Most criticism of religion in Spore is from "militant atheists", claims Wright
Calm down, for God's sake.
As a simulation of evolution from single-cell organism to space-faring civilisation, Will Wright feared his latest creation, Spore, would draw criticism from religious groups. But so far, the game's creator has revealed, the portrayal of religion in the game has only drawn the ire of angry non-believers.
Wright told Eurogamer: "I think our bigger fear was that we didn't want to offend any religious people; but looking at the discussion that unfolded from this thing, what we had was a good, sizeable group of players that we might call militant atheists, and the rest of the players seemed very tolerant, including all of the religious players."
Life in Spore is created according to the theory of panspermia - which hypothesises that it has been seeded on Earth from elsewhere in the universe. But it's the mere presence of religion in the game's civilisation stage that has raised hackles amongst some in the gaming community.
"I didn't expect to hit hot buttons on the atheist side as much; I expected it on the religious side," Wright revealed. "But so far I've had no critical feedback at all from anybody who is religious feeling that we were misrepresenting religion or it was bad to represent religion in the game. It was really the atheists."
He added that early objections from team members enabled the studio to iron out any potential areas of conflict early on.
"We have a number of team members that are pretty religious," he continued. "And so in design, on the team, in our small, little microcosm of players out there, we tried our best to make sure we weren't overtly offending any religious people, but yet we wanted to include the idea, the concept of religion in the game."
Wright, however, who described himself as an "atheist", insisted that with Spore he was not trying to pronounce on the issue one way or the other:
"We didn't want to go too far down that path: we leave the whole creation of the universe question open," he said. "Obviously as the player you're coming in and playing something like a god, directing the evolution of a species, but we never really state who you the player are."
Spore is due out on PC and DS on 5th September. You can read the full interview with Wright on Eurogamer today.
You may also like...
-
Why Can't Games Do Sex?
-
Dear Esther Review
-
UFC Undisputed 3 Review
-
Eurogamer.net Podcast #100: Ellie returns! And we filmed it!
-
Girl Vader stars in Kinect Star Wars trailer
-
Remedy discusses Alan Wake 2
-
Will there be a PS3 version of The Witcher 2?
-
Darksiders 2 release date announced
-
Mojang won't sue FortressCraft dev, "bored" by Minecraft clones
-
Assassin's Creed 3, Splinter Cell: Retribution coming this year?
-
Mass Effect 3 teaser trailer invades Earth
-
Metal Gear Online to be switched off in June
-
Only Modern Warfare 3 made more money than Skyrim in 2011
-
If I Were in a Sealed Room With a Girl, I'd Probably XXX trailer
-
Total War: Shogun 2: Fall of the Samurai gameplay
-
Happy Action Theater Review
-
App of the Day: Candy Train
-
Motorola Xoom 2 Tablet Reviews
-
Who Killed Rare?
-
Why Devs Owe You Nothing
-
PlayStation Vita trailer launches new Sony campaign
-
Dead Island dev's Haste becomes Mad Riders
-
Digital Foundry: PS3 Skyrim Lag Fixed?
-
Skullgirls trailer features Nurse Valentine
-
Face-Off: Final Fantasy 13-2









Comments (46) Latest comment 4 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Don't let a bunch of tossers dictate the view, as the majority of us I'd wager couldn't give a rats ass! Only bell-ends of the highest order go around preaching to others what they should believe and how things should be.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Well, they don't do suicide bombings. yet. That has to count for something.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Having played all manner of games involving religion in some way, watching and enjoying plenty of films with plenty of religious overtones and using more than a few blasphemous words it somehow doesn't affect or offend my atheism/humanism or vice versa.
As Kami said, basically what we have here are wankers who have sadly discovered the internet (or are a product of the internet - you decide). You get wanker believers, non-believers, gamers, mothers-against-gamers, smokers, non smokers, non drinkers & drinkers, Paris Hilton, Paris-France, Matthew Paris, journalists, bloggers, smoggers & crusties. I could go on.
Basically what we have are humans. So this story is in essence "Some humans were wankers today." Long winded way of saying its a non story based on possibly some lame attempt to stir up page hits on the game that Eurogamer are promoting this week. Treat it with the contempt that it deserves.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"I believe in NOTHING!"
Shit, no, that's nihilists.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
But do that and you miss some truly amazing things. Stigmata, for me, ranks as one of the finest films ever made because it's so powerful and addresses so many issues between atheism and religion.
It's always going to be hard to not overegg a comment like this. But in doing so, you make a small minority speak wrongly for the entire community. If he, or you, had said "small number of militant atheists", I'd aassume that's more accurate. But there is no distinction and to be honest, if it is a sizable chunk of people being cocks, why not give them the size 10 boot up the ass and ban their stupidity?
In legendary WoW terms...
/golfclap
Comment below viewing threshold Show
* Not strictly true.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Careful now!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The issue here is if these people are being vocal and being twats, (a) why are they playing it and (b) could they kindly go jump in front of a moving vehicle aas soon as possible so we can cleanse our world of such utter stupidity! Oh and (c) why arent they being banned or told in blunt terms to go stick sharp pointy objects in delicate recesses of their body?
It's just utterly nonsensical. It makes no sense why an atheist should object more than any religion or faith. I suspect this was always intended to be a cynical headline-grabber and nothing more, and sadly EG bought into it.
Again...
/golfclap
edit; I'd be equally as enraged if Will Wright had pointed the finger at any other religious group. But because atheists can't really fight back under discriminatory laws, easy targets I assume. *sigh* /golfclap, Mr Wright. /golfclap.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Pah! Personally I see Spore as nothing more than a game, an off-shoot of the God Sims that gained popularity in the 1990s with games like Populous and Sim City (did atheists criticise those I wonder?). I really don't see why ANYONE would get upset over it unless they object to videogames in the first place.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
As I think the general concensus is demonstrating, these "militant atheists" are nothing more than troublemaking cocks. We've had god-games and games, movies and songs with religious overtones for decades. From The Exorcist to Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy, from Mary J. Blige to Joan Osborne (*sings* What if God Was one of us...), and from Final Fantasy 7 to World of Warcraft.
Why aren't these twits being forcibly booted from the game for stirring shit? I think that's the real issue here.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
No he wasn't. He had a very confused, but clearly non-atheist worldview.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Panspermia doesn't have to depend on "intelligent" agents though does it? It's perfectly compatible with single-cell lifeforms evolving on one or many planets then spreading via various non-intelligent means (I dunno, asteroid strikes, meteors etc?) as far as I understand it. Unless I'm thinking of something else.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Edit: typo
Comment below viewing threshold Show
yeah i was just about to say the same. most realistic proponents of panspermia theory reckon it's more like spores/bacteria/microbes travelling on meteorites. it's only the wackier end of the theorists that make any claims of intelligent beings visiting our world and 'seeding' it...
and i find it pretty unsurprising that it's the militant atheists that are the ones moaning, from my experience most atheists are every bit as dogmatic as the religious people they're railing against...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
And even afterwards he's still so fearful he thinks he has to appease them.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
But then I would have to read what he said in context
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
1. Aetheism is a religion like any other, and is based on beliefs. I know some people disagree, citing that empirical evidence is beyond belief. They are wrong.
2. Militant people that preach to others are just downright annoying. Doesn't matter what they are preaching, even if they are right, even if they are doing it for good and sounds reasons, they are annoying. Just look at Richard Dawkins for an example; even writing his name is making me annoyed. A grumpy teenager trapped in an old man's body (ooer) if ever I saw one.
There is probably a drop or two of irony contained within the above post. Ah well.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Am I the only one who has no idea what that means?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Well, he could also just be making conversation.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Seriously though, this hardly constitutes news. I suspect Wright released this inconsequential tidbit of gossip to stir up a little controversy ahead of the game's release.
No Will, we haven't forgotten about Spore.
And yes, vocal militant *anything* are always annoying and almost invariably idiots.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
(And Raz76 - Hitler was Catholic, but so what?)
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I am not denying that that is a certain brand of atheism that somehow turns the lack of a belief into a positive belief set and who are as evangelical in their beliefs as those they argue against. I just think 'militant' is a crap description for them because they do absolutely nothing that resembles militancy. They are the philisophical equivlant of Six Form politics
Atheists who are complaining about this game are idiots and if certain members of the religious community were offended by this game as well, they would be idiots too. What annoys me though is that although religious complaints could be just as spurious, they would be given a lot more credence.
That just irks the secularist in me.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
What beliefs? Belief in what? When did faith in facts become necessary? So you're an atheist who thinks all atheists who don't think atheism is a religion are wrong? You're not a very good atheist, then.
Evidence is beyond belief? You're not going to float off the Earth if you stop believing in gravity mate. You don't 'believe' facts.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I kind of agree, the whole 'atheism is just another religion' equivlancy arguement is a little disingenuous because atheism is no more a religion than not playing golf is a sport.
However, some atheists are so anti-theistic they are just as dogmatic and intolerant as the religous funamentalism they rail against.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Anyway, back on topic - I think that any atheist backlash against Spore is quite easy to explain: a game based on the theory of natural selection, the key theory of the atheist, then including religion at the "civilised" stage. Its like creating a game based on the teachings of the bible while inserting the small fact that we were all started out as monkeys. Imagine the backlash over that!
What really worries me is that one of the worlds leading game designers feels he has to change the design of his game because it risks annoying one group of people. Why? What happened to creative freedom? Or at least the feeling that your creative freedom would be protected? It sounds to me like the idiots have taken over the asylum and we are all the losers.
Comment below viewing threshold Show