Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next

Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

PC Game Roundup Review

PC Review by Darren Allen

30 April, 2007

Page 5 of 5. <- Page 4

Dawn of Magic

Gamepage

In most RPG games, elven mages and halfling thieves abound. Dawn of Magic steps away from these stereotypes, which sounds great, until you realise you can only choose from a small selection of rather odd characters, such as: "The Baker's Wife. A friendly plump lady who loves to spoil people with her pastries. Has a high health score." I don't know if you've ever seen a goblin being beaten to death with a cream horn, but it's a novel concept.

You can't roll your own character up, which seems a bit odd in a game that prides itself on customisation in terms of a huge range of magic schools you can invest your experience points in. There are twelve different types of magic in total, from elemental through conjuring to blessing and healing (there are no baking incantations, thankfully). What's more, spells can be combined to produce a range of different effects, which gives the whole package an added dimension.

'PC Game Roundup' Screenshot 5

Is there any proof that the accused is a witch?

However, aside from the inventive magic system - and some interesting item-customisation options - this Diablo-style click'n'slash is as bog standard as they come. Bash the monsters, break the barrels, pick up the loot. The quests are largely bland, consisting mostly of kill tasks and other basic fare which fails to spark the player's imagination.

Then there's the combat. It's messy. You'll fling ranged spells at enemies and they'll mysteriously miss, presumably due to line-of-sight issues, but it's difficult to tell. Even melee combat seems buggy at times, with monsters you can't hit even though they're stood right next to you. The camera angles can be awkward, which doesn't help either.

It seems the developer thought that twelve schools of tweak-able magic would make a great game in itself. It doesn't. One of Dawn of Magic's blood spells is called Masochism. I'd cast it on yourself if you're intending a purchase.

3/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Alpine Ski Racing 2007 on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 64 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
krudster [mod]
30/04/07 @ 07:58
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
*Thumbs up*
haowan
30/04/07 @ 07:59
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I like the format, but IMO you should wait until you have at least one favourable review before setting up such an article.

I would also like to take this opportunity to request more reviews of independent free or shareware software.
krudster [mod]
30/04/07 @ 08:01
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Thing is...if one of the games is really good, then it'd deserve a full length review, no?
Killerbee
30/04/07 @ 08:07
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Thing is...if one of the games is really good, then it'd deserve a full length review, no?

Hmmm.... good point...

But other than saying "here's a bunch of games that are't that good - steer clear", with all due respect to the work Darren has put into this, I suppose the question is: why bother at all?

None of these games was on my radar before and they're certainly off it now.
calexico
30/04/07 @ 08:14
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wild Earth Africa is a really good game. Perfect for children and also for a casual game. The concept is pretty cool.
UncleLou
30/04/07 @ 08:16
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Holy cow, that's quite the terrible collection you assembled there.
I guess the format isn't bad, but maybe it should somehow be made clear from the beginning that it'll be an article about games not good enough for a "proper" review - I first had the impression it would be a roundup of overlooked little gems rather than the trash it is, and came away a little disappointed.
RE*AC*TOR
30/04/07 @ 08:20
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Clusterfuck of shit
MoFo
30/04/07 @ 08:22
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
There are plenty of decent little indie games for the PC out there which have been overlooked, so why pick this mediocre bunch to review?
ZuluHero
30/04/07 @ 08:31
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Killerbee

They could just give a title and a score and that would have the same effect :P

Plus they'd get more crap games to a page then :)
disc
30/04/07 @ 08:31
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So only good games deserve good reviews?

Interesting.
Anora
30/04/07 @ 08:33
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Thank you for giving DOM a 3/10, the game s*cks b*lls
Tomo
30/04/07 @ 08:36
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Tricky situation really. I like the idea too. There are often loads of PC games you see in shops (and console games really) but don't have a clue about, so this is a useful feature.

However, I agree with KillerBee at the same time. I imagine Darren is going to get a bit peeved each time you shovel five shit-to-mediocre games in his direction every month or so.
krudster [mod]
30/04/07 @ 08:37
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
We're already doing about 65 game reviews a month, and have been for some time now.

The point is, Darren had no idea these games were going to be cack when he started the round-up, and in future there may well be hidden gems among them.

Also, one thing we ought to point out is that we have a limited budget, and simply can't devote 1000 words to every single game that comes out. If you lot want to pitch in with in-depth reader reviews, that's all fine with me :)
Azazel
30/04/07 @ 08:40
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Good roundup. I like reading reviews of bad games a lot more than the good ones (I know I'm probably going to buy them to start with...) And reviews for average games are the hardest kind to write.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 30/04/07 @ 09:41
kangarootoo
30/04/07 @ 08:44
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@disc

Way to miss the point.
trevd72
30/04/07 @ 08:48
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
soldat 1.4 is out.....that should be shouted about!!!
Tomo
30/04/07 @ 08:51
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
True krudster, but what happens then if Darren finds a game isn't cack? Are you going to pull it from this article and give the game its own review?

I know that's what you were asking further up, but what do you reckon would happen? I'd be inclined to leave it in here. First rule of PC Game Roundup - what gets chucked at Darren (or whoever) and gets reviewed here, stays here!
haowan
30/04/07 @ 08:51
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
krudster - don't get me wrong, I think it's a good idea for a regular feature. The more games you review, the better, right? If one of the games turns out to be really good, I guess you could devote a longer review of it, but it wouldn't be required.

Anyway :) Cave Story review! :D
trevd72
30/04/07 @ 08:51
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@krudster to be honest I don't read the whole review never mind the the two or three page reviews. i zip to the summing up and score then the comments. Less is more and the rest is just masturbation; as they say.
alimokrane
30/04/07 @ 08:52
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Glad you guys are doing this. Other websites seem to have forgotten that the PC exists and they tend to review only those super hyped games ... you give us hope!
pauleyc
30/04/07 @ 08:57
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
We check out five new PC games you might not care about.

I certainly hope this feature won't be regarded as proof for the incorrect stereotype that PC gaming is dead - at least as far as the scores are concerned.
disc
30/04/07 @ 09:00
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
kangarootoo: Did I?
Killerbee
30/04/07 @ 09:04
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The point is, Darren had no idea these games were going to be cack when he started the round-up, and in future there may well be hidden gems among them.


Fair enough - that's answered my question, thanks Krudster. Here's hoping (not least for Darren's sake!) that there are a few hidden gems next time around.

@disc:

So only good games deserve good reviews?

No - all games deserve a review. Having said that, I am well aware that Eurogamer can't hope to revew every single game that gets released, so I'd much rather those resources were devoted to bringing us reviews of great games we really should play or to warning us about over-hyped crap.

The reason for my question was that I'd not particularly heard of any of these games and really wouldn't have given it a second thought if there was no EG review. That fact that there is a review is good, but it's disappointing that none of the games are really that great.

/shrugs
aldo_14
30/04/07 @ 09:07
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show

No - all games deserve a review. Having said that, I am well aware that Eurogamer can't hope to revew every single game that gets released, so I'd much rather those resources were devoted to bringing us reviews of great games we really should play or to warning us about over-hyped crap.

The reason for my question was that I'd not particularly heard of any of these games and really wouldn't have given it a second thought if there was no EG review. That fact that there is a review is good, but it's disappointing that none of the games are really that great.


On the plus side, if you happen to glance upon one of these games at the bargain bin at Tescos (etc), then you can tell if it's worth a pop or not.
ZuluHero
30/04/07 @ 09:09
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@disc

how many ppl only flick to the review scores anyway? Good game or not? :P
MyPointIs
30/04/07 @ 09:20
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
And only good men deserve a fair trial?
The Bodybuilder
30/04/07 @ 09:35
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
>"how many ppl only flick to the review scores anyway? Good game or not? :P "

Those people who whing and moan about the score, yet not bothering to read the review as to why it got tht score?

We all know how that ends up.
ZuluHero
30/04/07 @ 09:45
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
lol, true :)
krudster [mod]
30/04/07 @ 09:47
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think we'll try and keep all the obscure games in a round-up format, good or bad. If they're just crap, then I can understand why people would ask why we're even bothering. Hopefully there should be some decent stuff around at different times.
huxathon
30/04/07 @ 09:58
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
was hoping for a little gem to be uncovered in that bunch, but alas... good review format for smaller releases though, sort of a quick fire round.
kinggid
30/04/07 @ 10:01
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Personally, I prefer the reviews separately. I'm happy with the mini-reviews but think each should have it's own page. This saves flicking through 4 game titles I know I'm not bothered about to find the one I am. Plus, if there is a good game in there, it will get lost.
ZuluHero
30/04/07 @ 10:02
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Krudster

I think that’s a fair point. It seems ppl are hung up with the fact that ALL the games in this line up received bad scores (myself included), that doesn't necessarily mean that some real gems might not turn up in the future.
Talha
30/04/07 @ 10:06
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Love it. That's precisely the sort of column EG needs to set itself apart. As for the games not getting good scores - people, THAT's the reason many people don't know about them, right?

PlugMonkey
30/04/07 @ 10:07
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nice article. I'd much rather read 5 straight to the point reviews of obscure/average games than one full length review that's been done in a 'hilarious' writing style to fill the void.

And as someone else said, these are the sorts of games you find in the 2 for £10 section of Game. If there's one that sounds like it might keep me entertained for a few hours on a hungover Sunday, that's often enough to pique my interest.

You should do a Steam round up - that's where my hungover Sunday games come from when I'm too hungover to leave the flat...
motslaps
30/04/07 @ 10:12
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
not one of these games got over 5 - why bother telling us about them?
azwipe
30/04/07 @ 10:14
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm of the opinion that 'obscure' or not, I want to read about more about good games and less about bad ones. There are plenty of great games that don't get enough coverage because they come from small studios, don't have huge marketing budgets, etc. I'd value Eurogamer alot more if they told me about those, and gave them the coverage they deserve because of their quality, not their market significance.

Some games are more obscure than they deserve to be and EG is complicit in that. I've been enjoying the hell out of the source mod 'Minerva' which I only stumbled across in the forums. Why?
UncleLou
30/04/07 @ 10:20
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
not one of these games got over 5 - why bother telling us about them?

So they should rather play the games, find they're bad, and not tell us about them?

Where would you draw the line? Should they not write a review if the game got less than an 8? Or 7?
Dezm0nd
30/04/07 @ 10:31
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Fives games I don't know about and still don't because the review scores were average.

Get some PC games people dont know about which get a 10!!
urban
30/04/07 @ 10:48
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
...bizarrre that you'd list so many shit games.
trevd72
30/04/07 @ 11:11
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
this kinda asks the question:

Should only worth while games and hyped (to see if the hype is true) games be reviewed and the rest deemed as not worth looking at or spending money on?

AHiFi
30/04/07 @ 11:18
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was hoping you guys would get around to doing a format like this; thumbs up from me too. I like reading about obscure titles, even if they are mediocre. It's because they haven't been shoved down our throats.

So please keep this format!
Pulsar_t
30/04/07 @ 11:37
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Interesting format, I like it so far.. But regarding the PC well it's just sad seeing it decline like this. Indie won't save it either.
Ryuken
30/04/07 @ 11:46
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh yeah, because there has been nothing but junk like this on the PC this year...
UncleLou
30/04/07 @ 11:54
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Interesting format, I like it so far.. But regarding the PC well it's just sad seeing it decline like this. Indie won't save it either.

Because a sign of a succesful platform is of course that only AAA stuff gets released...
spongebob
30/04/07 @ 12:12
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nice article!
stoopidgreg
30/04/07 @ 13:46
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
it's a sad day for PC games
loeffe
30/04/07 @ 13:51
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Guess I was right not to know them...
Tyronne
30/04/07 @ 14:01
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
As these titles are all crap , why bother reviewing them on their own page , when one page would of sufficed titled 'crap' with the scores on.
YourMessageHere
30/04/07 @ 14:17
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I find it unlikely that there's enough good but unknown stuff out there to actually justify this idea over a long space of time, but I see no reason not to put the thing out there if you EG people feel you have enough free time to do so =P. Shame these particular 5 are as "bleh" as they are.
Perrythegreat
30/04/07 @ 16:02
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Think this is a very good concept, and one I think should be continued. As you said, you might get a game of the year out of it, which would be good

Comments: 1-50 of 64 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Metaboli

X View gallery