Infernal Review
Now there's a name that's asking for it.
Version tested: PC
Back at the start of Infernal, Dave Angeldevil, or whatever the hell its straight-out-of-some-dismal-crap-on-Sky-One-around-11pm hero is called, is given a demonic power that can demolish metal doors and brick walls. It's actually pretty cool - the game seems to be demonstrating that it's over-the-top, it's got decent physics and Dave's (alright, alright - 'Ryan Lennox', but the other name suits him better) a proper badass, living up to his status as a fallen angel now working for the forces of darkness (or at least some guy with a spooky voice). Which only makes it all the more surprising that Dave spends the next few hours being obstructed by wooden doors and flimsy chain barriers that his new ultra-destructo-power can't even dent. The answer? Why, trudging around similar-looking corridors looking for keycards and buttons, of course.
Games have got to stop this. With graphical technology at the height it is (Infernal actually looks pretty good, whilst also feeling kind of cheap), creating a world where incredibly heavy explosives cannot affect everyday scenery is increasingly ridiculous.
There are ways to prevent players from escaping a carefully-arranged linear path without totally shattering in-game credibility - forcefields and heavy-duty security doors for instance; things that at least look resistant to firearms - but Infernal's still moping around in the primordial slime on that front. If Dave Angeldevil was the wisecracking, unflappable superpowered hulk he's supposed to be, he wouldn't waste his time scouring rooms full of barrels for switches to push so that a small glass panel on the other side of the room would slide open. He'd crash through walls, tear men limb-from-limb, repeatedly bellow "Look at me! I'm AWESOME" and finish the game in 20 minutes. He probably also wouldn't meet instant death from a 10ft drop, but then the game never explicitly states that an unfortunate side-effect of all his magic powers isn't having a horribly weak spine.

Souls: healthy and delicious, with a slightly damnationy aftertaste.
So, near-future shooter, awful, puerile, heavy guitar soundtrack, deep-seated misogyny, pop-up baddies, AI that always chooses something highly explosive to stand next to, almost total obliviousness to the shooter landscape post-Half-Life, Halo et al. Yep, SiN: Emergence by any other name still smells like rotting meat. Infernal's from a third-person perspective and slots in about four puzzle types on regular rotation, but otherwise it's exactly the same kind of hollow brawn that never got over early 90s videogame box art as the mercifully terminated (or at least on indefinite hiatus) SiN episodes were. Even some of the baddies are essentially interchangeable. But while that had at least flashes of a poorly-realised attempt to be tongue-in-cheek, Infernal takes itself deadly seriously. Initial talk of sex and high blasphemy reveal a game that believes itself to be mature, but in reality it's brash, testosterone-soaked, stupid and probably thinks Michael Bay movies are the highest artform known to humankind. Given its silly story, perhaps it's just read too many comics that concern a modern-day war between heaven and hell, in which case it should really put down the Spawn books and read some Preacher instead.
In other ways though, it's a superior game to the last SiN. Presentation values are all over the place (not least in some particularly excruciating voicework) and it lacks the vaguely cinematic grandness that made SiN: Emergence at least bearable, but it has more variety and ideas. Not remotely new ideas - the spectral vision is straight from the Soul Reaver games and the temporary teleport was recently seen in Prey - but they do reveal an intent to be more than a pure bulletforce game. At times, hitting a (usually rather too obviously signposted) obstacle and knowing which of Dave's handful of otherwordly abilities will overcome it creates the requisite sense of fluid omnipotence he's supposed to have. There's also some passably thoughtful boss fights - we're not talking Zelda here, but most aren't purely shoot-until-dead. There's plenty of shooting and deading involved, but usually at least one of the demonic powers is called for too.

Hands up if you've got a PhysX card! Never mind, then.
Occasionally toyed with is a light/dark environmental element that affects whether Dave is gaining or losing magic juice. It's tragically underplayed, used almost solely as a mechanism to ensure he doesn't have his best powers during the toughest fights, but once in a while shooting out the lights so that he can then turn a torrent of arcane force onto a horde of identikit troops feels pretty good. Health, mana and ammo collection is dealt with neatly too - Dave can eat souls. Eating souls makes him stronger. It's inarguably crazy videogame logic at work, but, at least in the context of Infernal's over-earnest holy versus evil but with guns plot, it feels a lot less silly than picking up white boxes with red crosses on.
Again though, it's undermined by too much time spent trekking through corridors, stairwells and rooms full of unopenable doors looking for keycards and getting shot in the back by men-from-nowhere. Staples of a great many FPSes for sure (and really this is an FPS in almost every way - the third person camera only seems to be there due to a misguided belief about how super-cool the lead character looks), but maddeningly overplayed here. Though generally it's pretty obvious what does what, the architectural similarities within each level means there's a little too much confused backtracking as Dave tries to find out which identical door the switch is hidden behind. Clearly, a lot of time has been spent on the depressingly videogamey character designs (monks with cyber-armour! Girls in PVC catsuits! Small-bearded anti-hero with tattoos!), and nowhere near enough on level structure.
Infernal has very little interest in fighting against any of the clichés of videogaming. This serves to make it both somewhat objectionable and the sort of thing you can accidentally lose a weekend to that you honestly did not enjoy. In its better moments it's a guilty pleasure, in its worst it's embarrassingly retrograde. By being consistently fairly slick with it, it easily avoids skimming the lowest depths, but really it's the kind of game we've all long since grown out of. Or so I like to tell myself, anyway.
5 / 10
You may also like...
-
Mass Effect 3 Demo: The First 20 Minutes
-
Face-Off: Final Fantasy 13-2
-
Why Devs Owe You Nothing
-
Retrospective: Star Wars Episode I Racer
-
Digital Foundry: PS3 Skyrim Lag Fixed?
-
Game of the Week: Catherine
-
Who Killed Rare?
-
Gotham City Impostors Review
-
App of the Day: Ascension: Chronicle of the Godslayer
-
Face-Off: The Darkness 2
-
Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning Review
-
The Darkness 2 Review
-
Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 Vita Review
-
EA evaluating FIFA Street features for FIFA 13
-
Epic's Sweeney on graphics tech: "the limit really is in sight"
-
Grand Slam Tennis 2 Review
-
App of the Day: Sir Benfro's Brilliant Balloon
-
One Piece: Unlimited Cruise SP Review
-
Catherine Review
-
Sony admits "dropping the ball" with Demon's Souls
-
King Arthur 2 Review
-
Mass Effect 3 FemShep trailer debuts
-
Skyrim patch 1.4 now live for Xbox 360
-
Metal Gear Solid: The "Lost" HD Remasters
-
Skyrim patch 1.4 performance tip: make a new manual save









Comments (34) Latest comment 5 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I've said it before though, the graphics engine is quite impressive. Looking great, and running ultra-smooth.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I think I will get this, it reminds me of Call of Juarez in that its worth battling through the less outstanding moments to get at the good bits underneath. The latest Gamestm has a nice review showing the game in alot better light.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Never mind, then."
LOL!!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Sound shite
Comment below viewing threshold Show
/head asplodes!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
As the review said, the better and more realistic the graphics, the more you expect realism from the rest of the game.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I have a sneaking suspicion that we won't be seeing deformable backgrounds on any higher level until Crysis hits store shelves. I can't wait to get Crysis, enter an unlimited ammo cheat, pick up a mini-gun and cut down an entire forest Schwarzenegger/Predator style!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I think Alec's right to be harsh in this review, since we've seen it so many times before and with the power available to PCs and next-gen consoles, we should be able to get passed the keycard, locked door trudge through levels. Instead everything looks a bit blurrier and more shiny and that's about it for most games.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
So is now the time we get pissy and complain?
Remember FEAR? It got an amazing review based solely around the fact that it has half decent AI. Everything else is horseshit. Why did'nt it get a shit review then?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Advertising revenue?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Lou I know you love FEAR but try and not take every single negative comment about it as a que to launch a crusade.
Also FEAR is pure gun-porn along the same lines as Black, if thats not testosterone-fuelled pseudo-mature pish I don't really know what is.
*Slows down time*
*Shoots face-less henchmen*
*repeats*
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Yeah, Eurogamer shows no mercy to those obscure C-list action games.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
- Alec
Comment below viewing threshold Show
If you saw that "idiot" comment I deleted, that wasn't aimed at you.
Apart from that, I'll defend FEAR as long as people attack it.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
See yesterdays PS3 FEAR preview thread for the difference between "level design" and "pretty setpieces", please.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
FEAR is one of the best FPSs I've played. Yes there were a lot of corridors, but there are in practically every FPS ever made. However, FEAR had a cracking atmosphere, looked superb and was a selection of great action set pieces that worked brilliantly. I loved it.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The level design I found to be some of the best, but only in places. I did get bored of it, but only just before the end (the entrance to the vault). The decor and the story wasn't good enough to get me through, unlike other games, as it was horribly dull.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Maybe people really should use words like "to me" or "for me" when praising or trashing a particular game.. It is of course obvious they're in the subtext, but it get's quickly annoying when somebody is saying something about a game that comes across as an objective truth.
Sorry for following some of you guys off-topic.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
In my opinion, you've just done what you didn't like, yes? I personally try to throw in such things to indicate my statements are subjective as it bugs me also, but find it is difficult to keep up.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I think the review is a bit unfair to the game. Sure, it isn't ground-breaking by any means, but I'd call it a very solid TPP shooter with some moments of brilliance.
My score will surely oscillate around the 7-8/10 mark, probably rather 7 than 8, cause altogether the EG review isn't far away from the truth when it comes to the game's weak points - it's just sad that it doesn't mention the STRONG points as well...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Oh, c'mon, you've focused on that single statement I forgot to specifily express that it is of course "just" my opinion
Comment below viewing threshold Show
FEAR was great the first 2 hours, then it got tedious, I hope this doesn't happen with this game.