Advertisement
Moore defends Rare's Xbox work News
Xbox 360 News by Tom Bramwell
Microsoft's Peter Moore has paid tribute to Rare's recent product history, defending the Twycross-based developer against claims that its output has struggled to keep touch with the critical and commercial successes of its output prior to its acquisition by the Xbox platform holder.
Xbox 360 launch titles Perfect Dark Zero and Kameo: Elements of Power had a "platform-driving presence", Moore, who is Microsoft's corporate vice president of entertainment and devices, told Newsweek. "It signalled that this wasn't going to be the same as Xbox 1, which was dominated by Mature-rated games, if you will, and for many people will go down in history as the Halo box or the shooter box. Kameo was very important. Kameo has done well; Perfect Dark Zero hit our expectations from a sales point of view; but these were two launch titles - and in Kameo's case, brand new intellectual property - that allowed us to get where we needed to go very, very quickly."
Moore went on to say that while he felt Rare's strength was in titles for broad audiences, he wouldn't rule out more mature titles from the developer just because Bungie (Halo) and Epic Games (Gears of War) seem to give Microsoft the edge in that area already. "We always allow them the reins to sit down with us when we do concept reviews and allow their creativity to say, 'Here's something three of us have been working on. We've got an idea, and we'd like to prototype this out.'" Which was effectively how Viva Piñata came about, as you'll know if you read our in-depth feature on the game's development. "Always very willing to hear that from Rare," Moore concludes.
For, er, "Moore", check out the rest of the Newsweek piece.
Advertisement
Are you excited about Viva Piñata on Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games
Thanks!
Related Games
Kameo: Elements of Power
Perfect Dark Zero
Viva Piñata
Latest Features
Latest Videos
No videos found.
Latest News
-
New Kameo deck for UNO [4]
-
New Kameo skins for download [3]
-
Kameo Power Pack released [18]
-
Kameo Power Pack coming soon [19]
-
Play Kameo co-op online [26]
Latest Screenshots
5 October, 2005 [6]
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
Poster
|
0
Hahaha
"more mature titles from the developer just because Bungie (Halo) and Epic Games (Gears of War) seem to give Microsoft the edge in that area already." They're undoubtedly big games and give MS an edge. But I'd hardly call their players mature...
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 18/05/07 @ 08:48
|
|
CrunchinJelly
18/05/07 @ 07:47
0
Kameo is still the best looking game on any console.
The textures and lighting are absolutely gob smacking. |
|
the_dudefather
18/05/07 @ 07:52
0
to be fair kameo and PDZ are not that bad, just not the games you would have been happy slashing out 50 quid for in a forced bundle at launch
|
|
0
I really enjoyed playing Kameo, it didn't really do anything wrong in my opinion. Viva Pinata is sheer brilliance but unfortunately probably more suited to the user base of the Wii. Looking forward to Banjo...I don't think Rare's output needs defending, its all been solid so far. Maybe Mr Moore could do with selling his Xbox do a wider range of people and not just shooting and racing fans.
|
|
lordofdeadside
18/05/07 @ 07:59
0
but kameo lacks any kind of artistic direction. its just a tech demo, of how shiny they can make textures.
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 18/05/07 @ 08:59
|
|
johnboy_johsnon
18/05/07 @ 08:05
0
I've all three and think they are all very good (Viva being the stand out). I think there only let down was that they were all developed as XBox 1 games initially. I'll be very interested to see how Banjoo game turns out. Could be excellent!!!!!!!
|
|
souljacker2000
18/05/07 @ 08:13
0
I have played all 3. Still have Viva Pinata, just love smacking those Sour Pinatas. Kameo, did look amazing but was quite short and overly easy. PDZ, i thought played well but kinda looked crap. Still cant wait to see BANJO
|
|
Eighthours
18/05/07 @ 08:14
0
Perfect Dark Zero hit our expectations from a sales point of view...
Those words are very revealing indeed! :) |
|
0
Yeah they're games are good but i don't think the they were good enough for the Money you bought Rare for hey Peter Moore?
Value can be expressed in more ways than money. Rare is a MGS, if they can access a certain niche area than that is value as well. Because VP may make a loss, but nobody buys a platform for one game. And making yourself known as other things than a hardcore fps platform is value as well. Not directly visible though. I don't think mgs had any illusions about making a direct profit when they started with VP. Simply put, there was no market for it on the xbox platform. But by releasing games like this they are making a market. |
|
reality_cheque
18/05/07 @ 08:37
0
Well I wasn't a fan of PDZ, but I'm loving Kameo at the moment.
My controlpads aren't though due to the time spent as Pummelweed! |
|
Britesparc
18/05/07 @ 08:42
0
I think their output's been great, so far; PDZ was a disappointment insofar as it wasn't as good as its prequel. Kameo was good, and Viva Pinata is amazing (although it could be even better - hurry up with a sequel!). And I'm looking forward to Banjo, too!
Overall, I think the quality of their games and the creative cachet they give MS means they're worth their money. |
|
0
Value can be expressed in more ways than money. Rare is a MGS, if they can access a certain niche area than that is value as well. Because VP may make a loss, but nobody buys a platform for one game.
Did Chelsea spend £30 million on Andriy Shevchencko just so he can be a striking consultant for Dider Drogba I'm sorry but this was screaming a football comparison. It's a load of crap you don't spend upwards of $300 million on a company with a huge reputation like RARE and don't expect an influx of quality titles in the same vein as Goldeneye, Project Dark, Banjo Kazooie, Donkey Kong 64, Jet Force Gemini etc, no matter how rich you are. |
|
0
On the Xbox, Grabbed by the Ghoulies was a disappointment but Conker: Live & Reloaded was very, very nice even if it was only an N64 remake. Perfect Dark Zero was a victim of a rushed launch and could (and should) have been so much better had Microsoft let Rare finish it at their own pace. Kameo was fantastic and surprisingly polished for a 360 launch game. Viva Pinata is perhaps Rare's best game to date on the Xbox platform though.
I still can't help thinking that Rare would have had more success had it stuck with Nintendo though, their colourful mostly-family friendly games seem more suited to that platform somehow rather than a console that is seemingly dominated by macho shooting games. Somehow I cannot see the forthcoming Banjo-Kazooie 3 being a huge hit on the 360 (it's one of my most wanted games though!) unless Rare add an online multiplayer mode that involves lots of shooting... ;) |
|
Emilia'sHorse
18/05/07 @ 08:55
0
Rare titles are always worth getting a little excited about, PDZ and Kameo as launch titles did the job nicely. Viva however is so good it makes me weep tears of joy just thinking about it. I disagree that it would be more suited for the Wii, on the grounds that the Wii would struggle to load the intro video. VP is as much a visual treat as it is an involved micro management title, that may appear cute but has a dark side most children will not understand so therefore just assume further cuteness.
Was MS right to buy Rare? Yes. From a financial point maybe not but all the Xbox and 360 releases have been worthy of attention. I still like to be Grabbed by the Goulies every now and then. |
|
0
I still can't help thinking that Rare would have had more success had it stuck with Nintendo though.
I don't Rare's form was dipping near the end of the N64 and the begginning of the Gamecube era, much like how Nintendo's games on he Gamecube, were subpar compared to their games on the N64. The jury is still out on Nintendo's titles to me to be honest but who knows if waggle might have re-invigorated Rare, guess we'll never know. |
|
Mentalist(air)
18/05/07 @ 09:28
0
I feel sorry for peter Moore after he was eliminated from the Eurovision Song Contest in the semi-final (far left)
http://info.rsr.ch/xobix_media/images/ts... Calling yourself DJ Bobo and representing Switzerland won't help you hide, Pete. |
|
MrFlintBlackman
18/05/07 @ 09:28
0
Perfect Dark Zero was quite poor gameplay wise, it also looks terrible.
Kameo was fine though. |
|
Mentalist(air)
18/05/07 @ 09:40
0
But then we haven't seen the likes of those from Free Radical, either, really, have we?
|
|
The Bodybuilder
18/05/07 @ 09:52
0
>" Kameo has done well; Perfect Dark Zero hit our expectations from a sales point of view"
Notice the subtle difference. Even Moore knows PDZ is crap. |
|
Monkey_Puncher
18/05/07 @ 10:03
0
The Goldeneye team left and made Free Radical, the Banjo team is still there though. Sure PDZ wasn't the best game ever, but even though I wouldn't go back to it now, it was still a good solid launch title that was fun at the time. Kameo and Viva Pinata were a different story, I thought they were good high quality titles and certainly made a change from the usual games you find on Xbox.
I personally can't wait to play Banjo, been waiting for a sequel for years. |
|
groovychainsaw
18/05/07 @ 10:09
0
Perfect Dark Zero was one of the worst shooters I've ever had the misfortune to play - traded it in 7 days after i bought my 360 - appalling. However, Kameo and VP were much,much better. Obviously they have lost their shooter talents (Free Radicals...), but can still go for the younger market. What MS need is another studio to do the same to lead, 2 games does not make the console 'youth' friendly.
|
|
Emilia'sHorse
18/05/07 @ 10:13
0
360 has tons of youth friendly games; Cars, Meet the Robinsons, Lego Bionicals, Shrek 3...and probably more, the problem is they are all a bit shit and not worthy of being on 360/PS3. Viva and Kameo are worthy and the difference shows.
|
|
0
well i still own and play PDZ and Kameo - which is more than can be said for other games i've bought.
They were the best and most polished games ive seen of any console launch (exluding Zelda on the Wii ofc :P) It sure beats the usual 'buying a console at launch and waiting for good games to appear' ;) |
|
FrostyPhoenixxx
18/05/07 @ 11:46
0
Viva Pinata is one of the top 5 best 360 games, easily. PD0 has horrible voice work, story, they turned Joanna Dark into a two bit hooker, horrible textures
yet it still plays ok. never played Kameo but found the demo kinda average. |
|
0
Kameo is very good. I'd love to see a sequel. Viva Pinata is excellent at what it does however it kind of prices itself out of the market it targets.
I like Rare's output. There's a worrying trend of people wishing to jump on the bash Rare bandwagon. Targetting a development company beacuse you have a particular hardware bias seems very lame. Tell you what, let's continue bashing Bizarre Creations, Rockstar North, JAM and pretty soon we can rid ourselves of the UK development scene. Geez, if you can't get support from home... |
|
0
I think we will support Rare whenever they deliver what is expected. Not since N64 have they delivered a AAA title which was their forte back in the day.
I don't think that there is bashing because they are a MS company, just that they haven't lived up to expectations, when MS announced the Buyout a lot were pissed but a lot were excited as well because they wanted to see what they could do with the resources MS have. They have not done anything truely spectacular, now most people are just a bit 'meh' towards rare. Of course if Banjo is any good I couldn't care less about their failings. |
|
0
I don't think MS have to do any defending of Rare. Ok PDZ was a dissapointment, but Kameo is a cult classic, there are many people who love this game to death and Viva Pinata has received huge critcal acclaim. As for "Rare would do better with nintendo" comments. Well duh, that's why MS bought them. Whenever someone says "the 360 is all driving games and shooters" the xbot can respond "what about Kameo and VP?" OK that's about it for the younger audiance (excluding XBLA) but 3rd party publishers won't release a game on a system if a game released earlier in the same genre hasn't succeded.
|
|
0
I don't buy that Rare is a "platform driving" company. I honestly think Kameo pales in comparison to just about any action adventure on the rivaling formats (Zelda especially), and the reason it sold was the lack of comparable games on the 360. PDZ however had Call of Duty 2 to fend off, while fighting in a genre where goofy characters and colourful locales just aren't really accepted. Of course, beyond that it struggled with its single player experience after having devoted all resources to its co-op campaign, but that's a bit beside the point.
I think it's unfair to expect one company to replace lack of content in the action adventure genre, and maybe the reason people are being so harsh towards them is really frustration over said issue. |
|
kangarootoo
18/05/07 @ 14:17
0
@bonker
I've always found the use of the term "mature" to be a little confusing when it comes to games. It usually seems to apply to content that would result in an age restriction on purchase, which is not necessarily the same thing as mature in the more traditional sense. Duke Nukem 3D may have had "adult" content, but it could hardly be described as a mature game (not dismissing it overall, it had some very good mechanics and I enjoyed playing it). |
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
