Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

PlayStation Home Article

PlayStation 3 MMO Article by Oli Welsh

12 December, 2008

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

One of the stranger things about PlayStation Home - and there are a great many strange things about PlayStation Home - is the experience of being in a virtual world without the slightest hint of fantasy about it.

It's hardly real life, of course. We don't live in a permanently sunny West Coast d'Azur lesiure complex, spend our days jogging between the bowling alley and the mall, or stand around in cinema lobbies doing the funky chicken in slouch pants. But this a purely contemporary, commercial, aspirational kind of escapism; a marketing fantasy.

So everyone looks like a 20-something male in bland, high street casual fashion, because that's who everyone actually is. You can only do things you might do in real life - chat, watch film trailers, play a frame of pool, or maybe a videogame. Conceptually this makes sense. It's not alienating, it's easy to identify with, and the socialising and advertising are entirely in context. But you're left pondering the inevitable question: why would you want to spend any time here?

This dislocation combines with one of the other strange things about Home. It's a virtual world populated by console gamers, many of whom are familiar with the interactions and social etiquette of massively-multiplayer online games like World of Warcraft, or even tweenie hangouts like Habbo Hotel.

At the moment - and we must remember that Home's beta only went open to all today - it's an unruly melee of greasy flirting, spammed greetings and aimless A/S/L enquiries. Female avatars get attention everywhere, but in Home, they're absolutely mobbed, relentlessly shadowed, danced at and messaged. It doesn't help that most people don't have keyboards plugged in and aren't brave enough to use voice.

'PlayStation Home' Screenshot 1

Ligne Roset is providing a line of designer furniture. Its shop isn't in Home yet.

Communication was always going to be one of the biggest problems for a console virtual world. Sony's done a half-decent job in some respects. The preset phrases available on L1 are useful, although a few new additions are needed. Most conversations go something like this: "Hello." "Yes." "I have no keyboard."

The emotes and dances on L2 are animated a little cheesily and without conviction, but they pass a funny few minutes between mute friends and there are plenty of them. ("Good job they included a whole move set under the banner of "Disappointment"," said Eurogamer's head of cynical barbs, Ellie Gibson.)

Voice chat quality is poor, and chat functionality all-round is far distant from what any MMO player or Second Lifer might be used to. A particularly glaring omission is the ability to "whisper" - or send an instant, private text message without everyone in the vicinity seeing what you're saying. You either have to "phone" someone for a private voice conversation via the headset, or use the PSN account messaging system - which may only be a few extra clicks on paper, but in reality, takes you out of world and makes conversations far more clumsy than they need to be.

It gets worse. There doesn't seem to be a way to form a party in Home unless you're actually launching a game together. Permanent and flexible parties that persist across any situation were one of the best features of last month's Xbox interface redesign - not to mention being the most basic requirement for any MMO or virtual world. That means you can only chat with several friends if you're near each other in the world, and only privately if you all go together to a private space.

'PlayStation Home' Screenshot 2

Looks like Red Bull's made an Air Race mini-game. It's not in Home yet.

You can forget about common chat channels for wider circles of friends - Clubs, in Home's world - too. You can probably forget about Clubs to be honest, since Sony is charging GBP 3.99 for the privilege of forming one. Not only that, but in the future - some time after 31st March 2009, according to the blurb - you'll be charged a monthly fee to keep your Club running. That's before you even consider the costs of setting up a club house and furnishing it with cool stuff.

We appreciate that Home is a completely free release, and that Sony needs to make money from it somehow. But charging for social features - especially charging fees on top of one-off payments - is a schoolboy error. In its search for revenue streams, Sony has put a premium, set a high barrier to entry, on the social organisation that should be the lifeblood, the glue of any MMO or virtual world. At a stroke, it's drastically reduced the number of potential attractions in Home, and the reasons players will have for hanging out there.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about PlayStation Home on PlayStation 3?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 250 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Sir_TimAlot
12/12/08 @ 15:57
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Home is dumb.
Discuss.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/12/08 @ 15:57
Retroid [mod]
12/12/08 @ 15:58
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Javelin.
Weezer
12/12/08 @ 15:59
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well, that anti-climax took a long time to arrive.
MaxiSleep
12/12/08 @ 16:01
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Lord god but this sounds dreadfull

As I had kinda feared its a non gamers view of what a virtual world is about.

A dreadful waste of resources by sony who should have spent the cash on optimizing graphics libraries for, you know, games.
Dizzy
12/12/08 @ 16:02
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sounds like a trainwreck from what you guys have written.

I expect a lot of "but the potential!", "but it is free!" and "it is a beta!" posts here.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 12/12/08 @ 16:07
Lexx87
12/12/08 @ 16:02
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Heh so a long long wait for fuck all then.
Vistrix
12/12/08 @ 16:03
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought it was incredible.I was completely blown away by how good Home looks. I didnt have high expectations though so I had a laugh.

It seems that it is lacking alot of content though and hopefully, updates come thick and fast.

Home is only going to get better. and I cant wait for full game integration.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/12/08 @ 16:03
onezeonx
12/12/08 @ 16:06
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
it will get better ffs

and i have a 360 :D
Vanmunt
12/12/08 @ 16:06
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well, I like Home... fair play to Sony for doing it. Whilst Xbox live's connectivity surpasses sony at every turn (although matchmaking on Gears has been a bit hit and miss), home is something revolutionary and should not be so pettily criticised especially as it is still the beta.
PearOfAnguish
12/12/08 @ 16:07
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hahaha oh wow, it sounds like Second Life without the flying penises and ability to shoot people and send them flying into the air.
Adam_T
12/12/08 @ 16:07
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
chatwithoutkeyboardlol
the_dudefather
12/12/08 @ 16:08
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Adam_T

You can plug in a usb keyboard and use that
zombies
12/12/08 @ 16:08
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh dear! Why did they even bother? And prices for 'content' are ridiculous. Someone should have canned this!

Anasui
12/12/08 @ 16:09
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
but it is free!
Dave797
12/12/08 @ 16:10
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ouch! Tough review! It would seem the long wait has in fact been for nothing! Oh well it is only a beta so we'll just have to hope the updates come thick and fast!
Sir_TimAlot
12/12/08 @ 16:10
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"home is something revolutionary"

Oh god....classic.....can't stop giggling, thats made my entire week.
Zelos
12/12/08 @ 16:13
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I bet the monthly fee for clubs will never arrive. The upfront fee is pretty dumb as well: if you're going to be stupid enough to charge for clubs, at least make it so each member has to pay ~20p, instead of one poor sap having to pay the whole fee.

Are there really people dumb enough to spend £3.99 on a virtual house?

Who are they trying to appeal to? I can't see the Sims crowd being interested with the poor selection of objects to choose from and expensive downloadable content.
PearOfAnguish
12/12/08 @ 16:14
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"home is something revolutionary and should not be so pettily criticised"

Yeah it's revolutionary if you ignore the existence of Second Life, Habbo Hotel, There, Entropia and all the other virtual worlds. And pointing out that it is bland, soulless and ultimately pointless isn't petty.

"Are there really people dumb enough to spend £3.99 on a virtual house?"

Sadly, yes. There are people in SL who pay hundreds, sometimes thousands, on virtual houses and virtual land.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/12/08 @ 16:15
Anasui
12/12/08 @ 16:15
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
well this is Sony's answer to Live and Animal Crossing. Poor chaps are trying to get casual
HiddenPooh
12/12/08 @ 16:15
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Lots of silly comments from people who obviously have not tried what is actually a really fun application for the early stage its at. "Tough Review" ?!?! - did I miss a review somewhere?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/12/08 @ 16:16
insincere_dave
12/12/08 @ 16:16
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Man, I totally need a PS3.*




*When it's under £150 and there are 10 exclusive gamers worth playing on it, xmas 2010 then.
andywilkie35
12/12/08 @ 16:17
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
oh dear
phatb0y
12/12/08 @ 16:17
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Soulless marketing device that uses the 'death of a thousand cuts' (read: micropayments) to shaft its users.

'But its free!'

So is cholera.
mcbi4kh2
12/12/08 @ 16:20
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Arent Sony confusing beta with alpha?

I thought Beta was all features + bugs and Alpha was missing features + bugs. Home sounds like alpha to me.
BOFH_UK
12/12/08 @ 16:22
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Finally got into home this morning and was massivley disapointed.

First, while it CAN look great there are a lot of rough edges on fairly basic things. Just as a quick example, go to the theatre, zoom in to a movie and look at the graphics quality of the 'theatre' itself... just terrible.

Actually, the theatre is a good example of what's wrong. It's a neat idea BUT the content is lacking and it take FAR too long to get to see any of the videos that are there from the point you decide you want to do so. The quality of the video is prety poor and, just to cap it off, you can't even view the stuff full-screen.

The thing is, I just can't see the point of releasing Home in its current state. There's very little content, there's huge swathes of functionality that's just flat-out missing, the underlying infrastructure seems to be suffering under the load and even the basic community features are lacking and badly thought out. Sony have been building the expectations for Home for almost two years now and what they've released is just a huge anti-climax with micro-payments for virtually everything that'll suck the life out of the eco-system if Sony persist with that approach.

I'd guess at this point that they've released earlier than they wanted to to try and compete with the 360's price drop and NXE but it just feels like they've blown a major opportunity to jump ahead with something really innovative, well integrated to the PSN and the first community environment built to the needs of console gaming. Instead we've got a bare shell full of potential but delivering nothing like what was initialy promised. Say, that sounds familliar for some reason...
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/12/08 @ 16:24
HuggyAtHome
12/12/08 @ 16:22
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
shocker - I fail to see why anybody would want to use it, even if/when it contains more stuff? Pointless. And I DO own a PS3 and an Xbox. Online is about playing games with friends or otehrs, not wandering around aimlessly. Home sounds like the lobby in Everybody's Golf.
GamerG
12/12/08 @ 16:25
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Home optimises Sony this gen

They just don't know what they are doing, they thought they could dictate what people want to them, thats what 100m ps2 units does to you I guess.
Skooch
12/12/08 @ 16:26
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
As expected, a complete pile of shite. Pointless, monotonous and poorly executed. And to think all those PS3 lovers waited so long for this....
DanWhitehead
12/12/08 @ 16:27
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm really surprised that they haven't dumped a bunch of new content into the thing for the Open Beta stage. There are maybe four or five clothing options, a couple of moustaches. I'm also saddened to learn that the movie trailers still aren't full screen or HD. It takes Quicktime a few seconds to start streaming HD trailers online, so I can't understand the decision to go lo-res with these.

Of course, I haven't actually been able to get past the avatar creation screen yet, thanks to the ongoing connection problems...
Zappa
12/12/08 @ 16:28
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Home is awesome an will no doubt get better and better:)

360 avatars are complete trash compared that do NOTHING and your forced to use them!!

iokthemonkey
12/12/08 @ 16:31
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The thing is, people keep going on about Second Life, but look at the latest Animal Crossing ads and the "social" potential there. People pay £30 quid for that and it appears less advanced than Home...
anomagnus
12/12/08 @ 16:36
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
3.99 JUST for a chat channel with my mates??!??!?

FUCK

AND

OFF
miiiguel
12/12/08 @ 16:36
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The "free PSN" is a burden that is hurting not only Sony but its users as well, imo. Money don't grow on trees and it has to come from somewhere. A steady income via a sub would be preferable, I think.
JohnnyWashnGo
12/12/08 @ 16:38
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Having spent some time on it today, and approaching it with an open mind, without expecting it to behave in a similar way to MMOs (because I don't play them), I have to say that I found it somewhat sterile and also claustrophobic.

There isn't that much to do, and what there is seems to be slow and somewhat cumbersome. The lengthy downloads for most things are irritating to say the least.

All that being said, I rather enjoyed my hour or so in Home. Creating my avatar was by far the most exciting bit, the rest of it was a bit of a let down. I don't know what I was expecting, but it wasn't this.

It is a beta however, so there is plenty of scope for improvement by Sony.
JediMasterMalik
12/12/08 @ 16:38
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
People seem to be utterly confused by just what Home is, it's not launched in the best condition, no, but for what it is, it doesn't seem to be nearly as bad as people are making out.

I can't get on because my Uni blocks ports for it, but reading other people's impressions it doesn't seem so bad.
ps3owner
12/12/08 @ 16:38
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
haven't managed to look at it yet, but from this read through I might not run home just yet... maybe when I have nothing else to do. But honestly, this home thing seems to be a project dreamed up by some internship guy/student.

one student started it off as a pet project for uni, while doing his intern at sony... he then ran out of time. so the next intern took over... he ran out of time... the next one has managed to get it to the beta stage. so, 3 years later and the beta is out. Makes perfect sense.

give it another 10 years (10 students) and maybe Sony will be broke.
trebell
12/12/08 @ 16:40
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
something revolutionary"

seriously? second life?

i'm looking forward to trying it tonight but it clearly isn't revolution.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/12/08 @ 16:40
captainrentboy
12/12/08 @ 16:42
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sounds pretty darned poor at the moment, then again it has never sounded particularly appealing to me anyway. Online chatrooms and all that jazz stopped being of any interest when I was around 16, I couldn't be bothered with all that random A/S/L? crud nowadays :) And the fact that it sounds like most of Home's inhabitants wont bother using a mic makes it even more uninteresting.
But I can see how it could all become pretty groovy (If you're into that type of thing) once they get around to putting a lot more content on there.
Just give me the basic chatroom setup of Live anyday, ''You wanna play so and so?'', ''Yes'', ''Let's go''.
trebell
12/12/08 @ 16:42
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"360 avatars are complete trash compared that do NOTHING and your forced to use them!!
"


wasn't doing nothing in a Kingdom for Kefflings when I played.
Moonprince
12/12/08 @ 16:43
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oli - In your excitement to bitch and moan you forgot to run a spell / grammar check. Might want to fix that buddy ;)
sifujames
12/12/08 @ 16:44
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sorry, can someone please explain to me what the f**k the point of Home is? Seriously, I cannot for the life of me see what the aim of Home is. It just seems like....nothing frankly. Is that the point of Home? That it is just a big giant nothing?
markypants
12/12/08 @ 16:50
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Home is horrible horrible horrible. Seriously. Second Life could be horrible, but at least there was always the option to do something interesting and outside the norm. This seemingly has no point at al and everything you can do here, you have been able to do online for years... and... nobody bothers. This could possibly be the biggest flop since curry flavoured condoms.
elephant_stone
12/12/08 @ 16:51
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think the article was overly harsh. It might be because I don't play MMO's so I probably don't "get" what the problem is.
Fodder
12/12/08 @ 16:52
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Sorry, can someone please explain to me what the f**k the point of Home is?"

I was in the closed beta, and I never worked that out. It seems to be a really inconvenient way to launch games and videos while pretending to live in a nightmare vision of the future where eugenics has made everybody look the same and corporations are placing adverts on every available surface. It's a sort of cross between Gattaca, Logan's Run and Bladerunner.
brappbrap
12/12/08 @ 16:52
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No one seems to have mentioned that you have to QUEUE TO PLAY THE GAMES

And it would have made everything so much easier if they'd just stuck a generous 4/10 at the end.
iokthemonkey
12/12/08 @ 16:53
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sorry, can someone please explain to me what the f**k the point of Home is? Seriously, I cannot for the life of me see what the aim of Home is. It just seems like....nothing frankly. Is that the point of Home? That it is just a big giant nothing?

---

I'm reminded of Bruce Lee pointing at the moon...

Yeah, it's "nothing" because you're not seeing what it is to you. It probably is nothing to you if you're not the sort of person who digs this kind of thing. But you know, you could look at the Internet and say it's just a load of nothing. Don't think of it in terms of winning or point - it's a social space. Think of it as a 3D myspace or facebook. It'll be what the community make it or don't make it.
PearOfAnguish
12/12/08 @ 16:54
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Hey Oli... OPEN BETA!!!
Do you know what that means?"

It doesn't mean 'immune from criticism'. If you just want to read puff pieces you should stop visiting gaming web sites and download press releases instead.
Carlo
12/12/08 @ 16:56
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"not in Home yet". Yeah, like mos tof us lot trying to log into it.
markypants
12/12/08 @ 16:56
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Home brings to mind the line in Jurrassic Park "Your scientists were so pre-occupied with whether or not they could they didn't stop to think if they should".
martynmac
12/12/08 @ 16:56
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Reads like a 5/10 to me

Comments: 1-50 of 250 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Get Games.  Download Great PC Games!

X View gallery