Microsoft turned down GTA III
Says new Xbox 360 book.
Microsoft could have had Grand Theft Auto III on Xbox first if a third-party publishing initiative called "The Star Chamber" hadn't turned down a Rockstar proposal, author Dean Takahashi claims in his new book, The Xbox 360 Uncloaked.
In an extract published on 1UP, Takahashi reports that under J Allard's direction, The Star Chamber - a group of game managers organised to evaluate game proposals sent to Microsoft - turned down a GTA III proposal, returning it with suggestions to "beef up" the game.
Rockstar went on to create the game exclusively for PlayStation 2, and it didn't appear on Xbox until much later - by which time the GTA brand was firmly associated with PS2. Further instalments launched first on the Sony format.
Takahashi said: "It wasn't Microsoft's kind of game, since it was a gritty crime game with foul language, abusive treatment of women, and cop killing. Microsoft had a corporate image to maintain and, like Electronic Arts, it avoided that category."
That's all in the past though - and Microsoft believes that the fact it'll have Grand Theft Auto IV on Xbox 360 on the same day it launches on PlayStation 3 could be a significant factor in the next-gen console war - as Peter Moore said on this site last week.
"When we do our research and ask PS2 owners why they're going to buy a PS3, they say it's because it's the only place they'll get Grand Theft Auto," he told us.
"So when you talk about neutralising that, that's very important to us. Then we say to gamers - and this flooded my inbox during the night - the only place you can play Halo 3 and Grand Theft Auto IV is on an Xbox 360, and they've seen Gears of War and it blows the doors down for them."
Microsoft has yet to say anything about Takahashi's comments on GTA III and Xbox.
You may also like...
-
Mass Effect 3 Demo: The First 20 Minutes
-
Face-Off: Final Fantasy 13-2
-
Happy Action Theater Review
-
Why Devs Owe You Nothing
-
Retrospective: Star Wars Episode I Racer
-
Digital Foundry: PS3 Skyrim Lag Fixed?
-
Game of the Week: Catherine
-
Who Killed Rare?
-
Metal Gear Solid 5 expected between April 2013 and May 2014
-
Gotham City Impostors Review
-
App of the Day: Ascension: Chronicle of the Godslayer
-
Face-Off: The Darkness 2
-
Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning Review
-
The Darkness 2 Review
-
Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 Vita Review
-
EA evaluating FIFA Street features for FIFA 13
-
Grand Slam Tennis 2 Review
-
Epic's Sweeney on graphics tech: "the limit really is in sight"
-
Alan Wake's American Nightmare gameplay
-
App of the Day: Sir Benfro's Brilliant Balloon
-
One Piece: Unlimited Cruise SP Review
-
Sony admits "dropping the ball" with Demon's Souls
-
FIFA Street footage pits France vs. Germany
-
King Arthur 2 Review
-
Mass Effect 3 FemShep trailer debuts









Comments (36) Latest comment 8 months ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Christ..making games lists like that is a sign of blatant insecurity.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Or advertising.
@PearOfAnguish
"And that, folks, is what happens when you let the cretins from marketing make your decisions for you"
And who would you put in charge of marketing if not the marketeers? Us? With our "I know best because I know what I like and my mates like it to" stat munching abilities?
Everyone makes mistakes and its easy to pick on the mistakes of others when you never have to provide the goods yourself. "Armchair Critic" is the accepted term I believe.
Christ, I sounded very parental there for a moment. I'm not in marketing and I don't really know anyone who is. But lets face it, if we the EG readers were in charge of marketing at any of the 3 big console hitters they were be lucky to last 3 years.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'm kind of repeating myself here, but if you ask yourself what you want you are pitching to a pretty tiny market surely? Asking shitloads of people what they want is likely to be safer bet, and believe it or not that is exactly what marketing companies do.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Sad, sad, sad state of affairs.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Well I do. They're often largely clueless, simply going for any job with the words marketing in the description without any particular knowledge of the subject. That may work in some areas but it's not going to turn out well with something like games (or movies, for that matter, to give another example). Chances are this was a group composed of people who knew little to nothing about games (it's Microsoft, remember, they've been doing operating systems up until then) formed after a suggestion from someone desperate to keep their job.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Someone who can't spell really shouldn't be criticizing other's mistakes
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
No I actually couldn't be bothered editing my post for a single letter.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
LMAO
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I remember them publishing UNIRACER in the SNES and Harvest Body on the N64. I also seem to remember that GTA was originally to be publishes by Ninitendo, but they turned it down also due to the violence.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Now correct me if I'm wrong, but Peter Moore said this was launching on October 16/19, I thought the PS3 wasn't out until November, making it a brief exclusive on the 360?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Indeed, the decision makes sense. From a marketing point of view. Why waste time with a controversial game from a small studio in a less popular or unproven genre? I can see why those particular people turned it down. They were going for the Halo's of this world - FPS's were known to sell.
But what if this committee had been a bunch of gamers looking at new concepts? It's more likely they'd have found its open-ended gameplay appealing.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Microsoft doesn't know quality when it kicks them in the testicles.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
They knew about malice, and sneakers, and tao feng, and that other action-rpg that no one remembers.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
For example, Sony's Playstation X was a bad business decision.
The official N64 Disk Drive attachment was a commercial failure, and thus a bad business decision.
And so forth....
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
J Allard needs to be kicked in the bollocks for this decision!!!
Prick!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Seriously... does anyone actually play it properly?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The only place I can play GTA IV and more then 4 RPG's will be the PS3, so the x360 still fails for me.
Comment below viewing threshold Show