Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Phil Harrison talks PS3 Interview

PlayStation 3 Interview by Rob Fahey

12 May, 2006

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

In recent years, Phil Harrison has not only been promoted within Sony to the point where he runs the firm's worldwide network of development studios, he has also become the de facto face of the company at industry events around the globe.

Despite his new-found high profile, however, Harrison remains a software man - so when we sat down with him for a brief chat at E3 this week in the wake of the firm's announcements, the company's hardware and software strategies were definitely top of the agenda, but its hugely controversial pricing announcement was not.

We hope to bring you more coverage of Sony's plans - and the reaction to them - in the coming days - in the meanwhile, we hope you enjoy these insights from the man in charge of what may be the most crucial component of all in the firm's bid to retain its market leadership in the next generation; the software.

Eurogamer: All three companies laid their cards on the table earlier this week - from your perspective, what do you make of the three conferences and the reaction to them so far?

Phil Harrison: Sadly, I haven't actually had a chance to watch the other two conferences, but I've heard enough reports. I think that if we think the industry or the future of the business is defined by this week of press conferences... Then, we're very much mistaken. I think it's going to be defined by what the consumer thinks and what the industry thinks, and what the game developers think. It's not just about the press conferences.

I think the pieces of the PlayStation 3 puzzle are now fully revealed. Obviously we did the hardware last year, this year it's confirming or re-asserting certain elements of it - obviously, people know about Blu-Ray, but confirming that every machine has a hard disc drive in it, I think, was an important step. Confirming that we've got a new controller strategy was an important step, and showing lots of games was an important step. So, those were the main take-outs, and I think that as far as that was concerned, we achieved our objectives.

Eurogamer: Your strategy and Microsoft's strategy are very divergent, in that Microsoft is offering consumers a choice - whether to have HD-DVD or not, whether to have a hard drive or not - while you're putting everything into a very expensive box and saying that they take all or nothing. Why that direction? Why not have a system where people who don't want to pay that premium for Blu-Ray don't have to?

Phil Harrison: Leaving aside the movie debate about Blu-Ray and HD-DVD, purely from a game design point of view and a game production point of view, we have to have Blu-Ray. DVD is just not big enough; DVD9 is nowhere near big enough for the kind of games, the richness that we're going to be putting in the games, the variety, the detail, you name it.

So, we had to adopt Blu-Ray primarily as a game format. The second benefit of it is that it becomes a video format as well. Putting it all in one box, as you say, is also down to the fact that a hard disc drive is necessary to create a totally integrated network platform. We want every consumer to be able to download and install content on their hard disc drive. If you want to put all your music on your hard disc drive, you'll probably go for the 60GB version. If you're a complete music fan and video fan, and you want to have huge amounts of digital content, then you can upgrade to whatever size of drive you like. You can put any in that you like - it is a computer, after all.

Eurogamer: So that hard drive is a standard PC drive?

Phil Harrison: ATA, bog standard, yeah.

Eurogamer: You're not going to be selling Sony drive upgrades?

Phil Harrison: We've got no plan to. We may offer something, but we have no plan to at the moment.

Eurogamer: Talking about software - how many titles do you actually have on the show floor this week? I think we counted a dozen...

Phil Harrison: I think it's fifteen playable games. At the conference, we had three titles from Japan - GT HD, Eye of Judgement and Genji 2, we had three from Europe - Singstar, Heavenly Sword and F1, and two from the US - Warhawk and Resistance. That was pretty evenly split.

Eurogamer: The controller. You showed off the boomerang, then said it was a prototype, and now you've come back and done the Dual Shock but with a twist - no pun intended. How long have you known that this was the plan?

Phil Harrison: [The motion sensing controller] has been thought about since about 1994, but in reality, you can't make some of the ideas that we have because the technology is not available in sufficient quantity or at a low enough price, and you kind of have to wait for certain things to converge. We had the concept of PlayStation Portable for many years before we could actually deliver it at a price and at a standard that was acceptable.

The controller is obviously a surprise to the industry. We've been thinking about it for a while, but it's a relatively recent addition to the format. We didn't show it last year, because we weren't ready to. The boomerang, as you call it, was very clearly designed as a design concept, and was never intended to be the final controller, despite what everybody said about it.

I think we certainly saw the strength of feeling that existed about the boomerang - even though nobody in the world ever held it in their hand. I thought that was very interesting, that people were criticising it for what it looked like, not how it felt.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 111 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Hench
12/05/06 @ 09:20
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Standard PC Drive? I thought it was removable?
king_skins
12/05/06 @ 09:23
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
he didn't say it wasn't. and left room for a possibility of a HDD upgrade. Said they didn't have plans currently but he didn't rule it out.
morriss
12/05/06 @ 09:24
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nothing there really. Shame.
Teeth
12/05/06 @ 09:26
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yeah, you remove it, put another one in :)
12/05/06 @ 09:26
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"I think that if we think the industry ... is defined by this week of press conferences... Then, we're very much mistaken. I think it's going to be defined by ... what the industry thinks"
I'm sorry, but what?
Very dissapointed in Sony in general recenlty.
The PS3 seems to be a hashed-together reactionary piece of hardware.
Games too big for DVD9 - Bah - Rubbish!
Teeth
12/05/06 @ 09:26
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I like the way he admits that they "jumped on the wave" of motion sensitive controllers :)
SeesThroughAll
12/05/06 @ 09:26
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
How about an interview to someone who doesn't suffer from compulsive BS sindrome?

@Teeth: I'm actually glad he finally admits something instead of the load of crap he said at the press conference.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/05/06 @ 10:27
lennon
12/05/06 @ 09:28
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Very disapointing interview after the Peter Moore one.
disc
12/05/06 @ 09:30
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Very different from the Peter Moore interview, in the Moore interview they mostly asked him about his reaction to the PS3 and WII and in this they asked about the PS3.

Odd.
SeesThroughAll
12/05/06 @ 09:32
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
...they mostly asked him about his reaction to the PS3 and WII and in this they asked about the PS3.

The X360 is not new anymore, so that's natural. They did press Phil into admitting that the tilt sensor is a mock-up of the Wiimote.
Nikanoru
12/05/06 @ 09:34
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ugh.

So now it's not a gimmick anymore, huh?

We kind of took an 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' strategy.

Except that the Dual Shock has been broke since its birth by shoehorning two analogue sticks into a controller they didn't belong in after seeing the competition do it. It sucks, you do need to fix it.
drumbaby
12/05/06 @ 09:34
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Very different from the Peter Moore interview, in the Moore interview they mostly asked him about his reaction to the PS3 and WII and in this they asked about the PS3.

Odd.


Not really...

Phil Harrison: Sadly, I haven't actually had a chance to watch the other two conferences, but I've heard enough reports. I think that if we think the industry or the future of the business is defined by this week of press conferences... Then, we're very much mistaken. I think it's going to be defined by what the consumer thinks and what the industry thinks, and what the game developers think. It's not just about the press conferences

/\/\/\/\ That just about killed such a line of questioning, right there /\/\/\/\
HyZepher
12/05/06 @ 09:36
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
For me he was less convincing than Moore and in fact MS seem to have a better idea on the real direction of gaming. I like the idea of the PS3 and 360 in the market together as I think once the hype settles down the consumer will benefit greatly, with the Wii not far behind we are probably in for a great generation of gaming with more choice than ever.

I do feel that Sony were forced into the next-gen race and that they are not quite ready for the fight - I am sure MS had this in mind when they decided to go next-gen early. Sony also have a few BIG gambles with the PS3, any of which could reduce the amount of units they sell - Price, Blu-ray, and MS 1 yr head start are the big three. To have 1 gamble at release is a risk to have at least 3 major gambles is Russian Roullette.

The success of their "live" offering will be key to the console. And making the leap to the new technology that is live is another gamble for a new console - although MS did succeed with the xbox. I think the decision to push the online environment back to the devlopment companies is a mistake. MS control the Live! environment for good reason - only one being an added revenue stream. For Live! developers have a standard environment to develop for and this gives MS opportunities to introduce new Live! functionality that can be adopted by all games developers. Sony will have the problem that functionality will be pretty much games based and not gamer based.

MS's Live! is based around the gamer and this is a winning formula. Each Live! member feels they are part of a community - a community that have the 360 console in common. Not a community that have a game in common - something that a fear the Sony online offering may result in

Hyzepher
dk_rare
12/05/06 @ 09:36
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wasn't there a game put into a 100kb file a few years ago?
OnlyMe
12/05/06 @ 09:41
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hmmm, is there a confirmation that the L2/R2 on the DS3 are triggers, or just shoulder buttons like we already have? They look more like triggers, but I can't see it being mentioned anywhere.

And I think he said you can change your harddrive yourself as they're bog standard ones.
rauper [staff]
12/05/06 @ 09:42
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i've used one - they are triggers

also the controller is REALLY light - because the dual shock is missing the "shock"!
Talha
12/05/06 @ 09:42
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
MS: "Sony is a great company, and [PS3's] a great product"

Sony: "We are not satisfied with what we showed at E3"
"We jumped onto the motion sensing bandwagon"
"Ps2 was difficult to program for"

...The sky is falling!
Eighthours
12/05/06 @ 09:45
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Rob Fahey's interviews are great when he asks the tough questions, which made the Moore interview a compelling read. Now, while this Harrison interview has all the opening salvos you could want, he doesn't follow up on them as much as he seems to do when Moore's in the chair. I'm wondering whether this has anything to do with the scope of what EG are allowed to ask Sony execs? The Microsoft interviews always seem to have more "meat" to them for some reason.

Let's face it, following their conference, Sony had a lot that could and should have been put to them... Why isn't Killzone at E3? Have you been "found out" about last year's CG? How do you justify the high price of the console, etc etc. My personal opinion is that Harrison wasn't challenged as much as Moore was, and that's a disappointment to me. Ah well.

(The 2 pictures on the front page are funny. Harrison looks kinda cool, whereas Moore looks like he's about to either cry or have an "attack" of some kind!)
weaselrat
12/05/06 @ 09:46
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I have just dug out the old interviews for the PS1 & 2. Both of them promise the world and massive games and we all know that both machines churned out 80% rushed crap and 20 % decent. I own both previous machines but I am always dissapointed with the promises made when they don't deliver. From what they're suggesting, the games would have about 200 hours of gameplay if they were to use the potential of blu ray and we know that won't happen. Yes some of their first party games rock but no one can tell me that third parties will make huge exclusive versions for this machine, it would be too costly.
I am still no more impressed with the games I have seen then what I have seen on the 360 and it's obvious that most of the games are CGI footage. even GT HD did'nt look that gobsmacking. If things don't improve I might just have to join microsoft as they seem to be offering a much more complete all round package.

Lets be honest about the controller, the only company who will make very good use of motion sensors are Nintendo as they have the balls to put there necks on the line. WOW (sarcasm) i'm so excited at tilting my controller to turn a corner in GT HD or dive my aircraft in warhawk. This will end in disasters for games if they don't do enough trouble shooting with them.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/05/06 @ 10:47
OnlyMe
12/05/06 @ 09:46
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's a conspiracy, I tell you! We're being used! Before you know it, Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo is announcing the next-next generation console together, and it will take over the world! And then there will be terminators! And predators! And aliens! And smurfs!
drumbaby
12/05/06 @ 09:50
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
MS: "Sony is a great company, and [PS3's] a great product"

(you can buy Wii + 360 for same price ha ha, where was Killzone, snipe snipe)

Sony: "We are not satisfied with what we showed at E3"

(You can always do better, best not be smug)

"We jumped onto the motion sensing bandwagon"

(Everyone does it, but we're not afraid to admit it)

"Ps2 was difficult to program for"

(Everyone knew this, but hey...PS2 was/ still is still hot property)

...The sky is falling!

(Luckily we're not all standing where you are)
tobi
12/05/06 @ 09:50
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
why has no one asked sony how much the PS3 will cost in £££???
gizmo
12/05/06 @ 09:54
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
sounds like a worried man.
drumbaby
12/05/06 @ 09:54
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Premium for £425 I saw somewhere, as an online preorder...can't remember where...
Talha
12/05/06 @ 09:59
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@drumbaby : LOL - I get your point. All I am saying is this is STILL much better than what we have been hearing previously.

@LeDil: I don't get it about you guys - if MS is the greatest company ever, and X360 is the greatest thing ever, why are people so INSECURE about the mildness of questions posed by a British gaming site to a Japanese executive, in LA, six month before the console in question is slated for launch?

That said, the Moore interview certainly made better reading. It seems Sony execs are just as confused about PS3 as MS are about Vista!!
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/05/06 @ 11:00
Eighthours
12/05/06 @ 10:02
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@LeDil: I don't get it about you guys - if MS is the greatest company ever, and X360 is the greatest thing ever, why are people so INSECURE about the mildness of questions posed by a British gaming site to a Japanese executive, in LA, six month before the console in question is slated for launch?

Standing up for LeDil here (OMG!): Why's it a sign of insecurity to note the clear difference in questioning styles between the 2 interviews? Surely it's just "analysis".
Danj
12/05/06 @ 10:03
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's a pity no questions were asked about the lack of HDMI in the PS3 tard pack, there seems to be a lot of confusion on this issue. It's good to hear that the hard drive should be user upgradable though, even 60Gb seems kinda puny by today's standards, and 250Gb hard drives are pretty cheap now so it'd be cool to be able to stick one of those in.
Talha
12/05/06 @ 10:05
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Eighthours : Well no one is denying the questions were different and the Moore interview was better. All I am saying is it doesn't matter that much, does it?

And standing up for LeDil is no big deal - I did it yesterday!!! (Good luck finding it in about 9000 posts floating around here...)

@LeDil: Mate, I am not missing the point, in the end I agree with you - you will see if you read the whole post. And that first sentence is kind of nice ain't it?? ;-)
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/05/06 @ 11:06
stuarty_2003
12/05/06 @ 10:06
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ Talha: I'm more confused as to the quality of the interviews, certainly not insecure. Frankly, the PH interview was a lot softer that the PM interview. Just as an example, there was no question posed to PH about the turnaround Sony has done in the last year over the dual SKU policy. A year ago they were saying it would confuse us simple consumers...and now they are doing it to. WHAT AN ODD COMPANY!!!lol
CrumpledPaper
12/05/06 @ 10:07
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Cool that you can upgrade the HDD with an off-the-shelf one. How very un-Sony.
Talha
12/05/06 @ 10:09
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@stuarty_2003 : (Sigh...) No one's denying it!! That's why I said Moore made better reading - because his was a BETTER interview, much more focused.
lennon
12/05/06 @ 10:10
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think I would have liked to hear his opinion on the GTA issue. It seems a big deal to MS and when you think how many ps2's were likely to have sold for that game alone it would have been interesting. He even illuded to it himself yet it was either ignored or not picked up on.

For me its not a case of whether it matters but more one of consistency.
space ace
12/05/06 @ 10:11
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
power, corruption and lies
Eighthours
12/05/06 @ 10:22
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Cool that you can upgrade the HDD with an off-the-shelf one. How very un-Sony.

Indeed, that's great. Part of me wondered whether "crippling" the Tard pack so that it lacks the functionality of the expensive version had something to with this, in that otherwise you could buy the Tard pack and way more than a 60Gig drive for less than the £420 of the expensive version...but then I figured it would be way easier for Sony to just take the Microsoft route and only allow their own Hard Drives to be compatible if they wanted to prevent that. So I obliterated my own conspiracy theory.
AusFreelancer
12/05/06 @ 10:23
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ Danj - Most likely the drive would have to be a 2 1/2 inch or laptop size (much more expensive)........ still you could probably buy 5 120g drives for the price of a PS3......
MrAtheist
12/05/06 @ 10:26
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
why has no one asked sony how much the PS3 will cost in £££???

Seconded, somebody just ask him the damn question already.
DaveTheHutt
12/05/06 @ 10:31
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I love that comment Phil made to some journo after the Sony pre-show conf, asking about why motion sensors but no rumble, and he spouted some bullshit about rumble was last gen, motion sensing is next gen... what a smug, pompous cock.

Why not just admit the truth... they bodged in some cheap tilt sensors so they could be seen to be innovating like Nintendo, and had to make room by chopping out the rumble.

This whole joystick business seems symbolic to me of Sony's whole approach with the PS3 - it's a Frankenstein's monster of elements that have been bolted together to guarantee one-upmanship in the spec sheet comparisons, but there's been little actual thought about *why* those elements are in there, i.e. does the consumer really need them to have a top gaming experience.

Hutt out
Psi
12/05/06 @ 10:33
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
hangon hangon hangon hangon...

NOT enough space on a DVD9?
BUT
20gb IS enough space on a console of that price?

Are you smoking the reefer? PC games still come on 2 or 3 CD's or a DVD, are you claiming that all your next gen games are going to require more space than say... oblivion? I mean that's not a small game! As for trends in space required by games, sure it's getting bigger and fast, but I can honestly say THIS gen, doesn't require anything more than a DVD's capacity.

So the harddrive in the unit is smaller in capacity than your chosen format?!?!

shit man that like buying a car too big for your garage.
DaveTheHutt
12/05/06 @ 10:35
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Gotta love this statement too... "[PS3 is] much, much easier to program for. Witness the fact that we've got so much software up and running, and playable, this far out from launch."

The PS3 launches in 6 months. If they didn't have software playable in some form at this point, they'd have a disaster on their hands. Once again, Phil Harrison's patented 'Sony Spin-O-Matic' goes into overdrive, turning what is actually a pretty disappointing display - only 15 games playable - into some sort of triumph.

Hutt out
Eighthours
12/05/06 @ 10:50
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Once again, Phil Harrison's patented 'Sony Spin-O-Matic' goes into overdrive, turning what is actually a pretty disappointing display - only 15 games playable - into some sort of triumph.

That's quite impressive compared to Microsoft's display last year, mind.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/05/06 @ 11:52
Carrybagma
12/05/06 @ 10:51
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought it was good. Microsoft are doing well, so not suprisingly the responses were bullish and positive. This show has been a low for Sony - the muted responses from PH reflect that. He's got little to offer this time around, although I'm surprised he wasn't more defensive about the tilt functions.

Who'd have thought? Sony & Microsoft execes interviewed at E3- and buggerall bullshit. A first, surely.
slasp
12/05/06 @ 11:04
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What's up with people and the price? It's not expensive from a purely hardware view. Everybody seems to agree that the XBox 360 Core is the bastard child nobody wants - let's take the notion that it's true, then this is what you get:

XBox 360 - 399$:
20 GB HD
Component Video
Max res. 1080i
Live service - no online play
DVD9
Standard controller
Up to 4 players on one console

PS3 - 499$
20 GB HD
Component Video
Theoretically 1080p but probably 1080i res.
Live service with online play
Blu-Ray drive
Motionsensing controller
Up to 7 players on one console (even though the controller looks like only having 4 leds on the top)


To me it seems like 100$ for the Blu-Ray and a motionsensing controller is pretty cheap and my guess is, MS won't sell the HD-DVD drive for less than 150$.


Now lets configure a XBox 360 to match the more expensive PS3:

XBox 360 - 399$
External WiFi - 99.99$
20 GB HD
External HD-DVD - Let's be kind and say 100$
Component video
Max res. 1080i
Standard controller
Headset
Up to 4 players on one console
Live Gold 1 yr with online play - 69.99$
---
total of 670$
===

PS3 - 599$
WiFi
60 GB HD
Blu-Ray
HDMI video
Max res. 1080p
Motionsensing controller
Probably no headset
Up to 7 players on one console
Live service with online play
---
total of 599$
===

For roughly 70$ LESS you get a motionsensing controller, a BIGGER harddrive and full HD support (for the future, if not for today), which maybe not many care about today, but in 2-3 years time most probably will appreciate. The one thing the XBox 360 got is the headset, but people interested in that will probably have one lying around from beforehand.

(by the way, HDMI is digital, while component is analogue - much the same as DVI vs VGA-cabling, HDMI gives the better picture. 1080i looks optically to the human eye approx. as 760p (not 720p) according to one of the technical responsible at the EBU (European Broadcasting Union))


To me, it seems like the PS3 is the better buy, no matter how one turns it. I for one definitely want hd movie playback and most everybody else wants the same in a couple of years time.

Now, the casual gamer, the student, and the kids on the block may think it's a lot of money, but still - most people won't buy the XBox 360 Core...
WicKeD
12/05/06 @ 11:11
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think for most people, Blu-Ray or HD DVD isn't all that a significant feature, to the everyman DVD's are just fine for now.

So having the choice to ditch the overpriced, glorified DVD player is a bloody godsend!
drumbaby
12/05/06 @ 11:11
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
the motion-sensing controller doesn't make the deal any sweeter at all, it came at a price.

But it also came as another way of playing games that will be Sony exclusives....
Edited 2 times, most recently on 12/05/06 @ 12:12
HyZepher
12/05/06 @ 11:12
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
On epoint to make is that their Live service maybe free to join but no one knows how much it will be to play games online. In fact MS €60 per year might be a steal compared to Sony's potential €10 per year per game - payable to the game developer.
Garulon
12/05/06 @ 11:13
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"It's just the reality of the world that we live in - and it was very kind of Microsoft to announce one of those [multi-platform titles] for us."

Yes, that you can play on a technically-equivalent console that's literally HALF THE PRICE of your bloated trainwreck, Phillip.

And to people adding up all the bits you can buy on the 360 and going "it's not that bad a price on the PS3" - yes, that's true IF you're the bloke that needs HDMI AND WiFi AND a HD drive AND a 60GB HDD - if you just want to play games though, you're getting a whole mudball of crap you don't need force-fed to you simply because Sony want some numbers against BluRay "customers" this time next year.

Oh and Live's free to join - the only thing you have to pay for is multiplayer, which Sony haven't announced as free yet. Multiplayer Live can cost you as little as a fiver.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/05/06 @ 12:15
Santino
12/05/06 @ 11:17
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Surely Sonys reliance on brand name alone cannot maintain such a dominant market share this time round...i truly think they have screwed themselves this time. Would serve the arrogant bastards right i reckon, when u start taking the piss out of your fans you deserve to fail. On another note i have to agree with many others, this interview lacked the 'balls' of the Moore interview and that isn't good enough considering the obvious questions that could have been asked. People are interested in what they have to say to such questions, if only for the comedy bullsh*t repsonse
slasp
12/05/06 @ 11:23
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
ok... I hardly ever notice the rumble thing anymore, both because I've gotten so used to it, and because I'm not holding the controller in a firm grip.

But let's skip that... And let's skip the HD-DVD thing (even though I'd want it, if I had a 360). And the free online play, because we are still not sure how much that is gonna cost.

Can everybody agree that WiFi is a good thing? I want to connect my console without cabling from my broadband to my livingroom.

And can we agree that the 13GB left on 360 harddrive is a bit small? Certainly my mates who has one says they are looking to expand it, but they can't because there is no official way to do it yet.


XBox 360 - 399$
WiFi - 99$
Bigger HD - 60GB maybe another 99$
---
total of 599$
===

PS3 - 599$
WiFi
60GB HD
---
total of 599$
===

So if you disregard my other points, they come out roughly equal... but you still get a lot more from the PS3 like a versatile memory card reader - I just don't mention it here, because a few might not be interested in that stuff...

It's still not expensive...
MrAtheist
12/05/06 @ 11:30
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Don't bet on it. The whole industry is behind SONY it's their bread and butter. Now.... when those commercials start rolling, people wont care.

Giants have stumbled before (ask Nintendo) or completely imploded (ask Atari). You never know what could happen.

MS are very bullish and aiming for 10 million sales before the PS3 even launches. This Xmas, with a price cut / killer bundle or combination of both (360 +Gears of War?), MS could easily match or even surpass what Sony can shift.
Santino
12/05/06 @ 11:31
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ Wonga "Don't bet on it. The whole industry is behind SONY it's their bread and butter. Now.... when those commercials start rolling, people wont care."

You are probably right, but I hope people do stand up and care. the consumer can probably buy 2 consoles for the price of this PS3, which now that we are finally seeing in game performance has no advantage over the 360. Sony has been so successful because of 3rd parties, these days exclusives are running thinner on sonys hardware,. consumers are going to be left with the choice of buying more expensive hardware for what is likely to be the majority of similar games, and dont forget MS has exclusive rockstar content. A summary of what i guess i am trying to say is that if sony can get away with selling it at this price at launch, especially with the lack of killer app and the sever competition from Nintendo and MS, then there is no hope
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/05/06 @ 12:41

Comments: 1-50 of 111 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Get Games.  Download Great PC Games!

X View gallery