Half-Life 2: $40 million in, still Steaming forward

Steam: content delivery service, poster-child for games on demand, and now part-time cosmetic surgeon. When your game costs 40 million dollars to make, why risk growing old?

'Half-Life 2: $40 million in, still Steaming forward' Screenshot 1

Half-Life 2 has been swimming in clichés for almost a year now. Expectations have "gone through the roof" since E3 last May. Its "breath-taking" and "jaw-dropping" technology is a "quantum leap" in terms of what we've come to expect from games. It is "the full package", promising a world that combines "unparalleled visual quality" and "realistic physics" so that its "believable characters" are in a position to deliver a "brand new experience". With "improved AI" helping them along.

What makes the difference is that most gamers actually believe a lot of what they hear about Half-Life 2. The original Half-Life - rightly regarded as one of the defining moments in a genre that used to belong almost solely to the residents of Dallas, Texas - is a very solid guarantor, and, even a year on, those first shots of the game and the trade show presentations continue to reverberate around the internet with the clanging resonance of the world's biggest crowbar.

But what with source code leaks and slippage problems, these days Seattle-based developer Valve Software has to contend with a faint level of scepticism from some quarters (even if we'd wager most of its critics are just as likely to buy the resulting game as everybody else). Given the developer's widely reported problems and the game's delays, it's hardly surprising that an interview with founder and head honcho Gabe Newell is now something of a rarity. When he does pipe up though, he doesn't disappoint.

"Last time I checked, we were about $40 million into the project," he told Maxitmag this week. "Yikes, that's a scary number." It certainly is. Off the top of our collective head, it's difficult to think of another game that came close to that figure, let alone one that managed to recoup it. Final Fantasy games may involve hundreds of staff members nowadays, but other than that we're stumped.

Perhaps more interesting than the extraordinary amount of cash that has been pumped through the Valve though is Newell's comment on the developer's ambitions for content delivery system Steam, which has endured its own problems - that one might charitably put down to "teething problems".

We all expect Half-Life 2 to debut at retail and on Steam simultaneously. Valve's single-player Counter-Strike project Condition Zero will be handled this way, and with HL2 on track for a summer release by current estimates it makes sense to look at CZ's release in terms of a "dry run".

However Newell's latest comments suggest that Steam - and products like it - will play an increasingly important role in the lifespan of PC game titles, removing the need to rely on scouring download sites for weighty patches, or worse probing forums for ways to enable those 'advanced options'. Equally, products like Steam could help developers like Valve keep a game fresh relatively seamlessly. "We can use Steam to update people's games as new hardware emerges," says Newell. Imagine buying HL2 in five years' time and still being impressed as it quickly downloads support for Smell-O-Vision and bump-screen explosion effects.

"Let's say there is some new fantastic capability that emerges in the hardware, we can give updated content to all of the people who buy this hardware. Basically you'll plug in the hardware, Steam will detect it, and get the new shaders, textures, or whatever you need," he told Mixitmag. "Being able to individually deliver unique assets is a big step forward from the one-size-fits-all approach that traditional physical goods delivery has restricted us to." And as good a reason as any to stick with PC development instead of relegating it to the role of fishing for tardy console ports. If your PC version looks crap because your target platform was PS2, why not continue to update it? The possibilities are very encouraging. Sure, some folks could exploit it to justify shipping unfinished games, but then people will always exploit things if it's in their interest.

Although Steam was always going to prove useful in delivering seamless updates, it's encouraging to see that Valve looks upon it in terms of supplying polished content further down the line, just as much as it looks upon it in terms of patching problems.

Oh, and if you're wondering whether we're still on track for "summer 2004", Half-Life 2 is just "months" away, now. Months rather than weeks, that is. We'll have more details on the game's expected appearance at E3 this May - cap in hand - as soon as we get hold of them. For more from Gabe Newell - including his view of games in relation to other forms of entertainment - we suggest you check out the Mixitmag interview in full.

Comments (33) Latest comment 8 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Errol #1 8 years ago

    $40 million ? Wtf ?
  • Razz #2 8 years ago

    I don't give a damn about this game.
    Where is Doom III? Give us DNF.
  • bionutz #3 8 years ago

    Yepp I don't care about this game either. Neither do I about Doom III.
  • UncleLou #4 8 years ago

    Steam, pffft. I bet it is the main reason for the delay. I wish they would never have had the whole Steam idea, and I don't even like the idea of seamless upgrading. In five years, I don't want to play HL2 with smell-o-vision as Mugs has nicely put it, but Half-Life 3 or whatever their new project will be called then.

    Call me old-fashioned, but I still want to hold a CD (or DVD for that matter) in my hand that contains the compelte and finished product.

    Apart from that I can only second Errol:

    $40 million ? Wtf ?

    And hell yes, this is still my most anticipated game next to Stalker, and unlike Stalker I know this here will be good. So bloody finish it already!

    edit:

    /slaps Razz
    /slaps bionutz

    You don't know what's good! :-)

    (and thanks for letting me pretend I edited the message because of you, not because of a typo)
    Edited by 1 at 22/03/04 @ 13:21
  • uptherevolution #5 8 years ago

    $40m - Hum, lets do the Math
    6 years since last game = roughly $550k per month
    $8000 per man per month = 70 people


    So either 70 people have for the past 6 years been happily working away on this title, or we're been bullshitted - hum, i smell bull shit
  • ruttyboy #6 8 years ago

    Hmmm... sounds very iffy to me. I can't see them going back to every game in their back-catalogue and up-dating it every time a new graphics card or controller comes out, certainly not for free anyway.
  • StixxUK #7 8 years ago

    What's with the reports on delayed games? Nothing worth reviewing come out lately or what?

    Besides which I don't have the computer to run the damn thing anyway (yet). I'll just sit here and patiently wait for the UK release of Ninja Gaiden, shall I?
  • Grim #8 8 years ago

    ...it's a shame....Gabe had some cred until he started using Steam as a smoke screen to cover up other problems.

    People are interested in the game not a delivery system.

    FarCry will steal alot of HL2's thunder IMHO.
  • Singularity #9 8 years ago

    Smell-O-Vision

    Sold!
  • UncleLou #10 8 years ago

    FarCry will steal alot of HL2's thunder IMHO.

    True. HL2 would have been the first real "next-generation"-engine game that uses all the latest effects, so HL2's impact will suffer a bit on a strictly technical level, but I have no doubt it will be a cracking game.

    The good thing is that HL2 won't suffer nearly as much form Far Cry as it would have been the other way round if HL2 had been released first, so as it is now at least Crytek receives some well-deserved attention. :-)
  • Pirotic #11 8 years ago

    $40 million sounds a little high.

    but lets not forget this has been in development since the release of HL, that it uses a fair amount of third-party middleware, all the dev team are probably paid an obscene amount after the success of the original and to top it off i suspect they have more than your average number of coders too - seeing as they are hoping to recoup some of that money by licensing the tech out.
    Edited by 1 at 22/03/04 @ 14:10
  • binky #12 8 years ago

    cheers for the update mugs.

    still want this game, although by the time it comes out i really dont know if i will be bothered to update my pc :(
  • X-Vector #13 8 years ago

    Grim,

    FarCry will steal alot of HL2's thunder IMHO.

    I find that hard to believe.

    Two main areas that Valve, according to the MaxiTag interview, have focussed on are character and world interactivity and FarCry majors on neither of these if the demos and the IGN review are anything to go by.

    IMO "Game X will steal (delayed) game Y's thunder" is just a cliche concept that serves as an excuse not to delve into the individual strengths and weaknesses of similar genre game titles.

    The way I see it, the only party that can steal Half-Life 2's thunder is Valve (and to some extent it of course already has).
  • Tyronne #14 8 years ago

    is this area free of dnf fanboys ?...as i noticed that this one had been in developement for a long time too...any sad cases defending it ? :)
  • Pirotic #15 8 years ago

    at this rate the other 'Source' powered games will be released before HL2 :p that really would steal its thunder.
  • bionutz #16 8 years ago

    /slaps bionutz
    aua!
    /goes away sobbing
    /installs neural interface
    /hacks UncleLou computer
    /activates house door lock
  • Grom #17 8 years ago

    OH I'M SO EDGY BY SAYING I DON'T CARE ABOUT HALF LIFE 2!!!!

    LOOK AT ME, I AM A FRESH IN-YOUR-FACE DISCERNING GAME KING!!! I ALSO DON'T CARE ABOUT MANY OTHER HIGHLY ANTICIPATED GAMES, WOW!!!
  • Grom #18 8 years ago

    oh and yeah man, there's no world interactivity in Far Cry, after all I've played it and there are definitely no physics traps, destroyable objects or anything like that!!! LOL
  • Razz #19 8 years ago

    I want this game to surprise me. I'm bored of all this hype. It sickens me, amd makes me not want to play the game. I wish Valve just keep quiet untill a week before release.
  • marilena #20 8 years ago

    I have a problem with Valve, though. I thought Internet delivery will decrease the cost of games, by removing the physical part and sidestepping the dammed retailers. Instead, HL2 via Steam is going to be more expensive than any other game. And what real advantage does it offer when compared to Battle.net? I know this will make me look like a Blizzard fanboy but, what the heck, I figure it's one of the few things that deserve fanboys. Blizzard also offers constant updates and strong anti-cheat measures, plus official servers with ladders and character storing. And you only have to buy the game.

    Other than that though, HL2 will probably be cool.
  • Dabs #21 8 years ago

    Can people stop referring to the source code "theft" as "leaks". Leak implies that it was an internal affair. Someone from outside hacked into Valve, fucked around with their systems aplenty, and legged it with the goods - "theft", not leak. All the word "leak" does is support those absurdly stupid people who believe that Valve actually gave away their 5-years of source code themselves to allow themselves a bit of extra time.
  • malloc #22 8 years ago

    How much are they expecting to make from sales? Or is $40m small potatoes?
  • WoodenSpoon #23 8 years ago

  • sheepsteak #24 8 years ago

    Well if the game sold at an average of £35 and they sold 2 million copies then theres £70million which is about $120million - $140million o.0

    But I'm sure they will sell a lot more than 2 million.
  • malloc #25 8 years ago

    "Well if the game sold at an average of £35 and they sold 2 million copies then theres £70million which is about $120million - $140million o.0

    But I'm sure they will sell a lot more than 2 million."

    Yes, but then how much actually goes to the publishers and dev studio? After you get rid of marketing and retail cuts etc. Enough I would imagine but the are counting on this making a sizeable amount. It should, but who knows.
  • sam_spade #26 8 years ago

    I imagine they are still raking in cash from Half-Life as well. So that will put dent in costs they need to recoup.
  • Kami #27 8 years ago

    ...

    I'll still buy this game. I'm sad like that... I wonder why?
  • inpHilltr8r #28 8 years ago

    $40m - Hum, lets do the Math
    6 years since last game = roughly $550k per month
    $8000 per man per month = 70 people


    Mathematics like that explains why you're not running a development studio. Hint, there's more to running costs than payroll.
  • space_ace #29 8 years ago

    what good are all these steam exras when there's no game? someone needs to wake up.
  • deadlock #30 8 years ago

    I think one that's worth remembering about HL2, particularly when mentioned in the same breath as Duke Nukem Forever is that people have only been anticipating HL2 since roughly this time last year. I mean, OK, yeah, on completing the original HL we all thought 'kewl, hope they do a sequel' and then held our breaths in anticipation.

    But no one really knew for certain that a HL sequel was on the cards until last year's revelation of a seemingly almost complete game/engine. Valve haven't been shouting about HL2 from the rooftops for the past five years, in the same way that 3DR have of DNF. So, yeah, there have been delays (of a few months), but nothing of the magnitude of DNF's delays. And maybe Valve's 'excuses' have been FUD, but at least they're not batting down the hatches and keeping shtum like 3DR.
  • Clive_Dunn #31 8 years ago

    Anyone know how much it costs to license the Source engine ?

    Seem to remember Q3A costing $350k a game, I'd speculate that it will be at least double that for the Source engine.
  • El_MUERkO #32 8 years ago

    Let's say there is some new fantastic capability that emerges in the hardware, we can give updated content to all of the people who buy this hardware. Basically you'll plug in the hardware, Steam will detect it, and get the new shaders, textures, or whatever you need," he told Mixitmag. "Being able to individually deliver unique assets is a big step forward from the one-size-fits-all approach that traditional physical goods delivery has restricted us to."

    OK I'm going to be the conspiracy theorist here but wouldnt this also create a situation where some hardware would be supported more and therefore try to sway the gamers choice for future updates?
  • onezeonx #33 8 years ago

    $40 million !!!!
    $1 million = game
    $39 = tea and coffee/pies !!!!!!!