PC makers see piracy as "hidden benefit" News
PC News by Games Industry.biz
Id Software's CEO Todd Hollenshead has stated that he believes PC manufacturers' acceptance of piracy is the PC hardware industry's "dirty little secret", GamesIndustry.biz reports.
According to Hollenshead, manufacturers are secretly happy with levels of piracy in the industry as it helps to sell hardware.
"I think that there's been this dirty little secret among hardware manufacturers, which is that the perception of free content - even if you're supposed to pay for it on PCs - is some sort hidden benefit that you get when you buy a PC, like a right to download music for free or a right to download pirated movies and games," said Hollenshead in an exclusive interview published today.
"I think that if you went in and could see what's going on in their minds, though they may never say that stuff and I'm not saying there's some conspiracy or something like that - but I think the thing is they realise that trading content, copyrighted or not, is an expected benefit of owning a computer."
Hollenshead - famed for PC titles Doom, Quake and the forthcoming Rage - believes that PC manufacturers will obviously speak out against piracy in public, but the enormity of the problem is evidence that it's being largely ignored by hardware companies.
"I think that just based on their actions...what they say is one thing, but what they do is another.
"When it comes into debates about whether peer-to-peer file-sharing networks that by-and-large have the vast majority, I'm talking 99 per cent of the content is elicitly trading copyrighted property, they'll come out on the side of the 1 per cent of the user doing it for legitimate benefit.
"You can make philosophical arguments that are difficult to debate, but at the same time you're just sort of ignoring the enormity of the problem," he said.
Related Games
Doom 3
Rage
Latest News
-
Sales show Doom 3 was "not bad" - Willits [44]
-
Todd Hollenshead defends Doom III [68]
-
Id Software creating new game [50]
-
High-Def DOOM movie trailer [15]
-
Doom III Chess [12]
Latest Screenshots
4 May, 2005 [20]
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
Comments: 1-26 of 26 in total
|
michaelius
21/08/08 @ 09:19
0
Hmm ok but what the hell is nvidia supposed to do about piracy for example ? Does industry expect them to put special DRM chips on everything they have ?
To put it simply make good games and don't sell them at rediculus prices. Also as for ID games while it's sad to say they haven't made anything worth buying since Q3 Arena. |
|
0
I'm a fan of Id and BOUGHT most of their stuff but Hollenshead and his constant whining is really getting on my nerves lately.
Especially the fact that he always tells you only half of the truth. Sony is doing the exact same thing. They're making lots of money with blank cd/dvd discs and burners while complaining about pirates at the same time. |
|
dominalien
21/08/08 @ 09:42
0
What are hardware manufacturers supposed to do about piracy? Make their network cards verify the legality of the content that goes through them?
Oh, and I really liked Doom 3. |
|
PearOfAnguish
21/08/08 @ 11:27
0
Why not make games that run well on old hardware so that people can afford them instead of forking out a fortune for hardware that can run it in the first place...
Most games do. It's just that people don't know this and continue to perpetuate the myth that PC gaming requires a £3k uber-system. |
|
kangarootoo
21/08/08 @ 11:49
0
"Why not make games that run well on old hardware so that people can afford them instead of forking out a fortune for hardware that can run it in the first place..."
How is that related to piracy? If your PC is too underpowered to run a game, you aren't going to get the game from any source, right? |
|
djcool3005
21/08/08 @ 14:35
0
PSP benefits tons from piracy. Custom Firmware makes it possible to do lots of stuff for the psp for free and I think secretly Sony are loving it. It's sold the psp really. If Dark Alex hadn't come along and created Custom firware then most likely quite a lot of people wouldn't have bought a psp. I agree with what everyone else is saying about the price of games. They're far too expensive. Why would i go out and pay £30 for a game when I can just download it for free. If you download 10 games that would of cost £30 each then you've saved yourself £300. Now if the games had only been about £5 - 10 each then maybe more people would actually of bought them.
|
|
0
"How is that related to piracy? If your PC is too underpowered to run a game, you aren't going to get the game from any source, right?"
What I mean is you're less likely to want to part with money for games when you've just spent your savings on a new PC. People have to spend money on the PC to play with all the latest bells and whistles, but they don't have to pay for the games. If you don't have to spend a fortune on hardware to play the latest games, then you're going to have more to spend on the games themselves. Also, id in particular are probably the worst for releasing what basically amount to interactive tech demos. People want to see the amazing graphics but they don't want to pay for the shitty to average games. I have an old PC, and I will probably buy Spore if the requirements are true. If I have to upgrade just to play it reasonably, I'm not going to be paying for it - either because I won't upgrade or I won't have any spare cash after I do. |
|
YourMessageHere
21/08/08 @ 20:05
0
Internet service providers, blank media companies and server hosting firms are all equally guilty. Wonder if he has ever owned a tape recorder or VCR, because that's exactly the same; clearly these technologies did their respective industries no end of harm. I think it's highly likely that a great proportion of the PC gaming market, or to put that differently, iD's main customer/fan base at least to date, are in that market in the first place due to piracy. Certainly my legit copy of Ultimate Doom was ultimately bought because originally my friend gave me a bunch of floppies with Doom on in 1996 which I played incessantly instead of revising for GCSEs.
|
|
0
I think he's spot-on. Take Apple - for years they've been making iPods with bigger and bigger hard drives. Who can afford to legally fill them? Even before iTunes started selling video content, it was still difficult to fill an 8 or even 4gb hard drive with legally obtained media. Yet Apple, and others, kept manufacturing them. Why? Because Napster had shown how easy it was to build a library of thousands of songs, not even albums, and that there was a need for a simple way to organise them.
|
Comments: 1-26 of 26 in total
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
