Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

Supreme Commander Preview

PC Preview by Ellie Gibson

10 May, 2006

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

Chris Taylor is a man with ambitions on a grand scale. It all started a decade ago, when he helped to create Total Annihilation - one of the most popular real-time strategy games of all time. Taylor failed to secure the rights to produce a sequel, but went on to set up his own studio, Gas Powered Games, which enjoyed a healthy amount of success with Dungeon Siege.

But the studio's next project is all about going back to Taylor's RTS roots. Supreme Commander has widely been referred to as the spiritual successor to Total Annihilation, and the similarities between the two games are clear from the first time you see SC in action. But what's also clear is that with Supreme Commander, Taylor is attempting to produce a game so massive in scale that it'll overshadow not only Total Annihilation but quite possibly everything else in the RTS genre.

To demonstrate this, Taylor starts off by showing us how the game's interface works. The maps are huge, and you'll have to deal with multiple battles at a time; to facilitate this, you're able to zoom out, and out, and then out some more, until you have an overview of the entire area, and your units are simply displayed as tiny coloured icons.

You can issue commands from this position, and so fight your battles from the ultimate vantage point - with a perspective on how your entire campaign is progressing. This offers many advantages, according to Taylor: "One of those being the ability to position and move waypoints in real time. And you can lay down paths, you can get estimated time of arrival, arrange a co-ordinated attack...

"This is a theatre of war. Traditional RTSes have been about battles - we bring you the war in Supreme Commander. We're trying to give you the kind of command and control that you've always wanted."

Close up and personal

'Supreme Commander' Screenshot transports

That'd be your transports in the foreground there. Very handy, they are.

That command and control extends to close-up warfare, too. Along with being able to view the action from far and away, you can also zoom in until you're right in the thick of it. Which means you get to see how battles are unfolding from a first-hand perspective, and are able to make adjustments to your strategy accordingly.

"This is a full 3D world, with depth - you can see right out to the horizon," Taylor says.

"We call this a spring look, so you can spring down take a look if you want and then go back; and there are full instant replay modes, so you can play it out to your hard drive and edit your own little movie if you like.

"Our goal is to make the visuals up close as exacting as you'd find in any RTS today, but you also get that experience pulled out at the same time. The technology has been engineered from the ground up to support this," Taylor says.

But just what are we going to be looking at, exactly? Well, Supreme Commander features three different factions, and each has their own unique set of units, battle tactics and even philosophical beliefs.

First up is the United Earth Federation, which appears to be the least technologically advanced of the three. Their units are the most traditional looking, so expect lots of wheels and caterpillar treads.

Then there's the Aeon Illuminate - like the UEF, they're humans, but they've nicked a load of alien technology to bolster their firepower. Their units are sleek and metallic in design, and many of them can not only hover but create a shield which makes them invisible, even to radars.

Fear factor

'Supreme Commander' Screenshot cybrans

The Cybrans are properly kicking off now.

And finally there are the Cybrans, which appear to be Taylor's favourite race, judging by the way he keeps banging on about them. "Cybrans are simple, elegant; their philosophy is, if you're really afraid of the other guys, you have to kill them... I know you've not heard of that. Just a little world politics there...

"The Cybrans are cool because they have this real can-do attitude. Their units can do anything," Taylor continues, demonstrating how the experimental Cybran spider unit can come in from the sea, sprout legs, run up the beach and head inland. The spider can crush whole tanks underfoot, and also comes equipped with a giant laser gun in case any should get away.

But the spider is by no means the most powerful unit in the game, nor the largest. Take the battleship, for example, which comes equipped with anti-aircraft guns, laser cannons and missile launchers which can attack units that are miles inland - and which is, put simply, bloody enormous.

"Scale's one of the big differentiators with Supreme Commander," says Taylor.

"What happens when everything's on screen is that your battleships become barely larger than tanks. So now, for the first time, we can actually have a battleship that's much larger, and you can see that the anti-aircraft guns are not too much smaller than the guns that are on the tanks.

"Finally we've got a scale that makes sense... You can do a battle with a tank versus a battleship, and you know who's going to win in Supreme Commander."

Despite its size, the battleship isn't invincible, since it'll take damage from subs and torpedoes, and will eventually get destroyed - in spectacular fashion. "When ships sink, they don't just go 'poof'. They break up into pieces sometimes, sometimes they go down, sometimes the turrets fall out; there are multiple different ways of dying. It's the power and majesty of naval combat that we really want to bring to the RTS genre."

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Supreme Commander on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-23 of 23 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
souljah
10/05/06 @ 21:55
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh I want, I want, i want, I want

.....a complete PC upgrade to play this :(
PinkSpider
10/05/06 @ 21:56
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wets pants.
Xerx3s
10/05/06 @ 22:05
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This is without doubt gonna give a shitload of MP fun :)
PinkSpider
10/05/06 @ 22:16
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Best thing about TA: Massive metal map, spend hours just building a base, then set two massive armies on each other.
Razz
10/05/06 @ 22:21
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Cool! :D
dsmx
10/05/06 @ 22:45
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Am I the only one who's terrified and the specs need to play this game?
disc
10/05/06 @ 23:10
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Doesnt look like too much of a system-hog. It does look like it could have too many units to be 'clean' for me.

Whitey McCool
11/05/06 @ 00:24
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What do you mean by clean disc? I think this looks spiffy. Hopefully it will be delayed long enough for me to justify an upgrade. :D
ave
11/05/06 @ 01:39
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Been waiting expectantly since this was first announced, the more details I get the more wet with anticipation I become.

This is going to be the biggest thing to happen to the RTS genre since the original TA

KillerMonkey
11/05/06 @ 05:24
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I can't wait for this game. I need it. Now!
Milbe
11/05/06 @ 06:39
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This looks very promising indeed!
reality_cheque
11/05/06 @ 08:30
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If nukes are even half as much fun as in StarCraft I very much look forward to it - and they sounds like the make SCs nukes look like pop guns :D
disc
11/05/06 @ 08:42
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Whitey: By clean I mean it might be hard to put your units in nice formations easily. The problem with TA was that you all these small bots and you couldnt manipulate them easily.

I require a nice formation functionality for the game, when creating groups with the standard shortcuts I'd like you to be able to then set the formations of the groups so that artillery types can stand behind the brutish powerful bots that can take a punch.

I dont really have a good example but think the formations from a game like rome total war but that you can create these formations yourself.
Ryuken
11/05/06 @ 09:24
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
There are enough screenshots from SupCom that do show a variety of formations. Those little robots in that base or an attacking squadron of tanks in V-formation.

Nevertheless, you all should see it in action => http://www.supcomuniverse.com/forum/showthread.php?t=410 it's hectic but cool.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 11/05/06 @ 10:24
Xerx3s
11/05/06 @ 09:28
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Am I the only one who's terrified and the specs need to play this game?"

TA was graphically superior to anything of its time (and a long time after that) and i remember beeing able to run it at me lowbudget p166mmx with a shit ati rage 3dcard. And it was a pleasure to play with. Im sure that they will pull of a similar trick again. If not, i can always rely on me topend pc. :)
shamblemonkee
11/05/06 @ 09:57
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Next year? *cry*

This and Spore are probably my most wanted PC games, and have been for a while.
Lutz [mod]
11/05/06 @ 11:02
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I complete new build to play this... but it'll be worth it.
coojam
11/05/06 @ 12:47
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm a massive fan of TA, but I'm a little worried that zooming out all the time will take the fun away from the close-up action...how are we supposed to direct multiple battles at the same time?
Whitey McCool
11/05/06 @ 14:02
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ahh I'm with you disc. I know what you mean actually, though with the scale of the whole thing being increased so dramatically I'm sure this is an area that has had a lot of thought put into it. In one of the interviews Mr Taylor talks about the way units attack a base, apparently its far more intelligent than the classic 'everyone drive up to the selected building and shoot at it!' approach.

Roll on 2007 then. And a new PC.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 11/05/06 @ 15:06
ralphwolfenstein
11/05/06 @ 15:09
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
footage on youtube!!!

here

OMFG!!!

Katsumoto
11/05/06 @ 16:48
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
this will be incredible, if TA was anything to go by. I don't think any "traditional" RTS (i'm excluding Total War series from that) has ever really come close to capturing the excitment and adrenaline that game could inspire! It also did naval well, and had nukes that (unlike in Red Alert) actually did some serious, serious damage! Which is what we all want. Naval battles look intense so far, hopefully land and air will be similarly breath-taking!
Bertie [staff]
11/05/06 @ 18:22
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wow, the footage of it is superb (the content) the actual footage is badly filmed and encoded!

/snob
Metalfish
12/05/06 @ 15:27
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wow, you can see through the shoddy capturing to the sheer awesomeness that lies within, in that video.

Hopefully they'll have thought of a decent way of building units quickly -it's always a bugger to have to quickly scroll back to your base to construct reinforcements in the middle of a carefully orcastrated attack, here, the increased scale could increase the problem.

Comments: 1-23 of 23 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery