Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Pokémon Battle Revolution Review

Wii Review by Dan Whitehead

10 December, 2007

With this, the first Pokémon game for the Wii, the last remaining member of Nintendo's holy quartet of heavy hitting franchises has finally reached the hand-waggling wonder and ooh, just in time for Christmas as well. Mmm, convenient. However, while Zelda, Mario and Metroid all gave fans many good reasons to be happy, Pikachu and pals can only offer what amounts to a prolonged and expensive advertisement for the DS rather than a Wii game in its own right.

The concept is much as it has been ever since Pokémon Stadium debuted on the N64 back in 2000, focusing on glitzy 3D Pokémon battles rather than the adventuring and collecting of the main series. At least the previous console versions had the good grace to include other things to do beyond endless turn-based fighting, such as mini-games, RPG modes and other assorted diversions. Despite the title, Battle Revolution has none of that and so, remarkably, boasts less features than its direct ancestor from the console generation before last. Instead you get a bunch of Coliseums, set in the vaguely defined resort of Poketopia, and you must plough through tournaments in each and beat the resident Pokémon master. That's it.

Things start with a rather baffling tutorial which teaches you how to use the Wiimote to select things on screen. Seriously. I know that Pokémon has a large kid audience, but if they can grasp the intricacies of the trading card game I'm pretty sure they know how to point at stuff. You're then introduced to Poketopia thanks to Anna, a perky receptionist, who can painstakingly explain absolutely everything about the game in stultifying long-winded text descriptions. But before anything else, she has a very important question for you: do you have a Nintendo DS?

'Pokémon Battle Revolution' Screenshot 1

The game uses a lot of split-screen to make things more exciting. It doesn't work.

If you answer in the affirmative, and have got Pokémon Pearl or Diamond, then Anna looks very happy, and goes on to show you how to transfer your carefully trained and groomed Pokémon to the Wii so you can see them battling in 3D on your telly. You get a Custom Battle Card, which allows you to select your own preferred roster, and the option to use your DS as a wireless controller. You can also unlock exclusive new Pokémon to be ported back to your handheld, along with other unlockables and extras. Oh yes, it's all VIP treatment, back rubs and free peanuts for the Pokémon faithful.

If, however, you don't have a DS, then Anna's cheery anime-grin barely disguises her seething contempt. For you, foul peasant, she has only a Rental Battle Card. There are two to choose from at the start, each with a pre-packaged selection of six Pokémon. It's not even a randomised selection. You get the same ones each time you start a new game and these Pokémon can't be traded, or levelled up. If you want more to choose from you need to beat the Pokémon masters and take their cards. It's a horrible and insulting restriction that makes the game tiresome and monotonous right from the start, and makes the game a fairly blunt slap in the face for non DS-owners. Anyone foolishly assuming that buying a full price standalone Wii game earns you a complete and worthwhile standalone Wii experience is in for a nasty shock.

'Pokémon Battle Revolution' Screenshot 2

Yep, it's him again. Pistachio, wasn't it? Piscean? Piccalilli?

So, let's assume that we've weeded out the genetically inferior non-DS owners. What are we left with? Well...not much, to be honest. Even with your own Pokémon in the game, you're still only getting a string of linear and context-free Pokémon battles to work through, with none of the surrounding story or development you get from the DS adventures. There's very little customisation, apart from irrelevant nonsense like changing your character's catchphrases (yes, you can swear - but the game uses the default text when you play online). The game doesn't even give you much incentive to keep playing. There's no real score system, and few opportunities to win or buy new things, so for most of the time you're just slogging through battle after battle because...well, because that's all the game offers. It's got Pokémon. It's got battles. But there's no revolution happening here.

There is online play, which made big whoops in America where this arrived before Mario Strikers, but it only serves to showcase how clunky Nintendo's efforts have been in this area. Each saved game generates its own Friend Code, so multiple players can play using their own Pokémon, but the Friend Codes from your DS game won't work. As the game uses an outdated mobile phone alphanumeric text entry system, rather than Wii's more elegant virtual keyboard, just hooking up or communicating with mates is a hassle. You can battle a random stranger online instead, but with no lobby system, leaderboards or indeed any way of knowing anything about who you're playing, or how well you're doing compared to everyone else in the world, it's pretty much devoid of purpose. And, thanks to the way the game openly discriminates against anyone who hasn't got a DS, chances are you'll end up fighting some freakishly skilled cosplaying Pokémaniac who'll demolish your feeble line-up in ten seconds with their super-evolved menagerie. Oh, that's always fun.

'Pokémon Battle Revolution' Screenshot 3

Azelf: still 'avin it large after all these years.

Even the presentation is below the usual polished Nintendo standard. The graphics are decent enough, but the animations are crudely looped and there's no flow from one round to another. Despite the advances in technology since the N64, it's still always clear that you're watching a clumsy sequence of pre-rendered animations, often with jarring continuity glitches. The audio is equally underwhelming. Pokémon just use generic squeaks and honks rather than drawing from the vast audio library of the TV show - while the commentator is generic, repetitive and almost always completely out of sync with what's happening. "It's a stalemate!" he kept yelping, after I'd removed almost two-thirds of my opponent's health with one hit. Well done, you.

Considering how much time Anna the receptionist can spend guffing on about the game at the start, it's amazing how little substance the whole thing has. If you've got a DS, plus Pearl or Diamond, and you've got a sizable collection of Pokémon that you'd like to see rendered in 3D on the TV, then Battle Revolution might be worth the asking price. Even then, you'd have to be a pretty hardcore Pokémon fan. I mean, Mudkip fan art on your walls and everything. But, if that's not you, then this is an entirely pointless release that makes no effort to give you value for money. You peasant.

4/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Pokemon Battle Revolution on Wii?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-43 of 43 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
MuppetThumper
10/12/07 @ 14:03
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Beware the POKEMON
JonFE
10/12/07 @ 14:05
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
That bad??? Sure hope my son won't get disappointed...
polar
10/12/07 @ 14:16
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
How is the Wii still so popular despite all these shit games? Fair play to the big N for making money in such a costly and competitive industry, but I really hope that the rest of the industry doesn't follow Nintendo example.
Der_tolle_Emil
10/12/07 @ 14:18
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Never even heard of that title before I think. I had Pokemon Stadium on the N64 (I think that was its name) and it was pretty good - although that was when I actually played Pokemon on the gameboy as well which I am not at the moment (haven't bought the DS game - yet) and even if I did (and this would have been good as well) I doubt I would be interested.
Benno
10/12/07 @ 14:20
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
WILL THE WORLD PLEASE STOP MAKING SHIT GAMES!
Santino
10/12/07 @ 14:31
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@groovemeister

i dont agree, if anything they have stepped up since the cube with their game with their big titles, especially mario galaxy, it is easily among the best games they have ever made, so how exactly is it a lack of effort? do lazy games make great games cease to exist? i dont understand what the hell you are complaining about.
Beek4257
10/12/07 @ 14:31
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@BENNO

After SMG, Orange Box, CoD 4, Mass Effect, Drake's Fortune, Halo III, Phantom Hourglass, etc, etc, etc. I'm actually kinda relieved.

BANK BALANCE LOVES MORE SHIT GAMES !

Thank you world.
Der_tolle_Emil
10/12/07 @ 14:43
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I have to agree with Santino. Nintendo's output of the other major franchises has been very good and all were better than I expected. Zelda, Mario and Metroid are all better than the cube predecessors, and they were all released in the first year as well. WarioWare and ExciteTruck have turned out to be very entertaining titles as well, although they are by far not as important or big as Mario or Zelda.
the_inchworm
10/12/07 @ 14:49
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I hear there's an unlockable mode where you can tell Anna that you don't even own the game, and are only playing it at a friend's house. At which point her anime grin slips completely, she powers up her space bracelet, the tentacles come out and everyone has a pretty good time.

Surely that must bump it up to at least a seven?
Katsumoto
10/12/07 @ 14:51
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Argh. That's it - every time a 360 game gets a 5 or below I'm going to post saying "I dont get why anyone buys 360 lol shit games lol" and conveniently ignore the host of games getting 8s and 9s.
drumbaby
10/12/07 @ 15:03
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Pika! Pika!
Nikanoru
10/12/07 @ 15:03
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Santino, Der_tolle_Emil... don't waste time trying. You should know by now how it goes in here, each time any vaguely Wii-related article comes up. Wii threads are like the witch trial in Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Except, sadly, the "peasants" here are not acting. :p
Der_tolle_Emil
10/12/07 @ 15:05
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think I know groovemeister (if only from the forums) and I often share his oppinions. In this case it is worth discussing since he isn't one of the trolls. As a matter of fact I was actually a bit surprised by hsi reaction, I thought he enjoyed the games.

Maybe he's playing tricks on us :/
Pac-man ate my wife
10/12/07 @ 15:09
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
erm... shit games have existed on all formats since videogames began. Look at the PS2 for christsakes! 90% crap.

The Wii has plenty of great titles and a handful of truly brilliant ones. For a year old console that's not bad going.

Just remember boys and girls that good games will be made on all formats and you don't have to buy the crap. Simple really.
Muddtallica
10/12/07 @ 15:10
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yeah, sounds just as lazy and pathetic a release as the US reviews made out. I'm a total sucker for Pokemon stuff normally, but even I'm not this stupid.

Try again, Nintendo, and next time put some goddamn effort into it.
JetSetWilly
10/12/07 @ 15:10
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You don't fool me, I know Gibson wrote this review really.
FooAtari
10/12/07 @ 15:11
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Pokemon is shit anyway, Even The Gameboy games were shit :)
Dom't get it all and really don't like anything to do with Pokemon, and I hate the bloody cartoon too (even more than the game). I don't think I have detest any other series of games as much as Pokemon.

Now that it's out my system...

Have to agree with the others, this is a blip in recent form for Nintendo.

It's the third party games you need to worry about. Many are existing games with the Wii's control method forced in with little thought.

I have the problem that I have never been a big fan of Nintendos core franchises, and even though the Wii is already way more successful than both the GC and N64 the best games still seem to be first party games.

Disclaimer: I am not saying Nintendo's first games are shit (excpet Pokemon)
Beek4257
10/12/07 @ 15:13
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Katsumo

Just this month: Golden Compass, Blacksite, Beowulf, NSF Pro Street, Viva Pińata: PA (and that's not including Live arcade).

You might want to reconsider, unless you've got a lot of time on your hands.

You've got a valid point tough. Dragging down one console doesn't necessarily make your own any better. Games being crap is hardly console exclusive.

jlaakso
10/12/07 @ 15:16
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was actually looking forward to this, my hopes for perhaps a second actually noteworthy Wii title resurfacing after the excellent Super Mario Galaxy (being the first Wii game I've managed to play for longer than a day). Alas, it's not to be.

I can't believe how Nintendo keeps doing this. They swore after the Gamecube that things would be different this time, but they're actually worse. Not that they care as they're effectively manufacturing money with the Wii.

You'd think that Pokemon would warrant more affection from them.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 10/12/07 @ 15:17
JonFE
10/12/07 @ 15:25
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Just a question though. As long as someone has put the effort in Pokemon Diamond and enjoyed it thoroughly, will he find anything worthwhile here?

I'm asking because I've already purchased this for my son (it will be his second Pokemon game after Diamond) and I'd hate to think that he'll hate it...
DanWhitehead
10/12/07 @ 15:36
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Battle Revolution is basically an expansion to the DS game so you can see your Diamond Pokemon on the TV, in 3D. That's it. If your son enjoyed the Pokemon battles in Diamond, then I doubt he'd hate this. He may grow tired of it quite soon though. It's not that the game is technically poor, just that there's very little for your money.
GrandpaUlrira
10/12/07 @ 15:37
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Pokemon Stadium on the N64 was good because it allowed you to transfer rare Pokemon like Mew, Hitmonlee, Eevee and the starters back to your Game Boy game. If this game had something like that, then I'd be tempted, to get Celebi, etc. It really spoils Pokemon for me that certain Pokemon are essentially unobtainable in Europe.
Lemming81
10/12/07 @ 15:55
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
As a Ninty fan I was hoping this would fail miserably. The more shit like this that doesn't pass the grade the more likely the Big N will actually make the effort with a true 3d Pokemon RPG game.
Nikanoru
10/12/07 @ 16:21
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Super Mario Galaxy (being the first Wii game I've managed to play for longer than a day).

Wow. Sucks to be you.


I can't believe how Nintendo keeps doing this. They swore after the Gamecube that things would be different this time, but they're actually worse. Not that they care as they're effectively manufacturing money with the Wii.

You clearly don't remember the first year of the Gamecube's life.

"Keeps doing" what, anyway? What kind of a comment is that? That's just so detached from reality that I don't even know what to say about it. If SMG is "the only Wii game you've managed to play for longer than a day" then clearly there's something wrong on your side.
ProtoformX
10/12/07 @ 16:53
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nikanoru - Does that mean if a game weighs more than a duck it's crap?
JonFE
10/12/07 @ 17:02
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Thanks Dan, really appreciate the prompt response :)
AOFanboi
10/12/07 @ 17:26
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Maybe look for the GameCube's "dark an moody" Pokémon XD: Gale of Darkness instead of this one.
Nillsens
10/12/07 @ 18:00
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
MUDKIPS?
Sid Nice
10/12/07 @ 18:14
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
IGN gave the game a 5/10 back in June; so the Eurogamer score of 4/10 is of no surprise. Theoretically Pokémon Battle Revolution should have been a must have title for the Wii/DS owning Pokémon fan; the concept behind the game is a good, sadly the game doesn’t offer value for money and should have been distributed free to Wii/DS/Pokémon/Diamond/Pearl owners.

I'd rather catch crabs than catch 'em all.
rock27gr
10/12/07 @ 19:17
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Err, Pokemon Battle was never a full game; it was always a 3D colosseum for pokemon battles and GB-N64/GBA-GC/DS-Wii interoperability.

So it is shit, except for those that care about pokemon too much perhaps.

@ Groovemeister
20 months of life!!??? O_o

The Wii just closed 12 months, 13 if you're american.
Muddtallica
10/12/07 @ 19:40
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
By the way, to those registering disbelief that a Nintendo in-house product could be this shoddy and half-assed, there's an explanation for that: it isn't one. This was developed by second-party Genius Sonority, the same guys who did Colosseum, XD and Trozei. Frankly, I'm not fans of them; the series seemed to be trying a lot harder back in the HAL Laboratory/EAD-led Stadium games.

In fact, I've generally noticed Eurogamer has gotten a little spotty when it comes to crediting Nintendo games to the correct first/second-party developer, and it's getting a bit distracting; when I read "Developer: Nintendo" at the top of an EG review, the implication is that it refers to Miyamoto's core EAD team, but more and more frequently that's just not true. The Hudson-developed Mario Party titles keep going down as in-house releases; the Kirby games are correctly acknowledged as HAL projects, but Pokemon Ranger is not; first-party Retro Studios is always acknowledged as a separate entity, but Intelligent Systems and NST rarely are. This might sound like I'm splitting hairs, but as far as I'm concerd this is information I need to know, because these development teams were not created equal; I'm infinitely more interested in a new Intelligent Systems game than I am in a new NST game, just as you would be more interested in a Square game than an EA game. And I'm sure as hell a lot more fussed about a new EAD title than I am with another sub-par Genius fricking Sonority title, so I wish EG would stop fudging the issue...
smelly
10/12/07 @ 19:57
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
(save 360 owners the hassle)

Wow.. another bad game review.. THE WII IS SHIT!!!
smelly
10/12/07 @ 19:58
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"I would have expected a 'proper' Pokémon game to have gotten a good rating."

It's not a "proper" pokemon game though.

We need a 3d version of the 2d game (similar to how zelda worked in 3d).

Not another ****ing battle game
smelly
10/12/07 @ 20:06
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"What blows me away is the runaway success of the Wii despite Nintendo's lack of effort. "

I dont see how this relates to a "lack of effort" form nintendo.

1. this is a 2nd party game
2. Nintendo develop a LOT of games over the space of the year
3. How many 1st/2nd party microsoft/sony 360/ps3 (respectively) games have there been? I can gaurantee much less than nintendo.

So lack of effort? Surely not?
thepiedpiper
10/12/07 @ 20:26
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
cutesy + wii

that's a rarity
thepiedpiper
10/12/07 @ 20:27
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
how do you get pikachu on a bus?
















pokehimon
Kryon
10/12/07 @ 20:38
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
How did smelly make an incest movie?




















Pokehismum.
Steroyd
10/12/07 @ 21:00
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
FFS Nintendo as a Pokemon fan all I ask is to TRANSLATE THE BLOODY GB/DS POKEMON GAMES TO 3D.

OMG I feel like bitch slapping them, it'd be awesome having a full console single campaign of the DS kind in 3D but they've been retarded enough to keep making these stupid Stadium extensions of the handheld version.

Nintendo is dead to me DEAD I SAY. >:(
smelly
10/12/07 @ 21:18
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"FFS Nintendo as a Pokemon fan all I ask is to TRANSLATE THE BLOODY GB/DS POKEMON GAMES TO 3D. "


Plus 1
Res
10/12/07 @ 22:07
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
FFS nintendo give me an MMO and suggested DS port but with better graphics above.
faëlnor
11/12/07 @ 02:26
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
please could you stop the shit
im trying to get some rest
from all the unborn pokemon voices
in my head

WHATS THAT ????!!! >:(
Lemming81
12/12/07 @ 10:08
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@groovemiester: "There have been many games released that are just pure gimmick and have little effort. They may be a bit of shallow fun for 'Wii party' casual gamer (if you can even call them gamers) muppets but Nintendo are making these in place of other things, and this is an undisputed fact of the industry. Similarly, why make a polished, deep Pokémon game when loads of kids will buy it with minimum effort put in anyway?"

You are pretty misinformed.

First of all it's NOT Nintendo that are releasing 99% of the tacked-on controls crap. It's 3rd party devs trying to make a quick buck.

Secondly, the reason (sadly) we will not get a 'deep' Pokemon game on the Wii because that's their hand-held franchise. It's what shifts hand-helds on name alone. This has been discussed a million times before, but it's a sad fact. The truth is you should never pay attention to, or get excited by, a Pokemon game on a full-sized console.

Finally this: "but Nintendo are making these in place of other things, and this is an undisputed fact of the industry. " Is an outright lie. Why would you make shit up? Is it fun?

Were party games made in place of their big franchises? No. They weren't. We've had most of the big names in the first year of the console, which is previously unheard of. That's not exactly slacking is it?

Mario Kart, Smash Bros., Animal Crossing...all still to come. And they are just the first party games guaranteed to be successful. On top of that you have 'normal' games which you put on a par with the other consoles.


Lemming81
12/12/07 @ 15:25
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@groovemeister:

Within the 1st year f the Wii's life we had MP3, and in the beginning of the 2nd year, we've had SMG.

Actually, we've had: Zelda, Mp3 and SMG in the first year. I've no idea how November 07 is the beginning of January 08 to you.

Warioware, Paper Mario, Mario Strikers, RE4:Wii, Umbrella Chronicles... all '07, all successful whether you consider them 'really GameCube games' or not is your opinion and not really relevant to what we are talking about which is: successful games for Wii in 2007.

For the US that number is great still, mainly because they got Zack and Wiki before us. ;)

Comments: 1-43 of 43 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery