Overlord II Review

Wicked.

Version tested: Xbox 360

Mayhem-mongering has rarely been as fun as it was in Triumph's gleeful action-strategy title Overlord. Released a couple of years back, it was but a few tweaks away from classic status, combining elements of Pikmin, Dungeon Keeper and Fable to satisfying and comic effect. Dispensing cackling evil at every turn, it made us want to play the bad guy more often - and obviously you lot felt the same way. Sales of more than a million worldwide across PC, Xbox 360 and latterly PS3 turned Overlord into Codemasters' biggest new IP in years.

So, apart from perhaps requiring Brian Blessed's inimitable input, what else should go in the follow-up? More evil, obviously. More comedy headgear. Less suicidally dumb minions. A better-behaved camera system. At least some of these kinks (such as the absent mini-map) were ironed out in the belated PS3 release, Overlord: Raising Hell, but it still felt a little shy of the finished article. With numerous preview showings of the sequel demonstrating a ton of interesting new features, confidence was riding high that Dutch studio Triumph could go all-out and deliver not only a worthy follow-up, but, dare we say it, one of the highlights of the entire year.

To begin with, the basic plunder-and-conquer premise remains, with roughly the same amount of puzzling interspersed with action. The main difference is that you're playing the offspring of the armour-suited mischief-maker, and we pick up the thread with the new Overlord firstly proving his evil credentials, and then being initiated by the ever-humble minion master, Gnarl. Acting as your tutor and fawning servant, the sequel follows a familiar pattern with a seamless introduction of your basic powers and the abilities of your ever-willing band of evil helpers.

You kick-off with five brown 'minions' - sharp-toothed, giggling little wretches who take great pleasure in smashing up anyone or anything that gets in their way. As the melee specialists of your gang, these are the guys you want spearheading attacks, although they prove vulnerable to water, fire and toxic gas - something the blue, red and green minions are resistant to, respectively, once they're added to your growing army of miscreants.

'Overlord II' Screenshot 1

Welcome to the Seal Cub Clubbing Club.

The standard two-stick third-person controls are once again the order of the day, with movement assigned to the left stick and the right stick sharing the camera controls for the Overlord with the 'sweep' controls for the minions. Selecting, switching between and manipulating minions remains a simple yet flexible process which is introduced steadily during the early portion of the game. Whether you're sweeping, sending minions to specific targets, setting up 'guard markers' or calling them back, it becomes second nature in a short while. Those who played the original will be at an initial advantage, but the steady way the game is structured ensures that even newcomers will be pleasantly surprised at how straightforward it is to pull off seemingly complex commands using button and trigger combinations.

From the top down, it's clear that the Dutch studio listened to the community. The first thing that old hands might notice is that the minion AI is a little sharper, and less inclined to just follow the Overlord to their doom if the way ahead is dangerous. Path finding, too, is more reliable, and as a consequence you don't lose too many minions in inexplicable circumstances. If they do become trapped, after a time they'll invisibly return to their respective minion gates rather than dying in droves as was often the case before. The new mini-map is another crucial addition - it ensures that you know when you're on the right track, and removes all the time-consuming wandering of the original.

Another new feature is the ability for your minions (blues excepted) to become extra powerful by mounting other creatures, such as wolves, salamanders and giant spiders. Otherwise insurmountable problems - such as a tightly meshed unit of shielded soldiers - can be barrelled apart by sweeping a pack of mounted wolves into them, while making friends with spiders allows your greens to sidle up walls, activate pressure plates and reach otherwise off-limits areas.

There's also the ability to disguise your happy band of evildoers in enemy garb on a few occasions, with nearby changing tents allowing you to dupe guards into letting you pass. On both counts, Triumph gets around the need to add further control commands by making certain new features context-sensitive, with the player only required to, for example, sweep minions into the tent or onto the mount to activate them.

'Overlord II' Screenshot 2

There's only one way to deal with bleeding heart environmentalists: feed them to the wolves.

Elsewhere, firing magic into Possession Stones allows the Overlord to possess a single minion and wander off with a limited number of his chums to investigate part of the level too locked-down, or simply too small, to barge into in standard form. These stealth-lite interludes are an enjoyable change of pace, and because of the small size of the minions, the game zooms down to their level and you end up with a real sense of scale and vulnerability as you sneak past lumbering sentries. As a concession to the omnipresent danger, Triumph doesn't overly punish failure during these sections, and if you happen to screw up and lose all of your minions, you get to start over at the Possession Stone once more, with all the minions replaced. Better still, any sentries you've dispatched, or doors you've unlocked remain that way on your next attempt, so you're not simply expected to repeat all your meticulous good work over and over again.

Other new 'War Machine' gameplay elements enter the mix too, such as catapult and ballista emplacements that give you the chance to launch boulders or fire wooden stakes to rip apart massed shield-wielding soldiers. In addition, you can also occasionally board ships and rafts in watery sections and chase after opponents while trying to ram their craft and set alight to their sails.

And if that wasn't enough, the Overlord's magical abilities have also been expanded and made more useful in a variety of situations. As well as being able to zap or slow targeted enemies from a distance, you can power up individual minions and turn them into a missile, or destroy them and devour their energy to give you a health boost. Later, you can even use a Halo spell to temporarily boost all of your minions' powers, or as a powerful shockwave. And as part of the game's central 'domination or destruction' premise, you can also now choose whether to enslave innocents and get them to fight alongside your minions, or just destroy them for the hell of it. Mwahaha.

Experience also plays a greater role in expanding the overall depth of Overlord II. Minions level up as they fight alongside you, and if they die you have the ability to go back to the Netherworld and resurrect them so that your trusted allies remain part of your army. Powering up your equipment and armour remains key to progress, although you'll soon discover that you can't simply upgrade everything unless you're prepared to spend a long time gathering souls and ransacking every last barrel and chest in the game world.

As well as generally ramping up every element of the gameplay, adding variety where needed and fixing some of the niggles of old, Triumph has proven itself no slouch in the technical department either. Visually, the game has come on leaps and bounds with an array of subtle new effects adding greatly to the already beautiful fantasy game world. And to complement the sumptuous, gigantic world that you explore, the characters that inhabit it are delightfully rendered, extremely well animated and full of comic touches. Watching the minions go about their business is never less than amusing, as they don improbable objects as headgear and tool themselves up for battle with whatever they find among the chaos.

And it's no surprise that the audio is similarly top-notch, with the excellent voice cast returning to give Gnarl and the minions an infectious character that somehow works even better the second time around. Hearing a minion ensemble singing 'Ring-A-Ring-A-Roses' out of the blue right after they've stolen a bunch of kid's clothes is priceless, and one of innumerable moments where you'll be grinning helplessly.

But while the game works brilliantly on the whole, there are a few occasions where some elements could have been tightened up. Arguably top of the list is the slightly wayward camera system. Whereas before the game took full automatic control, it now attempts to offer the player a halfway house system, where it will generally do its thing, but also give you the chance to tweak it whenever you fancy. While this is an admirable goal, the truth is that it's sometimes easy to trip the game up and make it think you want to sweep minions instead of moving the camera. When it does this, the view automatically snaps to the minions, meaning you end up running into the screen and have no idea where you're going. This takes some getting used to.

'Overlord II' Screenshot 3

The mighty Overlord poses for the adoring masses.

Another small complaint is the mini-map, which for some reason is nowhere near as effective as Overlord: Dark Legend's on Wii. While it's useful to have a broad overview of where to head next, it's strangely ineffective when you need a little more detail, with neither the ability to zoom in and out of the sub-menu map, or flick between explored areas. Oftentimes, the game throws up an exclamation mark on the map, but when you get there the nature of the goal is not always particularly explicit.

And if we're going to be really picky, it's pertinent to mention that the game is - on a few rare occasions - inconsistent with its checkpointing. For the vast majority of the time, when you die you simply go back to the start of the segment with your resources intact, but on others it may decide to checkpoint along the way, possibly after you've lost a ton of minions. And, of course, the more you fail, the harder it actually gets, to the point where you may end up with no choice but to go off on a frustrating trudge around to kingdom to re-harvest more souls to stock up your minion pool. Fortunately you can prevent such issues by changing the save-game slot now and then, but if you forget, you could find yourself grinding away just to make progress.

Another possible source of frustration is the soul-harvesting system. Unlike with Dark Legend, again, every soul you harvest is colour-coded, and corresponds to a type of minion. While this makes the game more strategic and tactical, it does mean you tend to run out of particular minion types just when you need them. Personally, I prefer this system for the challenge, but it's important to be vigilant about your save games if you don't fancy repeat soul-harvesting runs.

In terms of the challenge and game length, mind you, I'd say Triumph has got it spot-on, with a satisfying blend of styles that can be achieved in a number of different ways. And once you're all done with the campaign mode, there's also a pleasingly diverse multiplayer mode to dive into. Although restricted to just two players, each of the four maps are effectively modes in their own right. My favourite of the bunch is Invasion, where you play alongside a friend to take down a Centurion in the quickest possible time. Broadly the same as the single-player mode, you have to work together, guiding a limited number of minions around taking down progressively more difficult foes. As a glimpse into what Overlord in co-op mode would be like, this is a promising start, and it's a shame there's only one map shipping in the game.

'Overlord II' Screenshot 4

Poor Yeti. I never did feel good about giving him grief.

Elsewhere, co-op Survival simply pits you within an arena and tasks you with surviving an onslaught for the longest possible time. This is fun, but slightly overwhelming and quite limited in the long run. Of much more interest is Dominate, a versus mode where the two of you essentially try to capture each of the five points around a large map and increase your score the longer you hang onto them. With limited resources, you end up trying to tread a fine line between defending each area with carefully placed minions and going for your opponent's jugular. A great game of cat-and-mouse, I can see this one being played most out of all of them. Finally, Pillage mode grants each player an island vault to defend, and gold to collect in the water surrounding it. Again, the balance between plundering your opponent's vault and worrying about yours is a tough one to manage, and rounds quickly descend into a nervous balancing act.

Overall, in what has been a pretty underwhelming year for games so far, Overlord II feels like a shining beacon of quality. Not only is it a distinct improvement on the original, but the new features add greatly to what was already a superbly entertaining game. It manages to strike an excellent balance between being challenging and rewarding, and does so throughout with a wicked smile on its face. If the original was something of a sleeper hit, then the sequel ought to wake people up to its deliciously evil charms.

8 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (66) Latest comment 3 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Trafford #1 3 years ago

    Might get this then.
  • CableNut #2 3 years ago

  • Metalfish #3 3 years ago

    "in what has been a pretty underwhelming year for games so far"

    I predict several comments disagreeing with this statement. For me, it's been pretty good (PC mostly, mind).
  • Hunam #4 3 years ago

    Reads more like a 9 really, I'd wager it's one of those 'add a point if you loved Overlord'. Looking forward to it.
  • FanBoysSuck #5 3 years ago

    "Reads more like a 9 really, I'd wager it's one of those 'add a point if you loved Overlord'. Looking forward to it."

    +1
  • Triggerhappytel #6 3 years ago

    Sounds like fun - I enjoyed the demo. I loved the style and ideas in the first game, but it just felt like it was lacking that little bit of polish. It also felt a bit more linear than I would have liked; is the second game similar in this respect?

    Anyway, I will try to pick this up at some point, as it sounds like the sort of game I would enjoy.
  • krudster #7 3 years ago

    It's fairly linear, but not in a sense that detracts from the enjoyment. There are other sub quests you can do at different times, but mostly you'll just be focused on the next major task at hand.
  • YoungPayters #8 3 years ago

    cool! definetely be getting this for when my xbox gets fixed
  • spudsbuckley #9 3 years ago

    The first one was utter wank and i bought it on the strenght of the demo and positive reviews.

    Turns out the demo was pretty much all you needed to play of it.
  • Hunam #10 3 years ago

    Kristen: As you're around, how long does it take to get all the minion types? It was a large part of the first game, but I'd rather for a second round get all that sorted out in the first few hours, is that the case?
    Edited by 1 at 22/06/09 @ 00:55
  • Triggerhappytel #11 3 years ago

    Thanks kruds. I will probably still buy it anyway, although I would prefer if it had small-ish free-roaming areas.

    I also really liked in the demo the soppy elvish guys you had to beat up. Not at all meant to be a dig at Link, I imagine :)
  • krudster #12 3 years ago

    I'd say about 10 or so hours, depending on how many times you screw up!
  • Harmonica #13 3 years ago

    "Overall, in what has been a pretty underwhelming year for games so far, Overlord II feels like a shining beacon of quality."

    I like it when EG do the bit in the final paragraph which somewhat undermines the score they are about to give it.

    Shining beacon of quality in a year of underwhelming games might be correct, but that doesn't say much for review scores in an all-time sense.

    The main problem with Overlord is the fact that sweep feature is something which sounds good on paper but is actually really rubbish and flimsy in practice. I liked the original for its charm, but found the gameplay lacking in bite, and I doubt this is any different, despite the additions, which are pretty perfunctory.

    The hyperbole in this article doesn't really do anything to persuade me otherwise, either. Kristan how can you go from writing a really clinical and excellent review like the one for Virtua Tennis 2009 and then this one which is just a list of features, page of praise, and then a BUT paragraph which nearly almost spins the whole thing on it's head (but doesn't really).
  • MangoBen #14 3 years ago

    Sounds great. I'd still bet a fair wad that it sells a paltry number, mind.
  • Hunam #15 3 years ago

    Just gave the PC demo a run to compare it to the 360 version and whilst everything works just a little slicker on the mouse with the camera, the sweeping is just stick emulation rather than having a cursor appear on screen for proper mouse control. Which is a little annoying and well, rather backwards when you think about it.
  • Captain_Jono #16 3 years ago

    I'm quite interested in this game now, although it's currently a toss-up between RFGuerilla and this.

    I have to say though, the numerical score is looking more ludicrous by the day (although the written review itself is a fair assessment). Compare the previous review (Monster Hunter Freedom) to this one. The previous review read like a lengthy apologia; making reference to rage-inducing grind, game-breaking camera, and a multiplayer concept which doesn't work outside of Tokyo city, while making every effort to emphasise the plus points. This review speaks ofa fun and interesting game which is hampered (but not crippled), by a couple of camera and map problems. Why did both these games receive the same score: 8/10?

    In future, I suggest that the Japanese franchises not be delegated to the fanboys.
  • Svecke #17 3 years ago

    Well-written and thorough review. I'm glad I plonked down my preorder for this yonks ago.
  • makeamazing #18 3 years ago

    It has been a pretty underwhelming year so far... but in the next few months its certainly going to start picking up :D

    Really looking forward to this game, and cant wait to get it :)
  • Darren #19 3 years ago

    The demo was a ton of fun to play although it was a bit too short. It just interesting then it ended leaving me wanting more. I guess that's the point though. Tried all three versions and decided on pre-ordering the cheaper PC version for the eye-candy and 60 fps framerate.
  • jaguarwong #20 3 years ago

    Any word on which console I should get this for or do I have to wait for the next format face-off?

  • Darren #21 3 years ago

    There's demos of the PS3 and Xbox 360 versions as well as the PC one too so you can check out for yourself which version looks the best to you. PS3 and 360 versions looked very similar to me, although I noticed some horrid framerate drops in the latter version near the start leading up to freeing the Yeti. AA looks a little bit weaker on the PS3 but that's what I expected. Anyway, go and check them out for yourself.
  • jaguarwong #22 3 years ago

    Cheers, I'll do that.
  • jimboton #23 3 years ago

    Oftentimes, the game throws up an exclamation mark on the map, but when you get there the nature of the goal is not always particularly explicit.

    Why should it be?

    You already have a minimap that shows unexplored areas and every interactive element in the scenery glows (in the demo at least). Do we really need more hand holding than that? shouldn't the player have something left to figure out for himself every now and then?


  • Xerx3s #24 3 years ago

    "It's fairly linear, but not in a sense that detracts from the enjoyment. There are other sub quests you can do at different times, but mostly you'll just be focused on the next major task at hand."

    Even so, when did being linear become a bad thing? Take a game like oblivion. It's not linear but it makes fuck all difference. It's still a linear experience in whatever way you play it.
  • Widge #25 3 years ago

    STEAMING a demo down to see what this is like. RTS game leads me to think PC > PS3 for this one.
  • Gaol #26 3 years ago

    "Even so, when did being linear become a bad thing? Take a game like oblivion. It's not linear but it makes fuck all difference. It's still a linear experience in whatever way you play it. "

    The difference is you have a choice.

    Not that linearity is necessarily a bad thing.
  • Nephirion #27 3 years ago

    any live achievements in the pc version?
  • Doctor_What #28 3 years ago

    Loved the first one, so I'll definitely be picking this one up. Probably not a day one purchase, but I'll get it first hand because the Codies should get proper support for making a decent quirky game.

    Games with character seem to be becoming incredibly rare (how many grumpy, gravelled-voiced, 20-something protagonists have we already had this year? How many more before Chirstmas?) so this kind of game should be cherished :D
  • Darren #29 3 years ago

    Nephirion - It's a Games for Windows title so that means widescreen and Xbox 360 contoller support as standard (as used in the demo) but it's not a Games for Windows LIVE title as far as I know so no Achievements.

    Do PC gamers really care about Achievements though?

    I know I don't... in fact the presence of Games for Windows LIVE fills me with dread as it has been known to cause problems with games, for example most recently with GTA IV for which is required an emergency update to prevent it crashing when GfWL was running. It's nice that GfWL games are automatically updated but that's as far as the good points go really IMO. And since only a handful of PC games support GfWL anyway any worth that Achievements would have had are substantially diminished unless you also play games on the 360.
  • Skurmedel #30 3 years ago

    Call me insane, but I like linear games sometimes.
    Edited by 1 at 22/06/09 @ 10:19
  • cwk27 #31 3 years ago

    Expect PETA to cocme bitching about this game in 3....2.....1.....
  • Triggerhappytel #32 3 years ago

    I also think it's been a pretty good year so far, what with the likes of Killzone 2, Flower, inFamous, SFIV, Red Faction 3.

    Regarding the linearity comments; I would have liked a bit of free-roaming exploration, but I know linearity in a game is hardly to its detriment. In adventure games like this I just like to be able to fanny around exploring and go off the beaten path. I'm currently playing Viking: BFA and I think that game does it really well - there's a fair bit to explore and find, but the game world isn't too large.
  • Inquisitor #33 3 years ago

    I'd disagree that it's been an underwhelming year for games. Okay, so I didn't think Resi 5 was as good as it should have been but I enjoyed FEAR 2 and Bionic Commando and Prototype were fantastic games. Then you've got the stuff that I haven't played like Red Faction and Street Fighter 4 and it's hardly a poor start to the year.
  • creepylizard #34 3 years ago

    I like linearity. All those openworld,sandbox style games with orb collecting and pointless running around. urg. give me Dead Space or silent hill or something any day of the week..
  • creepylizard #35 3 years ago

    I've been pretty underwhelmed byt htis years games so far. yeah, there've been some good games. Prototype and bionic commando as someone else mentioned and maybe a few others but nothing has been particularly outstanding really..
    that should all change in 0ctober/November though..
  • ardamillo #36 3 years ago

    Shame they don't give you back your minions when you return to a checkpoint. I enjoyed the first game but the grinding near the end was bloody annoying.
  • andywilkie35 #37 3 years ago

    I've still got the first Overlord sitting on the shelf. I'll finish that and get this when its cheaper
  • Chufty #38 3 years ago

    £20? Never really played the first one but I'll purchase this one thanks.
  • Lutz #39 3 years ago

    Odd. That review reads like a 9, boardering on a 10... then an 8 out of no-where.

    Edit: Good review though! Just an odd score. Sorry Kristan.
    Edited by 1 at 22/06/09 @ 12:36
  • ademkermad #40 3 years ago

    8/10 :o Sounds good

    You really should re-review Halo: CE now though... clearly rated it too low if games like this get an 8
  • Les #41 3 years ago

    "I like linearity. All those openworld,sandbox style games with orb collecting and pointless running around. urg. give me Dead Space or silent hill or something any day of the week."

    Fully agree, though there's not really a distinction between linear games and sandbox as such. The content in pretty much every sandbox game is 100% linear. The only freedom you have is determining in what order to pursue the linear activities (or not pursue them at all and just waste time, though I don't think many EG visitors will go exclusively for this latter option).
  • Psychotext #42 3 years ago

    I played the demo on the PS3 and found that my minions got stuck all over the place... is this sorted in the full game?
  • Darren #43 3 years ago

    @Psychotext - You can summon the minions to you by pressing and holding down the O button (B on the Xbox 360). While not ideal, it's a fix for the occasionally wonky path-finding. I doubt it'll be any better in the full game though but it's not a problem for me as I never had any issue with it in the three demos I've tried.
  • RexRunti #44 3 years ago

    Am I the only person who had 1000s of minons by the end of the first game?
  • Lutz #45 3 years ago

    Rex: Most I've had was about 4,000. I chucked them all into armour and stuff.
    Tried going for the 10k minions achievement, but it's damned hard work.
  • Rodriguez #46 3 years ago

    Yay! Loved the first game and I'm pleased to see this sequel improves on aspects of the original, will definitely be getting this when it's released.
  • Darren #47 3 years ago

    The camera control on the right analogue stick seems to work surprisingly well which I didn't expect when I realised that it still controls the minions too. I never had any issue with it in the demos and it's a huge improvement on the first game which required you to hold down a bumper button to move the camera. That for me is one of the nicest things about the sequel, it feels more like a proper third-person game now with RTS elements and less like a clumsily implemented RTS game with third-person elements.
  • Lawlost #48 3 years ago

    Got to agree with others on this thread, it certainly read like a 9, bit surprised at an 8. I wonder if he'll end of regretting giving that score like Kieran did with Thief II and III.
  • Unofficial #49 3 years ago

    For me, the demo put me right off. It was extremely lacking in polish, something I had expected Overlord 2 to improve on over the first game. The cutscenes, character animation, graphical glitches, collision on the terrain....just needed a thorough going over to polish it all up. I was underwhelmed to say the least.

    Gameplay wise too I found it nothing special. The core mechanic was interesting in principle but again I didn't see any particularly inventive use of it in the demo.

    With the linearity thing, yeah I found it to be too constraining for me in both the 1st game and in this one. One of the reasons for designing an extremely linear level is to offer a polished, closely designed and carefully scripted experience to give the player the best of what you can offer. I saw none of that. It seemed shonky and bare bones.

    I don't hate the game by any means but based on what i've played it would seem like a 5 for me.
    Edited by 1 at 22/06/09 @ 14:24
  • Nikanoru #50 3 years ago

    "I like linearity. All those openworld,sandbox style games with orb collecting and pointless running around. urg. give me Dead Space or silent hill or something any day of the week.."


    This is a problem with linearity discussions sometimes, people act as if there's only two types of games: if you're not bound to a narrow linear path so that the game might as well be on-rails, then the game must be a completely open sandbox where you're just doing meaningless missions on a procedurally generated landscape that you can completely access right from the beginning.

    I dislike both of those game types. What I see way, way too little of these days is the type of game that's kind of in the middle. Something that plays on the strengths of either, while doing away with their weaknesses. Metroid, for example, is that kind of game (or at least it used to be before MP:H and MP3 came along, something I can't stop raging about D:). It has a complex, believable world that does not feel like some sort of barely-interactive linear disneyland ride (like a lot of games these days), but still it restricts your movement at the beginning, opening up gradually on all ends, allowing for game progression, the feeling like you've reached a new "level" which sandbox games just lack, and fill it up with all sorts of interesting interactions, puzzles and scripted events.

    Final Fantasy used to be like that as well, before FFX came along and ran the series right into the ground by making it into a straight railroad ride. FFXII tried to fix that by making it into a singleplayer MMO with a world full of large, empty, meaningless area maps where the only thing to do was grind monsters, basically.

    I guess either making a controlled, restricted level 1, 2, 3 game, or just plonking the player down on a procedurally generated soulless terrain map, is just the easiest and most cost effective. I guess the middle ground game type just takes way too much effort to create, effort that needs to go into epic cutscenes and super ultra HD grafx. Oh well.
  • butler` #51 3 years ago

    curious 8

    but i agree about gaming this year... seems like one of those "waiting on..." periods. Namely Blizzard to release something, Final Fantasy XIII, Just Cause 2, or SCEE to realise one of the few good games on PS3 isn't even being released in Europe.
  • Miths #52 3 years ago

    I think I'm going to give the PC demo a try today. The PS3 demo was fun and looked pretty great, but there were several places where the framerate was a tad more shaky than I would have liked - although there's of course a chance they've had time to do further optimization since the build the demo was based on.
  • Slim #53 3 years ago

    Loved the first Overlord too, thought it was vastly underrated by most people. A rare thing; a strategy game that controlled well on consoles. If the small annoyances have been ironed out, this game will rule.

    Anyone ever take it online? How does that play?
  • Spekingur #54 3 years ago

    I am probably going to be playing this just because it's the only new game that reminds me of Dungeon Keeper.
  • Triggerhappytel #55 3 years ago

    @ fightman

    Well, I hope your PC crashes on you and looses everything you have saved, because it sounds like you deserve it.
  • Grayvern #56 3 years ago

    Possible the only game ever to be darker in the sequel for an actual reason. Looks sweet been looking for something to play recently.
  • MidianGTX #57 3 years ago

    @Triggerhappytel: don't be too hard on fightman, it's gotta be tough when the pizza place barely pays him enough to tip the strippers he spends all his spare time drooling over.
  • Jdoki #58 3 years ago

    Underwhelming year for gaming so far? Bit of a blanket statement that.

    Guess you don't own a PS3! Been an awesome year so far... Started with Killzone 2, then Valkyria Chronicles. Just finished inFamous. Import copy of Demons Souls is amazing. Tonnes of Burnout DLC. Couple of solid PSN games like Burn Zombie Burn.

    PS3 has barely been turned off since Jan; and as much as I loved the first Overlord game, I'll be holding off buying the sequel until I've finished all the other games (2nd play through of inFamous; Persona 3 and 4 to finish on PS2).
  • ElectricDemon #59 3 years ago

    I got the original as an unexpected gift for Christmas, and I've absolutely loved what I've played so far (far enough to get all the minion types). It's been on the shelf for a few months now cos I got distracted by other games and uni, but I really must pick it up again sometime, then move onto the sequel.

    One of the few games in recent memory to make me properly laugh (or should that be cackle?) out loud, hilarious game
  • penhalion #60 3 years ago

    Loved the first one so I'll get this.
  • PlugMonkey #61 3 years ago

    fightman: Why are you putting so much effort into ensuring that everyone knows you're a pikey?
  • jimboton #62 3 years ago

    According to Erik Brudvig from IGN this game has been almost just as dumbed down as the wii game.. how dissappointing, I really liked the first one.

    "The trouble with Overlord II is that--likely in the name of making it more accessible--the sequel has removed almost all of the exploration and strategy elements that its predecessor offered. What is left is a mostly linear action game. There is never any question about where to head next because there is invariably only one direction to head in. There is never any question about which strategy to employ or which minions you should use because the game tells you the only solution. Even the concept of mixing and matching minions to produce effective strategies is mostly absent. By the time you have all four minion types, Overlord II is approaching its finish. Many other sections only allow a single minion type to be used. "

    "Frustrating controls and tedious gameplay. The exciting exploration of the first game has been ditched."

  • sneetch #63 3 years ago

    @jimboton
    "Frustrating controls and tedious gameplay. The exciting exploration of the first game has been ditched."

    "Exciting exploration"? Really? I think Erik must have been playing a different game to the one I played, it was also pretty linear as I recall. Don't get me wrong, I love Overlord and just picked up Overlord II at lunch but there wasn't all that much exploration in the game. You followed a path through each zone and couldn't really deviate all that much from that path.
  • Godhather08 #64 3 years ago

    Actually it's been a great gaming year.
  • kinggibbon #65 3 years ago

    8/10! What the hell are you on?!?! This game is horrendous. I've just spent £39.99 on it and i feel it is worth a fiver in a bargain bin. The game looks horrendous(Especially the cutscenes!), plays like a normal game with some crappy camera and seems the script was writen for a 8 year old. Why it is a 16+ is beyond me as it is far less gory than games with the same age rating. Though I could only play it for an hour before turning it off and almost snapping the disc in rage of how grossly over priced and over rated by every game site this piece of rubbish is. This is my opinion and i'm sure others may like it. Perhaps more children than grown adults but if you haven't guessed yet, this game didn't hit me very well. This'll teach me to try demo's before i buy. *Afterwatds edit* I thought i had been too harsh on this game and gave it another go. After this i could see the 8/10 rating. The start levels are pretty horrible but after that its quite addictive. I owe this game an apology.
    Edited by 1 at 03/07/09 @ 01:40
  • Ninja_Tino #66 3 years ago

    Hahaha. Kinggibbon, fantastic comment. One of, if not the funniest I've ever read. The complete 180 was so unexpected. Just picked this up for £12 on shopto. I swear they just hijack lorries.