Pricing announced for Sky on Xbox 360
Packages start at 15 quid per month.
Microsoft has revealed how much you can expect to access the Sky Player via your Xbox 360 in the UK.
First off you'll need an Xbox Live Gold membership. Then it's £15 per month for the basic Entertainment Pack, which includes G.O.L.D., Sky Real Lives, Sky Arts 1, Sky News and MTV One.
You also get National Geographic, Nat Geo Wild, History and Eden, while for sports fans there's Sky Sports News, British Eurosport and ESPN Classic. Kids get Cartoon Network, Boomerang, Nickelodeon, Disney Channel and Nick Jr.
You can get more channels if you front up more cash each month, as follows. (All packages include the Entertainment Pack as standard.)
- £25 - Sky Sports 1 OR Sky Sports 2 + Sky Sports Xtra
- £34 - Sky Sports 1, 2, 3 + Sky Sports Xtra
- £24 - Sky Movies Screen 1 OR Screen 2
- £32 - Sky Movies Screen 1 + Screen 2
- £33 - One movie channel + one sports channel + Sky Sports Xtra
- £38 - One movie channel + all sports channels, OR vice versa, + Sky Sports Xtra
- £41 - All sports and movie channels
- From £9 per month extra - ESPN
You can also access further movies and TV show episodes via Sky's on-demand service. Some of these will be free while others will be paid for, with prices starting at £1 for a single TV show.
If you've already got Sky, you can access on-demand content for the channels you already pay for. If you've got Sky Multiroom or Sky Broadband Unlimited, you can get live channels too.
To celebrate the launch Microsoft is releasing a special bundle pack for £29.99. That gets you a three-month Gold subscription, a one month Sky Player subscription (Sky Sports Pack) and a Media Remote.
Sky Player for Xbox 360 launches today. Visit Sky.com for more info, or read our preview.
You may also like...
-
Why Devs Owe You Nothing
-
Face-Off: The Darkness 2
-
Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 Vita Review
-
Sony admits "dropping the ball" with Demon's Souls
-
App of the Day: Sir Benfro's Brilliant Balloon
-
Skyrim patch 1.4 performance tip: make a new manual save
-
CD Projekt: Witcher 2 intro cinematic "the most expensive asset we ever created"
-
Grand Slam Tennis 2 Review
-
One Piece: Unlimited Cruise SP Review
-
Who Killed Rare?
-
Gotham City Impostors Review
-
Valve admits hackers accessed Steam transaction log
-
Mass Effect 3 FemShep trailer debuts
-
Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning Review
-
Epic's Sweeney on graphics tech: "the limit really is in sight"
-
App of the Day: Superman
-
Next Xbox has tablet-like touch-screen controller - rumour
-
The Darkness 2 Review
-
Double Fine Adventure passes Day of the Tentacle budget
-
Skyrim patch 1.4 now live for Xbox 360
-
Sony: The Last Guardian is making "slow progress"
-
Blizzard legally opposes Valve's Dota trademark application
-
EA announces starry Syndicate voice cast
-
David Braben discusses consumer Raspberry Pi release
-
King Arthur 2 Review









Comments (98) Latest comment 2 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
So would Sky One and more interestingly, FX be included in the base pack?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
This is to target the people that Sky can't currently get to. Examples: those who live in a rented property and are not allowed to install a satellite dish, people living in listed buildings that are not allowed to have a dish installed, students in uni accommodation, etc.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Terrestrial channels are not available initially and programmes will also not be shown in HD, because broadband speeds in Britain are "simply not good enough", says Sky's David Mercer.
http://ww w.computerandvideogames.com/art...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Sometimes I think this whole Gold subscription thing is just so utterly, utterly wrong and that it's Microsoft's cynical way of milking as much money out of their users as possible. I'm so glad I cancelled mine when I did and moved over to the PC for the majority of my gaming.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Correction...
"If you've already got Sky, whats the bloody point!"
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Anyone else not able to sign in to it though? I just get an error message
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I already have Sky, and I'm very happy with the news. It means I can watch it another room.
The prices are high, but if you don't already own Sky, where you expecting it to be cheap?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I have Sky HD, full package (movies / sport)
And they want me to pay again to watch the same content live on another device just because I choose a decent broadband provider?
Get real!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Where as on the 360 its £41.00
I've not been with Sky for a while, but i'm sure they'll still have the half a dozen movie channels where as 360 only seems to have 2.
Even if this is purely aimed at people who can't actually get Sky normally, why try to rip people off in this way, especially when its such a high profile add on to the 360?
On demand football matches may interst me depending on the cost, other than that its an atomic facepalm to whoever came up with this pricing!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
At any rate, now I know it needs a Gold account it's all moot as I don't have a Gold account and since I don't like playing online I'm not paying for one. You have to wonder why Sky, Facebook and Twitter bothered if they were going to be shut out from a huge number of users, just so they could be used as a means to try and squeeze a Gold subscription out of people...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Surely it should be discounted because the quality will surely not be as good or as reliable?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Sky does not have a large on demand service, their Anytime service is primarily used to record shows for channels you do not have to attempt to entice you to purchase them, alongside the odd large acquisition for them. As a Sky subscriber being able to access all the Sky Player on demand content via my television is, for me, a very good thing.
The pricing is ludicrous, but this is Microsoft & Sky we’re talking about, they’re not exactly known for giving their consumers the best value in entertainment. An for everyone asking for a per channel basis subscription, this will never happen, as it takes away from the value of other channels to the platform. Sky need a reason for having NatGeo and all the other channels you would never normally watch on the platform so that they can get a carriage fee from them.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
If Sky did that they would lose 75% of their subscribers tomorrow.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
[link url=http://support .microsoft.com/kb/976843
]http://support .microsoft.com/kb/976843
[/link]
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Sky are never ever going to allow people to just have the channels they want to watch on a 'pick & mix' basis, on any platform. Sky make money partly by charging the channels for being on the service. if they allowed people to have only the channels they actually watched, the other channels could then say 'well, hardly anyone is watching us, so we're not going to pay you very much to carry our channel'.
Sky bundles the channels together so it can go to the channel providers and say 'look at all these viewers who we are supplying your channel to. Pay us!' If it couldn't do that, it would lose a lot of money from a lot of it's channels - and the ones most people would want to watch are mostly the channels it provides itself that it actually loses money on, so there's nobody for it to charge for providing them.
So no, never going to happen. Not on Sky boxes, not on sky player, not on 360. Unbundling simply doesn't make sense for Sky.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
So no, never going to happen. Not on Sky boxes, not on sky player, not on 360. Unbundling simply doesn't make sense for Sky"
You're totally right, though, this isn't a Sky/MS thing, same thing happens here in Portugal, and I bet in other countries as well.
And, the same way *they* say: 'look at all these viewers" they also brag: 'look at all these channels', to the other end of the line.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I guess if you cant have a dish or are in a non cable tv area this is a good way of getting sky sports?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Will this mean I can watch series that I missed earlier in the year or will it only be what has been on sky that week?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
thanks for clearing this up, i'll be keeping my money then.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
We're subbed to the whole package and have Sky BB Unlimited, not signed up for this yet though.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
yeah. thats a real bargain!
wankers lol.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
This doesn't make sense, in this case. This is not available outside UK.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Exactly, I'm not entirely sure why people are bitching about it, I assume 99% of those moaning have Sky (or have the option to have Sky), so why are they moaning?! Anyone thinking this would be a viable alternative to their current package are in dreamland, Sky didn't get to where they are today by being generous.
The crucial benefits are:
1. For those who can't get Sky or Cable, and trust me, there are plenty of us out there.
2. This article doesn't make it clear, but as I understand it there is no 'contract' with this service, if there is a month with lots of Premiership football you want to want, just pay a one-off charge for that month.
Of course, the issue with bandwith remains. The services being offered in the UK now far outweigh the capability of our network. I live in a newish built up area with hundreds of 'executive homes', yet we are 3 miles from the nearest exchange and Virgin do not cable new estates for whatever reason.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
If i've got that right then BT are so screwed.
EDIT:
Also not sure what people are complaining about the prices are basically the normal sky subscription prices were you really expecting it to be cheaper?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Aplogies, just brought up my lunch at the sight of those prices.
I wonder if Sky have found a way of blocking the service or charging even more to users of Virgin Media Broadband yet?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
'This is the link you are looking for' -
http://ne ws.sky.com/skynews/Home/Technol...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Will check it out (if it works), but as non-HD its only going to be a last resort.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Also, i'm still confused about the price. I have the complete sky package in my living room and sky's mid level broadband. Am I correct in thinking that if I upgrade to sky unlimited that will be the only cost?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
http://www.t alkxbox.com/article3438.html
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
]http://sk yplayer.sky.com/vod/page/defaul...[/link]
For the people that think sky's website has no mention of the xbox or microsoft....probably PS3 fanboys.
Anyway yes it's far too overpriced. I wont partake after the free month.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I have sky HD already and pay for the multiroom subscription for my 2nd box which I don't use but this gives me access to the SKY player on my PC at work.
Going to put this on my kids xbox so he can have the movies etc on demand in his room instead of using his laptop.
No issues with broadband as I have Virgin 50MB cable. I didn't take virgin TV after the 30 day trial as it was complete shit and the V+ boxes are total crap with incredibly slow software on them.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
This shit will be the biggest failure since the PS3...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Simple, already got Sky HD upstairs but increasingly the kids and wife watch their share of recorded progs, THIS makes lot of sense for me to watch Top Gear etc on x360 in the basement!
We ll see how many takes this up but yes advantage for Sky is reaching those without access to dish and get few more customers.
PS3 has their free subs as business model but their services aren't cost free and perhaps why European doesn't see as much contents? I do wish to pay monthly subs on PSN if the result is going to be a lotta better service but yes big advantage to pay nothing.
Edit: Those of us who got Sky already doesn't need to pay extra for same package other than multi room right? Then how is it a problem, only if choose not to subscribe to Gold then that is a matter of choice ie not online playing any.
Also if paying double to watch same, course no one in right mind will bend over and get ripped off!! I wouldn't but certainly keen on watching paid for content in another room, put my name on please!!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
And why the hell would you want to pay extra? It doesn't look like the 360 offers anything that the sky box can't (unless I got something wrong)
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Do you have xbox live gold?
Do you have a current sky tv subscription?
Doyou have either Sky Multiroom or Sky Broadband Unlimited?
If you answer Yes to all 3, then it appears you can get this for free. Surprise, surprise there is now no mention of Sky Player on the dashboard now after all day saying it will be available later today. Except now, we can't blame people the other side of the atlantic for this mess.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show