Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Legendary Review

Xbox 360 Review by Dan Whitehead

31 October, 2008

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

Calling a game Legendary is either an act of supreme confidence or foolhardy hubris, especially when your last entry into the first-person shooter was the thoroughly dire Turning Point: Fall of Liberty. That's the position that developer Spark Unlimited finds itself in, and after only a few hours play you'll start to suspect that a more honest - though less marketable - title would've been Hilarious.

As in hilariously bad. Any hopes that Spark might have learned from the myriad flaws painstakingly pointed out in dozens of reviews for Turning Point is dashed almost immediately. In almost every respect, Legendary is exactly the same game but with the Nazi invasion of America replaced with an invasion of mythical beasts.

They've accidentally been released from Pandora's Box by our hero, Charles Deckard, you see. He's a blank slate of a thief, hired by a mysterious character to retrieve the fabled artefact, and in doing so he only goes and pops it open. Even the ancient Greeks understood that Pandora's Box was a metaphorical representation of mankind's capacity for evil and suffering, so the fact that the game labours under the impression that it's literally a box full of monsters, which looks like the Ark of the Covenant, should give you some idea of the level of creative innovation on display. That the monsters in question are drawn from Greek, Norse, medieval and even Jewish mythology simply confuses matters even more.

'Legendary' Screenshot 1

Oh good, the obligatory boss fight with rockets.

At least the opening of the box gives us our obligatory opening set-piece, as New York's Natural History Museum is torn asunder by the outpouring of evil monster energy in a scene crudely swiped from Ghostbusters. Just as Turning Point started with a series of staged sequences as you descended through a skyscraper construction site while German troops parachuted around you, so Deckard must scramble out of the museum as fire-spitting creatures chomp on civilians. As in Turning Point, it feels stagey and fake, and there's no sense of danger since every single moment is so obviously scripted. Try and shoot the griffins busy devouring bystanders on the street and your bullets pass right through. They're not actually there, you see. It's just scenery on a low-rent ghost train.

From there, it's a rapid slide past mediocrity into just plain bad. The aiming is better than it was in Turning Point, but that's hardly high praise. The twitchy crosshairs still fail to compete with any other current first-person shooter, while the generally unresponsive movement controls hamper your progress once again. Scenery snags are common, while the game goes out of its way to block your path with stupid and illogical obstacles. Deckard is apparently a very lethargic man, since he's completely incapable of jumping more than one foot off the ground, or pulling himself up onto waist-high objects. This means, for instance, that a simple handrail forces you to laboriously make your way around, over, out and through a protracted series of conveniently crashed subway cars simply to reach a door ten feet from where you started.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Legendary on Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 99 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Cider-X
31/10/08 @ 06:59
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yet another Atari failure...
3william56
31/10/08 @ 07:01
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Pow! Ouch! 2 points just for the trash golem, huh?

And they release this at the same time as Fable, Fallout, LBP and the rest of the 9+ joy currently screaming for my credit card's lovin?

Bye!

SuperBas
31/10/08 @ 07:06
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wow, wasn't expecting this. It looked like a 9 from the first trailer, than a 6. But a 2???
clockworkzombie
31/10/08 @ 07:07
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Damn, thought that review was written by Ellie for a moment and on that note why wasn't it? I thought it was written in her contract that she got the bad games.
the_dudefather
31/10/08 @ 07:11
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
'Howl inn'

Genius
ArchiRag
31/10/08 @ 07:11
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
releasing bad games at this time of year is a terrrible idea
Scimarad
31/10/08 @ 07:18
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Such a shame! It sounded like such a fun idea...
keyboardmonkey
31/10/08 @ 07:22
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Eurogamer showing their Xbox bias again ;-)

After the total glut of good games over the last couple of months, plus what is coming up, it's about time we had some low scores.
bad09
31/10/08 @ 07:25
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Now that is a shame but I did suspect it was poo after watching someone play it at the expo. I liked the sound of this one to.

dr_faulk
31/10/08 @ 07:41
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I feel sorry for the developers and anyone who buys this.... I'm thinking of innocent kids who don't know any better, or thoughtful parents hoping to "Wow!" their kids at Christmas.

Boy, does the world suck sometimes...
Gnort
31/10/08 @ 07:49
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wow, sounds awful. Which staffer wrote the preview which said that it was almost ready, and was feeling like a 7 or 8 for its fast paced, back to basics FPS fun? Clearly wasn't Dan.

Edit: Turns out it was Rob (Shinji), who wrote the following in the comments thread: "It's probably not a 9 or 10 out of ten kind of game, unless multiplayer is really stunning, but from what I played (about two and a half hours of the game), it's one of those 7 or 8 out of ten games that you develop a real fondness for while acknowledging that it's not doing anything particularly special."
Edited 1 times, most recently on 31/10/08 @ 08:17
Steroyd
31/10/08 @ 07:53
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ouch!

That's all I can say.

twas a joy to read.
Der_tolle_Emil
31/10/08 @ 07:54
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You have to admit that some of the screens do look nice though. At least it's not another horde of generic aliens that you have to shoot.
muscleblade
31/10/08 @ 08:03
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I bought Quantum of Solace special edition yesterday because of the fantastic metalbox. Hoping for a review today to decide if im going to start playing it or not.
siro
31/10/08 @ 08:09
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A low score was coming a long way imo. Never saw this anything but a turd.
UncleLou
31/10/08 @ 08:11
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh dear.

This got a 7 over at eurogamer.de. Now I am almost curious. :-)
Darren
31/10/08 @ 08:18
#17
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Until I saw this review I'd never even heard of this game. And judging by that review I don't want to know about it either! LOL
defdaz
31/10/08 @ 08:22
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Guess this publisher doesn't buy any advertising on eurogamer eh? ;)
Pirotic
31/10/08 @ 08:27
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Didn't they only give an interview to one of the magazines (Edge or GamesTM) a month ago saying about how they had learnt from their mistakes with the last game?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 31/10/08 @ 08:27
drumbaby
31/10/08 @ 08:35
#20
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So, only 6 worse than Gears then?
Daikon
31/10/08 @ 08:39
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
2/10? And here I was thinking such scores were reserved for video games starring Aerosmith...
farticusmaximus
31/10/08 @ 08:39
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Although I feel for the developers and hope they go on to have successful careers elsewhere, I really really hope Spark Unlimited disband as they do not deserve to produce games.

I thought nothing could be worse than Turning Point. Trust them to prove me wrong! xD
magicpocket
31/10/08 @ 08:40
#23
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Dan, Dan, Dan, you really sound like an incredibly hard man to please. I've played Legendary through to all but the end and i loved it. Of course i saw the same glitches you mention, but i had fun. More fun than i had with Fallout3 tbh.

This review stinks of someone deliberately setting out with a bad impression in mind.
Daikon
31/10/08 @ 08:40
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh and I see the game is published by Gamecock Media? Hmmmm...
DoctorZoidberg
31/10/08 @ 08:48
#25
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Two sounds a bit harsh.

I notice your slating things that EVERY fps since the dawn of time had... Sure repetition is bad etc, I thought Fallout 3 had levels in the sewers and "train lines"?

I've no intention of picking this up what so ever though.
Quint2020
31/10/08 @ 08:49
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Jesus, 2!?

I thought it looked like a good old fashioned dumb ass shooter.

Oh well, Fallout 3 it is then.
sailesh
31/10/08 @ 08:53
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
lol ouch lol.

i dunno why journos were even interested in this AT ALL. Looked shit from day one.
Xerx3s
31/10/08 @ 09:01
#28
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Deckard is apparently a very lethargic man, since he's completely incapable of jumping more than one foot off the ground, or pulling himself up onto waist-high objects."

You will find that most people are so out of shape that this applies. ¬_¬
Jigglybean
31/10/08 @ 09:07
#29
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
After the spore review, reviews on Eurogamer mean nothing to me. However, given Sparks track record, this will be crap
shadaik
31/10/08 @ 09:11
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You gotta admire the meta-ness of incorporating the opening of Pandora's Box as the game's beginning, though.
Aloominum_man
31/10/08 @ 09:15
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Two paragraphs of that review would work well in the Far Cry 2 review.
thesombrerokid
31/10/08 @ 09:17
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
actually this is the best time to release a bad game, it's like when the government releases scandals and bad news when they know no one's paying any attention, this is the same slip it past the reviewers and we'll get sales based on hype!
SparkyDD
31/10/08 @ 09:22
#33
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Glowing green items to help the player....Fable 2 does similar things. That got a 10. Probably is a bad game, but review did smell of someone who wanted to late the game regardless.
SparkyDD
31/10/08 @ 09:22
#34
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Glowing green items to help the player....Fable 2 does similar things. That got a 10. Probably is a bad game, but review did smell of someone who wanted to late the game regardless.
burns
31/10/08 @ 09:23
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ouch But I could see this coming a mile off.
miiiguel
31/10/08 @ 09:28
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You ppl should be ashamed to bring Fallout into this thread. And deserve a public imolation the ones who are comparing the two.

Or... you can just keep on going and look silly.
BillyBrush
31/10/08 @ 09:29
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
He he...i recall the preview which said it was great and was going to be about 8/10 ...it looked just as ponderous and mehsome then
seasidebaz
31/10/08 @ 09:30
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/awaits "i jus bort this an its wurth at leest a 7" comments to appear...
nickthegun
31/10/08 @ 09:30
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Haha! See Pete, I told you this was shit!
Krelle
31/10/08 @ 09:34
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This was obvious since I saw the GiantBomb video-playthru a while back.
TruWari3r
31/10/08 @ 09:34
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nice, next time give it a 1 will you?

I especially enjoyed the gazillion developer specials, where the showed a mediocre build and tried to talk it up as being the shiznit. Nice that's it's actually worse then expected.
Krelle
31/10/08 @ 09:36
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Shinji, the guy writing the preview, said:
"I wouldn't say I've got an excessively sunny disposition over this one (I hauled myself across rush-hour London with a grotty head-cold to see it - sunny I was not! :) ), rather that I don't see the problem with simply taking traditional FPS play and doing it really well. It's probably not a 9 or 10 out of ten kind of game, unless multiplayer is really stunning, but from what I played (about two and a half hours of the game), it's one of those 7 or 8 out of ten games that you develop a real fondness for while acknowledging that it's not doing anything particularly special."

http://www.eurogamer.net/article_discuss...

Like, wtf?
smoothpete
31/10/08 @ 09:39
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yes Nick you were absolutely correct (I suspected you might be...). Shame, could have been fun.

EG you cruel people, inviting this game to the expo then slating it just a couple of days afterwards!
DoctorZoidberg
31/10/08 @ 09:40
#44
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You ppl should be ashamed to bring Fallout into this thread. And deserve a public immolation the ones who are comparing the two.


Fallout 3 is Fallout only by name, lets not get that confused, and they are far more similar than one would realise.

I'm still going to pick it up (F3), as it looks fun (in a very different way) but as soon as I'm past the title, it's a whole new franchise.


asphaltcowboy
31/10/08 @ 10:01
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I really like the idea behind the game, but they just can't make good games!
Gearskin
31/10/08 @ 10:20
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
From FUN preview... to hate filled review?
Xerx3s
31/10/08 @ 10:25
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Glowing green items to help the player....Fable 2 does similar things. That got a 10. Probably is a bad game, but review did smell of someone who wanted to late the game regardless."

Ah but in F2 it's a gameplay mechanic (did you actually read WHY the reviewer thought that it was a bad thing in this game?). In fable 2 you can soak up the experience orbs but you are defenceless against enemies when you do so. If you don't on the other hand, it might fade away.
Duckula
31/10/08 @ 10:38
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Worst game I've played this gen.
Fleisch
31/10/08 @ 10:49
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Played this at the eurogamer expo, it was utter utter guff, no queues all night! spot on review!
Eighthours
31/10/08 @ 10:57
#50
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ouch. A cathartic piece of writing, Dan? :)

Comments: 1-50 of 99 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery