It's COD: Modern Warfare 2 after all Comments by Tom Bramwell
Was always going to be, apparently.
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
Comments: 1-45 of 45 in total
Poster
|
beastmaster
10/07/09 @ 08:31
+1
Yeah, I think it's a good move adding the branding. Mums & Dads who go in every year at Xmas looking for the next Call of Duty will not be confused. Could potentially impact sales by dropping COD. Shame we'll never find out by how much.
|
|
ChthonicEcho
10/07/09 @ 08:39
0
By not calling it Call of Duty for three months. No no, it makes perfect sense.
Yes, exactly. It's more than just a bit odd. Oh, well, I couldn't care less about the name of a game.
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 10/07/09 @ 09:40
|
|
homerramone
10/07/09 @ 08:44
+1
Won't change the game though, it'll still be awesome!
And so much fun online in the first month I expect. With a cracking combo of connection problems, campers desperate to be one the first with a gold cross (or its COD6:COD4:MW2 equivalent) and of course the cockknockers that are just determined to find places to get in the map they really shouldnt be so that they can join the fellas with tents. Lets just hope they give us a little more flexibilty in the playlists. Like bieng able to search for a game with a specific class of weapon... or better yet a game w/o the fucking irritating helicopters the aforementioned campers get one after the other. |
|
carlitoswagon
10/07/09 @ 09:09
+2
@homerramone
Agree with that completely. Camping is my pet hate and it's got worse on cod4 since WAW was released. All the wee camping pricks who discovered cod4 late on are shaping the games I've played recently. Its getting on my tits. They should introduce a game mode where you explode into flames if you sit in the same spot for too long (unless sniping) and attempts to glitch send a 50,000 volt shock directly from your remote to your knob! I'm away to put that on Twitter.. Rant over............ |
|
rhinoxious
10/07/09 @ 09:26
+3
I reckon they did some market research and realised that most people had totally missed COD4's MW monicker.
|
|
donnie080208
10/07/09 @ 09:30
-1
yeah calling it modern warfare 2 only could have put off a lot of gamers who aren"t in the" know" but i still think activision have made the decision to let IW go there own way with the franchise so it is not sullied by treyarchs(imo underappriciated) games.personally i think if WAW beared the IW name it wouldnt have had the 7 and 6"s review it got from some places
|
|
kinky_mong
10/07/09 @ 10:11
+9
"Mums & Dads who go in every year at Xmas looking for the next Call of Duty will not be confused."
They're obviously already confused enough to miss the age rating plastered on the CoD games. |
|
+1
I thought it was strange that Activision would drop the Call of Duty name for Modern Warfare 2. It is after all an established brand that people are familiar with and that in turn helps to sell the game. It certainly worked for the inferior non-Infinity Ward developed Call of Duty games. Call of Duty 3 was terrible for example, rushed and very buggy, yet it went on to sell millions on the strength of the previous game by IW.
|
|
-1
"Then they should call it:
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare 2. Exactly what I was going to say. They are going to end up in a real piockle over this. There has been a genuine quality gap between the two developers output, but to the uninitiated it is hard to differentiate between which ones have been great and which ones OK. Activision are now giving that distinction and if the quality differential persists then COD blank is going to suffer as a franchise while COD MW is going to do no better than it would if they hadnt introduced the additional brand. |
|
TuftyMcTavish
10/07/09 @ 11:43
0
I love these marketing driven backtracking statements. I keep meaning to make a note of a few ones you can just tell will come back around in good time. Not fussed either way personally.
|
|
john_silence
10/07/09 @ 14:26
0
Exactly Artemus. I read somewhere that they ran a survey and the general level of awareness about the game dropped by 20% when they removed the "Call of Duty" part. Treyarch must be doing something right too, after all - or more probably, it's just the 5-year legacy that's starting to get the name into people's minds as a regular mainstream convention. How filthy, when you come to think of it.
I'll still buy MW2 of course. Maybe they won't sell me a DVD with only the ludicrous French dubbing on it this time, just because I happen to live in Paris.
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 10/07/09 @ 15:26
|
|
RogueTradr
10/07/09 @ 15:03
0
Not a COD expert but...
Why not COD 6: Modern Warfare? The next one from Treyarch would be COD 7 and so on and so forth. Or COD 2010: Modern Warfare... |
|
Triggerhappytel
10/07/09 @ 16:39
0
This is clearly ActiBlizz reverting after the buzz over the last few months indicated average folk weren't familiar with the name 'Modern Warfare' whereas every man and his dog now knows Call of Duty.
Can't they just be honest about it rather than all the backpeddling and lies?! |
|
clockworkzombie
10/07/09 @ 22:10
-1
@Darren
CoD 3 is a good game. The single player is fun and multiplayer is excellent and a little different from CoD 2 with the addition of vehicles. I am warming to Cod WaW. I think MW is more enjoyable online but I am happily shoving the WaW disc in the 360 and having multiplayer fun. The new maps help I hope they enter the single player deathmatch pool soon. CoD 2 is better due to the Russian parts, the single player Russian campaign is superb, I have had more fun with this than the entire MW single player game. The extra Russian maps added to the multiplayer game are some of my favourite maps. I wish IW would offer us a MW map pack with maps from the previous IW games, it might be a little strange using modern equipment, some of those maps are the best I have played on. |
|
local_celebrity
10/07/09 @ 23:24
+4
Gah! I've just had MODERN WARFARE 2 tattooed across my shoulders, nape and back. Why wasn't I consulted?!
:-( |
|
clockworkzombie
11/07/09 @ 01:10
+2
@local_celebrity
A second trip to put the rest on your cods perhaps? |
|
-3
It seems incredible to me that anyone's bothered – whether by reporting this or complaining about it. Who cares? Anyone who cares for, or is likely to buy Modern Warfare 2, knows what it is. The only people this affects are Activision and Infinity Ward. Personally I don't care what it's called. I know who's making it, I know it's the sequel to Modern Warfare, and having loved the original, I'll buy it. They can change the name to just "Combat" for all I care. If you really are bothered and won't buy a game based on whether it's title suits you, you clearly have no geniune love for the game and are probably better off buying the sequel to a game who's name you approve. A completely petty argument if ever there was one!
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 11/07/09 @ 11:09
|
|
0
There was the impression that Infinity Ward wanted to distence itself from Call Of Duty now that it became an anual franchise and that Treyarch also made games in the series.
But ofcourse how much can you do by confining yourself just to "Modern Warfare" ? There'd be maybe one more game you could do before the concept got old. |
|
makeamazing
11/07/09 @ 13:27
-1
I dunno, I was quite happy with it being called Modern Warfare. I certainly didnt think it would affect sales. Also there are so many different settings and locations I really think game developers could continue to think up new ideas quite easily.
|
|
Triggerhappytel
11/07/09 @ 14:59
0
@ Sniper_Fox
So you think ActiBlizz claiming that it was always going to be called Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is not backpeddling?! I for one don't believe that for a second. |
|
+1
On its own Modern Warfare is a bit of a rubbish title really. It worked on CoD4 as a means of distinguishing it from its WW2 based predecessors but without that context it doesn't sound interesting.
Got to give Activision credit for trying though. Seperating Modern Warfare as its own brand certainly makes sense as a long-term strategy as the series presumably continues to flip back and forth between modern and WW2 settings. Perhaps they should take the Square-Enix naming formula and call it something like Modern Warfare 2 -Call of Duty-. |
|
0
It might have been safe by now to trade on reputation alone, but Modern Warfare 2 has the elegance, intelligence and poise - not to mention the sense of streamlined chaos.
|
Comments: 1-45 of 45 in total
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
Advertisement
