Jump to navigation
Advertisement

GTA IV screenshot a hoax News

Xbox 360 PlayStation 3 News by Tom Bramwell

22 June, 2006

Rockstar says that an image circulating around web-forums this afternoon, supposedly showing a TV screen running a debug version of Grand Theft Auto IV, is a hoax.

The image, which you can see below, first showed up in the inboxes of various media organisations this morning under the subject line "From a disgruntled ex-employee of Rockstar..."

And initially Rockstar didn't have much to say about it, fuelling speculation it was an actual shot of Grand Theft Auto IV, which is due out on PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 next October - as announced at E3.

'GTA IV screenshot a hoax' Screenshot 1

But that's not the case, Rockstar told us this afternoon. It really is a hoax.

In other words, you'll have to wait a bit longer to find out what Grand Theft Auto IV looks like, where it's set, what sort of cars it has in it and of course, most importantly, whether it has dogs that wee on street corners or not.

For more on GTA IV, check out recent news about the cast, and suggestions that it will use Table Tennis's RAGE engine.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Grand Theft Auto IV on PlayStation 3/Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 54 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
foreverafternothing
22/06/06 @ 14:35
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well there we go then.
Darkedge
22/06/06 @ 14:36
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
fake? well okay then.
I like the mace but the cell shaded look... nahh
Blerk
22/06/06 @ 14:37
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
But is it a double bluff? Eh?

/cranks rumour mill
Freek
22/06/06 @ 14:39
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Even if it was real and somebody broke god knows how many NDAs they'd still say it was fake.
I'm not totaly convinced it is real but Rockstars denial is pretty predictable.
Wrestlevania
22/06/06 @ 14:43
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Quickly Freek--click Speak your brain... a third time for maximum combo!
Sko
22/06/06 @ 14:47
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm losing count - is this the third or the forth fake since GTA IV was announced. I remember a couple of 'my-first-city-scene' renders showing up with the old UI pasted over the top.
Baz_Dude
22/06/06 @ 15:00
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
LOL the main characters a giant :D
MrWonderstuff
22/06/06 @ 15:22
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If it's not GTA then what game is it? Possibly a Movies render.
ave
22/06/06 @ 15:24
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
And initially Rockstar didn't have much to say about it, fuelling speculation it was an actual shot of Grand Theft Auto IV, which is due out on PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 next October

Next october is 4 months away, October 2007 is 16 months,
Darren
22/06/06 @ 15:25
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Good job it's a fake 'cos it looks rubbish, barely better than the original running on a PC. Even Saints Row looks better!
Stormflood
22/06/06 @ 15:28
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Best GTA fake yet. Too many giveaways though.

Oh, and never trust a 'leak' taken from a TV screen - they're always done like that to conceal all the little tell-tale clues that would show up on a direct screenshot.
Darren
22/06/06 @ 15:32
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Next October is 4 months away, October 2007 is 16 months."

Since GTA IV isn't out until October 2007, EG are correct to say the game is out next October. October 2006 is THIS October. /wink
Trendyninja
22/06/06 @ 15:35
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Seems like an awful amount of work just to create a hoax screenshot.
Glitch
22/06/06 @ 15:41
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It does look shit hot, I do agree with Darkedge, cell shading looks turd.

GTA4 FTW!
22/06/06 @ 15:42
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don’t see the point in announcing such a precise release date [19/10/2007] for it when there’s still 1 year and 4 months left; especially that they never seem to be certain about near future release dates...
dk_rare
22/06/06 @ 15:44
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
3D map was cool though, I mean it looks friggan awesome. It's not the whole city btw on the 3D map, like the 2D map it scrolls the builings that you are around
22/06/06 @ 15:47
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I do believe that the next october to come is this october.

Even if it was real and somebody broke god knows how many NDAs they'd still say it was fake.
I'm not totaly convinced it is real but Rockstars denial is pretty predictable.

Oh, and the original GTA was a 2D scroller BTW.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 22/06/06 @ 16:48
nickthegun
22/06/06 @ 15:51
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Seems like an awful amount of work just to create a hoax screenshot.

Remember the PS3 fake that looked like a projector? Some internets retards will go to a lot of trouble over the most stupid things.

The fact that this screeny managed to make it onto several mainstream websites probably has led to several self congratulatory wanks in celebration.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 22/06/06 @ 16:52
22/06/06 @ 15:56
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I see everyone's trying to keep Freek's legend alive lol
Steroyd
22/06/06 @ 15:56
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
most convincing fake yet.
ecureuil
22/06/06 @ 15:58
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
lol, the main character is huge. And why is the chain on the mace rigid? It's gotta be a fake.

Again with the cynicism on this site.

Company says something.
Everyone suggests they are lying to cover something up.
Hunamster
22/06/06 @ 16:10
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
reminds me of that kids corner advert
weaselrat
22/06/06 @ 16:14
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The mace could be swinging as she walks and the camera may of just caught it looking straight. You have to admit, if you check the whole picture out it is very well done if it is a fake!??????????!!!!!!!!!!!
weaselrat
22/06/06 @ 16:17
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Also the 3d map of the town is very well done> I think this might just be an early game shot and it could well be a double bluff. I mean why waste that time doing this with one screen when a hoax could of leaked a whole page load.
22/06/06 @ 16:24
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
To me the graphics look like a slightly modified Sims 2 game!
Owen-B
22/06/06 @ 16:29
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Even if it was real and somebody broke god knows how many NDAs they'd still say it was fake.
I'm not totaly convinced it is real but Rockstars denial is pretty predi- ...



Oh. Damn my slow fingers!
22/06/06 @ 16:31
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
lol
22/06/06 @ 16:32
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Even if .. ... ..... ... ........"
theweaze
22/06/06 @ 16:42
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
crazy taxi 7 revenge of the giant women, and pissing dogs
22/06/06 @ 16:49
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It does look fake, even the tram rail in San Andreas looks better than this one... But then again it's due in 16 months time so it may well be an early version.
Freek
22/06/06 @ 17:26
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Got a server error when I replied and I geuse server gremlins cloned my reply.
kangarootoo
22/06/06 @ 17:47
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Course its a bloody fake, look at the state of it. I can't believe there are people on here saying stuff like "well its a very good fake".

A very good fake of a crappy screenshot perhaps. If any next gen title actually looked like that these threads would burst into flames.
weaselrat
22/06/06 @ 17:52
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If you look carefully just to the right of the women, you can see a lense flash from the camera that took the photo which suggests that this game was actually running or the hoaxer is very very considerate of minor details???.

Maybe the reason the women is big is because the game camera might be zoomed. Either way, if this is a very early version, I can't wait to see what it will look like when it finally arrives and if it's fake it's a very well done job.
weaselrat
22/06/06 @ 17:55
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Most of the PS3 games on display at E3 looked worse than this when they weren't showing all that CGI. Also look at some of the early shots for both 360 and PS3!!! This looks better than loads of those, so why could this not be a very early version??? not saying it is but why not???
Sko
22/06/06 @ 18:07
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"If you look carefully just to the..."

Yeah but no. I'm going to go with 'cheesy lense-flare effect added to shot'. Starts in the top-left corner just _behind_ the "debug" info. Unfortunately the shadows are pointing in the wrong direction.
nick_f
22/06/06 @ 18:15
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"If you look carefully just to the right of the women, you can see a lense flash from the camera that took the photo which suggests that this game was actually running or the hoaxer is very very considerate of minor details???."

Or just possibly they displayed the image on a TV to take a photo of it - something that would take about 2 mins with most decent digital cameras.

I'm sure half the people decrying this as an obvious fake were taken in by the Killzone 2 "footage".
22/06/06 @ 18:23
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ kangarootoo
" I can't believe there are people on here saying stuff like "well its a very good fake." A very good fake of a crappy screenshot perhaps. If any next gen title actually looked like that these threads would burst into flames."

Current GTA games look pretty last generation, so I wouldn't be that surprised at all even if this was the finished product.
penhalion
22/06/06 @ 18:37
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If this is a fake I'll be very interested to know what game it is from. I disagree that the graphics don't look next gen as I can see full shadows and the buildings are detailed enough for what I would expect of a GTA type game.

Main character a girl? Hmmm I guess if in the near future rockstar suddenly announce a female main lead, then we'll know for sure if this is a fake or not ;)

Of course the real slim shadey could stand up in the mean time.....
kangarootoo
22/06/06 @ 18:46
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@weaselrat

It could simply mean someone photographed a monitor that was displaying a still image, Just because it was on a screen doesn't mean it was "running" (unlewss you mean it was running photoshop.

It may have actually been a game of some description. But just bloody look at it! GTA on next gen it is not.

@Nintendude

Its the art detail I have issues with. The scale of the main character is wrong compared to her surroundings. The lampost is poking through the kerb.

Now it is possible I suppose that it is some actual Rockstar tech build for testing draw distance or something like that, but that doesn't make it GTA, just like John Carmack's self penned screen saver is not Doom IV.

/feels like he is actually painting himself into a corner here with quickly typed brain fart comments, but never mind eh.
weaselrat
22/06/06 @ 19:08
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@kangarootoo. I'm not saying it is, i'm saying I would not of been surprised as it looks about the same quality as some of the early next gen games.
It could well be an earlier GTA with a few minor photoshop adjustments......... with that wonderful package I can even make my ex look hot! well just about
Edited 1 times, most recently on 22/06/06 @ 20:09
22/06/06 @ 19:11
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@kangarootoo
Be careful not to get abducted by aliens lol, you seem to have some exclusive information
the creeper
22/06/06 @ 20:21
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Worst... fake... ever...

Seriously guys. Someone sticks the GTA HUD and some debug text on top of some naff screen render and some people are actually convinced... I wouldn't be impressed with that on current gen, give Rockstar some credit. You can argue the game's 16 months away, but a game 16 months out is unlikely to have much in the way of textures applied to the geometry anyway.
Pastici
22/06/06 @ 21:15
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought that was BBQ in the corner!
Baz_Dude
22/06/06 @ 22:28
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought it was one of those things that you shake and it looks like its snowing inside the thing (dont ask me wat they are called)
stoopidgreg
22/06/06 @ 22:47
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
it's simply a 3D render with some poser models. there's so many things wrong with it that there's no way it's real... and how awful does that 3D map look? it wouldn't even be functional, since you can't even see the streets.
Mick
23/06/06 @ 08:20
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
if it was actually a genuine pic, all the people saying it looks graphically grap need to give your head a shake. The game isnt out for another year and a bit, what would you expect from an early debug version?

Personally, i like the pic, it helps to give some idea of what we can expect from the game. i mean that image will be moving about in real time, all smooth and sexy.
getinthereson
23/06/06 @ 08:40
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Doesn't look like London or Tokyo to me. ;)
The Bodybuilder
23/06/06 @ 12:37
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
>"I thought it was one of those things that you shake and it looks like its snowing inside the thing (dont ask me wat they are called)"

Snow globes.

I personally thought it looked like a bowl of doritoes.
red_ray
23/06/06 @ 12:41
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
3 stars - where's the police?


Mentalist(air)
23/06/06 @ 12:51
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm a game developer, and I can tell you that from my experience that does look quite convincingly like a screenshot from an in-development game. It's not 'cell shaded' as people were trying to say further up the thread, they're just using pretty basic lighting shaders, which is the sort of thing in-development games do.

If you want proof, it actually looks very similar in quality to screenshots of Saint's Row, see the fifth one on the top row here for instance:

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?art...

It certainly has a real-time look, which you don't often get from renders, and those hard-edged stencil buffer shadows are a complete bastard to get right in-engine.

The only things that put me off thinking it's a real GTA screenshot are the very odd-looking mace and the fact that the blue building in the background look like static cutouts, which is not something GTA usually does.



Edited 1 times, most recently on 23/06/06 @ 13:55

Comments: 1-50 of 54 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery