normal Prince that is still a drug addict asshole, lame dialogues and things like the big statue where you ultra-slowly trial and errored your way through a puzzle where the biggest challange was trying to figure out what is going on and not throwing the joypad away out of frustration.

The QTE-like thingies were an OK addition though. They didn't break the game, were not especially intrusive, didn't kill you if you got them wrong and they were nice too look at
mazk
30/05/08 @ 19:07
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sorry to be a big hype-face, but this game sounds amazing. A great hub which turn into linear levels (Zelda), A partner to share the adventure (ICO), and less annoying combat - mainly bosses (Shadow of the Collosuss). Big games to be trying to add yourself to.

@ Laur. Your totally right. I reckon this sounds linear enough to be challenging though. Dont you hate when you spend a lot of time in games just faffing about trying to start levels and stuff. Burnout Paradise and Assassins Creed fail for this reason.
hiddenranbir
30/05/08 @ 19:57
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm glad he still believes in creating single player games, still.

Nithron
30/05/08 @ 22:46
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm liking that weird cel shading effect they're going for. Stylization > photorealism in my opinion: We're nowhere near photorealism yet, so if you can't actually manage your goal, you may as well fail in style.

Also... Has anyone else noticed that the prince of persia now appears to be a white guy? He looked sorta... well, persian in the last games. Like you'd expect.
Lateralaus
30/05/08 @ 23:38
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I love the style of this, its prince of persia too so I'll be buying it.
UncleLou
31/05/08 @ 07:45
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm liking that weird cel shading effect they're going for. Stylization > photorealism in my opinion: We're nowhere near photorealism yet, so if you can't actually manage your goal, you may as well fail in style.

If noone even tries, we'll never get there. Whether it's desirable is another topic, but your argument is flawed.
ManicDrunkMonk
31/05/08 @ 10:30
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Looks good so far. I bet only ten copies sell no matter what its quality is.
Nithron
31/05/08 @ 12:49
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@UncleLou

You have a point. But at the moment, when we can't actually reach photorealism, i prefer the way games look when they take a stylized approach. As you say, though, we need people working on it to make sure we have the techniques necessary to actually get there.

Which particular graphics style you prefer is a personal thing, anyway
onedeadcop
31/05/08 @ 14:01
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
sounds like assassin's creed with less-repetitive missions. i'm interested, at least, although i didn't bother with two thrones.
crickson
01/06/08 @ 16:24
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Re. the comments attributed to Phil Harrison, I would be very sorry to see the bulk of the games industry turning out MMO-type games. I'm probably in a minority but on-line play, esp. first-person shooters, still leaves me cold. I'd take an immersive single-player experience every time.
dustrat
01/06/08 @ 17:17
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sounds like it could be fun!
RedFoxOne
02/06/08 @ 16:43
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Truly a wonderful, delightful game indeed.

JT
http://www.Ultimate-Anonymity.com
magusat999
06/06/08 @ 14:52
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It sounds like one of those "lets make it feel like it had multi player elements" games. Sad indeed. There needs to ba a correction here, this may be the last big budget ATARI singleplayer games, Ben Mattes. Unless you work for every company, plus the companies that are going to pick up the slack if there is ever a dry point, you cannot verify a sweeping statement like that. Furthermore, your statement is not echoing the wishes of gamers, but rather the intent of greedy game companies who are more interesting in making cheap games (which online multiplayer games are, btw) and soaking people for as much as they can get out of them.

Ben Mattes also makes this all encompassing statement about people who come online, as if they all are one breed with one purpose. The person who comes online to download mods for Oblivion, for example, or updates to the scads of PC games out there aren't all there to play - they are there to download content for their game. Is there data that separates the casual online player from the serious ones? How about the people who come on just to get mods and updates, but aren't interested in the online game? Ben Mattes mixes all of these people up in his "conclusion" of the facts, and tries to make it look like there is some kind of mass movement towards online play, when in reality it simply isn't true. All you have to do is count the total numbers of games sold vs. the number of CONSISTENT online players to see the invalidity of Ben Mattes' flawed assertion.

I take Phil Harrison's statement one step further, and bear it out on many, many forums that I visit. The majority of gamers don't want one or the other - they want both, and they want both to be independent and fully flushed out. Even a multiplaying fanatic has to admit that if his / her internet access is interrupted, or if the server goes down, or if the game just loses popularity that it would be good to at least have the singleplayer mode of their favorite game to fall back on. Singleplayer mode should be included as the staple, as a given, for every game that it can possibly be made for. Sure there are some games that are totally not a good fit for Singleplayer - but those are far and few between. It's simply inane to create a game that everyone knows and expects to be single player - and change it up just because you want to get tyour hands in the pockets (hello Age of Conan).

I could go on, but suffice it to sy that this isn't over. Singleplayers are like the sleeping giant, we aren't saying much right now - because we don't feel we have to. But keep on poking at us...

Comments: 1-26 of 26 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery