Jump to navigation
Advertisement

"More broad appeal" for Blizzard MMO News

MMO PC News by Oli Welsh

15 September, 2009

Activision Blizzard chief Bobby Kotick has said that Blizzard's next, in-development MMO will have a "more broad appeal". Presumably he means broader that World of Warcraft's.

Asked about plans for the Battle.net online platform at a technology conference - as reported by GameSpot - bubbly burnette Kotick said: "What we've announced at Blizzard is that we have StarCraft coming, Diablo has been in production... and a new, unannounced MMO that has a little more broad appeal."

Having 11 million players and dominating the global online gaming landscape seems pretty broad already, Bobby.

However, easy digs aside, we do already know that Blizzard's new MMO will be "a different massively multiplayer experience" and "a brand new franchise" that's not intended to compete directly with WOW.

In light of that, we'd interpret Kotick's comment to mean that the new game will step outside the traditional, complex and time-intensive MMORPG genre, to which WOW belongs and which many players do find off-putting. Could we be looking at a massively multiplayer action or racing game, perhaps? Or something aimed at younger and casual players, like Sony Online Entertainment's Free Realms?

With regard to StarCraft II, Kotick also mentioned "cash play and prize play" as an element in Battle.net's tournament system. "As we start to add cash play and prize play and better rewards and recognition systems that come through the Internet, you will start to see audiences expand even further," he said.

Pressed further by GameSpot, a Blizzard spokesman wouldn't admit this was anything more than the existing tournaments that begin online and end with cash-prize finals at BlizzCon. But Kotick seems to think it is.

Advertisement

Are you excited about StarCraft II: Protoss - Legacy of the Void on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-26 of 26 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
LazyDan
15/09/09 @ 07:58
#1
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
WORLD OF EASTENDERS
rock27gr
15/09/09 @ 07:59
#2
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
How can it not complete with WOW?

There's only 24 hours per day, and these MMOs are huge time eaters.
BritishBlue1
15/09/09 @ 08:02
#3
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Blizzard should never have merged with Activision, they never needed them.
Ornithophobe
15/09/09 @ 08:02
#4
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
WORLD OF DUTY ONLINE QUEST
Eraysor
15/09/09 @ 08:07
#5
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Trouble is it was Vivendi that merged with Activision and Blizzard got dragged along.
AphoticCosmos
15/09/09 @ 08:15
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh look, it's Bobby Kodick.

/disregard
spatss
15/09/09 @ 08:21
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Kotick is a douchebag.

I have faith in Blizzard nonetheless.
Toothball
15/09/09 @ 08:23
#8
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This will definitely ship with a selection of fake plastic weapon controllers. Just imagine waving a sword around your bedroom for six hours at a time! They could do a nerf gun that sits on top of your monitor and fires stuff at you, which you can block with your fake plastic shield! And next year you can buy the new versions of those to go with the sequel.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 15/09/09 @ 09:24
20charactersmax
15/09/09 @ 08:30
#9
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Isn't the appeal of World of Warcraft already quite broad?
MyPointIs
15/09/09 @ 08:31
#10
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Is this is another of those ideas ('aimed at people who usually don't play games'), I sincerely hope they are also working on WOW 2 as well.
JahB
15/09/09 @ 08:39
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Isn't the appeal of World of Warcraft already quite broad?

not really. it appears to a relatively large niche group, but it's that group only that keeps the WoW machine running.

more broad appeal = no elfs and orcs
Adam_T
15/09/09 @ 08:48
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
'more broad'?

I don't think the queen would approve of that.
SL33PY
15/09/09 @ 09:01
#13
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Humanity as we know it is doomed
Dizzy
15/09/09 @ 09:06
#14
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I shudder to think what can be more broad. Seriously.... WoW has already become super casual (which I think is good) so anything more casual will almost have to play itself.
Svpamm1
15/09/09 @ 09:22
#15
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What does Kotick know about MMOs? I was really looking forward to Blizzards next MMO but if anyone could single handidly balls it up its this idiot with his micro transaction and pricing strategies.
actionfitz
15/09/09 @ 09:51
#16
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bobby Kotick can suck the back of my balls.
the_mtfr
15/09/09 @ 09:54
#17
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Kotick aiming high"? More broad appeal means aiming low, not high.
Silvervein
15/09/09 @ 10:56
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Dizzy

If you want to see the sample of a game with more broader appeal than wow, check youtube playthroughs of Barney's Hide and Seek. A game that, indeed, plays itself. The horror.
sneetch
15/09/09 @ 10:57
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@MyPointIs
Is this is another of those ideas ('aimed at people who usually don't play games'), I sincerely hope they are also working on WOW 2 as well.

I suspect they aren't, EQ2 proved that people who like and play the first game aren't that inclined to drop the characters they spent days/weeks/months of their life playing to start all over again just because a sequel has been released.

I'll be happy to continue playing the first WoW with more content and gradual improvements to the engine being released.
JahB
15/09/09 @ 11:13
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@GhenghisNaan

you forgot the weapon/armor shops where you can pay with either in-game gold, or directly by credit card. if kotick's involved, you can assume that as a given
shamblemonkee
15/09/09 @ 11:14
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
hope he gets hit by the more broad-side of a bus.
Spekingur
15/09/09 @ 11:58
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Only way you are going to see WoW 2 is through a massive update of WoW itself.
Serret
15/09/09 @ 13:03
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"More broad appeal"

It's gona be World of Tetris for sure. Can't wait to start making lines with those epic blocks.

I can only guess but i don't think blizzard is aiming at the usual mmo player with this one. I wouldn't expect that "cooler blizzard mmo" you're all hoping for. I'd expect a World of more Casual and Minigames (cause it already is casual).
As someone said above, the "core" blizzard player base is being completely ignored on this one in exchange for bigger masses I believe. Either that or they're making a console version of WoW.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 15/09/09 @ 14:03
Sar
15/09/09 @ 16:21
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hmm, I'm starting to feel it's going to be a Sims like MMO...

Shite IOW.
Slipstream
15/09/09 @ 21:59
#25
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Why not, the've obviously got what it takes.
Their marketing is a force to be reckoned with, getting people to switch to a new IP could be a breeze for them. Simply slap adverts all over the website, pre-gameplay installer page and, if they really wanted to, advertise in game itself. (lol Activision would totally pressure them into it)
Orange
15/09/09 @ 23:22
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Once the money men start pushing for things to be more commercial, then things start to rapidly decline.

Comments: 1-26 of 26 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery