May for Alone in the Dark News
PC
PlayStation 2
Xbox 360
PlayStation 3
Wii
News
by
Robert Purchese
Atari has ended speculation and confirmed a May release for Alone in the Dark on 360, PC, Wii and PS2.
A little later than its expected March release, but earlier than the rumoured September slip. PS3 offering missing in action, presumably still "to follow".
Confirmation comes by way of an interview with Infogrames/Atari big boss Patrick Leleu in French newspaper Les Echos.
Interestingly, all the recent Atari US problems seem to have taken its toll, and Leleu suggests the publisher has had enough of the hardcore market and competition within.
"We are scheduling regular releases for those [Alone in the Dark, Test Drive, Dungeons & Dragons] best sellers, but we will not position ourselves exclusively in this segment aimed at experienced gamers, which requires larger investments where competition from majors is increasingly fierce and where development cycles are getting longer, actually too long for us," admitted Leleu.
All of which sounds rather foreboding, especially as Wii and PS2 ports of Alone in the Dark have seemingly been knocked up in no time since their unveiling last November.
"Alone in the Dark will be a major release. But the company's survival does not hinge on the success of that game, although we do hope it sells millions of copies," offered Leleu as reassurance. If indeed it is reassuring and not a pre-emptive warning in disguise.
Its master plan? Casual games; the segment of the gaming market making a bigger name for itself each and every day. Probably because it makes shed loads of money for seemingly less effort.
"An Atari.com portal is soon going to be accessible, offering a series of specially developed games for playing online or downloading," he went on to reveal.
The aim is to become a well-known publisher of family games in the next three to five years. And, while Atari will try to remain independent and profitable, if a good enough offer for a merger comes along then it just might take it.
"Of course, with the sector consolidating, should a good opportunity to create value present itself, we would take a close look at it, but that's another story..."
Are you excited about Alone in the Dark on PlayStation 2?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games
Related Games
Alone in the Dark: Inferno
Alone in the Dark
Alone in the Dark
Latest Features
-
Alone in the Dark: Inferno Review [43]
-
Alone in the Dark: Inferno Hands On [52]
-
Alone in the Dark: Inferno Hands On [71]
-
Alone in the Dark: Inferno Interview [34]
-
Alone in the Dark: Inferno Hands On [95]
Latest Videos
Alone in the Dark: Inferno - Dark Key trailer [1] 31 October, 2008
Alone in the Dark - Making of Pt. 3 [0] 26 June, 2008
Latest News
-
Alone and MGS4 demos on PSN [14]
-
Atari dates PS3 Alone in the Dark [12]
-
AITD gets name change on PS3 [20]
-
Atari dates bundle of games [17]
-
Eden details Alone in the Dark PS3 [12]
Latest Screenshots
18 November, 2008 [0]
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
Comments: 1-27 of 27 in total
|
kissthestick
17/01/08 @ 11:43
0
Leleu suggests the publisher has had enough of the hardcore market and competition within.
muahahaha! |
|
squarejawhero
17/01/08 @ 12:09
0
Atari Spokesman, caught on wiretap - "Damn those gamers and their demands for quality! They should put up or shut up, the feckers."
|
|
muscleblade
17/01/08 @ 12:19
0
I am pretty sure the 360 version with its long development time will be great. I really like what ive heard about it so far. The newly announced versions developed by another company will be inferior. The PS3 version will be a poor port of the 360 version. Still very good for a PS3 game.
|
|
SomaticSense
17/01/08 @ 12:29
0
'Atari prefers big bucks potential of cheap crappy casual games and Wii mini-game releases, over - not quite as much profit earning but higher chance of critical success - expensive genuine games' shocker.
I know Atari aren't exactly Nintendo when it comes to quality releases, but this is still a very bad sign of where the gaming industry is headed. Expect more companies to be taking this tack over the next few years as profit is more important to these companies now than making good games. |
|
Triggerhappytel
17/01/08 @ 12:38
0
Atari are going out of business - surely it's only a matter of time now. They seem to be convinced that the casual market guarantees better sales, but that's not necessarily true - look at the relative failure of recent casual games like Boogie or RealPlay. The casual market is growing all the time and offering more and more choice, which obviously gives more competition in that field as time goes by.
I also agree with Jellyhead and SomaticSense. Particularly with SS; I think publishers are going to invest more and more money in the casual market, likely at the expense of the hardcore. Look at all the shit Ubisoft have been publishing recently - their ratio of good games is only about one in four at the moment. |
|
barnard666
17/01/08 @ 12:40
0
It makes sense that publishers are doing this, they want to be in a safe sector of the market. I don't think it's a good thing, if there isn't as much competition in the hardcore market, the quality of the products will undoubtedly be reduced.
|
|
SomaticSense
17/01/08 @ 12:56
0
Saying that though, Nintendo are going the same way. It was made pretty clear in recent Edge articles that they will be concentrating more on casual games as well.
I, for one, will completely give up gaming once this approach reaches it's zenith. I can't abide cheap and crappy casual games, mini-game compilations, rhythm action titles, or kareoke games. Once devs wake up to the fact that these offer them higher profit margins and give up on the expensive 'epic' titles, then I'm out. |
|
mooseman721
17/01/08 @ 13:09
0
If you want to sell millions, make it so it's not crap. It's simple really, hardcore gamers buy lots of games, just not shit ones.
|
|
The Bodybuilder
17/01/08 @ 14:09
0
>"Its master plan? Casual games; the segment of the gaming market making a bigger name for itself each and every day. Probably because it makes shed loads of money for seemingly less effort."
Yep, my wii fear is slowly being realized. I cannot imagine a world without "hardcore" games like mass effect, COD4, mario and metroid. People who think this just applied to crappy atari are in denail. Atari, EA (like'wem or not, they are the biggest) even ninty have admitted they will be going the casual route. If shareholders of other publishers see the competition making more money with less effort, money, and time, do you think they'll stand for it?
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 17/01/08 @ 14:12
|
|
0
"I know Atari aren't exactly Nintendo when it comes to quality releases, but this is still a very bad sign of where the gaming industry is headed. Expect more companies to be taking this tack over the next few years as profit is more important to these companies now than making good games."
Next few years? It's been happening for ages. How often is it you see a game with the polish and content which makes it worth the £30+ you pay to buy it? And I don't mean something which "is awesome" for a short time, like Halo 3's campaign. I mean consistently awesome games like Ninja Gaiden, or Super Mario Galaxy (two random examples to avoid “bias”). The majority of games (especially from Western developers) are too short, feel rushed, and don't equal enough content to warrant the price-tag. Lack of quality releases has and IS happening already. |
|
DanWhitehead
17/01/08 @ 17:40
0
Pretty much every game that the games industry was founded on (many of them made by, ooh, Atari) would be derided as "casual" were they produced today. Maybe I'm just sad because I remember when we just called them "games", and played them for fun, and didn't give a stuff whether they were "hardcore" or not.
|
|
SomaticSense
17/01/08 @ 20:05
0
"Next few years? It's been happening for ages. "
I mean companies completely giving up on 'traditional' games. It's leading up to that point for a while, your right, and has ramped up significantly since the advent of mobile phone games and - regrettably - the Wii. But soon companies will completely stop producing the more expensive games and solely concentrate on casual games. It'll be a sad day when that happens, and as a gaming fan I'll refuse to put any of my money in their pockets. I've been a gamer since I got my first gaming machine (the Speccy) in the late-eighties, and to see it go the way it's going and seeing my hobby start to be phased out purely to cater for the people who couldn't really give a shit, makes my blood boil.
Edited 2 times,
most recently on 17/01/08 @ 20:06
|
|
George Roper
17/01/08 @ 21:41
0
@Nithron
"What was the point in buying the name Atari when you're not actually Atari? It's really kind of pathetic..." Because Infogrames, at the time, were being aligned with shit, poorly developed, under tested games. They desperately needed a rebrand and bought Atari for that very purpose. Atarigrames should just fuck off and die, properly. They bought out and fucked over MANY classic UK developers, which included Ocean and Gremlin, without any long-term plan for how it would pan out. A classic case of Escom (if anyone recalls that failure). |
|
0
Infogrames still did some good games, like "Alone if the Dark".
Also they got Atari from Hasbro Interactive, that was back in 2001 after the dotcom burst ... and true, Infogrames future does not look well, this statements reminded me of Interplay. Also Infogrames is a example of how the gaming industry is simply advancing into the abyss ... you might cry about old developer houses but really, how long does a developer house last these days? what we seen 10 years ago is what we see now ... nothing changed except the names. |
Comments: 1-27 of 27 in total
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
