You may also like...
-
Day Z: The Best Zombie Game Ever Made? 55
-
Gravity Rush Review 58
-
XCOM: Enemy Unknown Preview: First Contact 16
-
Sony patents method to interrupt your gaming with an ad 143
-
Jet Set Radio announced for PlayStation Vita 48
-
Wii U Aliens: Colonial Marines is best-looking version because of console's "more modern tech" 98
-
Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning needed to sell 3 million to break even 80
-
Arma 3 in-engine footage shows off lighting tech 25
-
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Review 132
-
Activision vs. Vince Zampella and Jason West: Inside the game industry trial of the decade 72
-
App of the Day: Go Robo! 2
-
Skyrim gets mounted combat in new update 62
-
Harry Potter For Kinect announced 17
-
Kojima teases new Zone of the Enders project 16
-
Amalur MMO "would blow you away", claims game's author 11
Comments (7) Latest comment 2 years ago
Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Nice :)
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Ubisoft should have stuck to the reboot and worked on a sequel with none of the flaws the first one had. Instead, they cowardly run off to an established, successful franchise. Feh.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I hate the Warrior Within prince and while the Sands of Time gameplay was fresh when it came out, it can't carry four games without getting old. All Ubisoft did the last years was expanding the Sands gameplay instead of bettering it. It feels rigid now.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Drop the stupid DRM already ...
Comment below viewing threshold Show