Advertisement
No bare bums or boobs in Soulcalibur IV News
Xbox 360 PlayStation 3 News by Robert Purchese
The BBFC has deemed Soulcalibur IV worthy of a 12 rating in the UK for its "moderate fantasy violence".
Official blurb on the decision also points to the "exaggerated 'curvy' figures" of the female models, but scuppers our wildest dreams by confirming there will be no bare bottoms or boobs.
"The Guidelines at '12' state that 'Violence must not dwell on detail. There should be no emphasis on injuries or blood'," begins the BBFC summary.
"The game also contains some female warrior characters with exaggerated 'curvy' figures accentuated by skimpy costumes. They are presented in a comic book manner and although the game allows characters' costumes to be customised, the player is not able to create a character with full breast or buttock nudity."
Meanwhile, Namco Bandai has claimed suggestions Soulcalibur IV on PS3 will require a 6.5 GB install and produce 2 GB saved game files are "significantly overblown".
"Those numbers are not accurate and are significantly overblown. The actual amount of space for the Soulcalibur IV install and save data file are in-line with other games requiring this feature," a Namco Bandai spokesperson told Kotaku.
Soulcalibur IV is due out for PS3 and Xbox 360 on 1st August.
It's better looking and more attacking-minded than any of the previous instalments, and there's a fancy critical finisher move that instantly kills your opponent if you can press the right buttons after you diminish your opponent's Soul Gauge and turn it briefly black.
Darth Vader, Yoda and the Secret Apprentice from The Force Unleashed are in it as well.
Pop over to our Soulcalibur IV gamepage to see it in action.
Incidentally, if you can't wait for a taste of Soulcalibur you can always download a revamped version of the Dreamcast original from Live Arcade today for 800 Points (GBP 6.80 / EUR 9.60).
Advertisement
Are you excited about Soulcalibur on Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games
Thanks!
Related Games
Soulcalibur IV
Soulcalibur
Latest News
-
Soulcalibur IV demo on Xbox Live [29]
-
PSN update stuffed with new content [27]
-
Vader/Yoda DLC for Soulcalibur IV [55]
-
Fracture, Soulcalibur IV demos on PSN [15]
-
UK charts: Soulcalibur IV fighting fit [46]
Latest Screenshots
14 July, 2008 [72]
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
Poster
|
WinterSnowblind
02/07/08 @ 10:52
0
It includes all of the extra's the DC version had though.
It's only missing mission mode, all the unlockables are still there though, albiet already unlocked.
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 02/07/08 @ 11:52
|
|
0
@bad09 - I'm getting sick of these mandatory HDD installs for PS3 games personally, it's the main reason I went out and bought a 320 GB HDD for my PS3. Instead of these HDD installs becoming rarer due to developers getting to know the hardware better, they're on the increase such that every game now uses them. I wouldn't mind if they actually improved loading times noticeably over the 360 version but in most cases they don't, they're just the same. And those games which are faster, like DMC 4, are only quicker by 1-2 seconds at most.
/sarcasm mode on Yeah, the PS3 is really making efficient use of its HDD! /sarcasm mode off P.S. I've pre-ordered the 360 version of SoulCalibur IV even though I'd have preferred Darth Vader as the bonus character. P.P.S. The game will still have man boobs so I'm happy! ;)
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 02/07/08 @ 12:06
|
|
0
Do thongs count as buttock nudity? I think they should if the definition on this link is correct.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionar... I could have sworn I saw (thonged) buttocks on the gameplay video at the bottom of the article. |
|
farticusmaximus
02/07/08 @ 11:25
0
"I could have sworn I saw (thonged) buttocks on the gameplay video at the bottom of the article. "
Voldo would be your main suspect there, the guy has no dignity! |
|
alimokrane
02/07/08 @ 11:46
0
Well I guess not including an HDD as standard in the 360 wasnt such a bad idea after all.Lazy developers FTL! they are making it a nightmare for PS3 owners .... *sigh*
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 02/07/08 @ 12:47
|
|
Mentalist(air)
02/07/08 @ 12:07
0
Big games should require big installs, deal with it.
Or like Xbox 1 and 360 games, they could just cache the data automatically. From what I heard at dev conferences, MS weren't going to allow installs normally even if every 360 had a hard drive. |
|
farticusmaximus
02/07/08 @ 12:11
0
"Big games should require big installs, deal with it. "
No, no, no, no and finally, just for good measure, no. Consoles are not PC's. Consoles are all about picking up a disc, shoving it in the tray and playing. No console game, unless it's an MMO, should have forced HD installs. Optional sure, but not forced.
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 02/07/08 @ 13:13
|
|
0
I for one couln't give a bare buttocked fuck about waiting for a minute or two for a one time install. Granted disk housekeeping is a drag but it is very occasional.
I wonder just how perfect your life has to be before this kind of thing becomes an issue, unless this is just redirected anger drawn from other annoyances in life - like how your Mum asked you to turn down your music... again! |
|
0
"The game also contains some female warrior characters with exaggerated 'curvy' figures"
Is that really a matter for the BBFC? I can accept that people want to get upset over body image, but does it need mandating by the ratings board? Are they going to start rating Dawn French DVDs higher for promoting obesity? |
|
0
@Arbiter - The original Xbox arguably made better use of the harddrive than the PS3 does by caching efficiently and transparently. The main reason for these mandatory installs on the PS3 in the first place is to circumvent the slow BD speeds, something which could be avoided with many games if Sony released them on DVD instead of BD, i.e. multiformat releases. I believe the PS3 can read DVDs at 8X, not quite as fast as the 360's 12X admittedly but still it would be better than installing every bloody game! When most 360 games can run off a DVD with NO HDD install and load at the same speed, more or less, as HDD installed PS3 multiformat games, it does make Sony's system look a bit clumsy and messy IMO. The PS3 is supposed to be an easy-to-use games console for goodness sake not a PC!!!
|
|
0
@Chufty - That's not what I meant and you know it. For 40 GB HDD users who will eventually find themselves having to labouriously delete and reinstall games when they run out of space, the PS3 is NOT an easy to use system. Yes, it's an inconvenience that's all but nevertheless it's an inconvenience that the competition doesn't have. You don't have to buy an HDD to play Xbox 360 games for example.
I'm not against HDD installs personally IF they're used properly and PROVIDED they're optional. I don't think forcing mandatory 2-5 GB installs for a system that only has a 40 GB HDD model is particularly sensible myself. As Uncharted proved, it's possible to have a BD-based game without a massive install and still have quick loading times so it's up to Sony to ensure that the developers are using installs for legitimate reasons not through sheer laziness as so many seem to be doing now. P.S. I have a Wii! :P |
|
0
I love the fanboys trying to defend PS3 installs, it's funny! Me I don't really like the idea of having to watch the games I buy or wait to install games if I want to play something I've had to erase of the drive so I can play something new. Thankfully I have 360 which saves huge amounts of space on my PS3 drive, but if PS3 was my only console I'd be pretty pissed about it.
Sure I will (have to) get a new HDD (at further expense to me thank you very much Mr Sony) but that is far from the point. Personally, I thinks it terrible they only give us 40gb knowing full well the kind of storage these installs are taking up thanks to a disk system clearly not the best for running games, still blu wasn't put in PS3 for the games anyway was it.... ;) |
|
0
See now I always thought Namco would be one of the devs who could work well with a Bluray drive. Previous Namco fighters are always super quick to load. So to here they are doing a mandatory install on PS3 is quite bad news.
The problem I assumed with bluray drives was seektime. So games with open environments were tough but where you can bundle stuff up logically should be ok. A fighter should be easy to bundle up. One bundle for the arena and one bundle for each possible fighter combo. Although I seem to remember that SCIV has lots of character customisation which could arse this up. |
|
0
@bad09 - Exactly my point... completely agree with what you said.
At least, Sony don't make you pay for their own grossly overpriced HDDs like Microsoft do for anyone wanting more than 11 GB of storage space on the 360. I mean £130 for a 120 GB HDD?!?!? I paid £80 for a 320 GB HDD for my PS3!!! LOL |
|
0
@bad09
oh shut up will you , you can tell you are a new school gamer who has never heard of pc gaming Installs arnt a problem been doing it for 7 years with my pc and now the ps3 if it speeds up loading times then its okie by me , looking at a 300gb harddrive this month but for 40 odd quid no biggie just get a life and stop trying to get one over on people. |
|
0
"Sure I will (have to) get a new HDD (at further expense to me thank you very much Mr Sony) but that is far from the point. Personally, I thinks it terrible they only give us 40gb knowing full well the kind of storage these installs are taking up thanks to a disk system clearly not the best for running games, still blu wasn't put in PS3 for the games anyway was it.... ;)"
On the other hand, if they released an official 250 or 320 GB PS3 at this point, they would probably charge at the absolute very least around a hundred Euro more than for the 40 GB model, while on the other hand you can buy a 250 GB disk for around €50 and spend five minutes installing it yourself. But I do agree - for those stubbornly refusing to do such an upgrade (as I refused myself until around a month ago), the many large mandatory installs do become a pain in the ass with so little space available. I frequently had to go back and delete game data from games I hadn't played in a few weeks, but nevertheless still felt I might want to revisit soon. On the other hand, there's no way in hell I would rather have a faster DVD drive than a Blu-ray drive. That's one of the original reasons I bought a PS3 - as a full media system. And if it did have a DVD drive instead (or if games were released on DVD), I imagine it's likely we would suffer from the same horrible drive noise as you get from the 360 (and most PCs, but there you generally only have to sit through the turbine sound during the initial game install). |
|
0
@ Darren
I agree completely MS are no angels in the HDD skullduggery either but the important difference with MS is it's down to you if fill up your HDD with arcade titles and media with the PS3 you have no choice but to fill a great deal of space purely with data for "disk format" games before you even get to purchasing stuff off PSN or putting media on it. |
|
0
@ muftak
OK I don't know gaming. I don't need to prove myself as gamer to you or anyone and certainly not trying to get "one up" on anyone and also I'm perfectly aware PCs install, that's why I made sure when I built my PC I had enough storage. When I buy a GAMES CONSOLE I buy for ease and plug in and play and I don't expect to upgrading a HDD within 2 months (i think I've had PS3 two months maybe a little more) As you prove, my post stands, I love the way the fanboys try to defend it, it's funny.......
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 02/07/08 @ 15:02
|
|
monkie_king
02/07/08 @ 14:34
0
Darren makes a very good point -- if Sony would let games be published on DVD then these problems would go away. It clearly doesn't need the BD capacity, so what on Earth is the point?
A mandatory install for a fighter is ridiculous. On a related point, anyone know why the SCIV game data on xbox.com says "Harddrive required"? edit: oh, they've changed it now. Must have been confused with the PS3 version :-p
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 02/07/08 @ 15:37
|
|
IronCladChicken
02/07/08 @ 14:56
0
lol@bad09
These are the same fan-boys who'd say console gaming is superior to PC gaming in part becasue there were no HDD installs... All of a sudden installing to the HDD actually makes the games better (& obviously superior to the 360 in every respect) :P |
|
YourMessageHere
02/07/08 @ 15:24
0
Personally I want my games to automagically load instantly from unscratchable discs that are free and play in greater than HD resolutions. However this is impossible, so I manage within the physical limitations of throwing around the huge amounts of data required with latest generation resolutions and storage methods.
I don't get it - if you want a console that does more than the last generation did, it WILL be more complex and you WILL have to deal with it, including learning the terrible hardship this black art of installing and uninstalling presents. Admittedly I'm not a console person, but I can't believe that uninstalling a PS3 or 360 game also kills the saves; so if you run out of space, crikey, you have to uninstall a game. Then you may have to wait if you want to play it later. Why is this so hard? |
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
