Jump to navigation
Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War - Dark Crusade Preview

PC Preview by Alec Meer

16 October, 2006

There's been some canny identification of what did and what didn't work in previous instalments of this sci-fi RTS. What did - robots. Big robots, small robots, fat robots, skinny robots, flying robots, robots with spinning drillbits for hands, robots with giant laser guns, steam-powered robots with teeth... What didn't - well, not a whole lot actually, but the Imperial Guard, the new race in Dawn of War's last expansion, were a little vanilla. Men and tanks may well be a staple part of a decent war, but honestly, they're just not as much fun as robots.

So, this time around, the two new playable races include an awful lot of robots. In fact, the new evil faction, the Necron, present a sort of beautiful wish-dream for the discerning science-fiction enthusiast: robots with zombies inside that look like the Terminator and live in a giant floating pyramid. It's reasonably hard to argue with that. The not-necessarily-good-but-morally-ambiguous-at-the-very-least Tau, meanwhile, take more of a Japanese mecha approach. Do robot suits count as being real robots? The question has yet to be resolved to my satisfaction, but hey, the Tau's mechs stomp, rend and deathray with the best of 'em.

Robot wars

Even without such spectacular scratching of robot fetishists' itch, first impressions of near-finished Dark Crusade code suggest it's much more complete a prospect than Dawn of War has ever previously been. While the original game looked amazing and offered the best multiplayer RTS kicks of the last couple of years, it wasn't quite as comfortable when wearing single-player trousers. First expansion Winter Assault included a much-improved solo campaign (with a tantalising glimpse of the wonderfully menacing Necron in its closing battle) and introduced the aforementioned Imperial Guard as an interestingly defensive (if largely robotless) race. Trouble is, Games Workshop's Warhammer 40,000 tabletop gaming universe is so rich with frenzied sci-fi invention and homage that every bite upon its delicious flesh only fills you with craving for another. Still more was needed.

'Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War - Dark Crusade' Screenshot dow1

The Tau specialise in stealth. Sadly for them, Necron are good at seeing through stealth.

Fortunately, Dark Crusade is quite the meal. The two new races add an awful lot - more on those later - but it's the complete overhaul of the single-player game that has the greatest effect. It's no longer the standard cut-scene/battle/cut-scene/battle with some new units formula, but rather hung around a strategy map similar to that of the Total War games. It's a battle for territory, each conquered zone granting resources and buffs to your forces, and thus being heavily contested. Rather than simply fighting a big old scuffle and only moving on to the next level when you eventually win it, you need to make decisions about whether to spend your resources on defensive contingents, in case the enemy makes a play for one of your territories, or on building up a hefty invasion force to make 'liberation' of other zones that much quicker. It's non-linear too, asking you to choose which territory you nobble next rather than forcing you to play out a particular strategy. If you make a bad choice, defeat in battle isn't necessarily the end of the game and a miserable tap upon the quickload key, but merely the loss of a possibly valuable area.

This approach is so much more satisfying than having to go through the usual RTS rigmarole of dribbling unit types out by increments. Dawn of War vets wouldn't have much enjoyed having to start over again with a handful of crap infantry, trudging through 10 levels or so before they get access to the big stuff. In the campaign mode, you can build anything you have the time and resources for. So, in a large zone with plenty of resource point locations, you'll probably conscript a massive force in order to best the enemy's similarly meaty ranks, but a small zone may be best conquered by a quickly made handful of soldiers and a smash'n'grab Blitzkrieg approach.

Particularly cementing the desire to play through the campaign rather than just play skirmish or multiplayer missions is the reward system. Perform certain feats, such as vanquishing the enemy to a frankly humiliating degree or collecting an unholy amount of resource points, and you'll win unlocks for your commander unit. Pick which one you want, and it'll up his (or her, if you're playing as the Eldar) abilities in some way. Each upgrade affects your fella's appearance, too. It's a very light touch of role-playing, but it's a fine way of helping you connect to the giant, death-dealing magic war machine you're pretending to be.

Zimmer army

'Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War - Dark Crusade' Screenshot dow2

The single-player strategy map shows your progress in conquering the planet Khronos.

Dark Crusade is equally pleasing for non-veterans. It's standalone rather than an expansion pack, and includes all five factions (butch Space Marines, ethereal Eldar, brutal Space Orks, monstrous Chaos and soldier-y Imperial Guard) from the previous two instalments alongside the new Necron and Tau. The only thing you're missing out on if you don't have the previous titles is their single-player storyline games, which are outdone massively by Dark Crusade's solo play anyway. You can play the new single-player campaign as any of the seven races, with a little bit of different cut-scene action for each to build the atmosphere. In other words, it's almost a sequel. There's even a new and much improved tutorial to ease you in gently, and introduce the differences the new races have over the more established factions.

It's these differences that mean the Necron and Tau are so much more than just another slew of skins, animations and made-up names. For instance, rather than being important to unit production, captured resource points increase the speed the Necron army advances at. Without any capture points, you can have the biggest army in the universe, but they'll creak agonisingly across the map like a retirement home's annual day out to Skegness Pier. The Tau's party trick, meanwhile, is offering two different tech trees, each with varying units and upgrades. You need to decide relatively early on whether offensive or defensive tactics will win the day, as once you pick one route, the other is closed off for the rest of the battle. The Tau also break up the robot deluge by conscripting some rather nasty reptilian and insectoid melee units to their otherwise laser-y forces.

Whether all this is enough to make a two-year-old game fresher than ever or if it's excessive icing on a now slightly stale cake we'll find out in a couple of weeks, when we review Dark Crusade, but right now it's looking very positive.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War - Dark Crusade on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-32 of 32 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
coojam
16/10/06 @ 13:34
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
For anybody looking for a bargain, I don't know if it's everywhere, but most places sell Dawn of War for free with Company of Heroes.
kangarootoo
16/10/06 @ 13:36
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ooh, more of these full res screenshots please EG. They work really well, especially the map one in this article.
djchump
16/10/06 @ 13:42
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
mmm... I was a big fan of DoW but felt a bit let down there was no Orc campaign :-(
Moght check this out though - the Risk style map is the kinda thing I like! :-)
Rirekon
16/10/06 @ 13:44
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Necron's don't have any organic parts, so wtf was with the zombie comment?
AcidSnake
16/10/06 @ 13:45
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I have the feeling I've read this before somewhere...
absolutezero
16/10/06 @ 13:47
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Anybody know the excuse as to why we're getting the same game 3 weeks than the American launch? Its pretty much the same game bar slightly different box art.

According to most American reports from fans of the series, the Necrons are stupidly powerful if you let them get the Monolith up and running, you have to hit them hard, fast and early. Ultimate turtle race.

The Tau can kill mostly anything with a few fire warrior squads, however they fail massively in close quaters, and completely lack base defences. Still those tanks hit hard and are pretty fast.
16/10/06 @ 14:07
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Please could someone point out the robot races in Warhammer 40K, because as far as I knew the Space marines, Orcs, Eldar, Tyranids, Imerial Guard etc. are not robots.
Thus I do not understand the opening paragraph.
asphaltcowboy
16/10/06 @ 14:07
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sounds cool - Didn't realise it was standalone and I hadn't heard anything about the campaign map/open-endedness until recently - as much as I love DoW my interest was waning... now it's back! Cool!
Edited 1 times, most recently on 16/10/06 @ 15:08
Dynamize
16/10/06 @ 14:36
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Please could someone point out the robot races in Warhammer 40K, because as far as I knew the Space marines, Orcs, Eldar, Tyranids, Imerial Guard etc. are not robots.
Thus I do not understand the opening paragraph.


I don't really understand the underlying robot-thing in the piece ether. There aren't any robot races in WH40K (barring the Necron, and them being robots is debatable anyway), in fact the Imperium for one think the idea of robots blasphemous.

Maybe the writer's confusing "being in metal armour" with "being a robot".
Regardless, he obviously isn't enough of a geek :)

Anyways, sounds like a mighty expansion, worth a punt.
Bonzrat
16/10/06 @ 14:48
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
[To Dynamize] Wouldn't say I confuse the two, but essentially I do take a very broad view of robotage, yeah. I'm fully aware that a Dreadnought or a Killa Klan has a fella sat inside it, and that by definition a robot is something entirely machine, but so long as it's big, metal and preferably bristling with weaponary, it pleases mine eye in the same way a robot does. It's those units, whatever you wanna call 'em, that I enjoy most in DoW. As I said in the intro, the robot/robot suit argument has never been entirely settled in my book. In hindsight, perhaps something like 'mechanoids' would have been better, but thing is I really do like saying 'robot' as often as possible...
cheers, and sorry for any confusion,
Alec
Gurgeh
16/10/06 @ 14:48
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The Necrons appear to have been the victim of "Han shot first" syndrome with the game back story having them being defeated and hiding away for thousands of years, rather than having run out of living creatures to feed to their gods and going into hibernation till the food stock was replenished.

http://uk.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/warha...

Lim-Dul
16/10/06 @ 14:58
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Funny stuff this - seems as if WH40K is coming back to the roots - WH40K Epic: Final Liberation anyone? It may have been turn-based, but the meta-map concept was implemented in that game in almost the same way.
Dynamize
16/10/06 @ 15:01
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Don't mind me Mr Meer, I'm just being a nit-picking nerd :)
Very decent of you to post an explanation of your viewpoint, thanks for that.
Laserbream
16/10/06 @ 15:04
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Standalone you say? I'll surely buy it then. I'm not ashamed to say that I piratimated DoW and Winter Fun Adventure because there was no combined edition.

Oooh, upon further research it appears that a bundle with all 3 is being released. Tasty!
Stickman
16/10/06 @ 15:07
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
How to upset GW geeks in one easy lesson - make a technical error!

Actually, going back to the Final Liberation point (sort of), I can't believe that there isn't some kind of basic tabletop game emulator somewhere. I mean, turn-based, army list choosing, d6 rolling goodness.
rhinoxious
16/10/06 @ 15:34
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The only thing you're missing out on if you don't have the previous titles is their single-player storyline games, which are outdone massively by Dark Crusade's solo play anyway

eh? isn't thi sthe same thing?
botherer
16/10/06 @ 16:07
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Who's this "Alec Meer", and why is he writing the entire website?

I demand something be done in some way, and really rather quickly.
Azazel
16/10/06 @ 16:56
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Best way to upset GW geeks is usually to start saying things like, "ZOMG! Wtf R Chaos Dwarfs??1 U n00b! lawl!"

Anyway: I didn't know this was going to be standalone either... i'll most certainly be buying it in that case.
Blood_and_Thunder
16/10/06 @ 17:58
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
From what I understand, buying Dark Crusade by itself allows you all seven races in campaign and skirmish, but only Tau and Necrons online. So if you like playing RTS games online, might be worth getting the pack with all three in.
Ryuken
16/10/06 @ 18:17
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Heard some terrible stuff about the revamped mechanics (again), the buggy HWT and some glitchy animations but yeah, those two new races alone would warrant a purchase.

Waiting two weeks is not the end of the world but not great either.
Lonestar
16/10/06 @ 19:16
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've only played the demo's of these games and although quite enjoyable, there's somthing sparse about the maps which gives me an 'empty feeling'. I also didn't like the use of cover i.e. stand in a crater.

However, if they ever make a full blown sequel using the the Company of Heroes engine with it's use of cover and destructive buildings; Yummy.

17/10/06 @ 07:42
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm sorry, I'm not at all a GW geek, having never played a match in my life, and olny painted figures occasionally.

But to the the importnat distiction between the loss of life and simply the destruction of machinery should be made.

Did anyone cry because Goose's F-14 was destroyed? Or is a fighter plane a robot now?
Stickman
17/10/06 @ 08:47
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
That's what's bothering you is it? The fact that the reviewer doesn't mention those brave boys in power armour laying down their lives for the cause?

BremXJones
17/10/06 @ 10:12
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Stop being a big jessie. No tears! ONLY WAR!!!

KG
17/10/06 @ 10:49
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's just the seeming lack of any even basic knowledge of the IP that I'm worried about really. I haven't payed much attenting to GW stuff for nearly a decade now, and even I wouldn't fill a paragraph with "fat robots, skinny robots etc etc etc" and make the whole article about robots where there are none.

Be a bit like "Halo 3 - you play this robot who can shoot guns" - eh?
Azazel
17/10/06 @ 11:07
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Dreadnoughts have feelings too... *sniff*
Durandle
17/10/06 @ 12:00
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What I want to know is if the AI is better than the previous versions, cos on skirmish / multiplayer the AI was pretty bad, to the point of losing interest. "Why isn't the AI attacking... [10 min later] ... oh theres 50 units sitting in its base sleeping".
Turrican
17/10/06 @ 13:18
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think it must be very hard to program skirmish AI, but I think that DoW's was more challenging than most. For a comparison try Empire at War, its really basic stuff. Oh, and Battle for Middle Earth wasn't as good as DoW either.

Haven't completed Company of Heroes yet to try the Skirmish AI on that, but hopefully Dark Crusade will compare well.
BremXJones
18/10/06 @ 11:02
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I had no idea that GW fans were so humourless about their far future death. No Jokes. ONLY WAR.


KG
jonnyreb
19/10/06 @ 08:32
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
To be honest, I don't really care too much about the whole robot discussion thing - nicely written review IMHO.

But.....the history of the necrons is that they are actually 'mechanical' slaves with just their souls being encased within the metal shells (ie no fleshy bits and pieces)

I reckon you could get away with calling that a robot to be honest.

Anyway, for anyone bored or sad enought to read the history of Necrons just follow the link below.

http://uk.games-workshop.com/necrons/who...
BremXJones
19/10/06 @ 09:29
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I actually wrote a comic for GW about the Necron once.
First page looked like this:
http://gillen.cream.org/WH40K.jpg

KG
reality_cheque
19/10/06 @ 13:33
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Stickman - It'll never happen, as if you can play a PC version of 40k millions of geeks around the world would stop spending large wodges of cash on lumps of 'white metal' :(

It would be the ultimate in coolness though. I wouldn't even care about the graphics, just different coloured blobs on a map would do me. I just want to crush my friends beneath the large metal boots of my Space Marines :)

Comments: 1-32 of 32 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery